United States: The United States District Court For The Southern District Of New York Upholds Rulings With Respect To Subordination, Cramdown And The Make-Whole Dispute

In a memorandum decision dated May 4, 2015, Judge Vincent L. Briccetti of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York affirmed the September 2014 decision of Judge Robert D. Drain of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York, confirming the joint plans of reorganization (the "Plan") in the Chapter 11 cases of MPM Silicones LLC and its affiliates ("Momentive"). Appeals were taken on three separate parts of Judge Drain's confirmation decision, each of which ultimately was affirmed by the district court:

  1. the language in the indenture for Momentive's subordinated unsecured notes (the "Subordinated Notes") that carved out from the definition of "Senior Indebtedness" any debt that by its terms was junior to any other debt in any respect did not prevent Momentive's second lien notes (the "Second Lien Notes"), which were subject to subordinated liens relative to Momentive's first lien notes (the "Senior Lien Notes"), from being treated as Senior Indebtedness relative to the Subordinated Notes;
  2. the so-called "Till" formulaic interest rate, rather than a market-based interest rate, could be applied to cramdown paper being provided to holders of Senior Lien Notes; and
  3. the Senior Lien Notes were not entitled to a make-whole payment.

Background

Momentive incurred substantial debt obligations pursuant to various note indentures. The indenture for the Subordinated Notes provided that the notes were subordinated in right of payment to the prior payment in full of all existing and future "Senior Indebtedness" (a term that was defined to exclude "any Indebtedness or obligation of the Company...that by its terms is subordinate or junior in any respect to any other Indebtedness or obligation of the Company..."). The Second Lien Notes originally were unsecured at the time of their issuance, but contained a springing lien that ultimately gave them a lien junior to the lien of the Senior Lien Notes. The Senior Lien Notes and the Second Lien Notes were secured by the same collateral (the "Common Collateral"). An intercreditor agreement provided that the Second Lien Notes were subordinated to the Senior Lien Notes with respect to their position in the Common Collateral.

The indenture for the Senior Lien Notes provided for the payment of a make-whole premium if the notes were redeemed prior to a date certain (October 15, 2015). The indenture also contained a provision for the automatic acceleration of the principal, premium, if any, and interest on the notes upon a default triggered by a bankruptcy filing.

The Plan did not provide for any distribution to holders of Subordinated Notes. With respect to the Senior Lien Notes, the Plan provided that if the class voted in favor of the Plan, all outstanding principal and accrued interest would be paid to each holder in cash on the effective date; however, no make-whole premium would be allowed or payable. The Plan, however, contained a so-called "deathtrap" provision, under which if the Senior Lien Note class rejected the Plan, holders would receive replacement notes with a present value equal to the allowed amount of such holders' claims, which potentially could include a make-whole premium (to the extent the bankruptcy court allowed it). The holders of Senior Lien Notes ultimately voted against the Plan, choosing instead to continue to pursue through litigation their entitlement to the make-whole premium.

Because the Second Lien Notes Constitute Senior Indebtedness, the Fact That Subordinated Noteholders Will Not Receive Distributions Does Not Violate the Bankruptcy Code

Holders of Subordinated Notes argued that the Plan violated the Bankruptcy Code by denying them any recovery while providing a distribution to the holders of Second Lien Notes. Specifically, the holders of Subordinated Notes argued that according to the plain language of the indenture, the Second Lien Notes, which were secured by a junior lien, were not Senior Indebtedness, since by virtue of the lien subordination, they were subordinate or junior in any respect to other indebtedness of Momentive.

The district court, however, agreed with the bankruptcy court that the indenture excludes payment rather than lien subordination from the definition of Senior Indebtedness.1 Looking to New York contract law, the district court found that because the base definition of Senior Indebtedness excluded debt that was subordinated in right of payment, the six provisos that followed (including the proviso that excluded "any Indebtedness or obligation of the Company...that by its terms is subordinate or junior in any respect to any other Indebtedness or obligation of the Company...") only could be read as excluding indebtedness subject to payment (as opposed to lien) subordination. The district court, in affirming the bankruptcy court's conclusion, found that a contrary reading would result in the "in any respect" clause subsuming the reference to subordination in the right of payment contained in the base definition, thus rendering the base definition superfluous. Additionally, it was significant that the so-called anti-layering provision2 in the indenture for the Subordinated Notes did not prevent the incurrence of the Second Lien Notes.

The Cramdown Interest Rate Applied by the Bankruptcy Court is Appropriate

The trustee for holders of Senior Lien Notes argued that the Plan violated the fair and equitable requirement in section 1129(b) of the Bankruptcy Code3 by using the formula approach,4 as opposed to the efficient market approach,5 to calculate the appropriate cramdown interest rate. The district court, however, found that the formula approach was appropriate, applying much of the reasoning that the Supreme Court employed in adopting the approach identified in Till.6 In that case, the Supreme Court rejected the efficient market approach because it "...aims to make each individual creditor whole rather than to ensure the debtor's payments have the required present value."7 The district court also cited the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Valenti (a pre-Till decision) for the proposition that the Bankruptcy Code does not intend to put creditors in the same position they would have been in had they arranged a new loan, because a new loan would involve a built-in profit that would not be appropriate for someone who involuntarily received cramdown paper pursuant to a Chapter 11 plan.8 Finally, the district court found that the risk premiums chosen by the bankruptcy court were "well within the bounds of reasonableness" and would not be adjusted.

Holders of Senior Lien Notes Were Not Entitled to a Make-Whole Payment

The district court also agreed with the bankruptcy court that the holders of Senior Lien Notes were not entitled to a make-whole premium as a result of the acceleration of their debt.

The indentures provided that debt acceleration was automatic in the case of a voluntary bankruptcy filing. Under New York law, because such acceleration advances the maturity date of the loan, any subsequent payment is, by definition, not a prepayment. There is an exception, however, when a clause clearly and unambiguously provides for a prepayment. Here, the district court found that the make-whole provision did not clearly and unambiguously call for the payment of a make-whole premium, notwithstanding both the reference to a date certain—October 15, 2015—as well as the language in the acceleration provision that provided for the payment of, among other things, "premium, if any." The district court distinguished Chemtura,9 where the indenture required a make-whole payment if the debt was repaid prior to its original maturity date, which met the clear and unambiguous requirement. Additionally, the district court noted that the holders of Senior Lien Notes bargained for exactly this result by electing to have an automatic acceleration upon a bankruptcy event of default. Finally, the district court found that holders of Senior Lien Notes were not entitled to damages in the amount of the make-whole premium under the common law perfect tender rule or as damages for breach of a provision of the indenture that would have allowed the noteholders to rescind the automatic bankruptcy acceleration. The district court noted that the existence of the make-whole provision modified the perfect tender rule such that the common law remedy was unavailable. Moreover, because it was the automatic stay—and not the debtors—that prevented the noteholders from exercising their right to rescind acceleration, the debtors could not be liable to holders of the Senior Lien Notes for breach of contract.

Conclusion

The farthest-reaching implications of the district court's decision are the portions relating to cramdown interest and make-whole payments. By upholding the bankruptcy court's decision to utilize the Till formula approach, the district court has further opened the door to the cram-up of secured creditors through a mechanism that would provide take-back paper at below-market interest rates. It remains to be seen how widely this view will be adopted outside of the Southern District of New York, or whether it will survive further appeal.10

The make-whole portion of the ruling adds further weight to the argument against the payment of a make-whole premium in the context of an automatic acceleration provision (absent clear and unambiguous language in the relevant debt document providing that a make-whole is payable post-acceleration or upon automatic acceleration). Notably, unlike the pending issues in the EFIH case in Delaware, this decision did not address the extent to which solvency might impact the ability of holders to lift the stay to revoke an automatic acceleration.

Footnotes

1 The district court distinguished payment (or debt) subordination, which entitles the senior creditor to full satisfaction of its debt before the subordinated creditor receives payment, from lien subordination, where the priority of the lien of the subordinated party is demoted below that of another secured creditor (in other words, the recourse of the subordinated party to the collateral is delayed until satisfaction of the other party's claim from the collateral).

2 An anti-layering provision, often found in an indenture, prevents, in certain circumstances, the incurrence of debt that is senior to certain existing subordinated debt, but junior to existing senior debt.

3 Section 1129(b) of the Bankruptcy Code provides that in order to be confirmed, a plan (1) must not unfairly discriminate and (2) must be fair and equitable. Momentive sought to cram down the Senior Lien Notes under section 1129(b)(2)(a)(i), which requires that a dissenting class of secured creditors (I) retain its security interest to the extent of the allowed amount of its secured claim, and (II) receive deferred cash payments with a present value of at least the value of its interest in the collateral securing its claim.

4 The "formula approach" involves augmenting a risk-free or low risk base rate "to account for the risk of nonpayment posed by borrowers in the []financial position" of the debtor. Till v. SCS Credit Corp., 541 U.S. 465, 471 (2004).

5 The "efficient market approach" calculates the cramdown interest rate based on the interest rate the market would pay on a new loan having the terms being offered to the dissenting secured creditor under the plan.

6 Till, 541 US 465.

7 Till, 541 US at 477.

8 The district court was not persuaded by the argument that courts in the Sixth Circuit apply the efficient market rate in the Chapter 11 context; instead, the district court looked to Second Circuit precedent, which was controlling.

9 In re Chemtura Corp., 439 B.R. 561 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2010).

10 On May 22, 2015, the trustee for the Senior Lien Notes filed a notice of appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Morrison & Foerster LLP
Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
Orrick
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Morrison & Foerster LLP
Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
Orrick
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions