United States: Federal Circuit Addresses Damages In The Hatch-Waxman Context

Last Updated: April 20 2015
Article by Matthew D'Amore

On April 7, 2015, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued its decision in Astrazeneca AB v. Apotex Corp., No. 2014-1221, affirming an award of a reasonable royalty of 50% in a case arising from the Hatch-Waxman Act. While largely affirming a damages award of over $70 million, the Federal Circuit reversed the district court's award of damages during the period of pediatric exclusivity that AstraZeneca's product held after patent expiration.

The case provides important guidance regarding damages in the Hatch-Waxman context, and in particular whether damages are available in the period of pediatric exclusivity awarded to pharmaceutical patent holders who conduct qualifying pediatric studies.

Of note, the Federal Circuit specifically considered the use of the "entire market value" rule in this case, and held that the entire market value rule was inapplicable because the infringed patents "cover the infringing product as a whole," but also that the district court still must consider the relative value of the invention compared to "conventional" features in the claim.

BACKGROUND

Omeprazole is the active ingredient in AstraZeneca's Prilosec® product. AstraZeneca's product was covered by several patents, including patents related to the active ingredient (which expired in 2001) and patents related to the pharmaceutical formulation (which expired April 20, 2007).

Beginning in 1997, Apotex and several other generic manufacturers filed "Paragraph IV Certifications" as to the formulation patents, certifying to the FDA their belief that those patents were invalid or not infringed, and AstraZeneca in turn sued. The "Paragraph IV Certifications" permitted the FDA to approve the generic products before AstraZeneca's patents expired, even though litigation was ongoing. Apotex and some other generic companies thus launched their products "at risk" before infringement and validity were determined by the court.

Unlike some of the other generics, Apotex's product was found to infringe the formulation patents on May 31, 2007, and it was enjoined from further sales shortly thereafter. In 2008, the Federal Circuit affirmed the infringement ruling against Apotex, In re Omeprazole Patent Litig., 536 F.3d 1361 (Fed. Cir. 2008), and the case returned to the district court to set AstraZeneca's damages.

AFFIRMING THE 50% REASONABLE ROYALTY

The Relevance of the Market

The district court found a 50% royalty on Apotex's gross margin to be appropriate in view of the Georgia-Pacific factors commonly employed to assess a reasonable royalty. Among other facts, the district court found that the market for omeprazole in 2003-2007 had several features that supported a high royalty rate. First, while there were other generic entrants during that period, only one had been found not to infringe; the cases against the others were, like Apotex's, still pending. Accordingly, the district court found that the generic prices (and profits) stayed high because the "at risk" entrants hedged against a possible later finding of infringement. With this pricing, Apotex reported a profit margin of more than twice its average. The district court thus found that a license to Apotex would have a high value, because Apotex would have a greater ability to price its product below its competitors and take market share. Second, the district court found that Apotex would have had difficulty switching to a non-infringing product, given patent coverage on other formulations and likely regulatory delays. Third, the district court considered other licenses, settlements, and offers for settlement, and found that they supported its royalty award. Apotex challenged these factual findings, but the Federal Circuit found no error.

The Relevance of the Entire Market Value Rule

Separate from its challenges to the district court's factual findings about the market, Apotex contended that the district court erred by considering the value of its product as a whole, rather than just the patented improvements. In Apotex's view, because the active ingredient of the formulation was known in the prior art, under the entire market value line of cases the district court should have based its damages calculation on the value of the patented improvements – specifically, a subcoating that improved the stability of the drug – excluding the value of the omeprazole active ingredient.

The Federal Circuit rejected this argument. The court acknowledged that its precedent "held that when small elements of multi-component products are accused of infringement, a patentee may assess damages based on the entire market value of the accused product only where the patented feature creates the basis for customer demand or substantially creates the value of the component parts." Slip op. at 20-21 (quoting Uniloc USA, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp., 632 F.3d 1292, 1318 (Fed. Cir. 2001)). But the Federal Circuit nonetheless held that:

This case does not fit the pattern in which the entire market value rule applies. Astra's formulation patents claim three key elements—the drug core, the enteric coating, and the subcoating. The combination of those elements constitutes the complete omeprazole product that is the subject of the claims. Thus, Astra's patents cover the infringing product as a whole, not a single component of a multi-component product. There is no unpatented or non-infringing feature in the product.

Id. at 22 (emphasis added).

However, the court also held that the relative contribution of the invention remains important:

When a patent covers the infringing product as a whole, and the claims recite both conventional elements and unconventional elements, the court must determine how to account for the relative value of the patentee's invention in comparison to the value of the conventional elements recited in the claim, standing alone.

Id. And the Court further noted that "while it is important to guard against compensation for more than the added value attributable to an invention, it is improper to assume that a conventional element cannot be rendered more valuable by its use in combination with an invention." Id. at 22-23. The Federal Circuit observed that this approach was already reflected in the Georgia-Pacific factors, which include consideration of the benefits of the invention, and the portion of profit attributable to that invention.

In this case, the district court observed that the formulation claimed by the patents is what made the sale of the active ingredient commercially viable. The Federal Circuit saw no error in that factual finding, and thus no reason to exclude the value of the active ingredient from the damages calculation.

NO AWARD OF DAMAGES DURING PEDIATRIC EXCLUSIVITY

While AstraZeneca's formulation patents expired on April 20, 2007, the company enjoyed pediatric exclusivity with respect to those patents until October 20, 2007. The district court's injunction against Apotex issued on May 31, 2007, and required the FDA to revoke its approval of Apotex's product on June 28, 2007, in view of AstraZeneca's exclusivity. (The FDA subsequently reapproved Apotex's product after the exclusivity period expired.)

The Federal Circuit held that AstraZeneca could not recover a royalty for Apotex's sales during this period. It held that damages may only be awarded in a patent case for patent infringement, and there can be no infringement after a patent expires. While the court noted that a generic might be willing to agree to pay for a license during the pediatric exclusivity period as part of the bargain for a license, infringement damages were unavailable on the facts here, because the patents had expired and the Hatch-Waxman Act provides no other damages remedy for sales during this period.

Notably, while the court observed that a generic might agree to a license that includes royalties during this post-expiration period, it did not reach the question of whether such agreements would be permissible under Brulotte v. Thys Co., 379 U.S. 29 (1964), which held (outside of the Hatch-Waxman context) that agreements to pay royalties after a patent had expired were unenforceable. That precedent is presently under review in Kimble v. Marvel Enterprises, Inc., now pending before the Supreme Court.

CONCLUSION

The Federal Circuit's holding demonstrates that in assessing damages, whether the claim is directed to the entire pharmaceutical product or just one component is important. But even where the claim covers the whole product, the relative contribution of the new features of the invention compared to those known in the art also must be considered. Here, the district court found that the commercial value of the product depended on the patented improvements, not just the active ingredient, which along with other facts justified a high royalty rate in this case. That will not be so in all pharmaceutical cases, especially where formulation patents may cover later versions of previously commercialized products with the same active ingredient.

Additionally, the Federal Circuit's holding regarding the unavailability of damages during the pediatric exclusivity period provides important guidance for brands and generics. However, it will need to be evaluated again in view of Kimble v. Marvel Enterprises, Inc., on the issue of whether agreements to pay royalties after patent expiration – such as during the pediatric exclusivity period – are permissible.

Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP. All rights reserved

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Matthew D'Amore
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Hunton & Williams LLP
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Hunton & Williams LLP
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions