United States: The First, First Circuit Court To Opine On A Newman Challenge

Last Updated: May 19 2015
Article by Michele L. Adelman

And the Insider Trading Charges Stick

On May 12, 2015, in United States v. Douglas Parigian, U.S. District Court Judge Denise Casper became the first judge in the First Circuit to opine on a challenge to insider trading charges premised upon the Second Circuit's controversial ruling in United States v. Newman, 773 F.3d 438 (2d Cir. 2014). And the decision denied Parigian's motion to dismiss and held that under the facts of that case, Newman did not warrant dismissal despite that (1) there was no allegation that the "insider-tipper" received any benefit in exchange for the transmittal of the inside information, and (2) the alleged personal benefit to the "tippee" who subsequently tipped several rounds of inside information to Parigian was a steak dinner that the tippee would purportedly receive in the future.

The Parigian Case

The facts of the Parigian case at first blush appear to be classic insider trading. There are a group of golfing buddies. One of them is Douglas Parigian and another one is Eric McPhail. There is an insider – "Person A" – a senior executive at American Superconductor Corporation ("AMSC"), a company that produced wire, hardware and software for the wind power industry. According to the Superseding Indictment, beginning in July 2009, Person A disclosed material, nonpublic information about AMSC to McPhail, McPhail passed the information to Parigian and other golfing buddies, and they all traded on the information and made money. As luck would have it for the government, there are a series of emails chronicling the information flow, such as the following:

  • On July 9, McPhail sent an email "Try this one ... AMSC ... watch it on July 30th." (Superseding Indictment ¶ 14). Between July 9 and July 24, Parigian bought 1200 shares of AMSC stock. (Id. ¶ 19). On July 30, AMSC announced positive earnings and its share price shot up. Between July 30 and 31, Parigian sold 1000 AMSC shares and made about $9,000. (Id.). On July 30, McPhail emailed: "Nice profitable day for the boys. So when should I report in on which restaurant and massage parlor I want to be treated to?" (Id. ¶ 20). 
  • On September 29, McPhail sent an email: "Well boys ... went to the Sox game with a friend of mine tonight. He seems to think that AMSC has a $100 Million deal with China that should be signed very shortly ...This announcement should spike them close to 10%. Furthermore, circle October 29th for the next big day ... it could/should be as good as the last one ... I like Pinot Noir and love steak ... looking forward to getting paid back." (Id. ¶ 21). Parigian replied "I will take you for a nice dinner at Grill 23." (Id. ¶ 22). On the morning of September 29, Parigian bought a total of 1100 AMSC shares. (Id. ¶ 23). After the markets closed that day, AMSC issued a press release announcing a $100 million contract with Sinovel Wind Group Co., Ltd., a Chinese company involved in wind turbines, and the next day AMSC's stock shot up. (Id. ¶ 24). On September 30, Parigian sold 800 AMSC shares at a profit. (Id. ¶ 25). 
  • On September 29, McPhail sent an email about an AMSC quarterly earnings report to be released on October 29: "Hopefully there are no terrorist attacks between now and the 29th ... could be another bomber of a day. Similar to the end of July." (Id. ¶ 26). Parigian replied "I will be taking most my gains and putting it ALL on Options before Oct. 29. I just wish I knew what an Option was." (Id. ¶ 27). On October 22, McPhail emailed "Certainly looks like today may be a good buying opportunity for AMSC, T minus one week." (Id. ¶ 30). Between September 29 and October 28, Parigian purchased approximately 1180 AMSC shares and 60 AMSC call options. (Id. ¶ 32). On October 29, McPhail emailed "Please keep your arms and feet inside ... enjoy the ride," and AMSC announced high revenues accompanied by a share price increase. (Id. ¶ 31). Between October 29 and 30, Parigian sold 1480 AMSC shares and 60 AMSC call options and netted about $5,952.36. (Id. ¶ 33).

The Newman Challenge

Parigian moved to dismiss the Superseding Indictment on the basis that the government failed to allege that the insider – Person A – breached a fiduciary duty to AMSC by receiving a personal benefit in exchange for providing the inside information to McPhail. Specifically, Parigian relied upon the following language in Newman: "The test for determining whether the corporate insider has breached his fiduciary duty 'is whether the insider personally will benefit, directly or indirectly, from his disclosure. Absent some personal gain, there has been no breach of duty..." 773 F.3d at 446 (quoting Dirks v. SEC, 463 U.S. 646, 662 (1983)(emphasis added in original). Moreover, Parigian argued that he, as a tippee, must have knowledge of the foregoing quid pro quo, according to Newman. "For purposes of insider trading liability, the insider's disclosure of confidential information, standing alone, is not a breach. Thus, without establishing that the tippee knows of the personal benefit received by the insider in exchange for the disclosure, the Government cannot meet its burden of showing that the tippee knew of a breach." Id. at 448. The Superseding Indictment charging Parigian failed to allege any of these facts.

The District Court's Decision

The District Court declined to adopt the analysis espoused by Parigian. Rather, the Court found – consistent with the government's argument – that the Newman test did not apply because the case involved McPhail "misappropriating" the inside information from Person A and therefore the misappropriation theory – versus the classical theory – of insider trading applied. "[U]nder a misappropriation theory 'a fiduciary's undisclosed, self-serving use of a principal's information to purchase or sell securities, in breach of a duty of loyalty and confidentiality, defrauds the principal of the exclusive use of that information.'" United States v. Parigian, 2015 U.S. Dist LEXIS 62096 at *6 (quoting United States v. O'Hagan, 521 U.S. 642, 651-52 (1997)).

Thus, the Court found McPhail similar to the defendant in O'Hagan, a law firm attorney who was an "outsider" to a bidding company, who placed trades premised upon inside information about a proposed tender offer that was held by his law firm in confidence. Specifically, "the source of the material, nonpublic information (there, the law firm client; here, Person A) is an unknowing source and participant in the chain of information to the tipster (there, the law firm attorney; here, McPhail). Under this theory, a personal benefit need not be alleged to inure to the benefit of the unknowing participant, the source of the inside information." Id. at *9.

The Court also found that the relationship between Person A and McPhail was a "fiduciary-like" relationship, similar to the close relationship between two members of Alcohols Anonymous that was found sufficient for misappropriation liability in United States v. McGee, 763 F.3d 304, 316 (3d Cir. 2014). Id. at *9-10. "Given the nature of their close relationship and history, pattern and practice of sharing confidences, it is alleged that McPhail owed Person A a duty of trust and confidence and that he reasonably should have known that Person A's communications about AMSC should be kept in confidence." Id. at *10.

Finally, the Court found that "[t]o the extent that the Defendants are alternatively arguing that the indictment must allege that the tipster (McPhail) must receive a personal benefit and/or that the tippee (Parigian) knew that McPhail would receive, or expected to receive such benefit, the indictment here alleges both," citing to the allegations relating to the future steak dinner. Id. at *9.

The Conditional Guilty Plea

On May 12, 2015, Parigian entered a conditional plea of guilty to a Superseding Information charging him with conspiracy to engage in securities fraud and securities fraud pursuant to a plea agreement under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(a)(2). Specifically, Parigian pled guilty but preserved his right to appeal the denial of his Motion to Dismiss, and should he prevail on appeal, Parigian preserved the right to withdraw his guilty plea.

Issues on Appeal

While it is hard to predict where the First Circuit will go on this case and future insider trading cases post-Newman, there are some issues that are fair game under the facts of Parigian and the backdrop of Newman:

  • Whether the government must allege and prove a "personal benefit" to a tipper when alleging liability under the misappropriation theory of insider trading. Significantly, the Second Circuit came to the opposite conclusion in Newman and held that "the elements of tipping liability are the same, regardless of whether the tipper's duty arises under the 'classical' or the 'misappropriation' theory," 773 F.3d at 446, and at least one court in that circuit dismissed insider trading charges on that basis, see United States v. Conradt, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16263 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 22, 2015).
  • Whether the government's allegations with respect to the relationship between Person A and McPhail was sufficient to establish a fiduciary relationship sufficient to establish that McPhail "misappropriated" the AMSC inside information from Person A, similar to the O'Hagan law firm attorney misappropriating tender offer information from a client.
  • Whether the government's allegations with respect to McPhail anticipating receipt of a steak dinner at some point in the future after providing rounds of AMSC inside information to Parigian (and others) is sufficient to satisfy the personal benefit requirement. See, e.g., Newman, 773 F.3d at 450 (quoting Dirks v. SEC, 463 U.S. 646, 664 (1983))("[A] breach of the duty of confidentiality is not fraudulent unless the tipper acts for personal benefit, that is to say, there is no breach unless the tipper 'is in effect selling the information to its recipient for cash, reciprocal information, or other things of value for himself...'").

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
7 Nov 2018, Other, Boston, United States

Please join us on Wednesday, November 7 at the Westin Waltham Hotel for our quarterly New England M&A Forum, which brings the latest in market trends and recent legal developments to the New England M&A professionals' community.

13 Nov 2018, Webinar, Boston, United States

Social media platforms present countless opportunities for companies looking to connect to consumers and clients in real time.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions