United States: Sixth Circuit Clarifies Standard For Pleading "Collective Knowledge" Scienter In Securities Fraud Cases

A recently issued decision from the Sixth Circuit adopts a modified "collective knowledge" theory for determining corporate scienter and clarifies the standard for pleading corporate scienter in a securities fraud action. The decision pares back the Circuit's more expansive position in an earlier decision that permitted knowledge of all of the corporation's officers and employees to be imputed to the corporation. The decision also highlights for senior executives of public corporations the importance of internal review and oversight of public statements.

The On October 10, 2014, in Ansfield v. Omnicare, Inc., No. 13-5597 ("Omnicare"), a three-judge panel for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit clarified the standard in securities fraud suits for alleging the necessary element of "scienter," or the mental state embracing intent to deceive, manipulate or defraud, with respect to corporate defendants. In Omnicare, the plaintiffs alleged that a corporation and several corporate officers, employees and agents had committed securities fraud by making various material misrepresentations and omissions in public and in SEC filings regarding the corporation's compliance with Medicare and Medicaid regulations. In several years of the corporation's SEC filings, the corporation had stated that it believed it was complying in all material respects with federal, state and local law, and further that its billing practices materially complied with applicable state and federal requirements. However, plaintiffs alleged that the corporation had conducted three internal audits that showed that the corporation's billing and records practices were not in compliance with Medicare and Medicaid regulations, rendering those statements fraudulent.

The panel noted that a securities fraud suit must plead facts to show the following six elements: (1) a material misrepresentation or omission by the defendant, (2) scienter, (3) a connection between the misrepresentation or omission and the purchase or sale of a security, (4) reliance upon the misrepresentation or omission, (5) economic loss and (6) loss causation. The panel ruled that there are different standards for a misrepresentation that concerns "hard information" than for one concerning "soft information." A misrepresentation regarding historical or factual and objectively verifiable information (hard information) is actionable if a plaintiff pleads facts to show the statement was objectively false and the defendant acted with at least recklessness. However, a misrepresentation concerning soft information, such as predictions or opinions, is actionable only if the plaintiff pleads facts to show that the statement was made with knowledge that the statement was false and for the purpose of deceiving, manipulating or defrauding the public.

While the panel found that the Omnicare plaintiffs were able to plead facts adequately showing the first element, it nevertheless held that the Omnicare plaintiffs were unable to meet the heightened particularity standard for pleading scienter for any of the named corporate officers, employees and agents (or, ultimately, the corporation itself). Allegations against the individual defendants "on information and belief" that such individuals had received the results of the audits at issue were not sufficiently particular. Likewise, alleging only generally that the audits that were conducted "revealed fraud and compliance issues," and that a compliance officer raised "compliance related concerns" to the attention of corporate executives and officers, did not meet plaintiffs' heightened pleading standard of alleging with particularity "that Person A did Act B at Time C." Slip op. at 33.

After examining the allegations against the individual defendants, the Omnicare panel then analyzed the standard for pleading scienter as it relates to a corporate defendant. It noted that the heightened standard for pleading scienter in securities fraud cases can be even more complicated when considering a defendant that is itself a corporation "because there is the additional question of whose knowledge and state of mind matters." Slip op. at 20. The panel first surveyed the predominant views on corporate scienter in securities fraud cases in its sister circuits. It noted that the Fifth and Eleventh Circuits had adopted a narrow view of corporate scienter, in keeping with common law fraud principles, by allowing scienter to be imputed to a corporation only upon examining the state of mind of specific individual corporate officials who make, issue, furnish information for or approve false or misleading statements. In contrast, the Second, Sixth, Seventh and Ninth Circuits had all held to varying degrees that some form of collective knowledge may be imputed to a corporate defendant for purposes of finding scienter. In other words, under a broader collective view of corporate scienter, knowledge of a corporate officer, agent or employee may be imputed to a corporation even though that officer, agent or employee did not actually make or approve the false or misleading statement at issue.

In Omnicare, the Sixth Circuit panel noted that neither approach, at least when taken to its logical extreme, would be ideal. In its attempt to find middle ground, the panel scaled back on the dicta contained in its prior scienter ruling, in which it had stated that "knowledge of a corporate officer or agent acting within the scope of [his] authority is attributable to a corporation." Slip op. at 23 (quoting City of Monroe Emps. Ret. Sys. v. Bridgestone Corp., 399 F.3d 651, 688 (6th Cir. 2005)). The panel noted that reading that decision too broadly could expose corporations to liability beyond Congress's intent, and that a statement made by a low-level employee, perhaps even in a different country, could needlessly cause a corporation to face liability. Determining that such a result runs contrary to Congress's heightened pleading standard for scienter in securities fraud cases, the Sixth Circuit panel adopted the following test:

The state(s) of mind of any of the following are probative for purposes of determining whether a misrepresentation made by a corporation was made by it with the requisite scienter under Section 10(b):...

(a) The individual agent who uttered or issued the misrepresentation;

(b) Any individual agent who authorized, requested, commanded, furnished information for, prepared (including suggesting or contributing language for inclusion therein or omission therefrom), reviewed, or approved the statement in which the misrepresentation was made before its utterance or issuance; or

(c) Any high managerial agent or member of the board of directors who ratified, recklessly disregarded, or tolerated the misrepresentation after its utterance or issuance. Slip op. at 24.

Satisfied that the above test mitigated some of the Sixth Circuit's earlier statements as to imputing the knowledge of agents at all levels to corporate defendants, the Sixth Circuit panel further stated that the above test "largely prevents corporations from evading liability through tacit encouragement and willful ignorance" (a potential issue with the Fifth and Eleventh Circuits' more narrow tests), and would further not provide corporate insulation "if lower-level employees, contributing to the misstatement, knowingly provide false information to their superiors with the intent to defraud the public. As a result, corporations that willfully permit or encourage the shielding of bad news from management will potentially be liable." Slip op. at 25.

Although the Sixth Circuit panel agreed with plaintiffs that the corporation's public statements and omissions were both material and false or misleading, the panel still held that the plaintiffs had failed to plead adequately and with particularity facts sufficient to show scienter, both as to the individual defendants and the corporation itself, and affirmed the lower court's dismissal of the plaintiffs' claims.

While the Sixth Circuit panel explicitly adopted its formulation of a modified "collective knowledge" theory for determining corporate scienter in securities fraud cases, it remains to be seen whether any other circuit will endorse it or whether the Supreme Court will ultimately weigh in to resolve the split among the circuits.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions