United States: Government Seeks Rehearing In Landmark Insider-Trading Case

The U.S. Government filed a petition seeking panel and en banc rehearing of the Second Circuit's December 2014 decision in United States v. Newman and Chiasson, ___ F.3d ___, 2014 WL 6911278 (2d Cir. Dec. 10, 2014).  That highly publicized decision – about which we blogged here – overturned insider-trading convictions of two remote tippees by (i) holding that a tippee must know that the insider tipper received a personal benefit for providing the tip and (ii) clarifying or narrowing (depending on one's interpretation) the definition of what constitutes an actionable personal benefit.

The Government's rehearing petition, filed on January 23, 2015, makes a relatively surgical strike at the panel's decision.  Although the Government disagreed at trial and on appeal with the defendants' contention that a tippee must know that the insider tipper received a personal benefit, the Government chose not to seek rehearing of the panel's holding that such knowledge is required and that the trial court had therefore erred in not including that element in its jury instructions.  Instead, the rehearing petition focuses primarily on what the Government contends was an erroneous restriction of the nature of that personal benefit.  The Government also argues that the panel erred by vacating the defendants' convictions and remanding for dismissal of the indictments, instead of remanding for a new trial under different jury instructions.

The Government's Argument About Personal Benefit

The Newman decision held that a corporate insider entrusted with a fiduciary duty does not breach that duty by disclosing confidential information to a tippee unless he or she does so "in exchange for a personal benefit."  The court ruled that such a personal benefit does not exist unless the disclosure was for a pecuniary gain or was part of "a meaningfully close personal relationship that generates an exchange that is objective, consequential, and represents at least a potential gain of a pecuniary or similarly valuable nature. . . .  [T]his requires evidence of 'a relationship between the insider and the recipient that suggests a quid pro quo from the latter, or an intention to benefit the [latter].'"

The rehearing petition argues that this "'exchange'-based, pecuniary limitation on what constitutes a personal benefit" is inconsistent with the Supreme Court's decision in Dirks v. SEC, 463 U.S. 646 (1983), and conflicts with decisions of other Circuit Courts.  The Supreme Court held in Dirks that the insider's requisite personal benefit may be "direct or indirect" and may involve "a relationship between the insider and the recipient that suggests a quid pro quo from the latter, or an intention to benefit the particular recipient" – or "a gift of confidential information to a trading relative or friend."  This holding, the Government contends, demonstrates the error of the Second Circuit's ruling that the Government may not "prove the receipt of a personal benefit by the mere fact of a friendship, particularly of a casual or social nature."

The Government also cites the Seventh Circuit's ruling in SEC v. Maio, 51 F.3d 623, 632 (7th  Cir. 1995), that, "[a]bsent some legitimate reason for [an insider's] disclosure . . . the inference that [the] disclosure was an improper gift of confidential corporate information is unassailable.  After all, [the insider] did not have to make any disclosure, so why tell [the tippee] anything?"  In addition, the Government cites the First Circuit's statement that "the mere giving of a gift to a relative or friend is a sufficient personal benefit."  SEC v. Rocklage 470 F.3d 1, 7 n.4 (1st Cir. 2006).

The Government then takes issue with the factual record that the panel's decision cited concerning the relationships between the insiders and the initial tippees – relationships that the Government contends were close enough to support the inference that the insiders had received personal benefits and had intended to benefit the initial tippees.  And the Government argues that the evidence was sufficient to show that the defendant remote tippees had known about those personal benefits, so the panel should have remanded for a new trial under what it considered to be correct jury instructions.

What's Next?

The fate of the Government's rehearing petition is uncertain, but such petitions are always long shots.  The Second Circuit has held only one en banc rehearing since 2012.  While panel rehearings might be more frequent, they are hardly routine – especially where, as here, the panel was unanimous.  If the court denies the rehearing petition, the Government could seek a writ of certiorari from the Supreme Court – another long shot, especially in the absence of either a constitutional issue or, perhaps, a direct conflict among the Circuit Courts (although the Government has tried to show that such a conflict exists on the personal-benefit issue).

The rehearing petition notably does not mention the Government's recent argument that Newman's holdings on personal benefit apply only in classical-theory insider-trading cases (where the tip comes from a corporate insider and the duty at issue is to the corporation's shareholders), but not in misappropriation-theory cases (where the tip can come from a corporate outsider and the duty at issue is to the initial source of the information).  The Government advanced that argument in United States v. Conradt, but a judge in the Southern District of New York rejected it on January 22 (the day before the Government filed its rehearing petition in Newman), holding that the elements of tipper and tippee liability are the same in classical and in misappropriation cases.  (See our blog post here.)  The rehearing petition mentions the Government's loss in Conradt, but does not suggest that the Second Circuit should clarify whether Newman applies only to classical-theory cases or whether it applies to all insider-trading cases.  The Government seems to have decided to leave that issue for another day – perhaps in light of the long odds of obtaining a grant of rehearing.

Government Seeks Rehearing In Landmark Insider-Trading Case

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions