United States: ISS And Glass Lewis Publish 2015 Proxy Voting Guideline Updates

On 6 November 2014, Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. ("ISS") and Glass Lewis & Co. ("Glass Lewis") released their respective 2015 updates to their proxy voting policies. The 2015 policies generally will be effective for shareholder meetings of publicly traded companies held during the 2015 proxy season. The proxy requirements for which the ISS and Glass Lewis policies have been developed do not apply to foreign private issuers.

ISS 2015 Updates

As was the case in 2014, ISS has not adopted sweeping changes to its 2015 policies; however, the proposed modifications reflect movement away from rigid policies towards a more flexible, holistic approach. The ISS updates are in the following areas:

  • Management Equity Compensation Plan Proposals
    • Under its 2014 policies, ISS used a series of six "pass/fail" tests to evaluate equity plan proposals. For 2015, ISS has adopted a more nuanced approach to evaluate proposals for stock option plans, restricted stock plans, omnibus stock plans and stock-settled stock appreciation rights plans for employees, which will consider a range of positive and negative factors related to plan features and historical grant practices. This is referred to as the Equity Plan Scorecard ("EPSC"). ISS issued frequently asked questions ("FAQs") on the EPSC on 22 December 2014. As described in the FAQs, the EPSC evaluates the following three pillars:
      • Plan Cost: This pillar considers the total potential cost to a company's shareholders of an equity plan relative to plan costs associated with the sponsoring company's industry or market peers. Cost is measured using ISS's proprietary Shareholder Value Transfer ("SVT") model. SVT represents the estimated cost of shares issued under a company's equity incentive plans, taking into account full value shares and stock options, if applicable. ISS's model measures SVT relative to two benchmarks: (1) new shares requested, combined with shares remaining for future grants and outstanding unvested/unexercised grants and (2) only new shares requested plus shares remaining for future grants. The relationship of these two SVT measures is weighed against the company's benchmark SVT, as determined by ISS using the company's GICS industry group, market cap size and operational and financial metrics that ISS identified as correlated with total shareholder return ("TSR") performance in the industry.
      • Plan Features: The Plan Features pillar considers the following factors, the presence of which may have a negative impact on the EPSC score, depending on the company's size and circumstances: (1) automatic single-triggered award vesting upon a change in control; (2) broad discretionary authority to accelerate the vesting of an award unrelated to a change in control, death or disability; (3) liberal share recycling policies (notably, allowing shares withheld or tendered for taxes or to pay the exercise price of an award to be available for re-grant); and (4) the absence of a minimum required vesting period of at least one year.
      • Grant Practices: The Grant Practices pillar is an amalgam of factors related to the past and future operation of the plan and the terms of the company's plan awards and equity grant policies. Factors include (1) the company's three year average burn rate relative to the comparative burn rate of its industry and its index peers, (2) vesting schedules under the CEO's most recent equity grants during the prior three years, (3) the plan's estimated duration, (4) the proportion of the CEO's most recent equity awards/grants subject to performance conditions, (5) clawback policies that include equity grants and (6) post-exercise or post-vesting shareholding requirements.
    • The EPSC uses three different scoring models, depending on the type of company. Each of these models weights the three pillars differently. The maximum number of points that may be accrued is 100. A score of 53 points is required to result in a positive recommendation on a plan proposal.
    • Notwithstanding a company's EPSC score, ISS may still recommend against a proposal that features certain egregious characteristics including (1) a liberal change of control definition (such as one defining a "change of control" to include shareholder approval of a merger or other transaction rather than the transaction's consummation), (2) the ability to reprice options without shareholder approval, (3) the plan's nature as a vehicle for problematic pay practices or a pay-for-performance disconnect and (4) any other plan features or company practices that are deemed detrimental to shareholder interests which may, on a case-by-case basis, include tax gross-ups related to plan awards or provisions for reload options.
  • Unilateral Bylaw/Charter Amendments
    • Under its 2014 policies, ISS evaluated unilateral bylaw/charter amendments under its "Governance Failures Policy." For 2015, ISS has adopted a stand-alone policy that codifies the current policy application related to unilateral bylaw/charter amendments under the "Governance Failures Policy."
    • ISS will generally recommend a vote "Against" or "Withhold" from directors individually, committee members or the entire board if the board amends the company's governance documents without shareholder approval in a manner that materially diminishes shareholders' rights or that could adversely impact shareholders. In performing its analysis, ISS will consider the following factors: (1) the board's rationale for adopting the bylaw/charter amendment without shareholder ratification; (2) disclosure by the company of any significant engagement with shareholders regarding the amendment; (3) the level of impairment of shareholders' rights caused by the board's unilateral amendment to the bylaws/charter; (4) the board's track record with regard to unilateral board action on bylaw/charter amendments or other entrenchment provisions; (5) the company's ownership structure; (6) the company's existing governance provisions; (7) whether the amendment was made prior to or in connection with the company's initial public offering; (8) the timing of the board's amendment to the bylaws/charter in connection with a significant business development; and (9) other factors, as deemed appropriate, that may be relevant to determine the impact of the amendment on shareholders.
  • Independent Board Chair Shareholder Proposals
    • Under its 2014 policy, ISS would generally recommend a vote "For" shareholder proposals for independent chairs unless the company maintained a certain specific counterbalancing governance structure. This method of evaluation required that the company satisfy all of the criteria on ISS's list.
    • For 2015, ISS has added new governance, board leadership and performance factors to the list of criteria considered when evaluating shareholder proposals for independent chairs, including (1) absence/presence of an executive chair; (2) recent board and executive leadership transitions at the company; (3) director and CEO tenure; and (4) a longer (five year) TSR performance period.
    • ISS's new policy is to vote "For" shareholder proposals requiring that the chairman's position be filled by an independent director, taking into consideration (1) the scope of the proposal; (2) the company's current board leadership structure; (3) the company's governance structure and practices; and (4) any other relevant factors that may be applicable.
    • As noted above, ISS has adopted a more holistic approach in evaluating these types of proposals. Therefore, a "For" or "Against" recommendation will not be determined by any single factor. Rather, ISS will consider all positive and negative aspects of the company based on the new expanded list of factors when assessing these shareholder proposals.
  • Litigation Rights
    • For 2015, ISS has expanded its policy on exclusive venue provisions to cover other types of bylaws that have a material impact on shareholders' litigation rights, including bylaws that mandate fee-shifting or arbitration. ISS will evaluate these bylaws on a case-by-case basis, taking into account factors such as (1) the company's stated rationale for adopting such a provision; (2) disclosure of past harm from shareholder lawsuits in which plaintiffs were unsuccessful or shareholder lawsuits outside the jurisdiction of incorporation; (3) the breadth of application of the bylaw, including the types of lawsuits to which it would apply and the definition of key terms; and (4) governance features such as shareholders' ability to repeal the provision at a later date (including the vote standard applied when shareholders attempt to amend the bylaws) and their ability to hold directors accountable through annual director elections and a majority vote standard in uncontested elections.
  • Political Contributions
    • ISS has refined its policies relating to political contributions shareholder proposals. ISS will vote for proposals requesting greater disclosure of a company's political contributions and trade association spending policies and activities, considering (1) the company's policies and management and board oversight related to its direct political contributions and payments to trade associations or other groups that may be used for political purposes; (2) the company's disclosure regarding its support of, and participation in, trade associations or other groups that may make political contributions; and (3) recent significant controversies, fines or litigation related to the company's political contributions or political activities.
    • When reviewing disclosures of trade association support or participation, ISS will look at the comprehensiveness of a company's trade association membership disclosure, the nature of a company's trade association participation, the level of transparency provided regarding a company's trade association expenditures and other relevant factors.
  • Greenhouse Gas Emissions
    • ISS noted that during the 2014 proxy season, the most prevalent resolutions on climate change requested companies to adopt goals to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions ("GHG"). In this regard, ISS has updated its policies to provide greater clarity on the factors that are considered in its analysis of GHG-related proposals. Under the 2015 policy, ISS will make recommendations on a case-by-case basis on proposals that call for the adoption of GHG reduction goals from products and operations, taking into account the following considerations: (1) whether the company provides disclosure of year-over-year GHG emissions performance data; (2) whether company disclosure lags behind industry peers; (3) the company's actual GHG emissions performance; (4) the company's current GHG emission policies, oversight mechanisms and related initiatives; and (5) whether the company has been the subject of recent, significant violations, fines, litigation or controversy related to GHG emissions.

Glass Lewis 2015 Updates

The Glass Lewis updates for the 2015 proxy season do not provide for sweeping changes to prior policies, but instead generally attempt to clarify Glass Lewis's policies. The Glass Lewis 2015 updates are in the following areas:

  • Governance Committee Performance
    • Glass Lewis adopted a new policy regarding instances where the board of directors, without seeking shareholder approval, has amended the company's governing documents to reduce, remove or otherwise impede the ability of shareholders to exercise shareholder rights that Glass Lewis deems important (e.g., the elimination of the ability of shareholders to call a special meeting or to act by written consent, an increase to the ownership threshold required for shareholders to call a special meeting or the adoption of a classified board structure). In these instances, Glass Lewis may recommend "Against" the chairman of the governance committee or the entire committee.
  • Board Responsiveness to Majority-Approved Shareholder Proposals
    • Under its 2014 policies, Glass Lewis would recommend "Against" all members of the governance committee during whose tenure a shareholder proposal relating to shareholder rights that Glass Lewis deems important received support from a majority of the votes cast if the board has not begun to implement or enact the proposal's subject matter.
    • In its 2015 policies, Glass Lewis applies a more nuanced approach to evaluating the adequacy of a board's response to these types of proposals. Glass Lewis will not only consider whether the board has enacted the proposal's subject matter, but it will now examine the quality of the right enacted or proffered for any conditions that may unreasonably interfere with a shareholder's ability to actually exercise the right (e.g., overly restrictive procedural requirements).
  • Vote Recommendations Following an IPO
    • While Glass Lewis generally refrains from issuing voting recommendations on the basis of most corporate governance best practices during the one-year period following an IPO, its 2015 policies provide for increased scrutiny of certain provisions. These include anti-takeover provisions adopted in a company's charter or bylaws prior to an IPO that are not later put up for a shareholder vote following the IPO. The 2015 policies specifically provide that the adoption of an anti-takeover provision and the adoption of an exclusive forum provision or fee shifting bylaw warrant strong shareholder action against the board of a company that completed an IPO within the past year.
  • "Material" Transactions with Directors
    • In the context of determining director independence, Glass Lewis deems a "material" relationship to exist between the company and a director where such director is employed by a professional services firm (such as a law firm, investment bank or consulting firm) and the company has paid such firm $120,000 or more during the past three or five years, depending on the specific circumstances. For this category of "material" relationships, Glass Lewis has clarified in its 2015 policies that it may deem such a transaction to be immaterial where (1) the amount represents less than 1% of the firm's annual revenues and (2) the board provides a compelling rationale as to why the director's independence is not affected by the relationship.
  • Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation ("say-on-pay")
    • Glass Lewis applies a highly nuanced approach when evaluating say-on-pay proposals. This approach is less formulaic than the methodology used by ISS, allowing for more flexibility (and potentially, unpredictability). Glass Lewis reviews executive compensation on a case-by-case basis based on the company's industry, size, maturity, performance, financial condition, historic pay-for-performance practices and any other relevant internal or external factors.
    • Under its 2014 policies, Glass Lewis reviewed say-on-pay proposals on both a qualitative and quantitative basis, focusing on (1) overall design and structure of the company's executive compensation program, including the selection and challenging nature of performance metrics; (2) the quality and content of the company's disclosure; (3) the quantum paid to executives; and (4) the link between compensation and performance as indicated by the company's current and past pay-for-performance grades.
    • The 2015 policies add a fifth factor: the implementation and effectiveness of the company's executive compensation programs, including pay mix and use of performance metrics in determining pay levels.
    • Glass Lewis will recommend "Against" a say-on-pay proposal if it finds deficiencies in the design, implementation or management of a company's compensation program, including (1) a pattern of poor pay-for-performance practices, (2) unclear disclosures regarding the overall compensation structure, (3) questionable adjustments to certain aspects of the overall compensation structure or (4) other egregious compensation practices.
    • Glass Lewis's 2015 policies also include revised guidance on one-off compensation awards granted outside of a company's standard incentive scheme, clawback policies and compensation consultant independence.
  • Employee Stock Purchase Plans
    • The 2015 policies add a description of Glass Lewis's approach to evaluating proposals to adopt or amend employee stock purchase plans ("ESPPs"). Previously, Glass Lewis did not disclose its approach to ESPPs. For 2015, Glass Lewis maintains a quantitative model that estimates the cost of an ESPP by measuring the expected discount, purchase period, expected purchase activity and whether the ESPP has a "lookback" feature (e.g., the plan bases the purchase price on the stock price at either the beginning or end of the purchase period, whichever is lower). The model compares this data to ESPPs at similar companies. Glass Lewis will also analyse the potential shareholder dilution and whether shareholders will not have a chance to approve the program for an excessive period of time. In addition, ESPPs that contain evergreen provisions (that automatically increase the number of shares available under the ESPP each year) will generally receive a negative recommendation.

Our client publication discussing ISS's updates to its proxy voting guidelines is available at:


Our client publication discussing ISS's frequently asked questions regarding its EPSC program is available at:


Our client publication discussing Glass Lewis's updates to its proxy voting guidelines is available at:


The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions