United States: What Is A "Financial Covenant"? An Illinois Court Decides

Last Updated: July 21 2015
Article by John Lawlor

If you were to ask a number of people whether a particular covenant in a contract was a financial covenant, you might get a wide variety of answers.  Some might say that only the covenants that required the borrower to comply with financial ratios or metrics were financial covenants.  Others might expand this to refer also to covenants that gave the borrower exceptions measured by monetary amount to general prohibitions against the payment of dividends, the incurrence of indebtedness or the making of acquisitions or other investments.  Others might have different answers.

In GDI, LLC, et al. v. Cole Taylor Bank, N.A.,1 an Illinois appellate court was asked to determine whether the borrower's failure to make a required principal payment under a loan agreement constituted a breach of a financial covenant under such loan agreement.  The court held that such failure was not such a breach.

Background

In 2008, GDI and Cole Taylor Bank executed an amended and restated loan and security agreement.  This agreement provided for a secured line of credit where availability was subject to a borrowing base consisting of accounts receivable and inventory.

GDI fell into financial difficulty.  The loan agreement was amended to permit GDI to have an overadvance of $1,000,000 until March 31, 2009.  GDI did not repay the overadvance on such day; on the same day it also failed to meet its payroll.  On April 2, 2009, GDI informed the bank that it had stopped operating.  On April 3, 2009, the bank sent a notice to GDI that GDI was in default; that notice referred only to the failure to repay the overadvance.

Among the events of default listed in the loan agreement were (i) an event of default for nonpayment of amounts owing to the bank under the loan agreement, which was subject to a five day cure period (the "Payment Default"), and (ii) an event of default for nonperformance of "any of the  . . . financial covenants" in the loan agreement, which was not subject to any cure period (the "Financial Covenant Default").  The Financial Covenant Default listed some specific sections of the loan agreement as examples of what would be considered "financial covenants," but the loan agreement did not further define what a "financial covenant" was.  Importantly, the section of the loan agreement that imposed the requirement to repay the overadvance was not specifically listed as a "financial covenant" in the text of the Financial Covenant Default.

After sending the notice of default (but apparently before five days had lapsed since the repayment of the overadvance was due), the bank accelerated and commenced exercising remedies against its collateral, including imposing a freeze on GDI's bank accounts, instructing GDI's account debtors to pay the bank directly and attempting to dispose of the inventory.  GDI sued, claiming that the bank had not given GDI the benefit of the cure period applicable to the Payment Default prior to exercising remedies.  The bank argued that the obligation to repay the overadvance was a "financial covenant" not subject to a cure period.  The trial court agreed with this analysis.

The appellate court disagreed that the covenant to repay the overadvance was a financial covenant, but held that other events – including the cessation of GDI's operations and the failure to make payroll-- constituted a separate event of default that justified the bank's actions, even though such events were not specified by the bank in its notice of default, and even though such events had not been relied upon by the trial court.

Analysis

In general, a lender needs to have an actual matured default before it can exercise remedies.  If it acts before it has such a default, it risks liability for wrongful action, including the potential for damages under Section 9-625 of the Uniform Commercial Code.2

The appellate court found that the term "financial covenant" as used in the Financial Covenant Default was "[a]t best . . . ambiguous."  The court undertook what it referred to as a "survey of case law and commercial lending industry resources" from which it concluded that "[f]inancial covenants are, in general, not affirmative obligations to make payments, but instead require the borrower to do or not to do certain things that would increase the risk borne by the lender or jeopardize the borrower's financial security."

The court noted that the Payment Default was "a separate default provision for failing to timely make payments."  While the court did not say so expressly in its analysis, it is a fundamental principle of contract interpretation that a specific term should be given greater weight than general language,3 and here the Payment Default provision, which clearly covered all payment defaults, was more specifically applicable to the failure to repay the overadvance than the Financial Covenant Default provision (which, if it applied at all, only did so in a general sense).

Although the trial court had based its decision on its conclusion that there had been a breach of a financial covenant, the appellate court held that it could affirm the trial court's ruling "for any reason supported by the record, regardless of whether the trial court relied upon that basis."4  The appellate court found that the record showed that GDI's failure to meet payroll and cessation of operations constituted an "incontrovertible event of default."

The loan agreement had a separate event of default if GDI failed to pay, or admitted in writing its failure to pay, its "debts as they come due."  This separate event of default apparently was not subject to a cure period.  The appellate court cited the failure to make payroll as a failure to pay a debt that was due.  The court also stated that the failure to repay the overadvance as "another example" of GDI's failure to pay its debts.5

Debt instruments often contain an event of default for failure to pay debts generally as they become due.6  The language in the loan agreement here did not appear to have contained the word "generally."  However, the language could be read, in a manner adverse to the bank, to mean that the provision would only be triggered upon GDI's failure to pay all of its debts, not just its debts generally.  The court's opinion does not contain much analysis of whether the debtor was not paying its debts, other than a conclusory statement that the failure to make payroll and the failure to repay the overadvance satisfied the standard set by the default.

The loan agreement also contained an event of default if GDI breached a covenant to give the bank prompt written notice of a material adverse change.  The bank alleged that GDI had breached this obligation despite GDI's notice to the bank that it had stopped operating.  The appellate court's opinion contains no reference to whether the loan agreement contained an event of default based on the occurrence of a material adverse change or a provision allowing the bank to accelerate if it deemed itself insecure.  However, the court concluded that the cessation of operations and the failure to pay debts constituted an event of default.

The appellate court also expressed its view that payment default was inevitable, even if GDI had been given the benefit of the cure period, due to GDI lacking the capital necessary to meet its obligations and continue its operations.  The court noted that, while not "outcome determinative," GDI had not argued that it could have cured the default and that "the events that followed confirmed that GDI could not have performed."  Since the court had concluded that a default existed other than the Payment Default, for it to suggest that the cure period did not have practical importance was unnecessary.

Final Observations

The appellate court's determination that the failure to timely repay the overadvance was not a "financial covenant" was correct.  Such failure was more specifically covered by the text of the Payment Default, and as such the cure period applicable to that type of default was applicable here.  In a case such as this, a lender should not expect a court to bless an interpretation of the loan agreement that would effectively result in the loss of a cure period negotiated with respect to an event of default that is specifically applicable to failures to make payment on the grounds that such failures are also covered by a more general default that has no cure period.  Lenders should also avoid using phrases that have no commonly understood meaning in their loan documents, particularly in provisions as important as the events of default.

The term "financial covenant" does not have a commonly understood meaning.  Although the bank ultimately prevailed in this case, it might have been able to avoid litigation if it had not used that term in the Financial Covenant Default, and instead specified clearly those breaches of covenants that were subject to a cure period, and those that were not.

The court may have bailed out the bank in its determination that the trial court record supported the "incontrovertible" conclusion that a separate event of default existed.  The court's analysis on this point is rather cursory.  The opinion contains no analysis of whether the payment failures that did exist were material (even though one might reasonably expect them to have been, given the borrower's situation).7

In general, the content of the events of default in a loan agreement –including which events are to be defaults and whether any cure period applies to a particular default-- are a matter of contract between the borrower and the lender.8  Lenders should make sure that the language in their loan agreements relating to events of default is drafted as clearly as possible.  Otherwise, their ability to enforce their rights may be compromised, particularly in the event that they wish to act quickly in a deteriorating situation, as was the case here.  In this case, if the bank wanted no cure period to apply to the requirement to repay the overadvance, it would have been better if the loan agreement had said so expressly.

Footnotes

1 2015 IL App (1st) 132310-U (Ill. App. 1st Dist. June 9, 2015).  The GDI decision was filed under Illinois Supreme Court Rule 23, which means that the decision may not be cited as precedent except in very limited circumstances.

2 See Margolin v. Franklin, 132 Ill. App. 2d 527 (Ill. App. 1971).  Section 9-625(a) of the Uniform Commercial Code also expressly contemplates the possibility of injunctive relief if the secured party does not comply with Article 9.

3 See Restatement (Second) Contracts §203(c); Alberto–Culver Co. v. Aon Corp., 812 N.E.2d 369 (Ill. App. 2004); Faith v. Martoccio, 316 N.E.2d 164 (Ill. App.. 1974).

4 Nichols v. City of Chicago Heights, 2015 IL App (1st) 122994 (Ill. App. 1st Dist. April 30, 2015).

5 There is an argument that the court's inclusion of the loan agreement debt within this provision's general reference to "debts" violates the principle of contractual interpretation cited above in that the Payment Default includes a failure to make the overadvance payment more specifically than this provision's general reference.  We believe that in an appropriate case nonpayment of debt to the lender may be included in a determination of whether the debtor is paying its debts generally (even if the nonpayment of the lender's debt is separately covered by a payment default), but the case may be more difficult to make if, for example, the only debt owed was to the lender.

6 There do not seem to be many cases that have construed this language in the context of an event of default under a loan agreement.  This language, with the "generally" included, is similar to language in Section 303(h)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code, which relates to when a bankruptcy court is to issue an order for relief in an involuntary case, as well as to language defining whether a debtor is "insolvent' in Section 2(b) of the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act and in Section 1-201(a)(23) of the Uniform Commercial Code.  In cases examining Section 303(h), courts have looked to several factors.  In some cases, courts have found that the nonpayment of a single, material debt could be enough to satisfy the requirement.  Whether a debtor that is a business entity has terminated business may also be a factor.  See generally 73 A.L.R. Fed. 763; 8A C.J.S. Bankruptcy § 383.

Official Comment 2 to Section 2(b) of the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act states:

In determining whether a debtor is paying its debts generally as they become due, the court should look at more than the amount and due dates of the indebtedness.  The court should also take into account such factors as the number of the debtor's debts, the proportion of those debts not being paid, the duration of the nonpayment, and the existence of bona fide disputes or other special circumstances alleged to constitute an explanation for the stoppage of payments.  The court's determination may be affected by a consideration of the debtor's payment practices prior to the period of alleged nonpayment and the payment practices of the trade or industry in which the debtor is engaged.  The case law that has developed under §303(h)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code has not required a showing that a debtor has failed or refused to pay a majority in number and amount of his or her debts in order to prove general nonpayment of debts as they become due. [citations omitted].

7 As noted above, there is an argument that as a matter of contract interpretation the nonpayment of the overadvance should have been disregarded for this purpose.

8 For example, in setting forth the rights of a secured party that may be exercised after default, Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code does not specify when a default arises, leaving that for the debtor and secured party to negotiate.  See Official Comment 3 to UCC §9-601 (" . . . [T]his Article leaves to the agreement of the parties the circumstances giving rise to a default.")

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions