United States: Delaware Court Enforces Exclusive Forum Provision Adopted Concurrently With Announcement Of Merger Agreement

Public companies are increasingly enacting "exclusive forum" bylaws — designating a single forum for intra-corporate disputes — as a way to limit the risk and burden of multi-jurisdictional stockholder litigation. This trend emerged from the Delaware Chancery Court's 2013 Chevron decision, which held that forum selection bylaws generally are permissible under Delaware law.1

The Delaware Chancery Court's recent decision in City of Providence v. First Citizens Bancshares, Inc.2 provides further support for the flexibility of companies in adopting such provisions, holding that (under Delaware law):

  • A board can adopt a forum selection provision during a transaction process — even on the day the merger agreement is announced — and the provision generally will be enforced, absent some particular factual allegations demonstrating that it was enacted for an improper purpose.
  • A corporation with headquarters in another state may designate its headquarters state, rather than Delaware, as the exclusive forum.

Exclusive forum provisions are still relatively new and some questions remain, particularly as to their reception by courts outside of Delaware, where provisions designating Delaware courts as exclusive forums will need to be enforced. With few exceptions, however, other courts that have addressed the question have enforced these provisions, recognizing that their effect is not to preclude stockholder litigation against boards but simply to limit it to a specified jurisdiction.


First Citizens arose from a challenge to the agreement of First Citizens BancShares, Inc. ("FC North"), a Delaware corporation based in North Carolina, to acquire by merger First Citizens Bancorporation, Inc. ("FC South"), a company incorporated and based in South Carolina. Both FC North and FC South are controlled by the same family, the Holdings.

On the day the merger was announced, FC North's board also amended the company's bylaws to, among other things, adopt a forum selection clause designating North Carolina courts as the exclusive forum for most intra- corporate disputes, which would cover the types of stockholder claims typically expected following a merger announcement.

The City of Providence, an FC North stockholder, filed suit in Delaware Chancery Court challenging the validity of the forum selection clause and asserting various class and derivative claims in connection with the announced merger. The parties stipulated that the validity of the forum selection bylaw should be decided before any other issue.


The court upheld the forum selection bylaw and dismissed the stockholders' action. The court noted, as it had in prior opinions, that corporate bylaws are generally interpreted as part of a binding broader contract between the corporation and its stockholders. The court also noted that the forum selection provision would not insulate FC North's board from judicial review; rather, it would simply require that such review take place in a North Carolina court.

Adoption of Bylaw Concurrent with Merger Agreement

The court rejected the stockholders' argument that enforcing the forum selection bylaw would be unjust because it was adopted simultaneously with the announcement of the merger. The court found that the stockholders did not call into question the integrity of North Carolina's courts or otherwise explain how the board would improperly advance its own self-interests by having challenges to the merger agreement adjudicated in North Carolina. According to the court, without "well-pled allegations . . . demonstrating any impropriety in [the] timing," the fact that the board adopted the forum selection provision "on an allegedly 'cloudy' day when it entered into the merger agreement with FC South rather than on a 'clear' day is immaterial."

In so holding, the Delaware court reached the opposite conclusion from the Oregon circuit court, which recently declined to enforce a forum selection bylaw adopted by a company's board the same day it announced a merger, in part on the basis that the bylaw appeared to have been adopted after the "alleged wrongdoing" had occurred.3 The Delaware court noted the Oregon decision and explained that, to the extent it rested on an interpretation of Delaware law, the decision was "based on a misapprehension of Delaware law regarding the facial validity and as-applied analysis of forum selection bylaws."

Choice of North Carolina Forum

While then-Chancellor Strine expressed his view in Chevron that Delaware was "the most obviously reasonable forum" for litigation involving a Delaware corporation, Chancellor Bouchard in this case found that nothing in Chevron precluded the board from selecting "North Carolina — the second most obviously reasonable forum given that NC North is headquartered and has most of its operations there."

Chancellor Bouchard noted this conclusion was supported by "important interests of judicial comity" — if Delaware corporations expect foreign courts to enforce bylaws designating Delaware as the exclusive forum for intra-corporate disputes, then Delaware courts should uphold forum selection bylaws designating states other than Delaware.


Forum selection provisions can be an important tool for companies and boards to consider when seeking to reduce the burden and uncertainty of multi-jurisdictional shareholder litigation. Since the 2013 Chevron decision, several courts outside Delaware have followed Chevron and upheld the validity of Delaware forum selection bylaws.4 However, Chevron also noted that forum selection bylaws, in certain cases, may be invalid if they produce some "fundamentally inequitable result."

First Citizens addresses two important outstanding issues that will provide companies and boards with greater clarity in adopting forum selection bylaws.

  • First Citizens makes clear that a forum selection provision will not be found to be invalid under Delaware law merely because it was adopted during the transaction process-even if it is adopted on the day the transaction is announced.
  • Delaware corporations generally prefer to litigate intra-corporate disputes in Delaware. But, for reasons of convenience and familiarity, among others, a corporation might instead prefer to litigate in the state where its headquarters, operations, and senior employees are located. First Citizens makes clear that Delaware courts will enforce forum selection bylaws that select their headquarter forum for resolving intra-corporate disputes as long as that forum is a reasonable choice.

Companies should be cautious, however, in waiting until the eve of a transaction to adopt such bylaws. Like the court in Chevron, Chancellor Bouchard stressed that, "[i]n the appropriate case, a foreign forum selection provision may not withstand . . . scrutiny." While we expect that courts in other jurisdictions should recognize First Citizens as persuasive precedent on these points, there remains some uncertainty about whether some states, like the Oregon circuit court, may decline to enforce forum selection provisions enacted as part of the transaction being challenged in the underlying suit.


1 See Boilermakers Local 154 Ret. Fund v. Chevron Corp. (Del. Ch. June 25, 2013). We discussed exclusive forum provisions as an item for boards' corporate governance and M&A checklists in a prior client alert here [link to http://www.mofo.com/~/media/Files/ClientAlert/140625ExclusiveForumProvisions.pdf ].

2 Del. Ch. Sept. 8, 2014.

3 Roberts v. TriQuint SemiConductor, Inc. (Or. Cir. Ct. Aug. 14, 2014). Our client alert describing the TriQuint decision can be found here [link: http://www.mofo.com/~/media/Files/ClientAlert/2014/09/140909ForumSelectionBylaws.pdf ]. ,

4 See Groen v. Safeway Inc. (Cal. Sup. Ct. May 14, 2014); Miller v. Beam Inc. (Ill. Ch. Ct. Mar. 5, 2014); Hemg Inc. v. Aspen Univ. (N.Y. Sup. Ct. Nov. 14, 2013); In re MetroPCS Commc'ns, Inc. (Tex. App. 2013); but see TriQuint Semiconductor Inc., referenced above.

Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP. All rights reserved

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

James J. Beha, II
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions