United States: Assumption Of Risk On The Field Of Play – A 2014 New York Roundup

Assumption of Risk is a simple doctrine. If you head down the ski slope, you assume the risk that you will wipe out – or that another skier will lose control and smack into you. If you play baseball, you assume the risk that you will get hit by a pitch or skin your knee sliding into second.

Despite its simple premise, the doctrine has subtle nuances. The slightest factual distinction can turn a sure plaintiff's win into a defense victory. In 2014, New York courts have ruled for both sides: While some courts give plaintiffs the benefit of the doubt, others show no patience for a plaintiff's complaints of bruises from the field of play.

What is Assumption of Risk?

As a general rule, a plaintiff who voluntarily participates in a sporting or recreational event is considered to have consented to those commonly-appreciated risks that are inherent in, and arise from, participating in the sport.1 This includes injury-causing events, which are the known, apparent, or reasonably foreseeable risks of participation.2

The "voluntary" nature of the participation is plaintiff-specific, assessed by the individual's skill and experience. Thus if the risks are known by the plaintiff, or should have been known by a plaintiff with like skill and experience, plaintiff has consented to them. Likewise, if the risks are perfectly obvious, the plaintiff will be presumed to have been aware of them – getting hit by a batted ball or tripping over a track hurdle, for example. The duty of care of the defendant, in particular a landowner or event operator, is thus qualified by the plaintiff's assumed risks. Yet the defendant always has a duty to protect even a risk-taking plaintiff from injuries arising out of unassumed, concealed, or unreasonably increased risks3 – for instance, dangerously-positioned or missing mats at a gymnastics facility.

In 2014, New York courts have primarily examined two main areas involving sports-related assumption of risk: (1) dangers on the field itself; and (2) the "experienced" plaintiff.

Dangers on the Field Itself

Four recent cases provide good examples of dangers arising from the field of play itself. Two resulted in the Appellate Division affirming for the defendant on summary judgment. In Perez v. N.Y.C. Dep't of Education4(Second Department), a 17-year-old boy attempting to stifle a fast-break layup on an indoor basketball court jumped into an entrance door of the gymnasium and thrust his arm through a pane of glass on the door. Plaintiff unsuccessfully argued that the door was too close to the court, but the appellate court held that the danger was not hidden or even unreasonable – plaintiff knew or should have known that the court was tight, but he chose to play there anyway and assumed the risk.

Similarly, plaintiff in Latimer v. City of N.Y.5(First Department) tripped over the raised, cracked, and uneven edge of the concrete sidewalk adjacent to the blacktop where he chose to play catch with a football. While the unkempt playing surface may seem like an actionable defect, the appellate court disagreed. By engaging in even a casual game of catch, the court determined plaintiff consents to commonly appreciable risks, including risks associated with the construction of the playing surface, even where that construction is "less than optimal."

This same reasoning applied to a sledding hill in Bakkensen v. City of NY6(Supreme Court New York County). Plaintiff, careening down the hill in some after-dark sledding, headed toward a tree surrounded by fencing and injured her leg on protruding metal on the fencing. The New York County jury found plaintiff assumed the risk of sledding, and the court agreed. An experienced sledder assumes risks like "terrain, weather conditions, ice, natural and man-made objects that are incidental" to the sledding hill. A tree wrapped in fencing is one of these risks plaintiff assumed when she took off down the hill, absent any evidence that the fencing was defective.

In some cases, however, courts have rejected the defense argument that the plaintiff accepted the risk of injury from a dangerous field by participating in the activity. In Agosto v. City of New Rochelle7, decided by the Second Department, a sandy condition on an asphalt parking lot where camp activities took place was considered too dangerous to put the risk of injury on the plaintiff. Additionally, the minor plaintiff was playing the touch football game with adult counselors. The court found that the "inherent risks" of the game were unreasonably increased.

All four cases posed a situation where there was something imperfect – "less than optimal" – about the field of play. Whether the court found for plaintiff hinged, at least in part, in whether or not the plaintiff knew or should have known – and in a sense, embraced – the imperfect conditions. A "tough" player risks the skinned knees from the blacktop, but also risks potentially more serious injuries. If plaintiff in Latimer had not simply fallen while trying to catch a pass, but instead dove, suffering serious cuts and bruises from the uneven pavement, there would likely be no cause of action due to the rough blacktop surface. He chose to engage in a sporting activity in a place where a reasonable person would expect to get scuffed up if they hit the ground. Under these decisions, there is no difference between accidentally falling and purposefully diving – both could happen over the course of the game.

The Experienced Plaintiff

Plaintiff's background of skill and experience was important to a number of cases recently, Bakkensen included. Bakkensen highlighted that this was not plaintiff's first time on a sled. She was admittedly experienced, and chose a "flimsy" plastic sled without steering or stopping mechanisms for unsupervised nighttime sledding. Though the New York County court did not say, "She should've known better," one can imagine that being defendant's best argument.

Two recent health club cases out of the Appellate Division, Second Department – DiBenedetto v. Town Sports International, LLC8and Rosenblatt v. St. George Health and Racquetball Assoc.9– also hinged on a plaintiff being experienced enough to know better. In DiBenedetto, plaintiff suffered injuries when she inadvertently stepped onto a moving treadmill. The record was clear: She was a longtime treadmill user at the club, and could have very easily noticed that it was running. Plaintiff in Rosenblatt had been attending the same body sculpting class twice a week for two years. The court found her well able to know what she could and could not do, so when the substitute instructor offered her and the class an exercise ball to use, she was experienced enough to know there was a risk she might roll right off – which is what happened. The court, finding she could have easily asked for help, ruled for the defense.

Contrast those plaintiffs with the one in Blumenthal v. Bronx Equestrian Ctr., Inc.10 (Supreme Court, Bronx County), where plaintiff's horse threw her after she had allowed it to stop and graze (something an experienced rider would know is ill-advised). Plaintiff was an arguably experienced horseback rider, though not in recent years. She similarly did not voice any concerns about getting on the horse. Defendant, however, unlike in Rosenblatt, did not ask about her skill level or otherwise provide any sort of instruction (nor was there adequate proof that plaintiff read, understood, and signed a waiver). In large part because of defendant's failure to determine plaintiff's background of skill and experience, the Bronx Supreme Court determined that, issues of fact remained, allowing plaintiff to proceed to trial.

An experienced plaintiff only absolves defendant of liability for those generally appreciable risks, not hidden or increased risks that are not inherent to the sport. In Torres v. Long Island Motocross Assoc.11, the Suffolk County Supreme Court found plaintiff to be an experienced motocross rider, having even ridden at the subject course. However, experience was not the issue; a potentially dangerous piece of PVC pipe lay exposed, just off a turn where riders were known to crash. Crashing into mud and dirt was a risk naturally assumed in motocross; crashing into PVC equipment was not.

All of these cases show that factual subtleties can determine the outcome. It may not matter if plaintiff had a certain level of experience. If a defendant did not seek to make that determination itself, or if the dangers were hidden or unreasonable, a plaintiff will survive summary judgment.

To Consider

The decisions of the New York courts thus far in 2014 in the assumption of risk context show the court's willingness to grant defendants summary judgment where a plaintiff, having voluntarily engaged in a sport or recreational activity, gets hurt in the normal course. In many athletic and recreational activities, accidents do happen and people get hurt. By and large, there is not necessarily liability unless there is that something more that takes the factual situation out of what is normal – extra sand that makes the blacktop abnormally slippery like in Agosto or exposed PVC piping like in Torres. But all in all, courts in 2014 still abide by Judge Cardozo's 1929 truism: "The plaintiff was not seeking a retreat for meditation... He took the chance of a like fate, with whatever damage to his body might ensue from such a fall. The timorous may stay at home."


1. Morgan v. State of New York, 90 N.Y.2d 471 (1997)

2. Cotty v. Town of Southampton, 64 A.D.3d 251 (2d Dep't 2009)

3. Manoly v. City of New York, 29 A.D.3d 649 (2d Dep't 2006); Turcotte v. Fell, 68 N.Y.2d 432 (1986)

4. Perez v. NYC Dep't of Education, 115 A.D.3d 921 (2d Dep't March 26, 2014)

5. Latimer v. City of N.Y., 118 A.D.3d 420 (1st Dep't June 3, 2014)

6. Bakkensen v. City of NY, 2014 NY Slip Op 31965(U) (Sup. Ct. New York Co. July 29, 2014)

7. Agosto v. City of New Rochelle, 114 A.D.3d 625 (2d Dep't Feb. 5, 2014)

8. DiBenedetto v. Town Sports International, LLC, 118 A.D.3d 663 (2d Dep't June 4, 2014)

9. Rosenblatt v. St. George Health and Racquetball Assoc., 119 A.D.3d 45 (2d Dep't April 30, 2014)

10. Blumenthal v. Bronx Equestrian Ctr., Inc., 2014 NY Slip Op 31653(U) (Sup. Ct. Bronx Co. May 14, 2014)

11. Torres v. Long Island Motocross Assoc., 2014 NY Slip Op 31855(U) (Sup. Ct. Suffolk Co. July 14, 2014)

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


From time to time Mondaq may send you emails promoting Mondaq services including new services. You may opt out of receiving such emails by clicking below.

*** If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of services offered by Mondaq you may opt out by clicking here .


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.