United States: Context, Reasons, Hedges, And Disclaimers: The Supreme Court’s Ruling In Omnicare May Shape Whether And How Companies Express Opinions

The Supreme Court's decision yesterday in Omnicare Inc. v. The Laborers District Council Construction Industry Pension Fund, No. 13-435 (U.S. March 23, 2015) articulated the standard of liability for statements of opinion. At its core, the decision endorses the uncontroversial notion that public companies must have a reasonable basis supporting any opinions they disclose. What constitutes a reasonable basis will depend on what a reasonable investor would expect, unless the opinion is accompanied by disclosure of the actual basis for the expressed opinion.

Strictly speaking, the Omnicare ruling addresses the standard of liability for statements of opinion published in registration statements that are filed in connection with a public offering of securities. The ruling, however, might have some spillover effect that shapes whether and how public companies and those that speak on their behalf express opinions in other types of investor communications. To minimize the risk of liability, Omnicare hints of a new best practice: either don't opine (which may not be practical in many cases), or accompany any volunteered opinion with the actual reasons supporting it, and appropriate context, including "hedges, disclaimers, or qualifications."1 More disclosure, not less, may be the order of the day.


In Omnicare, the Supreme Court addressed the standard of civil liability under Section 11 of the Securities Act for statements of opinion. Section 11 applies to statements contained in registration statements that are issued in connection with initial public offerings and other registered securities offerings.

The plaintiffs alleged that Omnicare violated Section 11 when it expressed its belief, in connection with its public offering of common stock, that the company complied with legal requirements. For example, Omnicare stated: "We believe our contract arrangements . . . are in compliance with applicable federal and state laws."2 After those statements were published, the federal government filed civil complaints alleging that Omnicare received payments that violated anti-kickback laws. According to the plaintiffs, Omnicare's statements were materially misleading because Omnicare did not disclose that it was violating the law. To support that claim, the plaintiffs alleged that one of Omnicare's attorneys had warned that a particular contract carried a risk of liability under the anti-kickback laws. The district court granted Omnicare's motion to dismiss. The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed. The Supreme Court, in turn, granted review to consider how Section 11 pertains to statements of opinion, which the Court helpfully defined as a "sentiment" that does not "imply definiteness or . . . certainty," as contrasted with a "statement of fact," which "expresses certainty about a thing," is "determinate," and "verifiable."3


The Court's opinion in Omnicare hinges on the text of the statute. The Court explained that an investor may pursue a claim under Section 11 if a registration statement contains either (1) an "untrue statement of material fact"—what Omnicare calls the "false-statement provision"—or (2) "omits to state a material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein not misleading"—what Omnicare calls the "omissions provision."4 Because Section 11 is a "strict liability statute," a plaintiff can recover damages under either of these provisions for proving falsity without having to prove that the defendant intended to defraud investors.

The Court squarely ruled that "a statement of opinion is not misleading just because external facts show the opinion to be incorrect," casting aside the ruling of the Sixth Circuit in the decision under review.5 More is required. Under Omnicare, liability for statements of opinion will arise under Section 11 in the following circumstances:

First, a statement of opinion is actionable under the false-statement provision of Section 11 if the statement is not sincerely believed. That is because a statement of opinion (an assertion like "we believe X") conveys the fact that the speakers actually hold the stated belief. If that is not actually the case, then the statement is false.6

Second, a statement of opinion is actionable under the false-statement provision of Section 11 if the opinion contains an "embedded statements of fact."7 For example: "We believe X because of Y fact." If Y is untrue, then there may be liability because the supporting fact supplied is untrue.

Finally, a statement of opinion is actionable under the omission provision even when it is literally accurate and sincerely held if the statement "omits material facts about the issuer's inquiry into or knowledge concerning a statement of opinion, and if those facts conflict with what a reasonable investor would take from the statement itself."client alert on the case, this third liability hook was pressed by the Solicitor General, who participated in the case as amicus on behalf of the United States, and is the aspect of the Omnicare decision that forges some new ground. 8 As previewed in our previous


Justice Kagan, writing for the Court, reasoned that opinion liability under the omissions clause makes sense: "a reasonable investor may, depending on the circumstances, understand an opinion statement to convey facts about how the speaker has formed the opinion—or, otherwise put, about the speaker's basis for holding that view. And if the real facts are otherwise, but not provided, the opinion statement will mislead its audience."9 Relying on common law tort principles, the Court's decision points out that "an expression of an opinion may carry with it an implied assertion, not only that the speaker knows no facts which would preclude such an opinion, but that he does know facts which justify it."10 That implied assertion, according to the Court, requires a speaker to have a reasonable basis for an expressed opinion (or an express disclosure that the opinion lacks a reasonable basis).

That is not to say that any undisclosed fact will trigger liability for a statement of opinion. An opinion statement "is not necessarily misleading when an issuer knows, but fails to disclose, some fact cutting the other way."11 That is so, the decision posits, given that "[r]easonable investors understand that opinions sometimes rest on a weighing of competing facts; indeed, the presence of such facts is one reason why an issuer may frame a statement as an opinion, thus conveying uncertainty."12 The Court went on to emphasize that a "reasonable investor does not expect that every fact known to an issuer supports its opinion statement."13

The Court brushed aside Omnicare's argument that companies will avoid expressing opinions because, according to Omnicare, "any inquiry into the issuer's basis for holding an opinion would be 'hopelessly amorphous,' threatening 'unpredictable' and 'possibly massive liability.'"14 For one thing, the scope of liability, the Court explained, reflects a "policy" decision that is better left to Congress, which extended omissions liability to "all statements"—not just statements of fact.15 And, in any event, "market-based forces push back against any inclination to underdisclose," the Court assured.16

The Court was also not persuaded that the floodgates would open to more shareholder lawsuits. Establishing liability for an opinion under the omissions theory will be "no small task for an investor," Justice Kagan wrote.17 An investor cannot come to court and "just say that an issuer failed to reveal its basis" for an opinion.18 Instead, an investor will have to "identify particular (and material) facts going to the basis for the issuer's opinion—facts about the inquiry the issuer did or did not conduct or the knowledge it did or did not have—whose omission makes the opinion at statement at issue misleading to a reasonable person reading the statement fairly and in context."19


The Court volunteered guidance on how to "avoid exposure for omissions" under Section 11.20 An issuer "need only divulge an opinion's basis, or else make clear the real tentativeness of its belief."21 That may be done by "including hedges, disclaimers, and apparently conflicting information" that could be taken into account by an investor.22 The decision thereby highlights the importance of "context" as providing the "broader frame" by which liability must be assessed by lower courts. That analytical approach echoes the "holistic" type of analysis that the Court has previously mandated in other recent securities cases.23

The Supreme Court remanded to the lower courts to consider whether Omnicare's statements of opinion were misleading, especially in light of context, including, among other factors, the status and expertise of the attorney who allegedly warned Omnicare about the risk of liability under the anti-kickback statutes, the disclaimers and other information that Omnicare disclosed about its legal compliance, and Omnicare's express cautions that the federal government had expressed significant concerns about some manufacturers' conduct.24 How the lower courts ultimately resolve these issues in the case may help define the limits or extent of liability for similar statements of opinion.


Although all of the Justices concurred in the judgment vacating the Sixth Court of Appeals ruling in favor of the plaintiffs, two wrote separate opinions. Justice Scalia would have limited liability to statements of opinion that were not sincerely held. The "objective test" adopted by the Court, Justice Scalia wrote, is "inconsistent with the common law and common intuitions about statements of opinion" and "invites roundabout attacks upon expressions of opinion."25 He added that the Court's decision "produces a far broader field of misrepresentation"26 that will invite more second guessing in hindsight by disgruntled investors. Justice Thomas filed a separate concurring opinion expressing his view that the Court should not have reached the omissions theory because it was not addressed by the lower courts.


The Omnicare decision will affect whether and how opinions are communicated in registration statements. It may also shape, to some extent, how courts approach liability even for statements alleged to be misleading where a material fact is omitted from other investor communications. That is because the statutory language at issue in Omnicare is similar to more than a dozen other federal securities laws provisions. One key difference, however, is that civil liability under other statutes like Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934—the federal securities statute most frequently invoked by private plaintiffs—requires proof of scienter, unlike Section 11. That means that, with respect to opinion statements made outside of registration statements, plaintiffs must show not only a material misstatement or omission, but also that a defendant did not believe his or her opinion and intended to deceive investors, a high hurdle for plaintiffs to overcome.

Going forward, public companies, their speakers, and the gatekeepers who advise them (including in-house and external counsel) should give special consideration to expressions of opinion that are communicated to the investing public. A prudent approach would be to accompany statements of opinion with the actual basis for the belief, the reasons for that belief, and qualifications of the opinion, including caveats or statements of tentativeness. In addition, documents supporting the basis for every statement of opinion should be verified, preserved, and readily accessible if litigation is filed. Indeed, doing so can significantly help bolster the defense of claims relating to all types of public statements, not just statements of opinion.

For better or worse, more disclosure may be the best defense to those who might "Monday morning quarterback an issuer's opinions," as the Court described, particularly with regard to "inherently subjective and uncertain assessments."27 Given that it is plaintiffs' lawyers who tend to play that role, redoubled diligence and caution in expressing various types of qualitative statements about a company's business may be the surest way for issuers and insiders to minimize the risk of securities liability going forward.


1 Slip op. at 20.

2 Id. at 3.

3 Id. at 6.

4 Id. at 2, 7, 10.

5 Id. at 11.

6 See id. at 6–8.

7 Id. at 8.

8 Id. at 12.

9 Id. at 11.

10 Id. at 15 (citations omitted).

11 Id. at 13.

12 Id.

13 Id.

14 Id. at 17.

15 Id.

16 Id. at 19.

17 Id. at 18.

18 Id.

19 Id.

20 Id. at 19.

21 Id.

22 Id. at 14.

23 See Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd., 551 U.S. 308 (2007).

24 Slip op. at 3.

25 Slip op. at 6 (Scalia, J., concurring).

26 Slip op. at 3 (Scalia, J., concurring).

27 Slip op. at 9.

Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP. All rights reserved

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Mark R.S. Foster
In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:
  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.
  • Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.
    If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here
    If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq you may opt out by clicking here

    Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

    Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

    Use of www.mondaq.com

    You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


    Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

    The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


    Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

    • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
    • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
    • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

    Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

    Information Collection and Use

    We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

    We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

    Mondaq News Alerts

    In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


    A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

    Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

    Log Files

    We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


    This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

    Surveys & Contests

    From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


    If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


    From time to time Mondaq may send you emails promoting Mondaq services including new services. You may opt out of receiving such emails by clicking below.

    *** If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of services offered by Mondaq you may opt out by clicking here .


    This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

    Correcting/Updating Personal Information

    If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

    Notification of Changes

    If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

    How to contact Mondaq

    You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

    If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.

    By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions