United States: Clear Rift Highlighted By Commissioners’ Lack Of Action On New England’s Most Recent Forward Capacity Auction Results

Last Updated: September 25 2014
Article by Terence T. Healey, Kenneth W. Irvin, Gregory K. Lawrence and Thomas Reid Millar

Most Read Contributor in United States, October 2018

On September 16, 2014, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's four Commissioners issued statements explaining a 2-2 deadlock between Chairman LaFleur and Commissioner Moeller on the one hand and Commissioner Clark and new Commissioner Bay on the other, over whether to accept rates resulting from ISO New England Inc.'s ("ISO-NE") most recent capacity auction as just and reasonable.  In addition to fueling concern that capacity resources in New England cannot necessarily rely on the results of future capacity auctions, the sharp contrast  among the Commissioners' statements provides a glimpse of what to expect when Norman Bay takes over as Chairman on April 15, 2015.1 Commissioner Bay's joint statement with Commissioner Clark also does little to alleviate concerns raised by some during his confirmation proceedings that Bay's past experience as head of FERC's Office of Enforcement will be featured prominently during his tenure as Chairman.

ISO-NE's Most Recent Forward Capacity Auction

ISO-NE's eighth Forward Capacity Market Auction ("FCA-8") was conducted in early February, 2014.  Prior to being conducted, but following expiration of the qualification deadline for new resources to participate, nearly 3,000 MW of capacity exited the market.  This abrupt drop in potential supply left a deficit of more than 1,000 megawatts going into FCA-8, when compared to the region's installed capacity requirement.  ISO-NE, as a result, termed FCA-8 "non-competitive," triggering certain administrative pricing rules under its tariff.  Following the auction, ISO-NE announced that FCA-8 had produced capacity costs of approximately $3.05 billion.  This amount nearly doubled the next highest capacity costs from prior capacity auctions in New England.

ISO-NE's tariff requires that auction results be filed with FERC pursuant to section 205 of the Federal Power Act ("FPA") – a relatively unique condition stemming from the terms of the settlement agreement which formed the basis for ISO-NE's capacity market design.  As required, ISO-NE filed the results for FCA-8 on February 28, 2014, in Docket No. ER14-1409.  Many parties intervened, with several protesting the auction results.  Despite several months and the provision of supplemental information by ISO-NE, FERC was unable to agree on whether to accept or reject ISO-NE's filing.  Instead, the split panel allowed FCA-8's rates to become effective by operation of law as of September 16, 2014, issuing individual and joint statements explaining their respective positions on the same day. 

Commissioner Moeller acknowledged the rarity of allowing a rate to become effective without an order, but noted that ". . . such a result will happen when a four-member panel finds itself deadlocked."  Despite the absence of an order, the Commissioners' statements provide important insight as to how the various issues were considered, including issues of regulatory and rate certainty, market power, and the underlying purpose behind ISO-NE's requirement to file the results from its forward capacity auctions with FERC.

Sharp Contrasts in Reasoning and Approach

Chairman LaFleur and Commissioner Moeller stated separately that they would have voted to accept FCA-8's resulting capacity rates as just and reasonable.  Conversely, Commissioners Clark and Bay, through a joint statement, made clear that they would have voted to reject these rates, and would have set the matter for a fast-track hearing and settlement procedures. 

Chairman LaFleur's statement emphasized past precedent in support of the filed rate doctrine, underscoring the importance that "the FCA be transparent and that auction participants not be subject to significant regulatory uncertainty or after-the-fact ratemaking."2  Commissioner LaFleur noted that since the start of ISO-NE's forward capacity market, FERC's review of forward capacity auction results has focused on whether ISO-NE administered its auction in accordance with its tariff and not, alternatively, whether the resulting rates are themselves just and reasonable.  Commission LaFleur reasoned that if ISO-NE followed its tariff, but FERC then found the resulting rates to be unjust and unreasonable, the only way to arrive at different rates would be through some form of retroactive ratemaking in contravention of FERC's filed rate doctrine.  Commissioner LaFleur stated that even if market power had been exercised, such market power should be addressed through prospective, tariff-imposed mitigation measures as opposed to retroactive relief.  If existing mitigation measures are found to be unjust and unreasonable, any remedy must be prospective in nature.  Commissioner LaFleur also noted that FERC has been clear in the past that it lacks authority to order retroactive relief unless a party violates its tariff, the parties agree to such relief, or there is notice that a rate is tentative and may later be adjusted.  According to Commissioner LaFleur, none of these circumstances are present with respect to FCA-8.

In direct contrast, Commissioners Clark and Bay determined that the FERC's ability to ensure that the auction results are just and reasonable, and "not merely the process leading to them," is an "important underpinning" of ISO-NE's capacity market.  Clark and Bay reasoned that FERC would "abdicate its responsibility under section 205 of the FPA if it treated the FCA 8 Results Filing as a mere informational filing and determined without further review that the prices resulting from the auction must necessarily be just and reasonable."  Describing FERC as "the backstop for protecting consumers when a market produces non-competitive rates," Commissioners Clark and Bay determined that there is evidence of unmitigated market power with respect to FCA-8, and that based on the record, they could not find that ISO-NE had "carried its burden of establishing that the auction results are just and reasonable."  Clark and Bay also were not persuaded that the filed rate doctrine precludes FERC from examining whether FCA-8's resulting rates are just and reasonable, believing instead that these rates are not final until ISO-NE's filing is accepted pursuant to section 205.  Accordingly, Commissioners Clark and Bay would have instituted fast-track hearing and settlement procedures to address and consider results of FCA-8.  Commissioners Clark and Bay also stated that they also would have directed FERC's Office of Enforcement to issue a public report on what it has found to date on FCA-8, redacted as necessary to protect the identity of the subjects being investigated.  While FERC's regulations provide that information learned during the course of an investigation is non-public, Commissioners Clark and Bay determined that disclosure is warranted here "given the need for transparency and the importance of this proceeding to the New England Market."3 

Perhaps landing somewhere in the middle, Commissioner Moeller stated that he would have voted to approve the resulting rates as just and reasonable on the basis that the high prices resulted from supply and demand fundamentals.4  Commissioner Moeller agreed with Commissioner LaFleur that ISO-NE administered FCA-8 in accordance with its tariff.  However, Commissioner Moeller acknowledged that an auction process previously found just and reasonable by FERC may well result in unjust and unreasonable rates, and that higher prices deserve greater scrutiny.  Accordingly, although Commissioner Moeller would have voted to find that FCA-8's rates are just and  reasonable, he would seem to agree with Commissioners Clark and Bay that such rates are indeed subject to Commission examination under section 205 of the FPA, regardless of whether the rates result from an auction process previously determined to be just and reasonable.

Show Cause Order (EL14-99)

Despite being unable to reach agreement on whether to accept the results from FCA-8, the Commissioners on the same day issued a show-cause order requiring action by ISO-NE within 30 days.  Specifically, FERC's order requires ISO-NE to either revise its existing market rules to provide for the review and potential mitigation of offers by capacity importers in a manner similar to how existing resources' offers are reviewed, or to show cause why such revisions are not required.  FERC stated that although it has found in the past that most imports should be treated consistent with internal resources for mitigation purposes, ISO-NE's current tariff does not require the market monitor to ensure that importers' de-list bids are consistent with their going forward opportunity costs.  FERC said that it is concerned that this might create an opportunity for the exercise of market power and result in preferential and unduly discriminatory treatment favoring importers.5

Going Forward

FERC's decision to allow the results of FCA-8 to become effective by operation of law, and the Commissioners' related statements, highlights the significant regulatory uncertainty for capacity resources in New England – and possibly more broadly for all market participants.  Subsequently, parties will surely argue that this disposition puts resource owners on notice that auction prices cannot necessarily be relied upon until ISO-NE's results filing has been addressed – even where ISO-NE has conducted its auction in accordance with its tariff.  Such headwinds will surely buffet New England and may well adversely affect the cost of financing resources.  FERC's show-cause order in EL14-99 stirs in further uncertainty and may ultimately result in investors favoring other markets.  The joint statement from Commissioners Clark and Bay illuminates their view of the role FERC serves in protecting consumers and squaring that responsibility with the filed rate doctrine.  The statement also suggests FERC may utilize its enforcement arm more actively and in a "real-time" role – including in section 205 proceedings, potentially at the expense of regulatory certainty.

Footnotes

1 See https://www.ferc.gov/media/headlines/2014/080114.asp#.VBnk3kopDcs

2 Statement of Chairman Cheryl A. LaFleur, available at http://ferc.gov/media/statements-speeches/lafleur/2014/09-16-14-lafleur.asp#.VCLr2EopDcs

3 Joint Statement of Commissioners Clark and Bay, available at http://ferc.gov/media/statements-speeches/clark/2014/09-16-14-clark.asp#.VCLsXUopDcs

4 Statement of Commissioner Moeller, available at http://ferc.gov/media/statements-speeches/moeller/2014/09-16-14-moeller.asp#.VCLscEopDcs

5 ISO New England Inc., 148 FERC ¶ 61,201 (2014).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions