United States: All Native Advertising Is Not Equal: Why That Matters Under The First Amendment And Why It Should Matter To The FTC – Part IV

In this five part series, originally published in the Summer 2014 edition of the Media Law Resource Center Bulletin,1we take an in-depth look at the native advertising phenomenon and the legal issues surrounding the practice.  After canvassing the many faces of native advertising and the applicable law, the series ultimately examines the pervasive assumption that all native advertising is, and should be regulated as, "commercial speech."  This assumption presumes that all native advertising is equal under the eyes of the law, and we come to the conclusion that it probably isn't. Native advertising that is closer to pure content than pure commercial speech may deserve greater or even full First Amendment protection, which would carry significant implications for government regulation2.

Part 1: Introduction to Native Advertising

Part 2: Early Native Advertising and the Current FTC Regulatory Landscape

Part 3: Evolution of the Commercial Speech Doctrine

Part 4 below examines the important legal distinction between "Commercial Speech" and "Non-Commercial / Inextricably Intertwined Speech" 


Commercial and Noncommercial Inextricably Intertwined Speech

The Bolger court found that the mailings constituted commercial speech "notwithstanding the fact that [informational pamphlets] contain[ed] discussions of important public issues."3 Advertising that "links a product to a current public debate" is not automatically transformed into constitutionally protected noncommercial speech.4 This is because "a company has the full panoply of protections available to its direct comments on public issues, so there is no reason for providing similar constitutional protection when such statements are made in the context of commercial transactions."5 And in that circumstance, "advertisers should not be permitted to immunize false or misleading product information from government regulation simply by including references to public issues."6

But by the same token, the Supreme Court has clearly held that when commercial speech is "inextricably intertwined with otherwise fully protected speech," courts "cannot parcel out the speech, applying one test to one phrase and another test to another phrase."7 In those cases, the Court applies its test for fully protected speech.8 For instance, in Riley v. National Federation of the Blind of North Carolina, the Court held that paid professional charity solicitations were fully protected First Amendment speech because the commercial aspects of the solicitations could not be disentangled from the content of the charitable program.9 As the plurality explained in 44 Liquormart v. Long Island, when striking down a State's ban on liquor advertising, a "State's power to regulate commercial transactions justifies its concomitant power to regulate commercial speech that is 'linked inextricably' to those transactions."10 But the "State retains less regulatory authority when its commercial speech restrictions strike at the 'substance of the information communicated' rather the 'commercial aspect of [it]...."11

Combined Commercial Speech

In applying Bolger's three part commercial speech test and "inextricably intertwined" commercial and noncommercial speech precedent, lower courts have focused on whether the noncommercial aspect is insignificant at best, or masquerades as commercial speech at worst. In United States v. Bell, the Third Circuit rejected a defendant's attempt to "packag[e] a commercial message with token political commentary" to avoid criminal liability.12 The defendant's website advocated several legal theories on why Americans are not obligated to pay income taxes,13 while offering fraudulent and illegal tax advice and services. The website's illegal promotion of tax evasion was not inextricably intertwined with Bell's political tax views as the website was nothing more than "the internet version of a television infomercial made to entice visitors to join Bell's organization and pay him for tax advice."14

The Virginia Supreme Court recently rejected a similar argument in Hunter v. Virginia State Bar, finding that while an attorney's blog contained some political commentary posts, the blog on the whole was commercial speech as it was economically motivated, advertised his past legal success, and promoted his legal services.15 "Unlike situations where the subject matter is inherently, inextricably intertwined, [the Hunter defendant] chose to comingle sporadic political statements within his self-promoting blog posts in an attempt to camouflage the true commercial nature of the blog."16

In Downing v. Abercrombie & Fitch, the Ninth Circuit found that the unauthorized use of several photographs of surf legends in an Abercrombie clothing catalog was commercial, notwithstanding that the images were employed to illustrate the catalogue's underlying surf theme.17 The Ninth Circuit stated that the photographs were mere "window dressing" to the catalog's surf motif and ultimately were exploited to promote Abercrombie's clothing line.18 Likewise in Native American Arts, Inc. v. Earth Dweller, Ltd, the court focused on the "primary purpose" of defendants' representations of association with the Native American community as a mechanism to attract customers and sell products, holding that the advertising and promotional materials were thus commercial speech and subject to regulation under the Indian Arts and Crafts Act ("IACA").19

Non-Commercial / Inextricably Intertwined Speech

Courts have also applied Bolger and its progeny to find commercial aspects of speech so inextricably intertwined with protected speech that the overall speech is not commercial. In City of New York v. American School Publishers, the New York Appellate Division struck down New York City's denial of a permit to distribute a magazine through New York City street dispensers on the grounds that the publication was a "mere advertisement."20 The magazine featured various stories, articles, and reviews related to education, as well as advertisements for the publisher's school courses.21 Relying on Bolger, the court rejected the City's denial of the permit, holding that neither an economic motivation nor the fact that something is an advertisement is sufficient to render speech commercial.22 The Court reasoned that "[i]n fact, all publishers have an economic motivation to a greater or lesser extent, those of the New York Times and Washington Post no less than those of the Learning Annex Magazine."23 Regulating defendant's publication stricter than other newspapers and magazines was not only unfair in this case, but unconstitutional.24

Similarly, in Hoffman v. L.A. Magazine, L.A. Magazine successfully defended a commercial misappropriation claim by Dustin Hoffman on First Amendment grounds.25  The subject of the lawsuit was a doctored image that appeared in L.A. magazine imposing Hoffman's head on a female model in a "butter-colored silk gown by Richard Tyler" for a fashion article that spoofed iconic movie scenes.26 Despite ties between the model's clothing and ads in the magazine, the court found that, viewed "as a whole", the article was a "combination of fashion photography, humor, and visual and verbal editorial comment on classic films and famous actors." 27 The magazine's use of Hoffman's image was not commercial speech due to the fact that "[a]ny commercial aspects are inextricably intertwined with expressive elements, and so they cannot be separated out from the fully protected whole." 28

The Southern District of New York came to a similar conclusion in Gorran v. Atkins Nutritionals, Inc.,29 where a dieter sued the publisher of the Atkin's Diet book and website after undergoing an angioplasty to unblock an artery.30 Atkins argued that the book and website—providing information on the Atkin's Diet—were noncommercial speech fully protected by the First Amendment.31 The court agreed, finding that even though the website at issue contained some commercial speech, i.e. an e-commerce store, it was separable from the editorial content of the site.32 The court emphasized that "[i]t is well settled that the mere fact that there is an underlying economic motivation in one's activity does not turn that activity into commercial speech."33 Thus, the presence of an online store selling defendant's products was insufficient to render all of defendant's dieting advice "commercial."34 In another more recent website case, the Fourth Circuit found that a website recounting the author's trademark trials and tribulation against Skippy was of a "primarily informational purpose, not a commercial one,"and was thus distinguishable from other "inextricably intertwined" cases where the court found speech to be commercial because they "involved commercial speech supplemented by comments related to the marketed products."35

Although most lower courts apply the three Bolger factors in greater or lesser extent to determine whether speech is commercial, others have developed their own commercial speech tests.  In one of the most prominent of these cases, Kasky v. Nike, Inc., the California Supreme Court in finding Nike's speech commercial, looked at three factors: (1) the speaker; (2) the intended audience; and (3) the content of the message (i.e. is the representation about a "fact of a commercial nature").36 Notwithstanding that the court found these factors consistent with Bolger and other precedent37, the court appeared to adopt a much more expansive definition of commercial speech than Bolger would allow38—finding that Nike's speech was commercial largely because it had a tangential profit motive, and defending its labor practices concerned "factual representations about [Nike's] business operations."39 Accordingly, although an important case for California law, we view Kasky as largely inconsistent with Supreme Court precedent.40


1.The MLRC has graciously allowed republication of this article. For more information on the MLRC check out www.mlrc.org.

2.more dense that our typical blog.

3.Bolger, 463 U.S. at 67-68.

4.Id. at 68 citing Central Hudson, 447 U.S. at 563.

5.Id.; see also Virginia Pharmacy, 425 U.S. at 761-62 ("No one would contend that our pharmacist may be prevented from being heard on the subject of whether, in general, pharmaceutical prices should be regulated...")

6.Bolger, 463 U.S. at 68.

7.Riley v. National Federation of the Blind of North Carolina, Inc., 487 U.S. 781, 796 (1988).



10.44 Liquormart, Inc. v. Rhode Island, 517 U.S. 484, 499-500 (1996).


12.Bell, 414 F.3d at 480.

13.Id. at 475.

14.Id. at 479.

15.Hunter v. Virginia State Bar, 285 Va. 485, 497-498 (2013).

16.Id. at 498.

17.See Downing v. Abercrombie & Fitch, 265 F.3d 994 (9th Cir. 2001).

18.Id. at 1002.

19.See Native American Arts, Inc. v. Earth Dweller, Ltd., 2001 WL 910394 (N.D.Ill. Aug. 10, 2001).

20.119 A.D.2d 13, 15 (Sup. Ct. App. Div. 1st Dept. 1986).

22.Id. at 14.

23.Id. at 18.


25.Id. at 19.

26.Hoffman v. L.A. Magazine, 255 F.3d 1180 (9th Cir. 2001).

27.Id., at 1188.

28.;Id. at 1185.

29.Id. (internal citations omitted).

29 Gorran v. Atkins Nutritionals, Inc., 464 F.Supp.2d 315 (S.D.N.Y. 2006), aff'd 279 Fed.Appx. 40 (2d Cir. 2008)

30 Id. at 321-22.

31 Id. at 327.

32 Because the plaintiff's claims were not predicated on the content of the online store, finding the online store to be commercial speech had no impact on the decision. Id.

33 Id. at 327 citing Bolger, 463 U.S. at 67.

34 Id. at 328.

35 CPC International v. Skippy, 214 F. 3d 456, 462 (4th Cir. 2000) citing Bolger, 463 U.S. at 67-68; Board of Trustees of the State University v. Fox, 492 U.S. 467, 474-75.

36 Kasky v. Nike, 27 Cal.4th 939, 960 (2002).

37 Id. at 960-61.

38 See William Warner Eldridge IV, Just Do It: Kasky v. Nike, Inc. Illustrates That it is Time to Abandon the Commercial Speech Doctrine, 12 Geo. Mason. L. Rev. 179, 180 (2003) ("[California Supreme Court's] test has the potential to broadly sweep into its purview speech that is noncommercial."); see also Brody & Johnson, §2:3 at 23 ([California Supreme Court] "introduced a new and extraordinarily broad definition of commercial speech.")

39 Kasky, 27 Cal.4th at 963.

40 See Eldridge IV, supra note 142 at 180.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


From time to time Mondaq may send you emails promoting Mondaq services including new services. You may opt out of receiving such emails by clicking below.

*** If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of services offered by Mondaq you may opt out by clicking here .


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.