United States: Second Circuit To Lenders: Get Your UCC Filings Right


On January 21, 2015, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued an opinion regarding a mistaken UCC-3 termination statement that all loan market participants should consider carefully. The Second Circuit held that a secured party's lack of intent to terminate a properly filed UCC-1 financing statement, which perfected its lien granted in connection with a secured financing, is not sufficient to deem ineffective the filing of a UCC-3 termination statement with respect thereto. Even absent the intent to terminate, the actions of the secured party and its lawyers prior to the filing of the UCC-3 termination statement were, in this case, sufficient as a legal matter to form the requisite authority to file under Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code (the "UCC"). As a result of the Second Circuit's ruling, a $1.5 billion prepetition financing does not have a perfected security interest on the intended collateral, and the secured creditor may not be repaid in full as part of the debtors' bankruptcy. For general unsecured creditors, the secured creditor's error created a significant source of additional distributable value, potentially improving their recoveries on their prepetition claims.

On February 4, 2015, the secured party filed a petition with the Second Circuit seeking a rehearing en banc. We anticipate that it will take at least one month for the Second Circuit to rule on the secured party's rehearing request.


Bankruptcy Court

This matter dates back to the summer of 2009 when the official committee of unsecured creditors (the "Committee") in the Chapter 11 bankruptcy cases of General Motors Corporation et al. (collectively, "GM") commenced an adversary proceeding in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York against JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as agent ("JPM") and members of a term loan lending syndicate. The Committee sought a determination from the Bankruptcy Court that a lien securing a 2006 $1.5 billion syndicated term loan (the "Term Loan") to GM was not perfected as a matter law because the UCC-1 financing statement that perfected JPM's lien granted under the Term Loan had been properly terminated prior to the commencement of GM's bankruptcy cases.1

Prior to entering into the Term Loan, GM was also a party to a synthetic lease (the "Synthetic Lease"), and JPM was also the administrative agent for the Synthetic Lease and identified on the associated UCC-1s as the secured party of record.2 GM paid off the Synthetic Lease in 2008. Two law firms involved in the Term Loan and Synthetic Lease financing reviewed the results of a search of UCC-1 financing statements recorded against GM.3 The search results showed three UCC-1s filed against GM in Delaware, each with a unique filing number. A UCC-3 was prepared for each of the UCC-1s. However, only two of the UCC-1s related to the Synthetic Lease; the third UCC-1 related to the Term Loan (the "Unrelated UCC-3").4 The Unrelated UCC-3 was filed, together with the UCC-3s for the Synthetic Lease.

The goal of the Committee's adversary proceeding was to convert the Term Loan creditors' secured claim into an unsecured claim. If successful, the claims of the Term Loan creditors' would not be paid prior to the unsecured creditors with the proceeds of the Term Loan collateral. Rather, proceeds of the Term Loan collateral would be shared pari passu among the Term Loan creditors and the unsecured creditors, thereby significantly increasing the recoveries of the unsecured creditors.

The UCC, as amended in 2001, does not require the execution of a UCC-3 termination statement by the secured party; rather, the filing may be done without a signature by anyone, provided that the filing has been authorized by the secured party. If the requisite authorization is lacking, then the termination is ineffective.5 As noted by the Bankruptcy Court, three sections of Article 9 of the UCC are relevant to this dispute: (i) 9-509(d), which provides that a person is entitled to file an amendment to a financing statement if the secured party of record authorizes the filing; (ii) 9-510(a), which provides that a filed record is effective only to the extent that it is filed by a person who may file it under 9-509; and (iii) 9-513(d), which provides that, except as otherwise provided in section 9-510, upon the filing of a termination statement with the filing office, the financing statement to which the termination statement relates ceases to be effective.6

Two fundamental facts were undisputed: (i) neither counsel to GM or JPM nor their respective clients knew that the UCC-1 filing number shown on the Unrelated UCC-3 was actually the filing number for the UCC-1 for the Term Loan; and (ii) neither GM nor the lenders under the Term Loan ever intended to affect the UCC-1 filings for the Term Loan in any way. In short, the parties to the adversary proceeding did not dispute that the filing of the Unrelated UCC-3 was an error caused by the failure of JPM and its counsel to realize that the Unrelated UCC-3 related to the Term Loan. Notwithstanding the absence of intent to effect the lien securing the Term Loan, the Bankruptcy Court had to decide whether the UCC-1 perfecting JPM's lien in the Term Loan collateral ended with the filing of the Unrelated UCC-3.7 Since GM's counsel filed the Unrelated UCC-3, Judge Gerber's ruling centered on whether GM acted as JPM's authorized agent to complete the filing of the Unrelated UCC-3. JPM argued that the absence of its understanding that one of the UCC-3s to be filed in connection with the termination of the liens for the Synthetic Lease financing would also terminate the lien of the Term Loan meant that it did not give GM the authority to file the UCC-3. On the other hand, the Committee argued that JPM's subjective intent was not relevant to its grant of authority to GM, and therefore, the prepetition lien termination was authorized and valid.

The Honorable Robert E. Gerber, U.S.B.J., disagreed with the Committee and held that the Unrelated UCC-3 was ineffective because it was not authorized under the common law doctrines of actual authority, apparent authority, ratification or implied authority.

Actual Authority

"Actual authority exists when an agent has the power 'to do an act or to conduct a transaction on account of the principal which, with respect to the principal, he is privileged to do because of the principal's manifestation to him.'"8 The four documents considered by the Bankruptcy Court to determine the scope of authority given by JPM to GM were: (i) the Synthetic Lease Termination Agreement,9 (ii) the Synthetic Lease Closing Checklist, (iii) the Unrelated UCC-3, and (iv) the Synthetic Lease Escrow Agreement. The Bankruptcy Court found that, through the Synthetic Lease Termination Agreement, JPM authorized GM to file terminations of existing financing statements only with respect to the specific properties that were the subject of the Synthetic Lease.10 GM's counsel prepared the Synthetic Lease Closing Checklist – a six-page listing of several dozen documents to be executed in connection with the Synthetic Lease payoff. While JPM and its counsel reviewed the document, and even though the document included the unique filing number of the UCC-1 for the Term Loan, the Bankruptcy Court did not find that any element of the document provided authorization to file the Unrelated UCC-3, especially as the document made no mention of the Term Loan.11 With regards to the Unrelated UCC-3, the Bankruptcy Court found that, even though JPM's counsel reviewed and approved (or failed to object to) it, the Unrelated UCC-3 was not itself an authorization to terminate the Term Loan UCC-1 because it did not call for the signature of the secured party's principal or contain any sort of express granting clause.12 The Bankruptcy Court then found that, while the Synthetic Lease Escrow Agreement was an authorization to implement the letter's joint directions with respect to the Synthetic Lease, it did not give express instructions or authority to GM's counsel to do anything, including anything affecting the Term Loan.13 When considering these documents together with all of the relevant circumstances, Judge Gerber viewed this as nothing more than a "payoff of a real estate financing under which parties intended to bring the real estate financing liens to an end, without any intention to affect anything else."14

Judge Gerber also noted that he could not find the filing of the Unrelated UCC-3 to have been authorized under the doctrine of actual authority because GM did not have the requisite understanding. According to the Bankruptcy Court, "[a]n agent does not have actual authority to do an act if the agent does not reasonably believe that the principal has consented to its commission,"15 and this was affirmed by the evidence that no one at GM actually believed that it had been authorized to terminate JPM's financing statement with regards to the Term Loan.

To read this article in full, please click here.


*Geoffrey R. Peck is a Partner in the New York office of Morrison & Foerster LLP and Jordan A. Wishnew is an Of Counsel in the New York office of Morrison & Foerster LLP.

1. See Off. Comm. of Unsecured Creditors of Motors Liquidation Co. v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., et al. (In re Motors Liquidation Co.), 486 B.R. 596, 602-03 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2013).

2. See Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Motors Liquidation Company v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., et al. (In re Motors Liquidation Co.), 755 F.3d 78, 79 (2d Cir. 2014).

3. Id. at 80.

4. 486 B.R. at 603.

5. Id. at 617.

6. Id. at 618, notes 68-70.

7. Id. at 604.

8. Id. at 621, quoting Hidden Brook Air, Inc. v. Thabet Aviation Int'l, Inc., 241 F. Supp. 2d 246, 260 (S.D.N.Y. 2002) (citations omitted).

9. The Termination Agreement provided, in pertinent part, "[T]he Administrative Agent [JPMorgan] and the Lessor do hereby (x) release all of their Liens ...against the Properties created by the Operative Agreements [of the Synthetic Lease], (y) acknowledge that such Liens and Lessor Liens are forever released, satisfied and discharged and (x) [sic] authorize Lessee to file a termination of any existing Financing Statements relating to the Properties [of the Synthetic Lease]." 755 F.3d at 81.

10. Id. at 624.

11. Id. at 625.

12. Id. at 625-26.

13. Id. at 626-27.

14. Id. at 629.

15. Id. at 630.

Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP. All rights reserved

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions