United States: Trademark Tacking is Factual Question For Juries Says U.S. Supreme Court

Hana Financial, Inc. v. Hana Bank, 135 S.Ct. 907 (2015)

In its first trademark ruling in a decade, the U.S. Supreme Court in Hana Financial, Inc. v. Hana Bank unanimously held that the question of trademark tacking is a factual one for juries to decide.

"Tacking" developed as a trademark doctrine to accommodate the fact that trademark owners sometimes alter their marks over time. Tacking permits the owner to "tack on" the use of an older mark format to the use of a newer format in order to claim priority back to first use of the older format. Tacking is permitted only where the marks are deemed "legal equivalents," that is, where the marks "create the same, continuing commercial impression so that consumers consider both as the same mark." Hana Financial, Inc. v. Hana Bank, 135 S.Ct. 907, 909 (2015) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted).

Although tacking is a well-established principle in trademark law, courts had differed on whether tacking was a question of fact for the jury or a question of law for the judge. The Ninth Circuit, which adjudicated the Hana case before it was appealed to the Supreme Court, held that tacking is a question for juries. Hana Financial, Inc. v. Hana Bank, 735 F.3d 1158, 1160 (9th Cir. 2013) (tacking "requires a highly fact-sensitive inquiry" that is "reserved for the jury") (internal quotation marks omitted). The Sixth Circuit and Federal Circuit, on the other hand, had held that the question of whether two marks are legally equivalent should be left to a judge. See Van Dyne-Crotty, Inc., 926 F.2d at 1159; Data Concepts, Inc. v. Digital Consulting, Inc., 150 F.3d 620, 623 (6th Cir. 1998).

The Supreme Court, however, had no difficulty placing the question squarely before a jury. The Court first noted that "[t]he commercial impression that a mark conveys must be viewed through the eyes of a consumer." Hana, 135 S. Ct. at 910 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). With that principle established, the Court easily concluded that "[a]pplication of a test that relies upon an ordinary consumer's understanding of the impression that a mark conveys falls comfortably within the ken of a jury." Hana, 135 S. Ct. at 911. The Court went on to remark that "we have long recognized across a variety of doctrinal contexts that, when the relevant question is how an ordinary person or community would make an assessment, the jury is generally the decisionmaker that ought to provide the fact-intensive answer." Id.

The Court was not persuaded by Hana Financial's several arguments that tacking must be left to a judge. In particular, the Court did not agree that because the "legal equivalents" standard for tacking involves the application of a legal standard, it must be decided by a judge, noting that "the application-of-legal-standard-to-fact sort of questions . . . , commonly called a "mixed question of law and fact," has typically been resolved by juries." Id. (internal quotation marks and citation omitted).

Reassuringly, the Court also pointed out that its conclusion that tacking is a question for juries to decide does not mean that judges can never decide the issue. The Court stated that, "[i]f the facts warrant it, a judge may decide a tacking question on a motion for summary judgment or for judgment as a matter of law." Hana, 135 S. Ct. at 911.

Although the Supreme Court implicitly recognized that the tacking doctrine should apply "only in 'exceptionally narrow circumstances,'" Hana, 135 S. Ct. at 910 (quoting Hana Financial, Inc. v. Hana Bank, 735 F.3d 1158, 1160 (9th Cir. 2013)), the facts of Hana Financial show that juries might be inclined to apply the doctrine broadly.

Petitioner Hana Financial owned rights in the trademark HANA FINANCIAL dating back to its first use of the mark in 1995. Hana Financial sued Hana Bank in 2007 alleging that the HANA BANK mark infringed the HANA FINANCIAL mark. Hana Bank denied infringement by, inter alia, claiming priority or rights via the tacking doctrine. Hana, 135 S.Ct. at 908.

Hana Bank, established in Korea in 1971 as Korea Investment Finance Corporation, changed its name to Hana Bank in 1991. In May 1994, Hana Bank established a service called "Hana Overseas Korean Club" and first began to promote its services in the United States through advertisements that read "Hana Overseas Korean Club" in both English and Korean, and included the name "Hana Bank" in Korean along with the bank's logo. In 2000, Hana Bank changed the name of "Hana Overseas Korean Club" to "Hana World Center." It was not until 2002 that Hana Bank began operating a physical bank in the United States under its own name. Hana, 135 S.Ct. at 909.

Based on this history, the jury concluded that Hana Bank had priority of Hana Financial's first use of its own mark in 1995. Hana, 735 F.3d at 1163. After the jury verdict, Hana Financial moved for judgment as a matter of law or for a new trial, and then appealed to the Ninth Circuit when the district court denied the motion.

Noting that the names "Hana Overseas Korean Club," "Hana World Center," and "Hana Bank" "seem aurally and visually distinguishable" and do not even necessarily indicate "that these entities offer the same services," Hana, 735 F.3d at 1166, the Ninth Circuit seemed constrained to accept the jury's decision. Id. ("our characterization of tacking as a question of fact is arguably dispositive"). That said, the Ninth Circuit ultimately concluded that, considering the evidence as a whole, the jury's decision was not entirely unreasonable:

The jury could have reasonably concluded that ... purchasers associated "Hana Bank" with the "Hana Overseas Korean Club" when "Hana Overseas Korean Club" appeared, in English, next to "Hana Bank," in Korean, and the dancing man logo in the advertisements. In that context, "Hana" was arguably the most significant portion of the trade names, as the ordinary purchasers would have made the association between the English word "Hana" and the Bank's Korean name. . . . In light of this combination of facts, the jury could reasonably conclude that throughout the time period at issue, the ordinary purchasers of these services had the continuous impression that the advertised services were being offered by the Bank and that there were no material differences between the marks.

735 F.3d at 1167.

If the Ninth Circuit was discomfited by the Hana jury's application of the tacking doctrine, the U.S. Supreme Court expressed no such qualms, deciding the case in a short, eight-page decision. But if practitioners are now less sure how broadly tacking will be applied in a given case, at least they are left with clear guidance that tacking is a question of fact, and can develop their evidence with a view to convincing a jury, not a judge.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions