United States: Court Examines Application Of Implied Covenant, Step-Transaction Doctrines

While the decision by Delaware Court of Chancery Vice Chancellor John W. Noble in Ellis v. OTLP GP LLC, C.A. No. 10495-VCN (Let. Op. Jan. 30, 2015), takes as its form a letter opinion addressing the merits of a motion to expedite, the court's discussion of the merits of the dispute (in applying the "colorable claim" aspect of the test for expedition) is worth noting for its coverage of two topics. First, does the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing preclude structuring a transaction (in a manner specifically permitted by the governance documents) to avoid having to submit the matter to a vote of unaffiliated unitholders? Second, should a transaction's two phases be deemed a unitary transaction under the "step-transaction doctrine" such that a vote of unaffiliated unitholders was required to approve it? The court answered both questions in the negative and refused to expedite the proceedings seeking to enjoin the vote on the proposed transaction.

The Transactions

The plaintiffs are limited partners of Oiltanking Partners L.P. Oiltanking's general partner was OTLP GP LLC (the GP). The GP was wholly owned by defendant Marquard & Bahls AG (M&B), which also owned 65 percent of the limited partner units in Oiltanking. In June 2014, defendant Enterprise Products Partners L.P. approached M&B regarding a purchase of Oiltanking, which would include a purchase of both M&B's 65 percent interest as well as the 35 percent owned by unaffiliated limited partners. M&B was willing to entertain a transaction with Enterprise, but was only willing to do so if it could be structured to avoid a vote that would depend on the support of the unaffiliated limited partners. Pursuant to Oiltanking's LP agreement, any merger would require the affirmative vote of a "unit majority." Given the definition of unit majority in the LP agreement, the affirmative vote required to approve a merger would depend on when that vote was taken. If taken during the "subordination period," the vote required for approval would be at least a majority of the limited partner units not affiliated with the GP—which acted as the functional equivalent of a "majority of the minority" condition to approval. If the vote was taken after the subordination period, then approval by a majority of all limited partner unitholders was required. The subordination period was based on the period pursuant to which the unitholders were to receive certain cash distributions and was expected to end in mid-November 2014.

Given M&B's preference for a transaction that would not require a majority vote by the unaffiliated unitholders, M&B and Enterprise agreed to a deal structure where Enterprise would acquire the limited partner units owned by M&B (representing 65 percent) and announced that Enterprise would complete a merger for the other 35 percent after the expiration of the subordination period, which would expire approximately six weeks later. Thus, as structured, the transaction was specifically designed to avoid the need to solicit the affirmative vote of the unaffiliated unitholders during the subordination period, and would allow Enterprise to approve the merger solely with the 65 percent of the votes it would then own.

The plaintiffs sued to enjoin the vote on the merger and asked the court to rule that the merger could only be approved by the affirmative vote of a majority of the unaffiliated limited partners. In support of that argument, the plaintiffs contended that "because the acquisition was announced during the subordination period, the voting standard applicable during the subordination period would govern the merger vote." The plaintiffs asserted two theories. First, that the LP agreement was ambiguous on this issue, and thus the court should apply the implied covenant to find that a transaction announced during the subordination period but voted on after its expiration is nonetheless subject to the vote that would be required during the subordination period. The plaintiffs also argued that while each phase of the transaction might be valid if viewed in isolation, they were—in reality—a single, unitary transaction that was subject to the vote that would be required during the subordination period.

The Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing

The court declined to find that the LP agreement was ambiguous such that terms should be implied. The court noted that the "LP agreement specifies a voting standard during the subordination period and a voting standard for after the subordination period. ... The plaintiffs offer no reason why, under either the LP agreement or Delaware law, the voting standard is not determined by reference to the time of the vote"—as opposed to the announcement of the transaction. The court, therefore, found that there was no omission from the LP agreement warranting the application of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. Moreover, the court cautioned that "the implied covenant is not a free-floating duty that requires good-faith conduct in some subjectively appropriate sense ... [but] rather, the doctrine by which Delaware law cautiously supplies implied terms to fill gaps in the express provisions of an agreement." Given the subordination period was "well-defined and its expiration was readily predicted," the court found that holding the limited partners to the voting scheme to which they agreed in the LP agreement would not be inequitable.

The Step-Transaction Doctrine

The plaintiffs' second argument contended "that the entire process by which M&B sold its interests to Enterprise and Enterprise pursued a merger must be assessed as a single integrated transaction"—and hence, would be subject to the vote required at the time of the first part of the transaction. The court also rejected this theory. M&B, as a holder of 65 percent of the limited partner units, was well within its rights to steer Enterprise toward a purchase of its 65 percent. The court then found that Enterprise, as the now-holder of 65 percent of the limited partner units, was free to work within the confines of the LP agreement, await the expiration of the subordination period, and then complete the merger transaction upon the force of its 65 percent vote. The court found that these two steps were distinct, and that the step-transaction doctrine's "end result test, the independence test, and the binding commitment test" were not satisfied.

While the letter opinion addresses a couple of other theories raised by the plaintiffs, the court's discussion of the implied covenant and the step-transaction doctrine are likely the topics for which this opinion might be consulted going forward.

Previously published by Delaware Business Court Insider

Richard L. Renck is a partner in Duane Morris' Wilmington office. His practice focuses on complex corporate and commercial litigation, including actions relating to the Delaware General Corporation Law and common-law fiduciary duties, as well as advising corporate boards, directors and committees of boards in high-stakes litigation and counseling directors and senior executives regarding issues of corporate governance.

Disclaimer: This Alert has been prepared and published for informational purposes only and is not offered, nor should be construed, as legal advice. For more information, please see the firm's full disclaimer.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions