United States: TTAB Strategy After B&B Hardware

Last Updated: May 6 2015
Article by Jeremy M. Klass, Matthew R. Farley and Mark B. Harrison

In the wake of B&B Hardware v. Hargis Industries, 13-352 (U.S. Mar. 24, 2015), TTAB practitioners and trademark litigators need to assess how issue preclusion will factor into litigation strategy. In B&B Hardware, the Supreme Court ruled in a 7-2 decision that "a court should give preclusive effect to TTAB decisions if the ordinary elements of issue preclusion are met." Slip op. at 2. While it may be some time before we see court decisions relying upon or distinguishing this case, it is never too early to consider how B&B Hardware can shape strategy in TTAB proceedings.

At the outset, one should recognize that the universe of cases proceeding to final judgment before the TTAB is relatively small compared to the number of proceedings filed. As a rough guide, according to the USPTO, in 2014, parties filed 5,509 oppositions and 1,722 cancellations. The TTAB decided only 132 cases (not necessarily of these cases).1 Assuming this filings-to-decision ratio is constant, this means the TTAB issues final judgments in less than one-half of one percent of all oppositions and cancellations. The number of such cases that are not stayed during concurrent civil litigation may be similarly small, possibly approaching zero.

This makes the procedural history of B&B Hardware somewhat unusual in that the parties did not suspend the TTAB proceeding pending the outcome of the district court litigation (nor did Hargis appeal the TTAB's judgment). Suspension is the more common practice, since, unlike the TTAB, an Article III court is not limited to ruling on registrability, and can also grant injunctive relief and damages.

It remains to be seen whether the Board will continue to grant suspension requests as a matter of course now that B&B Hardware has altered the calculus. Currently, the Board's practice is to routinely grant suspensions when they are sought to avoid parallel Board practice and district court litigation. This practice of granting suspensions pending the outcome of district court litigation is motivated in part by comity concerns― that is, a desire to conserve judicial and agency resources by prioritizing the court decision on likelihood of confusion. (See Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Manual of Procedure, §510.02(a): "Most commonly, a request to suspend pending the outcome of another proceeding seeks suspension because of a civil action pending between the parties in a federal district court. To the extent that a civil action in a federal district court involves issues in common with those in a proceeding before the Board, the decision of the federal district court is often binding upon the Board, while the decision of the Board is not binding upon the court." (emphasis added).)

This practice of suspending TTAB proceedings made sense because, prior to B&B Hardware, practitioners and the Board alike assumed that a court would not be bound by the Board's determination on likelihood of confusion. However, now that B&B Hardware establishes the Board as a co-equal arbiter of the likelihood of confusion question, the Board's presumptive comity concern is (at least partly) undercut, and its practice of suspending proceedings as a matter of course may be undercut as well. This suggests one of two outcomes: a substantial increase in the scope of TTAB discovery and motions practice, or a strategy designed to avoid a final decision (likely by settlement but possibly by abandonment in some cases).

Regardless of the Board's suspension practices, how else will B&B Hardware come into play?

One likely scenario is one in which a brand is re-launched or expanded a number of years after a final adverse TTAB judgment. Perhaps this renewed commercial activity brings two marks, possibly for the first time, into a true commercial conflict. Envision that the conflict is with a party that was previously only a concern from the perspective of policing the USPTO registry, or at best only a minor player in the field. Now competitors, the parties seek relief in federal district court, and one may wish to assert issue preclusion based upon the prior TTAB decision.

For those not familiar with trademark portfolio strategy, trademark owners often engage in TTAB proceedings (both oppositions and cancellations) to increase a mark's strength on the register, even where the third-party marks at issue are not associated with directly competitive goods or services. This is a legitimate practice, and is distinguishable from trademark bullying. It is easy to see that clearing a path on the USPTO Register—that is, opposing registration and seeking cancellation of marks that arguably crowd a mark holder's registration—achieves different business goals versus pursuing district court litigation. These different options come with different price tags.

It is possible that a brand re-launch may materially alter the trademark usage in dispute, rendering B&B Hardware and the prospect of issue preclusion inapplicable on its face. However, this question itself means that B&B Hardware opens the door to time-consuming and costly motions practice and possible interlocutory appeals to address whether issue preclusion even applies.

B&B Hardware means that the specter of issue preclusion in future disputes now looms over all inter partes TTAB proceedings.

Final TTAB judgments are limited to registrability only. The Board cannot grant injunctive relief, damages or attorney fees. Given the limited (although not insignificant) scope of TTAB judgments, parties understandably are reluctant to expend more resources than are necessary to present their best case.

Unfortunately, concerns over issue preclusion may encourage parties to spend more on TTAB litigation (e.g., surveys and expert witness testimony) than they otherwise would, out of a concern that the TTAB may be their only bite at the likelihood of confusion apple. It is ironic that a ruling expanding the applicability of issue preclusion may have the perverse net effect of increasing litigation, even though the policy behind issue preclusion is, in fact, just the opposite.

This leaves us to ponder: How can we prevent a final TTAB judgment, which is limited solely to registrability, from having outsized influence on a trademark infringement suit, where injunctive relief and damages are on the table?

B&B Hardware is a powerful yet narrow decision, according great weight to final TTAB decisions in limited circumstances. Notably, the high court ruled that "a court should give preclusive effect to TTAB decisions if the ordinary elements of issue preclusion are met" (emphasis added). Slip. op. at 2. The Court's careful word selection ("should" vs. "shall") signals that lower courts ultimately have some discretion to determine whether and when issue preclusion is warranted.

While this language leaves practitioners with room for maneuvering in the district court, the time to avoid or minimize issue preclusion is earlier, during TTAB proceedings. At this stage, we have no idea how (or how frequently) lower courts will rely upon B&B Hardware to streamline litigation. Nonetheless, there are several ways to avoid or minimize the likelihood that issue preclusion will unexpectedly (or unfavorably) apply in future disputes.

Talk to your client. Post-B&B Hardware, practitioners must consider issue preclusion early on in TTAB proceedings. While ultimately you may adopt a more limited litigation strategy before the TTAB than in district court, the risk of issue preclusion should now factor into your larger litigation strategy.

Contract. Can you contract around the problem? In a hotly contested proceeding where a final judgment bears on the registrability of both parties' marks, it is possible to reach a side agreement where the parties agree that regardless of outcome, neither party will raise issue preclusion in a future dispute. An appropriate liquidated damages clause and the ease of proving a breach should encourage the parties to abide by its terms. Of course, a court may raise issue preclusion sua sponte, even if neither party raised the issue. It is also possible that such a contract could be challenged as against public policy.

Settle smart. The fact that the TTAB's jurisdiction is limited to registrability doesn't mean a settlement in a Board proceeding must also be so limited. Build in appropriate use restrictions and carve-outs to let your client's mark expand while limiting the risk of a future dispute.

Appeal. If your client is dissatisfied with the outcome, especially if you think the Board erred, appeal. "The fact that the TTAB may have erred . . . does not prevent [issue] preclusion." Slip op. at 19.

B&B Hardware undeniably enhances the impact of TTAB judgments. Practitioners must now weave the risks (and rewards) of issue preclusion into TTAB litigation strategy.


1 See http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks-application-process/appealing-trademark-decisions/ttab-incoming-filings-and-performance#.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions