United States: A Sufficient Controversy Exists When A Second ANDA Filer Seeks DJ Of Noninfringement Of An Orange-Book-Listed Patent Owned But Disclaimed By Brand Name Manufacturer

In Apotex Inc. v. Daiichi Sankyo, Inc., Nos. 14-1282, -1291 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 31, 2015), the Federal Circuit reversed the district court's dismissal of Apotex, Inc.'s ("Apotex") complaint for DJ that Apotex will not infringe an Orange-Book-listed patent owned but disclaimed by Daiichi Sankyo, Inc. and Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd. (collectively "Daiichi") if Apotex manufactures or sells a generic drug bioequivalent of Daiichi's Benicar®.  The Federal Circuit also reversed the district court's denial of Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc.'s ("Mylan") motion to intervene.

Daiichi listed two patents in the Orange Book to cover Benicar®.  The first, U.S. Patent No. 5,616,599 ("the '599 patent"), covers the active ingredient of the drug, olmesartan medoxomil, and expires on April 25, 2016.  Daiichi's second listed patent, U.S. Patent No. 6,878,703 ("the '703 patent"), covers methods of treatment and expires on November 19, 2021.

Mylan filed an ANDA in April 2006, certifying that both patents were invalid or would not be infringed by Mylan's proposed drug.  Thereafter, Daiichi disclaimed all claims of the '703 patent and asked the FDA to remove the '703 patent from the Orange Book.  The FDA did not remove the '703 patent from the Orange Book.  Daiichi sued Mylan for infringing the '599 patent.  The district court in that case upheld the validity of the '599 patent and entered judgment of infringement against Mylan.  As such, Mylan's earliest date of market entry is October 25, 2016, six months after the expiration date of the '599 patent. 

After the litigation was over, Apotex filed its own ANDA and two certifications under 21 U.S.C.
§ 355(j)(2)(A)(vii):  (1) a Paragraph III certification accepting the result of the prior Mylan litigation with respect to the '599 patent; and (2) a Paragraph IV certification stating that Apotex's product would not infringe the '703 patent.  Daiichi did not sue Apotex for infringing the '703 patent.  Apotex brought a DJ action, seeking a declaration that its product would not infringe the disclaimed, but still listed, '703 patent.  Mylan moved to intervene, and both it and Daiichi moved to dismiss Apotex's complaint.  The district court granted Daiichi's motion to dismiss and denied Mylan's motion to intervene as moot.  Apotex appealed, and Mylan cross-appealed the denial of its motion to intervene.

On appeal, the Federal Circuit first confirmed Mylan's right to intervene.  To the Court, Apotex seeks to cause a forfeiture of Mylan's presumed market-exclusivity period, and Mylan has a strong, concrete monetary interest in retaining such exclusivity—180 days of more sales and/or higher prices than are likely when Apotex enters the market.  The Court explained that, although Daiichi likely benefits from the exclusivity period as well, Mylan's interest exists apart from that of Daiichi.

"The patent disclaimer eliminates one, but only one, potential legal barrier to Apotex's ability to make [sales of olmesartan medoxomil] sooner rather than later.  The listing of the patent, with its current consequence of preventing FDA approval during Mylan's presumptive exclusivity period, is another, and the parties have adverse concrete interests in the truncation or preservation of that period."  Slip op. at 10.

The Federal Circuit then reversed the district court's dismissal of Apotex's complaint for lack of a case or controversy, concluding that "the facts alleged, under all the circumstances, show that there is a substantial controversy, between parties having adverse legal interests, of sufficient immediacy and reality to warrant the issuance of a declaratory judgment."  Slip op. at 9 (quoting MedImmune, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc., 549 U.S. 118, 127 (2007)).  In reaching this conclusion, the Federal Circuit addressed the following four issues.

First, the Federal Circuit rejected Daiichi's contention that its statutory disclaimer of the '703 patent itself means that there is no adversity between it and Apotex over stakes of a concrete character.  To the Court, the concrete stakes over which Daiichi and Apotex were fighting are the revenues to be earned through selling olmesartan medoxomil.  The patent disclaimer only eliminates one of the potential legal barriers to Apotex's ability to make such sales sooner rather than later.  The listing of the '703 patent, with the current consequence of preventing FDA approval during Mylan's presumptive exclusivity period, is another legal barrier, and the parties have adverse concrete interests in truncating or preserving that period.  The Court also explained that all three parties were likely affected by whether Apotex can cause the forfeiture of Mylan's exclusivity period.  As explained by the Court, once Apotex enters the market, Daiichi and Mylan can expect to lose sales they otherwise would have made. 

Second, the Federal Circuit held that Daiichi was also wrong in asserting that the delayed entry of Apotex is not "fairly traceable" to Daiichi.  Id. at 12.  The Court explained that a first filer's eligibility for marketing exclusivity is expressly conditioned on its ability to "lawfully maintain[]" a Paragraph IV certification.  Id. (alteration in original) (quoting 21 U.S.C. § 355(j)(5)(B)(iv)(II)(bb)).  According to the Court, Daiichi's original listing of the '703 patent in the Orange Book supports Mylan's exclusivity period.  Had Daiichi not listed the '703 patent in the Orange Book, the '599 patent would be the only listed patent, and Mylan would have no exclusivity period.  Thus, the Court concluded that Daiichi was responsible for the current existence of Mylan's exclusivity-period rights.

Third, the Federal Circuit decided that Apotex did not have to wait until it obtains tentative FDA approval of its proposed drug to support an adjudication of the request for a noninfringement judgment.  The Court explained that the congressional judgment embodied in the Hatch-Waxman Act and the Court's case law make clear that "tentative approval of an ANDA is generally not a precondition to the existence of a case or controversy concerning patents listed in the Orange Book."  Id. at 18.

Fourth, the Federal Circuit highlighted the two requirements for forfeiture under the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003—a court's final decision of noninfringement that is no longer appealable (certiorari aside) and the second (or later) filer's receipt of tentative FDA approval.  The first filer forfeits its exclusivity if it has not entered the market seventy-five days after those two requirements are satisfied.  The Court concluded that Apotex can trigger forfeiture by obtaining a DJ of noninfringement and tentative approval, if it does both early enough in relation to Mylan's market entry. 

The Federal Circuit rejected Mylan's argument that the second filer must have tentative approval before it initiates the DJ action and stressed that no such requirement could be found in the statutory text.  To the Court, tentative approval is required to trigger forfeiture, and Apotex's approval status when it brought the DJ action is immaterial.  The Court also rejected Mylan's argument regarding the statutory policy underlying the exclusivity period, emphasizing that the exclusivity period encourages early entry by generics into the market by providing a reward to first filers, but only up to a point.  Finally, the Court distinguished the instant case from Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. Sebelius, 595 F.3d 1303 (D.C. Cir. 2010), by pointing out that the forfeiture Apotex sought to produce would not be effected by Daiichi's unilateral action but by a court judgment.  

Judges: Taranto (author), Mayer, Clevenger

[Appealed from N.D. Ill., Judge Coleman]

This article previously appeared in Last Month at the Federal Circuit, April, 2015

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Copyright © 2015 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP | All rights reserved

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Events from this Firm
21 Nov 2018, Workshop, London, UK

Finnegan partner Leythem Wall will consider European claim drafting strategy and lead the Chemical Workshop during a two-day course, hosted by Management Forum.

27 Nov 2018, Webinar, Washington, DC, United States

As part of Strafford Publications’ webinar series, Finnegan partners Mark Feldstein, Anthony Gutowski, and Tom Irving will discuss the impact of case law on daily U.S. patent practice.

28 Nov 2018, Webinar, Washington, DC, United States

This latest series of webinars will explore emerging trends in the changing intellectual property (IP) legal environment in Europe and the United States.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions