United States: Digital Rights Review: Summer/Fall 2014 Federal Copyright And Trade Secret Legislation Update

Last Updated: October 9 2014
Article by Armand J. Zottola and Robert F. Parr

Since the Winter 2014 update, the 113th Congress has continued to devote effort to establishing or amending certain federal statutes related to the protection, enforcement, and exploitation of trade secrets or copyrights. Some legislation aims to establish a private right of action for trade secret theft under federal law or to prevent or deter trade secret theft through cyberattacks. Other bills are designed to modify the royalties owed to authors of certain sound recordings or visual works under federal copyright law. If signed into law, these bills would have important implications for a wide range of interested parties, including songwriters, certain performing artists, authors of visual works, entertainment industry or content right stakeholders, and any business intent on exerting greater control over its trade secrets.

In addition to these bills making their way through Congress, President Obama recently signed a bill into law that allows consumers to "unlock" their mobile devices without fear of committing copyright infringement. Set forth below in Sections 1 and 2 is a summary of these recent trade secret and copyright bills and the newly enacted legislation. Section 3 of this document also provides a brief update on the status of the proposed legislation discussed in the Winter 2014 update.

1. Trade Secrets

There appears to be renewed momentum in Congress to pass legislation that would establish a federal civil cause of action for trade secret theft in order to strengthen the trade secret protection regime in the US. A growing number of lawmakers have voiced support for this legislation largely because the Economic Espionage Act of 1996 (EEA) currently only provides for criminal prosecution, there are material differences among the versions of the Uniform Trade Secrets Act (UTSA) adopted in some form by 48 states, and state courts that hear civil trade secret misappropriation cases have limited jurisdiction to obtain evidence and witnesses located in other states or countries.

Introduced in the Senate with bipartisan support on April 29, 2014, the Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2014 (S. 2267) (DTSA) would amend the EEA and authorize trade secret owners to bring civil actions for:

  1. violations of Section 1831 of the EEA (economic espionage);
  2. violations of Section 1832 of the EEA (trade secret theft); or
  3. a "misappropriation of a trade secret that is related to a product or service used in, or intended for use in, interstate or foreign commerce."

Although the DTSA is predominantly modeled on the UTSA (e.g., both define "trade secrets" very similarly and offer nearly the same robust remedies), the DTSA appears to have certain advantages over the UTSA. First, the statute of limitations under the DTSA is five years compared to the three-year period under the UTSA. Second, the DTSA allows for punitive damages in an amount up to three times actual damages, while the UTSA caps such damages at two times actual damages. Third, the DTSA authorizes courts to issue ex parte orders for the seizure of any property used to commit or facilitate the alleged misappropriation when the plaintiff can satisfy certain requirements for injunctive relief set forth in the Trademark Act of 1946. This provision would presumably allow plaintiffs to seize computers, tablets, cellular phones and/or any other equipment used in the alleged misappropriation. Finally, unlike the UTSA, the DTSA does not preempt state common law remedies, which would allow plaintiffs to plead state common law claims in lawsuits filed under the DTSA.

A companion bill inspired by and principally based on the DTSA, the Trade Secrets Protection Act of 2014 (H.R. 5233) (TSPA) was introduced in the House of Representatives with bipartisan support on July 29, 2014. The TSPA largely offers the same rights and protections as the DTSA, although the TSPA appears a bit broader and more flexible in certain respects. For example, while the DTSA only authorizes courts to seize property that was actually used to facilitate an alleged misappropriation, the TSPA appears to allow courts to seize additional property that was not directly used in furtherance of a scheme to steal trade secrets when doing so would "prevent the propagation or dissemination of the trade secret that is the subject of the action." Moreover, the TSPA seems to require the applications that must be submitted by plaintiffs to obtain seizure orders to contain less detail and particularity than the DTSA. Furthermore, unlike under the DTSA, the TSPA does not require plaintiffs to provide US Attorneys with advance notice of their intention to file applications for seizure orders, and does not expressly permit the court to deny such orders if the public interest would be served by criminally prosecuting the alleged perpetrator.

Although other bills introduced in the 113th Congress that aimed to establish a federal private right of action under the EEA failed to advance beyond the committee stage, either the DTSA or TSPA appear to have better prospects of becoming law. These bills have received broad bipartisan support by high-ranking legislators in both houses of Congress and ringing endorsements from the National Association of Manufacturers, US Chamber of Commerce, and more than a dozen Fortune 500 companies. Moreover, the Obama Administration would likely support either bill, given its conclusion in the Administration Strategy on Mitigating the Theft of US Trade Secrets that preventing trade secret theft is critical to US economic and national security. If signed into law, either the DTSA or the TSPA would dramatically broaden and strengthen trade secret protection in the US.

The federal private right of action would empower companies to directly combat theft of their trade secrets in federal court rather than having to rely on the Department of Justice (DOJ) – which only brought 25 trade secrets cases in 2013 – to investigate and prosecute their cases. Furthermore, the federal civil cause of action would presumably help facilitate multi-jurisdictional litigation involving witnesses and critical evidence located in another state or country. In addition, either bill would help foster the development of a national standard for trade secret misappropriation for use by businesses of all types and sizes to protect their intellectual property. Moreover, all other forms of intellectual property – patents, copyrights, and trademarks – are afforded a civil cause of action at the federal level. Either the DTSA or the TSPA would therefore confer upon trade secrets a similar level of protection as other forms of intellectual property at a time when new technologies are making it easier to store, access, disseminate, and publish trade secret information.

Another noteworthy bill was introduced on May 22, 2014 to prevent and deter trade secret theft resulting from cyber invasions or cyberattacks. An updated version of a 2013 bill, the Deter Cyber Theft Act of 2014 (S. 2384) (DCTA) is largely reactionary to the recent wave of cyber intrusions against US companies, as illustrated by a 2013 report indicating that the Chinese military had hacked into the computers of many US businesses to steal valuable trade secrets and a May 1, 2014 indictment filed by the DOJ against certain Chinese military officers involving the first ever charges against state-sponsored actors for computer hacking and economic espionage. The DCTA would authorize the Department of the Treasury to freeze assets of individuals or companies that benefit from theft of US technology or other commercial information, and would also require the President to report annually to Congress certain key information about cyberattacks (e.g., the countries engaging in such practices and a priority watch list of the most egregious offenders).

2. Copyrights

There have also been several important developments in the copyright law arena. Signed into law by President Obama on August 1, 2014, the Unlocking Consumer Choice and Wireless Competition Act (S. 517) (Unlocking Act) repealed a Library of Congress (LOC) rule that classified bypassing or "unlocking" technical access controls on cellular phones as copyright infringement under the 1998 Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA). Consequently, the Unlocking Act allows consumers to reprogram their mobile devices in order to change wireless service providers, although its benefits may be rather modest and short-lived. This law predominantly benefits AT&T and T-Mobile customers because these carriers use the same technology to deliver wireless services that is utilized throughout the world. Such customers may therefore switch carriers on unlocked devices by simply swapping SIM cards (i.e., the embedded circuit that contains subscriber identity information). By contrast, Verizon and Sprint customers must have their unlocked devices "provisioned" (i.e., programmed) by the new service provider before they can receive wireless services. Moreover, the Unlocking Act applies only to customers who fully own their cellular phones, which means that it does not apply to customers who are still under contract with their carriers and/or who bought their phones at a subsidized price. Finally, the Unlocking Act expires in 2015, at which point the LOC will again consider whether cellular phone unlocking should constitute copyright infringement under the DMCA.

Two bills recently introduced in Congress are designed to address the royalties owed to certain artists for digital transmissions of their songs through services such as Pandora, Spotify, and Sirius. First, the Respecting Senior Performers as Essential Cultural Treasures Act (H.R. 4772) (RESPECT Act), would amend the US Copyright Act (Copyright Act) to require services that digitally transmit musical works to pay royalties for transmissions of any songs that were recorded before February 15, 1972 which are currently covered by a hodgepodge of state laws that do not require payment of such royalties. Introduced in the House of Representatives on May 29, 2014, the bill has generated significant buzz by addressing a controversial copyright issue that is central to several pending lawsuits involving satellite and Internet radio companies and record labels.

Along similar lines as the RESPECT Act, the Songwriter Equity Act of 2014 (SEA) would amend Section 114(i) of the Copyright Act to allow the courts that set royalty rates under federal copyright law to consider all relevant evidence when establishing royalty rates applicable to digital transmissions of musical works through streaming services such as Pandora, Spotify, or Sirius, which is currently prohibited by law. Moreover, the SEA would also amend Section 115 of the Copyright Act to require the Copyright Royalty Board (the government entity responsible for setting royalty rates) to consider the rates that would have been negotiated in the marketplace between a willing seller and willing buyer when setting royalty rates for the reproduction and distribution of musical works. In this regard, the SEA Act is designed to modernize the music licensing system under the Copyright Act to ensure that songwriters, composers, and publishers receive fair compensation for the reproduction, distribution, and performance of their songs. Initially introduced in the House of Representatives on February 25, 2014 (H.R. 4079), momentum to pass the SEA into law has recently picked up in Congress as the Senate introduced a companion version of this bill on May 12, 2014 (S. 2321).

Congress has also introduced a bill designed to ensure that artists receive a resale royalty for sales of certain visual works (e.g., paintings, drawings, or prints). Known as the American Royalties Too Act of 2014 (ARTA), this bill would amend the Copyright Act to establish a resale royalty rate equal to the lesser of (i) 5% of the purchase price, or (ii) $35,000, for any work of visual art sold by a major auction house (i.e., one that has sold at least $1,000,000 worth of works during the previous year) or in an online auction. Predictably, major auction houses and online sales platforms have voiced opposition to the ARTA, which has been introduced in substantially similar forms in both the House of Representatives (H.R. 4103) and the Senate (S. 2045).

3. Status Update Regarding The Bills Cited in The Winter 2014 Update

The table below provides a brief update on the status of the proposed legislation discussed in the Winter 2014 update.

Bill Status
Future of American Innovation and Research Act (S. 1770) Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary on November 21, 2013 and has not moved beyond this stage.
Private Right of Action Against Theft of Trade Secrets Act of 2013 (H.R. 2466) Referred to the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, Homeland Security, and Investigations on June 20, 2013 and has not moved beyond this stage.
Cyber Economic Espionage Accountability Act (H.R. 2281) Referred to the Subcommittee on Immigration and Border Security on June 6, 2013 and has not moved beyond this stage.
Deter Cyber Theft Act (S. 884) Referred to the Committee on Finance on May 7, 2013 and has not moved beyond this stage. Although, as noted above, a new version of this bill was introduced on May 22, 2014.
Strengthening and Enhancing Cybersecurity by Using Research, Education, Information and Technology Act (H.R. 1468) Referred to the Subcommittee on Research and Technology on June 24, 2013 and has not moved beyond this stage.
Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act (H.R. 624) Referred to the Select Committee on Intelligence on April 22, 2013 and has not advanced beyond this stage.
Free Market Royalty Act (H.R. 3219) Referred to the Subcommittee on Courts, Intellectual Property, and the Internet on October 15, 2013 and has not advanced beyond this stage.
Next Generation Television Marketplace Act (H.R. 3720) Referred to the Subcommittee on Courts, Intellectual Property, and the Internet on January 27, 2014 and has not advanced beyond this stage.
Television Consumer Freedom Act of 2013 (S. 912) Referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation on May 9, 2013 and has not advanced beyond this stage.
Unlocking Technology Act of 2013 (H.R. 1892) Referred to the Subcommittee on Courts, Intellectual Property, and the Internet on June 6, 2014 and has not advanced beyond this stage. Although, as noted above, a similar bill was recently signed into law that permits cellular phone unlocking.

As illustrated by the developments described above, Congress has been working on meaningful trade secret and copyright legislation. The pending legislation described herein may lead to amended US federal laws relating to the protection, enforcement, and exploitation of trade secrets and copyrights. Consequently, interested parties should monitor these bills to ensure they are fully aware of any developments that may affect their rights and obligations under US federal law. Stay tuned for further updates from Venable's Intellectual Property team on important developments in this area.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


From time to time Mondaq may send you emails promoting Mondaq services including new services. You may opt out of receiving such emails by clicking below.

*** If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of services offered by Mondaq you may opt out by clicking here .


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.