A second Video Gaming bill was introduced yesterday in the Pennsylvania House. HB 901 has many similarities to HB 808 introduced last month (which I blogged about here).
But there are some key distinctions:
HB 901 would place control over VLTs in the hands of the Department of Revenue rather than the Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board (although the legislation does provide Revenue with the opportunity to partner with the PGCB for the limited purpose of developing and verifying specifications for the VLTs).
Additionally, HB 901 is silent regarding residency requirements and eliminates the "distributors," combining that role with that of the "Operators," who would "buy, sell, own, maintain, service or distribute video gaming machines for placement in licensed establishments."
The net profits would be distributed: 40% to the General Fund; 30% to the licensed establishment; and 30% to the operator. Under HB 808, the General Fund would receive 34% and establishments and operators would each receive 33%.
So what's next:
The introduction of a second VLT bill in less than a month is a positive sign for VLT proponents. If either bill is to survive, it likely won't be done without heavy compromise and amendment, so neither bill is set in stone. The House Gaming Oversight continues to be very active on this issue and others – a hearing was held last week on this issue and a hearing scheduled next week on Internet gaming.
Stay tuned here as we track legislative progress on these gaming-related measures.
Disclaimer: This Alert has been prepared and published for informational purposes only and is not offered, nor should be construed, as legal advice. For more information, please see the firm's full disclaimer.
