United States: Skilled Nursing Facilities: Steps For Reducing FCA Liability

Several government agencies have voiced concerns related to the level of therapy services necessary to care for residents of Skilled Nursing Facilities (SNFs).  The level of therapy services indicated for SNF residents affects the resource utilization groups (RUGs), which in turn determine the reimbursement that SNFs receive under Medicare Part A for providing care to residents.  The more acute a resident's physical therapy needs are, and the more therapy minutes are provided in assessment periods to determine RUG rates, the higher the resident's RUG rate and the higher the SNF's reimbursement will be.

Both the Office of Inspector General (OIG) and the U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) have expressed skepticism with regard to the accuracy of assessments that result in the higher levels of coding, and the U.S. Department of Justice recently extracted a $10 million settlement payment from a SNF chain related to the issue as part of a $38 million total settlement payment—the largest ever paid by a SNF to resolve alleged False Claims Act (FCA) violations.

OIG and CMS Concerns

Both the OIG and CMS have expressed skepticism regarding the proportion of residents needing higher levels of (and thus more expensive) therapy.  The recently released OIG 2015 Work Plan notes that Medicare Part A billing remains a topic of interest and that the OIG intends to explore therapy utilization trends.  As in the 2014 Work Plan, the OIG has indicated that its prior work reflected that SNFs "increasingly billed for the highest level of therapy even though beneficiary characteristics remained unchanged."

CMS, in comments to the FY 2015 SNF prospective payment system (PPS) Rule—in both Proposed and Final forms—echoed these concerns.  In the Proposed Rule, CMS noted that the percentage of SNF residents classified into Ultra-High Rehabilitation groups has increased "rather steadily."  CMS also observed that many patients are receiving the minimum minutes of therapy to qualify for a given RUG.  In the Proposed Rule, CMS stated that it would continue to follow and analyze these trends and requested comments regarding such "observations."

In the Final Rule, CMS observed that "given the comments highlighting the lack of medical evidence related to the appropriate amount of therapy in a given situation, it is all the more concerning that practice patterns would appear to be as homogenized as the data would suggest."  CMS also noted that it found certain commenters' explanations for the therapy trends "troubling and entirely inconsistent with the intended use of the SNF benefit."  For example, CMS cited a commenter who noted that the minimum minutes for a RUG level are often perceived as maximum minutes and that some providers might implement internal rules that prohibit clinicians from providing therapy above RUG level minimums contrary to their professional medical judgment.  "Specifically, the minimum therapy minute thresholds for each therapy RUG category are certainly not intended as ceilings or targets for therapy provision.

In a separate discussion in the Final Rule, CMS stated that it is currently working with contractors to "identify potential alternatives to the existing methodology used to pay for therapy services received under the SNF PPS," but such research, and the potential subsequent implementation of a new payment model, has no set timeframe.

The OIG and CMS sentiments parallel increased scrutiny of SNF therapy services and billings by federal prosecutors.  Two recent False Claims Act (FCA) cases—one of them ongoing—illustrate the issues SNF operators should evaluate to reduce regulatory and enforcement risks.  Both cases were originally filed not by federal prosecutors, but by "relators," i.e., private citizens whom the FCA allows to sue on the U.S. government's behalf to seek appropriate remedies for FCA violations, including money damages.

The Ongoing Life Care Centers of America Case

In 2008, Relator Glenda Martin filed an 11-page FCA Complaint against Life Care Centers of America (LCCA) based on her alleged observations when working at LCCA SNFs in Tennessee and North Carolina.  She alleged that LCCA, which operates about 200 SNFs, violated the FCA by submitting false claims for payment whereby LCCA staff would examine residents and propose care plans, which physicians approved "without any detailed examination of the patient," and which focused "sole[ly]" on "increas[ing] payment."  She alleged that SNFs falsely documented the care that they provided, and provided therapy care even when residents did not or could not benefit from the therapy.

In 2012, after deciding to intervene in the case, federal prosecutors filed a 48-page Complaint.  It included in two separate counts the same FCA claims (alleging submission of false claims and making and/or using false statements for the purpose of causing the government to pay false claims) and added claims for unjust enrichment, payment by mistake and conversion.

About 15 pages of the government's Complaint outlined LCCA efforts to set "targets" for high RUG levels "with little regard to the individualized needs of Medicare patients," to "push" facilities to achieve those targets, and to "award" and "recognize" facilities and managers who achieved those targets (although such recognition, according to the Complaint, was symbolic and not financial).

The Complaint characterized these efforts as "corporate pressure" that allegedly caused LCCA to engage in the following behaviors, among others: 

  • Providing unneeded care or unnecessarily extending resident stays to continue to provide therapy that residents allegedly did not need
  • Billing for care that was not actually provided
  • Billing for therapy care that was not "skilled"
  • Providing care to residents who could not tolerate the care, could not benefit from it or both
  • "Ramping up" care provided during assessment periods, which would then allow for higher RUG rates and higher reimbursement following those assessment periods, regardless of the minutes actually provided after the assessment periods 

LCCA is contesting these allegations, and is actively litigating the case.

The Extendicare Case and Settlement

In 2010, Relator Tracy Lovvorn filed an FCA Complaint against Extendicare in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.  The Complaint named as defendants both the real estate investment trust that operates more than 140 Extendicare SNFs in the United States and the Extendicare division that provides physical therapy services at those facilities.

Lovvorn had been a rehabilitation director at Extendicare facilities in Pennsylvania and Delaware, and alleged that the defendants violated the FCA by submitting false claims for payment, making and/or using false statements for the purpose of causing the government to pay false claims, and retaining payments on false claims rather than refunding them to the government.  She alleged that the false claims were for therapy services the government paid at the highest RUG rates because Extendicare engaged in a range of fraudulent conduct, including the following:

  • "Clustering" therapy sessions ordered for three times a week around weekends.  Such clustering inaccurately implied that residents were receiving treatment five times a week, which the government reimburses at a higher rate.
  • "Ramping up" therapy minutes during assessment periods to meet higher RUG levels, without intending to sustain those therapy minutes after assessment periods.  Lovvorn alleged that Extendicare then knowingly "ramped down" therapy minutes between assessment periods resulting in a "suspension bridge" pattern of some residents' therapy minutes over time.  The Lovvorn Complaint quoted from Extendicare business records encouraging "ramping up" and "ramping down."  The records also described examples of residents who received increased therapy minutes, allegedly to meet higher RUG levels, but who poorly tolerated the therapy.

Another relator—a former Extendicare resident, Donald E. Gallick—along with his son filed a second Complaint against Extendicare in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio in February 2013.  They limited their FCA allegations to only the relator's own care, which Gallick contended included therapy services he did not need as well as prolonged placement at a rehabilitation facility when he was capable of living independently.

In resolving both relators' allegations and federal prosecutors' investigation of Extendicare, Extendicare agreed to pay $38 million to settle those allegations and end the investigation, and also agreed to enter a five-year, company-wide Corporate Integrity Agreement.

Takeaways

The government's leverage under the FCA arises in part from its remedy provisions: civil penalties ranging from $5,500 to $11,000 for each proven act violating the FCA and treble damages that the government proves that it has sustained.  Those damages are calculated as the difference in the amount the government paid because of the fraud and the amount the government proves it would have paid in the absence of fraud—times three.  As a result, SNFs have significant incentives to reduce FCA liability.

Federal regulations set forth both Medicare conditions of participation and conditions of payment, which should guide SNFs' operations.  The Extendicare and LCCA cases, however, illustrate the government's view of proper SNF conduct.  Although LCCA is contesting the government's claims and Extendicare admitted no wrongdoing, given prosecutors' apparent expectations expressed in both cases, it is recommended that SNFs take the following steps:

Structure SNF operational policies and procedures to ensure that care conforms to clinically appropriate decision-making. 

It is critical that an operator's corporate culture (as well as its written communications and medical documentation) reflect that patient care is a priority, and that the operator's job is to deliver quality, compliant care consistent with clinicians' judgment.  SNF operators can advance toward this goal by ensuring that they broadcast and promote effective Codes of Conduct; that executive, manager and staff evaluations account for performance in delivering quality, compliant care and positive resident outcomes; and that the ongoing training and management of therapy staff accounts for patient prognoses, implementation of valid care plans and tolerance for therapy as much as efficiency.

Invest in self-assessment.

Most SNFs already have compliance programs.  It is advisable to revisit compliance programs regularly to ensure that they foster a compliant culture and include mechanisms for auditing and monitoring relevant issues.  Continued self-imposed discipline in this area will benefit SNFs in the long run. 

Conduct tailored audits concerning therapy services, specifically.

The OIG's recent guidance emphasizes that it will analyze "trends"—namely, statistics concerning SNFs' populations of high RUG residents, the number of minutes provided over both assessment and non-assessment periods, the relation of therapy minutes between those two periods and the effectiveness of such therapy in improving patient outcomes.

This guidance provides a potential blueprint for self-assessment that the OIG and prosecutors may expect to see SNFs adopt, and could inform enforcement decisions.  Regardless, conducting such assessments also could enable SNFs to understand whether they are adequately responding to potential instances of concern, and whether they are adequately documenting therapy utilization goals correlating to (for example) a high-acuity resident population, and documenting valid clinical reasons for material deviations in residents' therapy minutes over time.

Conduct multifactorial audits.

Regulators and law enforcement are increasingly focusing on therapy services.  Yet federal investigations of SNFs often require the production and analysis of resident charts, which reflect all SNF services.  This fact only highlights the need for SNF operators to be vigilant concerning the entire scope of their operations and compliance with all federal regulations.

For instance, the Lovvorn and Gallick Complaints focused almost exclusively on FCA allegations concerning therapy services.  Yet in the Extendicare settlement agreement, the government's first allegation was not about therapy services.  Instead, the government alleged that Extendicare had provided "materially substandard and/or worthless skilled nursing services" at 33 of its facilities.  The therapy issues received second billing in the settlement agreement.

The Extendicare settlement expressly noted that it comprised "disputed claims," and the defendants thus admitted no wrongdoing.  The settlement agreement nevertheless included statements in which the government contended that Extendicare employed insufficient nursing staff, deviated from applicable protocols concerning pressure ulcers and falls, and erroneously administered resident medications.  In addition, the settlement described the larger ($28 million) part of Extendicare's total settlement payment ($38 million) as corresponding to these issues.  The remaining $10 million corresponded to the therapy services allegations that the Lovvorn Complaint described.

Given the financial scope and potential reputational harms of so-called worthless services claims, SNFs should monitor all aspects of their operations, not merely the therapy services that may initiate regulators' interest in a SNF's operations.

Skilled Nursing Facilities: Steps For Reducing FCA Liability

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions