United States: Digital Rights Review: Summer/Fall 2014 Federal Copyright And Trade Secret Legislation Update

Last Updated: October 9 2014
Article by Armand J. Zottola and Robert F. Parr

Since the Winter 2014 update, the 113th Congress has continued to devote effort to establishing or amending certain federal statutes related to the protection, enforcement, and exploitation of trade secrets or copyrights. Some legislation aims to establish a private right of action for trade secret theft under federal law or to prevent or deter trade secret theft through cyberattacks. Other bills are designed to modify the royalties owed to authors of certain sound recordings or visual works under federal copyright law. If signed into law, these bills would have important implications for a wide range of interested parties, including songwriters, certain performing artists, authors of visual works, entertainment industry or content right stakeholders, and any business intent on exerting greater control over its trade secrets.

In addition to these bills making their way through Congress, President Obama recently signed a bill into law that allows consumers to "unlock" their mobile devices without fear of committing copyright infringement. Set forth below in Sections 1 and 2 is a summary of these recent trade secret and copyright bills and the newly enacted legislation. Section 3 of this document also provides a brief update on the status of the proposed legislation discussed in the Winter 2014 update.

1. Trade Secrets

There appears to be renewed momentum in Congress to pass legislation that would establish a federal civil cause of action for trade secret theft in order to strengthen the trade secret protection regime in the US. A growing number of lawmakers have voiced support for this legislation largely because the Economic Espionage Act of 1996 (EEA) currently only provides for criminal prosecution, there are material differences among the versions of the Uniform Trade Secrets Act (UTSA) adopted in some form by 48 states, and state courts that hear civil trade secret misappropriation cases have limited jurisdiction to obtain evidence and witnesses located in other states or countries.

Introduced in the Senate with bipartisan support on April 29, 2014, the Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2014 (S. 2267) (DTSA) would amend the EEA and authorize trade secret owners to bring civil actions for:

  1. violations of Section 1831 of the EEA (economic espionage);
  2. violations of Section 1832 of the EEA (trade secret theft); or
  3. a "misappropriation of a trade secret that is related to a product or service used in, or intended for use in, interstate or foreign commerce."

Although the DTSA is predominantly modeled on the UTSA (e.g., both define "trade secrets" very similarly and offer nearly the same robust remedies), the DTSA appears to have certain advantages over the UTSA. First, the statute of limitations under the DTSA is five years compared to the three-year period under the UTSA. Second, the DTSA allows for punitive damages in an amount up to three times actual damages, while the UTSA caps such damages at two times actual damages. Third, the DTSA authorizes courts to issue ex parte orders for the seizure of any property used to commit or facilitate the alleged misappropriation when the plaintiff can satisfy certain requirements for injunctive relief set forth in the Trademark Act of 1946. This provision would presumably allow plaintiffs to seize computers, tablets, cellular phones and/or any other equipment used in the alleged misappropriation. Finally, unlike the UTSA, the DTSA does not preempt state common law remedies, which would allow plaintiffs to plead state common law claims in lawsuits filed under the DTSA.

A companion bill inspired by and principally based on the DTSA, the Trade Secrets Protection Act of 2014 (H.R. 5233) (TSPA) was introduced in the House of Representatives with bipartisan support on July 29, 2014. The TSPA largely offers the same rights and protections as the DTSA, although the TSPA appears a bit broader and more flexible in certain respects. For example, while the DTSA only authorizes courts to seize property that was actually used to facilitate an alleged misappropriation, the TSPA appears to allow courts to seize additional property that was not directly used in furtherance of a scheme to steal trade secrets when doing so would "prevent the propagation or dissemination of the trade secret that is the subject of the action." Moreover, the TSPA seems to require the applications that must be submitted by plaintiffs to obtain seizure orders to contain less detail and particularity than the DTSA. Furthermore, unlike under the DTSA, the TSPA does not require plaintiffs to provide US Attorneys with advance notice of their intention to file applications for seizure orders, and does not expressly permit the court to deny such orders if the public interest would be served by criminally prosecuting the alleged perpetrator.

Although other bills introduced in the 113th Congress that aimed to establish a federal private right of action under the EEA failed to advance beyond the committee stage, either the DTSA or TSPA appear to have better prospects of becoming law. These bills have received broad bipartisan support by high-ranking legislators in both houses of Congress and ringing endorsements from the National Association of Manufacturers, US Chamber of Commerce, and more than a dozen Fortune 500 companies. Moreover, the Obama Administration would likely support either bill, given its conclusion in the Administration Strategy on Mitigating the Theft of US Trade Secrets that preventing trade secret theft is critical to US economic and national security. If signed into law, either the DTSA or the TSPA would dramatically broaden and strengthen trade secret protection in the US.

The federal private right of action would empower companies to directly combat theft of their trade secrets in federal court rather than having to rely on the Department of Justice (DOJ) – which only brought 25 trade secrets cases in 2013 – to investigate and prosecute their cases. Furthermore, the federal civil cause of action would presumably help facilitate multi-jurisdictional litigation involving witnesses and critical evidence located in another state or country. In addition, either bill would help foster the development of a national standard for trade secret misappropriation for use by businesses of all types and sizes to protect their intellectual property. Moreover, all other forms of intellectual property – patents, copyrights, and trademarks – are afforded a civil cause of action at the federal level. Either the DTSA or the TSPA would therefore confer upon trade secrets a similar level of protection as other forms of intellectual property at a time when new technologies are making it easier to store, access, disseminate, and publish trade secret information.

Another noteworthy bill was introduced on May 22, 2014 to prevent and deter trade secret theft resulting from cyber invasions or cyberattacks. An updated version of a 2013 bill, the Deter Cyber Theft Act of 2014 (S. 2384) (DCTA) is largely reactionary to the recent wave of cyber intrusions against US companies, as illustrated by a 2013 report indicating that the Chinese military had hacked into the computers of many US businesses to steal valuable trade secrets and a May 1, 2014 indictment filed by the DOJ against certain Chinese military officers involving the first ever charges against state-sponsored actors for computer hacking and economic espionage. The DCTA would authorize the Department of the Treasury to freeze assets of individuals or companies that benefit from theft of US technology or other commercial information, and would also require the President to report annually to Congress certain key information about cyberattacks (e.g., the countries engaging in such practices and a priority watch list of the most egregious offenders).

2. Copyrights

There have also been several important developments in the copyright law arena. Signed into law by President Obama on August 1, 2014, the Unlocking Consumer Choice and Wireless Competition Act (S. 517) (Unlocking Act) repealed a Library of Congress (LOC) rule that classified bypassing or "unlocking" technical access controls on cellular phones as copyright infringement under the 1998 Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA). Consequently, the Unlocking Act allows consumers to reprogram their mobile devices in order to change wireless service providers, although its benefits may be rather modest and short-lived. This law predominantly benefits AT&T and T-Mobile customers because these carriers use the same technology to deliver wireless services that is utilized throughout the world. Such customers may therefore switch carriers on unlocked devices by simply swapping SIM cards (i.e., the embedded circuit that contains subscriber identity information). By contrast, Verizon and Sprint customers must have their unlocked devices "provisioned" (i.e., programmed) by the new service provider before they can receive wireless services. Moreover, the Unlocking Act applies only to customers who fully own their cellular phones, which means that it does not apply to customers who are still under contract with their carriers and/or who bought their phones at a subsidized price. Finally, the Unlocking Act expires in 2015, at which point the LOC will again consider whether cellular phone unlocking should constitute copyright infringement under the DMCA.

Two bills recently introduced in Congress are designed to address the royalties owed to certain artists for digital transmissions of their songs through services such as Pandora, Spotify, and Sirius. First, the Respecting Senior Performers as Essential Cultural Treasures Act (H.R. 4772) (RESPECT Act), would amend the US Copyright Act (Copyright Act) to require services that digitally transmit musical works to pay royalties for transmissions of any songs that were recorded before February 15, 1972 which are currently covered by a hodgepodge of state laws that do not require payment of such royalties. Introduced in the House of Representatives on May 29, 2014, the bill has generated significant buzz by addressing a controversial copyright issue that is central to several pending lawsuits involving satellite and Internet radio companies and record labels.

Along similar lines as the RESPECT Act, the Songwriter Equity Act of 2014 (SEA) would amend Section 114(i) of the Copyright Act to allow the courts that set royalty rates under federal copyright law to consider all relevant evidence when establishing royalty rates applicable to digital transmissions of musical works through streaming services such as Pandora, Spotify, or Sirius, which is currently prohibited by law. Moreover, the SEA would also amend Section 115 of the Copyright Act to require the Copyright Royalty Board (the government entity responsible for setting royalty rates) to consider the rates that would have been negotiated in the marketplace between a willing seller and willing buyer when setting royalty rates for the reproduction and distribution of musical works. In this regard, the SEA Act is designed to modernize the music licensing system under the Copyright Act to ensure that songwriters, composers, and publishers receive fair compensation for the reproduction, distribution, and performance of their songs. Initially introduced in the House of Representatives on February 25, 2014 (H.R. 4079), momentum to pass the SEA into law has recently picked up in Congress as the Senate introduced a companion version of this bill on May 12, 2014 (S. 2321).

Congress has also introduced a bill designed to ensure that artists receive a resale royalty for sales of certain visual works (e.g., paintings, drawings, or prints). Known as the American Royalties Too Act of 2014 (ARTA), this bill would amend the Copyright Act to establish a resale royalty rate equal to the lesser of (i) 5% of the purchase price, or (ii) $35,000, for any work of visual art sold by a major auction house (i.e., one that has sold at least $1,000,000 worth of works during the previous year) or in an online auction. Predictably, major auction houses and online sales platforms have voiced opposition to the ARTA, which has been introduced in substantially similar forms in both the House of Representatives (H.R. 4103) and the Senate (S. 2045).

3. Status Update Regarding The Bills Cited in The Winter 2014 Update

The table below provides a brief update on the status of the proposed legislation discussed in the Winter 2014 update.

Bill Status
Future of American Innovation and Research Act (S. 1770) Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary on November 21, 2013 and has not moved beyond this stage.
Private Right of Action Against Theft of Trade Secrets Act of 2013 (H.R. 2466) Referred to the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, Homeland Security, and Investigations on June 20, 2013 and has not moved beyond this stage.
Cyber Economic Espionage Accountability Act (H.R. 2281) Referred to the Subcommittee on Immigration and Border Security on June 6, 2013 and has not moved beyond this stage.
Deter Cyber Theft Act (S. 884) Referred to the Committee on Finance on May 7, 2013 and has not moved beyond this stage. Although, as noted above, a new version of this bill was introduced on May 22, 2014.
Strengthening and Enhancing Cybersecurity by Using Research, Education, Information and Technology Act (H.R. 1468) Referred to the Subcommittee on Research and Technology on June 24, 2013 and has not moved beyond this stage.
Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act (H.R. 624) Referred to the Select Committee on Intelligence on April 22, 2013 and has not advanced beyond this stage.
Free Market Royalty Act (H.R. 3219) Referred to the Subcommittee on Courts, Intellectual Property, and the Internet on October 15, 2013 and has not advanced beyond this stage.
Next Generation Television Marketplace Act (H.R. 3720) Referred to the Subcommittee on Courts, Intellectual Property, and the Internet on January 27, 2014 and has not advanced beyond this stage.
Television Consumer Freedom Act of 2013 (S. 912) Referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation on May 9, 2013 and has not advanced beyond this stage.
Unlocking Technology Act of 2013 (H.R. 1892) Referred to the Subcommittee on Courts, Intellectual Property, and the Internet on June 6, 2014 and has not advanced beyond this stage. Although, as noted above, a similar bill was recently signed into law that permits cellular phone unlocking.

As illustrated by the developments described above, Congress has been working on meaningful trade secret and copyright legislation. The pending legislation described herein may lead to amended US federal laws relating to the protection, enforcement, and exploitation of trade secrets and copyrights. Consequently, interested parties should monitor these bills to ensure they are fully aware of any developments that may affect their rights and obligations under US federal law. Stay tuned for further updates from Venable's Intellectual Property team on important developments in this area.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP
McLane Middleton, Professional Association
Dickinson Wright PLLC
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP
McLane Middleton, Professional Association
Dickinson Wright PLLC
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions