United States: Marketers And Consumers – Watch Out For The Arbitration Fairness Act!

Last Updated: May 18 2015
Article by Damon W.D. Wright, Ari N. Rothman and Shahin O. Rothermel

Imagine this. You own a web-based business selling everything from nutritional supplements, to skin cream, to jewelry to consumers. Your website's registration page has a checkbox with text alongside it. In large font, the text says, "By purchasing a product and checking this box, you agree to the Terms of Use, including its mandatory arbitration and a class action waiver provisions. The hyperlinked Terms of Use explain the provisions in more depth.

All is good. You're selling products, your customers are happy, and you're making money.  One day, a process server knocks on your door. You've been served. A consumer class action complaint has been filed in court against your business. The complaint could allege that your advertising was deceptive, that your product was defective, or that your continuity re-billing is unlawful. You know the claims are frivolous but you also know that even frivolous class action litigation can be expensive.'

In 2015, there is good news. With the fact pattern above, a court will likely hold there can be no class action and the dispute must be decided through less-expensive arbitration.  Here's the bad news. A year from now this could all change. You could end up stuck in court defending an expensive class action lawsuit with every customer you've ever had as a potential class member.

Online marketers often implement binding arbitration provisions to limit their exposure to consumer class action lawsuits.  Senator Al Franken (f/k/a Stuart Smalley) and Congressman Hank Johnson want to change this.  The proposed Arbitration Fairness Act ("Act"), if passed, would ban those provisions and allow parties to agree to arbitration only after a dispute arises.  If the Act passes, marketers who now rely on mandatory arbitration provisions and class action waivers will face class action lawsuits in court.  This would up-end the Federal Arbitration Act ("FAA") and recent U.S. Supreme Court precedent.

The FAA, passed by Congress in 1925, provides for contractually based, compulsory, binding arbitration.  Under the FAA, if parties have validly agreed to arbitrate disputes that arise under a contract, the claims must be arbitrated rather than litigated in court. The FAA codified the public policy in favor of enforcing arbitration agreements, which typically provide for faster resolution and more relaxed procedural rules as compared to litigation in court. 

Online marketers and retailers use mandatory arbitration and class action waiver provisions to limit their exposure to expensive consumer and class action litigation.  The cost saving benefits of arbitration allow parties to quickly and quietly resolve disputes, rather than endure the length, costs, and risks of litigation in court.  Importantly, these provisions help to fend off plaintiffs' attorneys who pursue consumer class actions. 

No doubt, class action litigation can be expensive.  For example, in 2014, a consumer alleged that after drinking Red Bull over the years and despite the claim that Red Bull "gives you wings," he neither grew wings nor experienced enhanced athletic performance.  Although Red Bull could have defended, it chose the safer route, settled, and refunded $10 to any customer who had bought the drink, ultimately paying $13 million. This is not unusual. When facing a class action complaint, marketers often settle to avoid the length, costs and risks of litigation, even if there is a high probability that they could ultimately prevail.  Plaintiffs' lawyers know this, take advantage of this, and dislike mandatory arbitration provisions.  While class actions may help plaintiffs' lawyers in pursuit of large fee awards, arbitration is often a better, faster, and less-expensive forum for the actual parties to the dispute.  

In recent years, the U.S. Supreme Court has issued several pro-arbitration decisions.  With AT&T v. Concepcion in 2011, the Court upheld AT&T's arbitration and class action waiver provisions which prevented a customer from resolving claims in court or through class action.  In 2013 the Court decided American Express v. Italian Colors, upholding an arbitration agreement that barred plaintiffs from bringing a class action against American Express for alleged antitrust violations.  The plaintiffs' lawyers refrain in these and other cases is that the mandatory arbitration provisions should be unenforceable and class action should be allowed since the cost of proving an individual claim would far outweigh an individual recovery.  In case after case, however, courts have applied the FAA, emphasized that arbitration is a creature of contract, and enforced arbitration agreements according to their terms.

If enacted, the Arbitration Fairness Act would prohibit mandatory arbitration provisions in consumer disputes, as well as employment, antitrust, and civil rights cases.  The Act's supporters argue that consumers lack bargaining power when faced with a contract containing a mandatory arbitration provision and that these provisions allow companies to dodge liability and exposure for violating consumer protection laws.  Although the Act would not prohibit companies and customers from arbitrating consumer disputes, it would require that the decision to arbitrate be made through agreement by the parties after the dispute has arisen.  

The Arbitration Fairness Act has been introduced to Congress several times.  In the past, various trade and public policy organizations have lobbied for and against it.  The arguments against it are compelling because the benefits of mandatory arbitration are compelling. 

First, a single consumer could very well be worse off in court.  The court process is far from perfect, courts have complicated rules and overburdened dockets, and most cases are not suitable for class action treatment.  For a single consumer who must file a case in court, this likely means hiring a lawyer, incurring the added cost of litigation, and waiting several months, if not years, for trial, in the hope of one day obtaining relief.  By contrast, in arbitration, the rules are relaxed, the cost is less, and the pace is faster.  With more relaxed rules and a more efficient process, it is far easier for a consumer to represent themselves in an arbitration than in court.  To prohibit mandatory arbitration could actually limit access to justice.

Second, if the Arbitration Fairness Act passed, this would necessarily increase the price of consumer goods and services while providing a boon for consumer class action lawyers.  For companies facing class actions, there is strong incentive to settle for hundreds of thousands of dollars early on, rather than face millions of dollars in certain litigation expenses and potential worst-case exposure.  The cost of these settlements would necessarily be passed on to consumers.  In many instances, class action settlements also lead to big paydays for plaintiffs' lawyers but only minimal relief to class members.  Although the Act's supporters are motivated to help consumers, the Act could very well hurt consumers while lining plaintiffs' lawyers' pockets.

Third, the notion that the Arbitration Fairness Act's provision for post-dispute arbitration helps to ensure the availability of arbitration's benefits is misguided.  The reality is that parties are more likely to agree on matters pre-dispute than after a dispute has arisen.  Once a dispute has arisen, each party has an incentive to be strategic and prefer the forum that provides the best route to a win.  For an online marketer facing a claim by an individual consumer and no longer bound by a mandatory arbitration provision, the preferred forum could actually be court, since again the consumer may have to hire a lawyer, incur the added cost of litigation, and wait several months if not years in the hope of one day obtaining relief.  With the Arbitration Fairness Act, a consumer who actually prefers arbitration for any number of sensible reasons could instead be required to litigate and wait years for a decision in court.

The Arbitration Fairness Act may never pass.  If enacted, however, the Act would have a widespread impact on consumer transactions, prices, and the way marketers conduct business and analyze legal risks.  Given these stakes, online marketers would be wise to track the legislation and should be prepared to add their voice to the debate.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions