United States: Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill Legal Update: Judge Makes Findings Of Gross Negligence And Negligence

While the Deepwater Horizon oil spill has largely disappeared from the news headlines, for the parties involved in the litigation, the legal machinations, particularly with respect to liability, have a long way still to go.

In the first of several related rulings, on September 4, 2014, U.S. District Judge Carl Barbier (the presiding judge of MDL 2179, the limitation and liability action regarding the Deepwater Horizon oil spill) issued a ruling allocating liability in the United States' Clean Water Act (CWA) enforcement action against BP, Transocean, and Halliburton. Specifically, the court ruled that BP was grossly negligent and 67 percent at fault, Transocean was negligent and 30 percent at fault, and Halliburton was negligent and 3 percent at fault. The finding that BP's actions were grossly negligent lifts the maximum CWA civil penalty from $1,100 per barrel of oil discharged to $4,400 per barrel. Using the EPA's estimate of 4.9 million barrels discharged, which BP has strenuously disputed, the penalties assessed could be in excess of $20 billion. Additionally, the court found that BP's actions would typically have merited a punitive damages award, but held that punitive damages are prohibited in this instance by specific 5th Circuit precedent.

In October 2013, the court completed the trial regarding the total number of barrels discharged but has not yet released its findings. Additionally, the court is set to commence the "Penalty Phase" of the trial – in which the parties will present evidence related to the CWA penalty factors, which will be used to determine the fine to be assessed per released barrel – in January 2015. Once the court determines the number of barrels discharged and the applicable fine per barrel, it will determine BP's ultimate liability in CWA fines (the fines assessed will vary depending on the allocation of fault, but BP is indemnifying both Halliburton and Transocean).

In reviewing the court's decision, there are a number of important legal theories that the court relied on in making its decision, which should be "takeaways" for the oil and gas industry:

  • Causation: According to the court, liability under the CWA requires more than simple "but for" causation but less than many proximate causation tests. If a company's negligent act is "a substantial factor in causing the injuries," then it may be found liable under the CWA.
  • Gross Negligence: The court described gross negligence under the CWA as "an extreme departure from the care required under the circumstances or a failure to exercise even slight care." Further, it stated that a finding of gross negligence requires only objective proof and does not additionally require subjective proof of a "culpable mental state" as BP argued. It is possible that BP will challenge the gross negligence standard used by the court on appeal.
  • Attribution of Employee Conduct: The court found that "a corporation is vicariously liable under the CWA . . . for the gross negligence and/or willful misconduct of its employees" and rejected BP's contention that the company is liable only for "authorized" employee actions or actions that are subsequently ratified by the company.
  • Punitive Damages: The court stated that BP's conduct was sufficiently egregious to justify an award of punitive damages, but held that 5th Circuit law prohibits punitive damages in this scenario.1 The court went out of its way, however, to state that it would have awarded punitive damages under 1st and 9th Circuit law.

The court's findings of fact and corresponding analysis also give insight into the actions and events that the court found particularly significant and, in some respects, provide useful guidance to the industry regarding which "best practices" could be used to help head off a finding of gross negligence in the future. The following is a list of some of those findings:

  • The court focused intensely on whether certain decisions actually were – or theoretically could have been – "motivated by profits" or based on financial pressure.
  • The court viewed deviations from the original drilling plan or from established "best practices" skeptically, particularly if those decisions saved time or money. However, in at least once instance, the court determined that following the drilling plan and best practices was insufficient. The court took a more favorable view of deviations when there was formal deliberation and debate prior to making the change to the drilling plan.
  • If a test result deviated from the expected or modeled result, the court generally expected the test to be rerun or the results to be investigated and understood before moving forward.
  • The court stated that "a greater degree of care is required when the circumstances present a greater apparent risk" and found that cumulative decisions that increased risks, even when the individual decisions themselves were not unreasonable, further "raise[d] the standard of care" required. In other words, when the drilling is difficult or complicated, an even higher standard of care (and perhaps even more testing) must be taken during each subsequent step in the drilling process. For example, the court found that, due to the previous drilling complications, "the negative pressure test at the Macondo well demanded a level of care exceeding the 'high' care typically required during such a test."
  • The court took a favorable view of explicit actions prioritizing safety (e.g., demonstrable responsiveness to kicks) when determining that Transocean and Halliburton were only negligent.
  • While the court did not find that violating a regulation or law itself constituted negligence as a matter of law, regulatory violations were given significant weight in the analysis. Complying with the applicable regulations was not sufficient, however, as the court stated that "[a]lthough MMS regulations at the time did not explicitly require a negative pressure test, no party disputes that it is a safety-critical test." The misinterpretation of this unrequired negative pressure test was one of the court's main bases for the finding of gross negligence against BP.
  • The court undertook a formalistic analysis of entity responsibility, looking to the contractual documents for allocations of responsibility.
  • Some harmful evidence was generated during BP's post-accident internal investigation. For instance, while neither participant to the 8:52 pm phone call regarding the interpretation of the negative pressure test testified at trial, the court relied on notes regarding their post-accident statements to BP's incident investigation team to establish BP's actual knowledge that the negative pressure test was unsuccessful.

The court's decision provides useful insight into how a reviewing body, in the wake of a significant environmental, health, and safety incident, may view the decisions and actions taken by major players in the oil and gas sector, both pre- and post-incident. As a result, the sector has an opportunity to learn from the incident and to adjust or adopt new best practices in order to promote increased safety in the oil patch and to avoid the unfortunate string of events that led to the Macondo well blowout.

BP has engaged in an extensive appeals process regarding Judge Barbier's previous rulings related to the implementation of two large settlement agreements that BP entered into with private plaintiffs throughout the Gulf of Mexico region – and the relationship between BP and the court has, at times, been acrimonious. Given the extraordinarily high stakes involved, it is almost certain that BP will appeal at least portions of the court's recent ruling.


1 The court found that, in the 5th Circuit, "operational recklessness or willful disregard" is generally insufficient to support an award for punitive damages. Instead, there must be a showing that the offensive conduct "emanates from corporate policy or that a corporate official with policy-making authority participated in, approved of, or subsequently ratified the egregious conduct." Citing P & E Boat Rentals, Inc. v. Ennia Gen. Ins. Co., 872 F.2d 642, 652-53 (5th Cir. 1989).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


From time to time Mondaq may send you emails promoting Mondaq services including new services. You may opt out of receiving such emails by clicking below.

*** If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of services offered by Mondaq you may opt out by clicking here .


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.