United States: Recent Superior Court Decision Underscores Difficulty And Need For Caution When Determining Appealability Of Orphans' Court Orders

For several years, Pennsylvania judges, lawyers, and (even) rulemakers have struggled to define when an order entered in an Orphans' Court proceeding is immediately appealable. The issue, of course, is critical, because failure to take a timely appeal from such an order may forfeit all appellate rights, and (assuming that was not the party's intent) such a failure may then lead to a malpractice action against the party's lawyer. Defining an appealable Orphans' Court order thus requires clear rules.

After abandoning several other approaches to this issue, the Supreme Court in 2012 promulgated amendments to Rule 342 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure that sought to provide such clarity by broadly listing types of Orphans' Court orders that are immediately appealable. A recent Superior Court decision demonstrates, however, that defining an appealable Orphans' Court order remains a matter of some difficulty.

Estate of Cherry, 2015 Pa. Super. Lexis 115 (No. 633 MDA 2014, Mar. 17, 2015) was a dispute about how to deal with real property in an estate. The testator's will provided that after making several cash bequests, the residue of her estate would go to her church. Because there was insufficient cash in the estate to cover the specific bequests, the church, which apparently wished to obtain real estate that was part of the residue, offered to contribute funds to the estate that would enable it to pay the cash bequests without having to liquidate the real property. When the executor rejected that offer, the church sued to enjoin the executor from selling the realty. The Orphans' Court denied the injunction but entered an order stating: "since the [church] has offered to pay all of the cash requirements attendant to the settlement of this estate, this Court will not authorize the sale of the . . . real estate . . . and would, upon application, enjoin any proposed sale of these assets." The executor appealed, invoking the part of amended Rule 342 that lists an order "determining an interest in real or personal property" among immediately appealable Orphans' Court orders. Initially, the Superior Court affirmed in an unpublished opinion, but on reconsideration it quashed the appeal.

The Court's quashal opinion noted that before the 2012 amendments, Rule 342 permitted an appeal from an Orphans' Court order "determining an interest in realty" if the Orphans' Court judge certified that the order should be treated as appealable. In In re Stricker (2009), the Supreme Court had held that an Orphans' Court did not abuse its discretion under the pre-2012 version of the Rule when it declined to certify as appealable an order providing for the sale of real estate so that cash could be distributed to beneficiaries. Justice (now Chief Justice) Saylor filed a concurrence in Stricker in which he suggested changing Rule 342 to provide "for the general appealability of estate-related orders determining property interests at least in the real property setting" because there was a need for prompt resolution of potential title disputes. The 2012 amendments to Rule 342 were adopted in response to Justice Saylor's comments.

This history would suggest that the amendments to Rule 342 should have resulted in a different answer to the jurisdictional question in Cherry, but the Court held otherwise. The reason was that in a 2013 decision, In re Estate of Ash, the Superior Court adopted a narrow interpretation of Rule 342 that excluded property sales like that in Stricker from the types of property orders listed in amended Rule 342. The facts in Ash were similar to those in Stricker, in which real property was sold to accumulate cash for payment to the testator's beneficiaries, and the Court acknowledged that the sale "will eventually lead to a change in the ownership interest of the realty." But, the Court emphasized, the Orphans' Court's order did not resolve any dispute about ownership of the realty because no one contested the estate's ownership prior to the sale or the purchaser's ownership after the sale; the only question was whether there should be a sale at all. Therefore, even though quashing the appeal appeared inconsistent with the reasoning of Justice Saylor that led to the 2012 amendments, the Court interpreted the amended Rule in a way that would make the sale order unappealable. The Supreme Court denied a petition for allowance of an appeal from the Ash decision.

In light of Ash, the Superior Court held that the result in Cherry was preordained: if an order to sell property could not qualify as one "determining an interest in . . . property" under Rule 342, then an order declining to enjoin a sale could not qualify either. The Court therefore quashed the Cherry appeal.

This result is far from obvious, however. The 2012 amendments were intended to make it easier to appeal Orphans' Court orders, including those determining interests in realty. Although Ash and Cherry may correctly reflect an intent to limit Rule 342 to disputes between estates and others (devisees, those claiming as survivors, etc.) about current ownership of property, Justice Saylor's concurrence in Stricker suggested that he, at least, considered an order about whether realty indisputably owned by the estate may be sold during the estate's liquidation to merit immediate appeal, since it will determine ultimate ownership rights.

Moreover, even though the order in Cherry denied the church's request to enjoin a real estate sale, it gave the church equivalent relief by stating that the Orphans' Court would not authorize any future sale and "upon application, would enjoin any proposed sale of these assets." As the Superior Court noted, the order created an "untenable situation" under which "the estate is not compelled to transfer the property to the Church but is precluded from . . . selling the property . . . to settle the estate." Even if the order were not considered a de facto injunction (an issue not raised or considered by the Superior Court), it signaled future issuance of an injunction that would be immediately appealable under Rule 311(a)(4) (making interlocutory injunction orders immediately appealable).

The uncertainties surrounding the order in Cherry thus surely called for caution and justified the appeal that was filed. Cherry demonstrates that estate orders do not easily fit any mold — even one formed by a list of common Orphans' Court orders under amended Rule 342. And because of that, appeals from Orphans' Court orders often will lead to appellate uncertainty. Unfortunately, the only definitive way to resolve that uncertainty is to take an appeal and thereby let the Superior Court resolve the issue in each case.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions