United States: Trending In 3rd Circ.: Motions To Strike Class Allegations

Judicial trends can be tough to spot, but more motions to strike class allegations are being filed of late and federal courts do seem more receptive to the motions. To be sure, courts remain cautious about striking class allegations for the same reason that they are cautious about dismissing a complaint under Rule 12(b)(6). However, motions to strike class allegations can provide an early and cost-effective means of avoiding class treatment, and in clear cases, they can be economical for courts as well as for the parties. The increased use of motions to strike arguably is in lock-step with Wal-Mart Stores Inc. v. Dukes, 131 S. Ct. 2541, 2550 (2011) and Comcast Corp. v. Behrend, 133 S. Ct. 1426, 1432 (2013), which remind us that class actions are "an exception to the usual rule that litigation is conducted by and on behalf of the individual named parties only." Id., quoting Califano v. Yamasaki, 442 U.S. 682, 700-701 (1979).

Motions to strike class allegations generally are analyzed under Rule 12(f), which authorizes striking from pleadings any "redundant, immaterial, impertinent, or scandalous matter." While analyzing the class allegations under Rule 12(b)(6) has some appeal, see Bessette v. AVCO Fin. Servs Inc., 279 B.R. 442, 450 (D.R.I. 2002), the analogous motion to strike defenses in an answer is governed by Rule 12(f). Dann v. Lincoln Nat'l Corp., 274 F.R.D. 139, 142-43 (E.D. Pa. 2011). Some courts prefer the vehicle of Rule 12(f), which authorizes the striking of allegations rather than the dismissal of claims and, unlike Rule 12(b)(6), arguably allows for a record beyond the pleadings. See Royal Mile Co. Inc., v. UPMC, No. 10-609, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16224, at *60-65 (W.D. Pa. Aug. 21, 2014).

Motions to strike class allegations are viewed through the prism of Rule 23, and Rule 23(c)(1)(A) calls for a certification determination at "an early practicable time after a person sues." An order striking class allegations is equivalent to the denial of a motion for class certification. Royal Mile, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 116224, *62. Accordingly, most courts concur that the named plaintiff has the burden of showing the propriety of the class allegations on the motion. Semenko v. Wendy's Int'l Inc., No 12-CV-0836, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 52582 at *6 (W.D. Pa. Apr. 12, 2013); but see In re Paulsboro Derailment Cases, No. 13-784, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48209, at *13 (D.N.J. Apr. 8, 2014) (suggesting that defendants have the burden before the close of discovery). Courts will strike class allegations only where no amount of discovery could resolve the class deficiencies, as it is presumed that discovery is needed for the "rigorous analysis" required for class certification. In re Paulsboro Derailment Cases, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48209, at *15-16.

The watershed in the Third Circuit was Landsman & Funk PC v. Skinder-Strauss Assoc., 640 F.3d 72 (3d Cir. 2011). Prior to Landsman, district courts routinely — although not exclusively — declined to strike class allegations as premature because of the similarity between motions to strike and class certification issues. Korman v. Walking Co., 503 F. Supp. 2d 755, 762 (E.D. Pa. 2007). Landsman by no means advocated the widespread use of motions to strike class allegations, and criticized as "conclusory" and "premature" a district court's early analysis on a "request for class certification." 640 F.3d at 93. The Third Circuit, however, acknowledged in Landsman that the early striking of class allegations was appropriate in "the rare few [cases] where the complaint itself demonstrates that the requirements for maintaining a class action cannot be met." 640 F.3d at 93 n.30. See also General Telephone Co. v. Falcon, 457 U.S. 147, 160 (1982) (the class issues can be "plain enough" from the pleadings).

After Landsman, district courts in the Third Circuit remain cautious about striking class allegations. See, e.g., P.V. v. School District of Philadelphia, No. 11-CV-04027, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 125370, at *12 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 31, 2011)(reviewing case law suggesting that motions to strike are premature and noting that "unless the parties have completed discovery and at least one party has moved for class certification, a court very rarely has the information necessary to conduct the 'rigorous analysis' inherent in the class certification decision."); McPeak v. S-L Distribution Co. Inc., No. 12-348, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 123728 (D.N.J. Sept. 5, 2014); Humphreys v. Budget Rent a Car System Inc., No. 10-CV-1302, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 55438 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 22, 2014).

On the other hand, a number of courts in the Third Circuit have viewed favorably motions to strike class allegations. By way of example, in Semenko v. Wendy's In'l Inc., No. 12-CV-0836, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 52582, at *7 (W.D. Pa. Apr. 12, 2013), the court stated that class treatment should be determined as soon as practicable under Rule 23(c)(1). It relied on Bearden v. Honeywell Int'l Inc., 720 F. Supp. 2d 932, 942 (M.D. Tenn. 2010) to treat the motion to strike as if it were a motion to deny class certification. The Semenko court analyzed the requirements of Rules 23(a) and 23(b)(2),(3) and concluded that the broad putative class of all employees with disabilities denied accommodation under the Americans with Disabilities Act facially was inappropriate for class treatment because of the individual issues of whether the class members were qualified, whether they reasonably could be accommodated, as well as individualized defenses. See also Trunzo v. Citi Mortgage, No. 11-CV-01124, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 43056 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 31, 2014)(striking class allegations as to defendant Citi Mortgage for Pennsylvania Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law claim); Berk v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., No. 11-2715, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 109626 (E.D. Pa. Sept. 23, 2011); Royal Mile, U.S. Dist. LEXIS 116224 (noting the inability to assert certain class claims but allowing amendment of the complaint). See also Smith v. Merial Ltd., No. 10-439, U.S. Dist. LEXIS 78220 at *15 (D.N.J. June 5, 2012)(allowing additional briefing, but voicing "serious concerns that plaintiffs can ever meet the certification requirements of R. 23(b)".).

A successful motion to strike class allegations can avoid the expense attendant with class actions, including costly discovery. Even when unsuccessful, however, addressing perceived class deficiencies (and the responses to the perceived deficiencies) educates both the court and the parties early in the litigation. This can prevent wasteful blind alleys. Rather than simply pronouncing the motion to strike to be premature, a court can provide guidance on issues that need factual development and problems that are unlikely to resolve. The non-movant can be asked to delineate the specific discovery needed for class certification, as with a Rule 56(f) affidavit, to streamline and focus the issues.

The Paulsboro Derailment cases show how motions to strike can inform a class proceeding. The litigation arose out of a train derailment on a bridge over the Mantua River, resulting in the alleged release of vinyl chloride and an evacuation order. The defendant established a community assistance center to reimburse expenses for area residents. In addition to other litigation, a class action was promptly commenced. At issue in the motion to strike was the second amended complaint, which defined the plaintiff class into subclasses living and/or having a business in Gloucester County, New Jersey with unreimbursed nonmedical, income or business losses. In In re Paulsboro Derailment Cases, No. 13-CV-784, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48209 (D.N.J. Apr. 8, 2014), the court declined to strike class allegations based on ascertainability because the alleged residence and shelter in place zones, and residence and business boundaries, in Gloucester County could be established through discovery. The court predicted that the income and business losses required minimal actual fact finding. It also declined the challenge to numerosity, ruling that separate suits or joinder may be unwarranted if the putative class members' losses were minimal.

By the time of the class certification motion, the subclasses had shrunk significantly. While originally defined to include damaged residents and businesses in "Gloucester County" (total pop. 290,265), by the time of class certification, the subclasses had been whittled down to damaged residents and businesses in the town of Paulsboro (total pop. 6,023). In re Paulsboro Derailment Cases, No. 13-784, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 115542 (D.N.J. Aug. 20, 2014). The developed factual record presented for class certification did not change the court's conclusion that the smaller subclasses of residents with unreimbursed nonmedical expenses and income loss were ascertainable, but it found that the business loss subclass was not ascertainable. The court's numerosity decision, however, was affected by the discovery and the reduced size of the subclasses. Although 680 Paulsboro residents were implicated, defendants had settled with 486 evacuees and 45 had commenced their own individual lawsuits. The plaintiff had not provided evidence of the size of the balance of the subclasses. The court also found a lack of commonality in the business loss subclass. Ultimately class certification was denied.

Early motions to strike class allegations seem to be filed with greater frequency, and district courts seem willing to address such motions in appropriate cases. Handled properly, a motion to strike can help the litigants navigate through discovery and the merits, even if the motion itself is unsuccessful.

Previously published in Law360, New York (December 22, 2014, 11:24 AM ET)

Charlotte Thomas is a partner with Duane Morris in Philadelphia specializing in complex business litigation.

Disclaimer: This Alert has been prepared and published for informational purposes only and is not offered, nor should be construed, as legal advice. For more information, please see the firm's full disclaimer.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:
  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.
  • Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.
    If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here
    If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq you may opt out by clicking here

    Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

    Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

    Use of www.mondaq.com

    You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


    Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

    The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


    Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

    • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
    • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
    • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

    Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

    Information Collection and Use

    We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

    We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

    Mondaq News Alerts

    In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


    A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

    Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

    Log Files

    We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


    This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

    Surveys & Contests

    From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


    If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


    From time to time Mondaq may send you emails promoting Mondaq services including new services. You may opt out of receiving such emails by clicking below.

    *** If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of services offered by Mondaq you may opt out by clicking here .


    This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

    Correcting/Updating Personal Information

    If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

    Notification of Changes

    If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

    How to contact Mondaq

    You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

    If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.

    By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions