United States: Win Some, Lose Some: Assumption Of Risk Defense Fails For Sports Complex Owners; Claims Against Dome Seller Dismissed

A plaintiff bringing product liability and premises liability claims against multiple defendants in an effort to cover all bases often leads to different legal defenses among classes of co-defendants and a scattered offense by plaintiff's counsel and plaintiff's liability expert. A recent case out of New York's Appellate Division (Third Department), Dann v. Family Sports Complex, Inc.,1 dealt with this multiplicity of claims and defenses. The case serves as a reminder that even though product liability defendants cannot normally utilize an assumption of risk defense, there are still other – and often more potent – viable defenses in the sports context. The Appellate Division affirmed for the product seller on a stand-by defense: plaintiff's expert just didn't come up with a viable theory. The premises defendants were not as lucky, getting their summary judgment win overturned because of issues of fact surrounding their assumption of risk defense.

More than Turf Burn, but Who is to Blame?

The case involved a recreational league soccer match on one of multiple fields inside an inflatable dome. Plaintiff, an experienced recreational soccer player, slid after a ball headed out of bounds behind the goal line. He crashed into the wall of the dome, approximately 4-5 feet from the line and concealed by an inner vinyl liner. Because the inflated fabric walls were not cushioned he slid, knee first, into a concrete footer that anchored the dome walls. His knee cap shattered. 

Plaintiff brought suit in New York State Court against multiple parties, including the owner and operator of the dome (the "premises defendants") and the seller of the dome. The claims against the premises defendants included negligence and strict product liability claims; the claims against the seller were primarily in product liability, namely design defect. 

Plaintiff's main argument was that the negligent layout of the fields put the out-of-bounds lines too close to the concrete footer, dangerously concealed by the inner vinyl liner. As part of its multiple claims, plaintiff alleged the owner and operator of the dome were negligent in arranging the field in that negligent manner, and/or the seller of the dome was negligent or strictly liable on a design defect theory for designing the dome and fields in such a manner as to put the boundary lines too close to the dangerous concrete footers.

The lower court granted the premises defendants' motions for summary judgment, but the Appellate Division reversed and remanded, allowing the plaintiff's case to proceed against the owner and operator. The Court found that issues of fact remained as to whether or not plaintiff assumed the risk of injury when he slid after the ball. 

In general, voluntary participants in recreational or athletic activities are deemed to consent to "those commonly appreciated risks which are inherent in and arise out of the nature of the sport generally and flow from such participation."2 Participants do not, however, "assume 'concealed or unreasonably increased risks' or 'unique and ... dangerous condition[s] over and above the usual dangers that are inherent in the sport.'"3 While the risk of crashing into a wall while playing soccer is inherent in the activity, and proximity of the dome wall to the field was open and obvious, the Court noted that the vinyl liner hanging to the ground along the wall concealing the concrete footer may have served as a concealed, increased risk. 

The premises defendants argued that plaintiff should have noticed the concrete footer where it was exposed at other spots, or noticed how the ball bounced sharply off the liner, indicating its solid state. Plaintiff raised an issue of fact to these points, however. He testified he had never seen the concrete footer and thought the walls were cushioned in some way.  Thus, summary judgment for the premises defendants was overturned.

Victory for the Seller, but not on Assumption of Risk

On the other hand, the Court affirmed the dismissal all the product liability claims.4 The Court affirmed the dismissal of the sports dome seller, Yeadon Fabric Structures, because, quite simply, plaintiff failed to establish a defect case. Plaintiff's primary claim against the seller was basically the same as against the premises defendants – the fields were laid out in a defective manner.  However, the Court found no basis to hold the product seller responsible for the design. It appears that the seller did not provide any sort of guidelines as to how to lay out the fields within the dome or whether or not to provide padding at certain parts of the wall, and likewise the expert did not establish that industry standard required the seller to do so. Moreover, plaintiff's expert failed to provide credible support for this allegation. The expert relied on inapplicable standards (standards for outdoor fields for high school and collegiate soccer, not indoor recreational fields). The Court further ruled that the expert's theory that the layout of the fields constituted a "design defect" was conclusory and "unsupported by any analysis, explanation or citation to a relevant industry standard." 

Consider if the seller had been more involved with the end layout: would the seller have been able to rely on an assumption of risk defense? No. In New York, assumption of risk is not a viable defense to a product liability claim. As the Appellate Division has held before, "[t]o allow a defendant to escape its nondelegable duty to make a safe product by invoking the implied consent of the product user would undermine the policies underlying the doctrine of strict products liability."5 The focus of strict product liability is on the characteristics of the product, not on the conduct of the parties.  The concept weaves well into an assumption of risk mindset. When a player assumes the risk of injury, he or she is assuming appreciable, expected risks, not a hidden defect. The soccer player assumed the risk he would scrape up his leg while sliding across artificial turf, not that a vinyl cover on the nearby wall shrouded an uncushioned concrete wall. 

If under alternate, hypothetical facts, plaintiff's expert found (consistent with applicable industry standards) that a reasonable, safer alternative design employed by other sellers or manufacturers existed, then plaintiff's expert could have credibly opined that the dome itself was defective because, for example, the seller should have provided padding to be placed along the concrete footers. These hypothetical circumstances might have allowed plaintiff to defeat an assumption of risk defense raised by a manufacturer or seller.

A good example comes from a 2012 Supreme Court, Queens County case6 involving a swing set.  In that case, a child plaintiff jumping out of a swing lost the tips of two fingers when they became caught in the links of the swing. Plaintiff alleged the chain created a trap-like condition constituting a design defect. When the manufacturer of the swing tried to rely on an assumption of risk defense, the court did not allow it, and denied summary judgment. Plaintiff was helped there by evidence that the manufacturer offered a safer kind of swing chain but did not expressly offer it to the purchaser of the swing set at issue. Because the child could not have known the swing he was on contained a defect (or that safer swings existed), an assumption of risk defense could not apply.


Plaintiffs' attorneys often bring as many types of claims they can against all possible defendants, with the general thoughts of "the more, the better" and "one of the claims is bound to stick." In the personal injury context, this situation often results in product manufacturers, sellers, and landowners as co-defendants sorting through claims sounding in product liability, premises liability and various flavors of negligence. Defendants in those cases must recognize that they may not be able to use the same defenses – particularly assumption of risk – and their defenses may also at times end up at odds with each other.

In any sports or recreation case where defendants include both premises owners and operators and a product manufacturer or seller, all defenses should be considered because, presumably, plaintiff will have brought all imaginable claims. Even though a product seller or manufacturer may not be able to utilize an assumption of risk defense, it still is worth considering how all the arguments in the case will be shaped by assumption of risk factors and issues of fact related to them. When a defendant seller or manufacturer is strategizing in such a kitchen-sink, multi-defendant case, that seller or manufacturer should not lose focus of traditional product liability defenses even when the case sounds in premises liability. A plaintiff who is steered towards those issues of fact that typically apply to premises defendants may well end up losing focus – or enthusiasm – for more difficult and nuanced product liability claims.


1 Dann v. Family Sports Complex, Inc., et al. (2014 NY Slip Op 08525 (3d Dep't Dec. 4, 2014)).

2 Myers v. Friends of Shenendehowa Crew, Inc., 31 A.D.3d 853, 854 (2006).

3 Martin v. State of New York, 64 A.D.3d 62, 64 (2009), lv denied, 13 N.Y.3d 706 (2009) (quoting Morgan v. State of New York, 90 N.Y.2d 471, 485 (1997)).

4 The Court affirmed dismissal of product liability claims against the premises defendants because they were outside the manufacture, sale and distribution chain. 

5 Lamey v. Foley, 188 A.D.2d 157, 168 (4th Dep't 1993).

6 Faherty v. Birchwood Lodge, Inc., 2012 NY Slip Op 52031 (Sup. Ct. Queens Co. Oct. 24, 2012).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:
  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.
  • Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.
    If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here
    If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq you may opt out by clicking here

    Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

    Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

    Use of www.mondaq.com

    You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


    Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

    The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


    Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

    • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
    • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
    • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

    Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

    Information Collection and Use

    We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

    We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

    Mondaq News Alerts

    In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


    A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

    Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

    Log Files

    We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


    This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

    Surveys & Contests

    From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


    If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


    From time to time Mondaq may send you emails promoting Mondaq services including new services. You may opt out of receiving such emails by clicking below.

    *** If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of services offered by Mondaq you may opt out by clicking here .


    This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

    Correcting/Updating Personal Information

    If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

    Notification of Changes

    If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

    How to contact Mondaq

    You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

    If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.

    By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions