United States: April 2015 Corporate Alert

The Herrick Advantage

Over the years our sports law group has successfully represented some of the industry's biggest names. In a recent acquisition, we advised the purchaser of the Kansas City Royals minor league affiliate, the Lexington Legends. The deal, which included the acquisition of the team's home stadium, Whitaker Bank Ballpark, was subject to approval by the Southern Atlantic League, Minor League Baseball and Major League Baseball. This transaction ensured that the current CEO of the team would be able to continue the execution of his long-term business and growth plan. The deal team included Herrick corporate partner Daniel A. Etna and associate Liliana Chang.

Delaware Chancery Court Awards $171 Million in Conflict of Interest Transaction Claim

The Delaware Chancery Court awarded $171 million in damages to the common unitholders of a limited partnership against its general partner in connection with a "dropdown" transaction. This transaction involved the limited partnership's purchase of assets held by the general partner. The limited partnership agreement permitted such a purchase so long as it was approved by a committee whose members believed, in good faith, that the purchase was in the best interests of the limited partnership.

The "dropdown" transaction was evaluated and approved by a committee of three directors of the general partner's board of directors. The committee was advised by outside counsel and a financial advisor. While the committee members initially expressed reservations about certain aspects of the proposed transaction, they ultimately determined that the transaction was in the best interests of the limited partnership. The committee members made special note that they believed the proposed transaction would be immediately accretive to the common unitholders. The proposed transaction was approved after the committee received a fairness opinion from its financial advisor.

After trial, the court discredited the committee members' testimony as to their state of mind and opinion as to the merits of the transaction. The court, in holding that the committee members did not hold a good faith belief that the transaction was in the limited partnership's best interests, criticized the committee members for fixating myopically on accretion. The court further criticized the committee members for failing to vigorously vet the transaction or negotiate with the general partner to obtain the best possible price.

In re El Paso Pipeline Partners L.P. Derivative Litig., C.A. No. 7141-VCL (Del.Ch.Ct., Apr. 20, 2015)

SEC Expands Regulation A+

The SEC adopted new rules that update and expand Regulation A. These new rules, referred to informally as Regulation A+, were mandated under Title IV of the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012. Regulation A+ provides an updated exemption from registrations under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. Regulation A+ creates two tiers of offerings:  (1) Tier 1 for offerings of securities of up to $20 million in a 12-month period with not more than $6 million in offers by selling stockholders that are affiliates of the issuer and (2) Tier 2 for offerings of securities of up to $50 million in a 12-month period with not more than $15 million in offers by selling stockholders that are affiliates of the issuer.  Both tiers require the filing of an offering statement on Form 1-A.  Additionally, Tier 2 offerings are subject to the following requirements: (i) audited financial statements must be included in the issuer's offering materials; (ii) the issuer must file annual and semi-annual reports with the SEC and, as needed; current reports upon the occurrence of certain significant changes or transactions; and (iii) investments by non-accredited investors are limited to no more than 10% of either their net worth or annual income (whichever is greater).

State securities law registration and qualification requirements are preempted in Tier 2 offerings as all investors in such offerings are considered "qualified purchasers." Tier 1 offerings will continue to be subject to both federal and state oversight although the coordinated review program of Regulation A offerings implemented by the North American Securities Administrators Association is expected to alleviate some of the burden.

SEC Rel. No. 33-9741 (Amendments for Small and Additional Issues Exemptions under the Securities Act (Regulation A) (Mar. 25, 2015)

U.S. Supreme Court Addresses Liability for Statements of Opinion

The U.S. Supreme Court held that a statement of opinion does not become actionable under the "untrue statement of material fact" clause of Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, simply because subsequent events prove it wrong, provided the opiner honestly held the opinion. The case arose out of an opinion made by the issuer in a registration statement that it was in compliance with federal and state laws. The issuer was subsequently sued by the government for allegedly receiving kickbacks from pharmaceutical companies. Certain investors then sued the issuer claiming that the legal compliance statements amounted to untrue statements of material fact and that the issuer failed to state material facts necessary to make those statements not misleading.

The lower court ruled that because Section 11 is a strict liability statute that does not depend on the issuer's state of mind, the investors could state a claim if the opinion included a material misstatement, even if the opinion accurately conveyed the issuer's belief. The Supreme Court, however, reversed and remanded the claim. The Supreme Court held that a statement of opinion does not constitute an untrue statement of fact merely because the opinion ultimately ends up being incorrect.  However, the Supreme Court went on to state that an opinion can qualify as an untrue statement of fact if the opinion expressed was not sincerely held.  Furthermore, opinions can be actionable under Section 11 if they contain or are based upon untrue statements of fact.  In remanding the case, the Supreme Court ruled that for purposes of applying Section 11's omissions clause, the determination of whether a statement is misleading is an objective inquiry that depends on a reasonable investor's perspective. 

Omnicare, Inc. v. Laborer's Dist. Council Constr. Indus. Pension Fund, No. 14-435 (U.S. Sup. Ct. Mar. 24, 2015)

Delaware Chancery Court Finds No Waiver of Appraisal Rights in Squeeze-out Merger

The Delaware Chancery Court ruled that minority stockholders that agreed to allow a corporation to force them to vote in favor of a merger didn't waive their appraisal rights when the corporation failed to exercise its drag-along rights. The minority stockholders received a letter from the corporation advising as to the merger and the right to receive a cash payment. Thereafter, certain of the minority stockholders sought to initiate an appraisal proceeding for their shares. In response, the corporation tried to specifically enforce the "drag-along" rights contained in a stockholders agreement to which the minority stockholders were bound. The drag-along rights included the right to compel minority stockholders to vote in favor of certain change-in-control actions including mergers. The court, however, found that since the corporation never exercised the drag-along right to require the minority stockholders to vote in favor of the merger, the minority stockholders did not waive their appraisal rights. 

Halpin v. Riverstone Nat'l, Inc., No. 9796-VCG (Del. Ch. Ct., Feb. 26, 2015)

Delaware Supreme Court Refuses to Find Breach of the Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing

The Delaware Supreme Court reversed a $15.1 million award of damages to the buyer of a 65% interest in an investment advisory firm. The buyer argued that it would not have paid $25 million for such interest, but for its expectancy that it would manage seven specified funds for three or more years. Shortly after the buyer's purchase of the interest in the investment advisory's firm, the seller withdrew a majority of the assets from the largest of the seven funds and deposited them in a newly-created competing fund. The seller also exercised a performance-based contractual termination right which resulted in the termination of the buyer's investment advisory contract with the six other funds.

The lower court found that the seller had breached the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing by: (i) depriving the buyer of the benefit of its bargain to manage the seven funds for three or more years; (ii) transferring a majority of the assets out of the largest fund to a newly-created competing fund; and (iii) implementing a lower fee structure for such competing fund which made it impossible for the buyer to compete. The Delaware Supreme Court ruled that the lower court erred by implying contractual obligations on the part of the seller not found in its contract with the buyer. The Delaware Supreme Court stated that the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing cannot be used to end run negotiated agreements or to create a duty separate and apart from the contract between a buyer and a seller. 

Nationwide Emerging Managers, LLC v. Northpointe Holdings, LLC, No. 441,2014 (Del. Sup. Ct., Mar. 18, 2015)

U.S. Supreme Court "Reels in" Reach of Sarbanes-Oxley Act

The U.S. Supreme Court reversed a lower court conviction based upon an alleged violation of Section 1519 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.  Section 1519 provides that a person may be fined or imprisoned for up to 20 years if he "knowingly alters, destroys, mutilates, conceals, covers up, falsifies, or makes a false entry in any record, document or tangible object with the intent to impede, obstruct or influence" a federal investigation. The conviction arose out of an inspection of a commercial fishing vessel in the Gulf of Mexico. The inspection revealed that the ship's catch contained undersized red grouper in violation of federal conservation regulations. The ship's captain was instructed by the federal inspector to keep the undersized fish segregated from the rest of the catch until the ship returned to port. The captain instead told a crew member to throw the undersized fish overboard. For this offense, the captain was charged with destroying, concealing and covering up undersized fish to impede a federal investigation.

At trial, the captain argued that Section 1519 was a law designed to protect investors and restore trust in financial markets following the collapse of Enron Corporation. The captain further argued that Section 1519's reference to "tangible object" subsumes objects used to store information, such as computer hard drives, not fish. The federal appeals court confirmed the captain's conviction by concluding that Section 1519 applies to the destruction or concealment of fish because, as objects having physical form, fish fall within the dictionary definition of "tangible object." In reversing the conviction, the Supreme Court ruled that the dictionary definition needed to be considered in light of the specific context in which that language is used as well as the broader context of the statute in its entirety.

Yates v. United States, No. 13-7451 (U.S. Sup. Ct. Feb. 25, 2015)

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions