United States: Maryland Tax Court Again Subjects Affiliated Taxpayers To Corporate Income Tax With "Fair" Apportionment

The Maryland Tax Court has determined that a multistate retailer and its subsidiary engaged in substantial intercompany transactions with each other, as well as other members of an affiliated group, were subject to Maryland corporation income taxes. Following several precedential decisions of Maryland courts based on similar fact patterns, the Court ruled that the retailer and subsidiary had nexus with the state, and the Maryland Comptroller fairly apportioned income to the retailer and subsidiary based on incomeproducing activities that occurred in Maryland.1


The taxpayer, Staples, Inc. (Staples) is a multistate retailer of office products. Prior to 1998, Staples and a wholly-owned subsidiary, Staples Properties, Inc. (SPI), engaged in substantial intercompany transactions involving intellectual property. SPI held the intellectual property and licensed the property to Staples. SPI was audited by the Maryland Comptroller for the 1993-1997 tax years, and ultimately paid over $4 million in tax, penalties and interest to the state.

Staples engaged in an internal reorganization in 1998. Staples formed Staples the Office Superstore, Inc. (Superstore) as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Staples, along with several other affiliated entities. Staples provided managerial and administrative services on behalf of Superstore and the other affiliated entities, and Superstore provided franchise system services to the other affiliated entities. Superstore and the other affiliated entities relied on Staples for a variety of corporate necessities.

Following an audit of the 1999-2004 tax years, in 2008, the Comptroller assessed Staples and Superstore over $14 million in tax, interest and penalties. In doing so, the Comptroller contended that Staples and Superstore had no economic substance as separate entities. In response, Staples and Superstore argued that both Staples and Superstore had economic substance, as both companies employed thousands of individuals and owned substantial amounts of property. In addition, fees for intercompany transactions involving the provision of services by one company to another were charged at arm's length.

Nexus Determination

The Court began its analysis by reviewing the basic constitutional principles required to be met to impose the Maryland income tax. In addition to citing the relevant and oft-cited Due Process and Commerce Clause requirements for taxation,2 the Court pointed to the unitary business principle, under which according to the Court, "enables taxation by apportionment when . . . 'functional integration, centralized management and economies of scale' are present." The Court then pointed to Maryland's recent line of cases in which nexus could be achieved on the basis of an economic reality test, where the parent's business in Maryland produced the income of the subsidiary.3 The Court looked to Staples' structure and audit result from 1993-1997 to show that the reorganization that Staples undertook in 1998 was done to shift income from Maryland using transactions involving intercompany royalty and interest expense arrangements.

Following a review of Staples' post-1997 structure and intercompany arrangements, the Court determined that Staples and Superstore had sufficient contacts with Maryland to require both companies to file. The Court went to great lengths to show that since Staples and Superstore were not separate business entities, and were part of a unitary business enterprise, these entities had nexus with the state of Maryland for corporation income tax purposes. Specifically, the Court determined that Staples and Superstore could not operate independently and along with the affiliated corporations, exhibited enterprise dependency.

Fair Apportionment

Following the nexus determination, the Court approved the Comptroller's distinctive method of apportionment in an affiliated entity context. Citing the method endorsed in the Gore4 decision issued by the Maryland Court of Appeals, the Court stated that applying the apportionment factor of an in-state retailer acting as a licensee to affiliates that are receiving royalty and interest payments associated with the intellectual property used in the state was proper. In this matter, Superstore received royalty income and Staples received interest income which was reported as expenses by Staples' other affiliated entities. Again, the Court looked back to Staples' 1993-1997 structure and audit results to prove that the Comptroller's assessment was reasonable. The Court summarily rejected testimony from Staples' expert witness that the Comptroller's computation was distortive, in part because such testimony was premised on the assumption that Staples operated as a single entity prior to 1998.

Imposition of Interest and Penalties

Interestingly, given the above analysis and the focus on perceived lack of economic substance, one would have expected the Comptroller to impose interest and penalties under the Maryland Tax Code.5 Instead, the Court held that Staples and Superstore satisfied the reasonable cause exception since there was a good-faith reasonable basis to challenge the law. Accordingly, the Court abated interest from February 20, 2009, the date on which Staples and Superstore filed its Maryland Tax Court appeal, to May 28, 2015, the date the Court issued its decision in this matter. In addition, the Court did not impose penalties on Staples and Superstore.


The Court's decision, while not surprising given the decisions handed down by Maryland courts over the last several years, is somewhat disappointing and confusing in places. Specifically, the Court relied on the unitary business principle in part to determine that Staples and Superstore had corporation income tax nexus with Maryland. Traditionally, the use of the unitary business principle has been confined to determining whether affiliated corporations should be required to file on a combined basis. Use of the unitary business principle to conclude that nexus exists was a concept thought to be explicitly rejected by the Maryland Court of Appeals in Gore.6

The Court also claimed that the structure of Staples and Superstore following the reorganization lacked economic substance, even though Staples and Superstore argued that intercompany transactions were performed at an arm's length basis. The Court did not engage in a detailed review of the transactions to determine whether such arm's length standard was met, but simply rejected the arrangements made by Staples, Superstore and their affiliates out of hand. Compared to the fact patterns in Gore as well as the recent decision by the Court in ConAgra Brands,7 Staples and Superstores each had far more substantial payroll and property, but this fact ultimately did not interrupt the Court's conceptual association of enterprise dependency, non-economic substance, unity, nexus and the apportionment approximation that resulted in millions in additional Maryland corporation income tax liability.

The Court's decision not to require the payment of interest during the pendency of Staples' and Superstore's appeal to the Court is somewhat intriguing, and may be considered a tacit admission that the companies' position was not wholly meritless. Unfortunately, the Court's analysis still does not provide a taxpayer with an adequate roadmap to determine when a structure will pass the economic substance test, and how far the economic substance test can be taken in areas outside the fact pattern addressed in this matter. Given the overall stance of the Maryland courts in this area, it is unlikely that taxpayer-favorable decisions relating to related-party enterprises for tax years prior to the creation of the state's related-party addback statute8 are in the offing any time soon.


Staples, Inc. v. Comptroller of the Treasury; Staples The Office Superstore, Inc. v. Comptroller of the Treasury, Maryland Tax Court, Nos. 09-IN-OO-0148; 09-IN-OO-0149, May 28, 2015.

2  This analysis included references to prohibitions on taxing value earned outside a state's borders, and that there must be a definite link or minimum connection between a state and the person, property or transaction it seeks to tax. See Container Corp. of America v. Franchise Tax Bd., 463 U.S. 159 (1983); Allied-Signal, Inc. v. Dir., Div. of Taxation, 504 U.S. 768 (1992). In addition, the Court noted that if the substantial nexus test was achieved, the tax to be imposed "must be fairly apportioned, does not discriminate against interstate commerce, and is fairly related to the services provided by the State." Trinova Corp. v. Michigan Dep't of Treasury, 498 U.S. 358 (1991).

3 For example, see The Classics Chicago, Inc., et al v. Comptroller of the Treasury, 189 Md. App. 593 (2010); Comptroller of the Treasury v. SYL, Inc., 825 A.2d 399 (Md. 2003).

4 Gore Enterprise Holdings, Inc. v. Comptroller of the Treasury and Future Value, Inc. v. Comptroller of the Treasury, 87 A. 3d 1263 (Md. 2014).

5 Pursuant to MD. CODE ANN., TAX-GEN §§ 13-606, 13-714.

6 As quoted in Gore, the "principle does not confer nexus to allow a state to directly tax a subsidiary based on the fact that the parent company is taxable and that the parent and subsidiary are unitary." [emphasis in original]

7 ConAgra Brands, Inc. v. Comptroller of the Treasury, Maryland Tax Court, No. 09-IN-00-0150, Feb. 24, 2015.

8  Pursuant to MD. CODE ANN., TAX-GEN § 10-306.1, the advent of Maryland's related-party intangible and interest expense addback rules after the tax years at issue in this case likely served to eliminate much of the Maryland corporation income tax benefits derived by the corporate structure created by Staples and other large multistate corporations. .

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:
  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.
  • Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.
    If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here
    If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq you may opt out by clicking here

    Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

    Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

    Use of www.mondaq.com

    You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


    Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

    The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


    Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

    • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
    • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
    • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

    Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

    Information Collection and Use

    We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

    We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

    Mondaq News Alerts

    In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


    A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

    Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

    Log Files

    We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


    This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

    Surveys & Contests

    From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


    If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


    From time to time Mondaq may send you emails promoting Mondaq services including new services. You may opt out of receiving such emails by clicking below.

    *** If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of services offered by Mondaq you may opt out by clicking here .


    This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

    Correcting/Updating Personal Information

    If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

    Notification of Changes

    If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

    How to contact Mondaq

    You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

    If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.

    By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions