United States: Claims Directed To Document Data Extraction Technology Not Patent Eligible Under § 101

In Content Extraction & Transmission LLC v. Wells Fargo Bank, National Ass'n, Nos. 13-1588, -1589, 14-1112, -1687 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 23, 2014), the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court's grant of a motion to dismiss under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), which found the asserted claims invalid as patent ineligible under 35 U.S.C. § 101.

Content Extraction and Transmission LLC ("CET") owns U.S. Patent Nos. 5,258,855 ("the '855 patent"); 5,369,508 ("the '508 patent"); 5,625,465 ("the '465 patent"); and 5,768,416 ("the '416 patent") (collectively "the asserted patents"). The claims generally claim methods of extracting data from hard copy documents using scanning technology, recognizing specific information from the extracted data, and storing the data in memory.

CET sued Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ("Wells Fargo") and The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. and PNC Bank, N.A. (collectively "PNC"), alleging infringement of the asserted patents by automated teller machines ("ATMs") with check deposit software. Diebold, Inc. ("Diebold"), the manufacturer of Wells Fargo's and PNC's ATMs, filed a separate action against CET, seeking DJ that CET's patents were invalid under § 101 and injunctive and monetary relief for tortious interference and violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act ("RICO"). CET counterclaimed against Diebold for direct and indirect infringement of its asserted patents.

PNC moved to dismiss for failure to state a claim under Rule 12(b)(6), arguing that all of the asserted claims are directed to patent-ineligible subject matter under § 101, focusing its arguments on claim 1 of the '855 patent and claim 1 of the '416 patent, which PNC contended were representative. The district court granted PNC's motion that all of the claims were invalid as patent ineligible under § 101 and dismissed the complaints against PNC and Wells Fargo. The district court also dismissed Diebold's RICO claims, finding that CET's acts were protected under the Noerr-Pennington doctrine. CET appealed and Diebold cross-appealed.

"CET's claims attempt to limit the abstract idea of recognizing and storing information from hard copy documents using a scanner and a computer to a particular technological environment. Such a limitation has been held insufficient to save a claim in this context." Slip op. at 9.

On appeal, the Federal Circuit first considered whether the asserted patents claim patent-ineligible subject matter. Applying the test set forth in Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International, 134 S. Ct. 2347 (2014), and Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc., 132 S. Ct. 1289 (2012), the Court determined that the claims of the asserted patents were generally directed to "the abstract idea of 1) collecting data, 2) recognizing certain data within the collected data set, and 3) storing that recognized data in a memory." Slip op. at 7. The Court explained that "[t]he concept of data collection, recognition, and storage is undisputedly well-known," and noted that "humans have always performed these functions." Id. The Court then rejected CET's argument that the claims were patent eligible because they required hardware to perform functions that humans cannot, such as processing and recognizing the stream of bits output by the scanner. Comparing the asserted claims to "the computer-implemented claims in Alice," the Court concluded that the claims were "drawn to the basic concept of data recognition and storage," even though they recited a scanner. Id. at 8.

Next, the Court considered whether the limitations of the asserted claims transformed the claims into patent-eligible applications of the abstract idea. The Court noted that CET conceded during oral argument that using a scanner to extract data from documents was well known at the time of the asserted patents' filing. As a result, the Court found that the claims "merely recite the use of this existing scanning and processing technology to recognize and store data from specific data fields such as amounts, addresses, and dates." Id. at 9. The Court stated that "[t]here is no 'inventive concept' in CET's use of a generic scanner and computer to perform well-understood, routine, and conventional activities commonly used in industry." Id. Rather, the Court explained that, "[a]t most, CET's claims attempt to limit the abstract idea of recognizing and storing information from hard copy documents using a scanner and a computer to a particular technological environment," which the Court held was "insufficient" to render the claims patent eligible. Id.

The Court next considered CET's argument that the district court's failure to individually consider all claims was inconsistent with the statutory presumption of validity. The Court rejected this argument, noting that the district court treated two claims as representative and found that all of the claims were substantially similar and linked to the same abstract idea. The Court stated that CET had failed to object to the district court's identification of the representative claims and failed to identify claims that CET believed were not fairly represented by the representative claims.

The Court also rejected CET's assertion that the district court erred by dismissing its complaint at the pleading stage without first construing the claims. The Court explained that "claim construction is not an inviolable prerequisite to a validity determination under § 101." Id. at 11. Although finding that claim construction was not required, the Court then determined that even if the claims were construed in a manner most favorable to CET, "none of CET's claims amount to 'significantly more' than the abstract idea of extracting and storing data from hard copy documents using generic scanning and processing technology." Id. Accordingly, the Court affirmed the district court's finding that the asserted claims were invalid under § 101.

Turning next to Diebold's cross-appeal, the Court also affirmed the district court's dismissal of Diebold's tortious interference and RICO claims, although it did so on different grounds. The Court considered the Noerr-Pennington doctrine, which presumptively shields petitioning the government from liability on First Amendment grounds against certain types of claims. Applying this doctrine, the Court then held that Diebold failed to demonstrate that CET's suits were objectively baseless, explaining that "the state of the law of § 101 was deeply uncertain at the time CET filed its complaints," and that the suits were protected under the Noerr-Pennington doctrine. Id. at 13-14.

Accordingly, the Court affirmed the district court's grant of PNC's motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) on the ground that the claims of CET's asserted patents are invalid as patent ineligible under § 101 and affirmed the district court's dismissal of Diebold's tortious interference and RICO claims.

Judges: Dyk, Taranto, Chen (author)

[Appealed from D.N.J., Judge Shipp]

This article previously appeared in Last Month at the Federal Circuit - January 2015

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Events from this Firm
14 Nov 2018, Workshop, London, UK

Finnegan partner Leythem Wall will consider European claim drafting strategy and lead the Chemical Workshop during a two-day course, hosted by Management Forum.

14 Nov 2018, Conference, Washington, DC, United States

Finnegan is a Silver sponsor of the sixth annual World Intellectual Property Forum, hosted by Intellectual Professionals LLP. Finnegan partner Clare Cornell will present “Trademarks v. Company Names” and partner Patrick Coyne will present “Current Issues in U.S. Patent Law and Reform: The Next Wave”

14 Nov 2018, Seminar, New York, United States

Finnegan partner Denise Main will present “Supreme Court’s Continuing Influence over Patent Jurisprudence and Other Recent Case Developments and Their Impact” during Practicing Law Institute’s Patent Litigation 2018: Advanced Techniques & Best Practices.

 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions