United States: Not Only Alive And Well — But Full Of Energy

Last Updated: September 24 2014
Article by Scott J. Slavick

Safe distance rule in force after new ruling in 5-Hour Energy case. 'Sucks' to be N2G.

In a surprisingly large number of trademark infringement cases, defendants enjoined from use of an infringing trademark make only de minimis changes to the infringing product to present the appearance of compliance with a court's order.

For example, more than 60 years ago, the owner of the ESKAY mark, Eskay Drugs, Inc., obtained a consent decree that enjoined defendant Smith, Kline & French Labs, from using the ESKAY trademark or any colorable imitation of it. When the latter decided to use ENKAY as an alternative, the 5th Circuit disallowed the move, holding Smith, Kline & French in contempt of its injunction and stating that the defendant "must do more than see how close they can come with safety to that which they were enjoined from doing."

As trademark owners know, however, the same challenges keep coming back to the courts.

In 2008, Innovation Ventures, owner of the well-known 5-Hour Energy marks, sued N2G over its sale of an allegedly infringing energy drink product, including the then-named 6 Hour Energy Shot. Innovation Ventures (IV) quickly obtained a preliminary injunction against the sale of N2G's products while the case unfolded. In the end, a jury ultimately found most of N2G's products infringed IV's 5-Hour marks, hit the infringer with $1.75 million in damages, and issued a permanent injunction barring N2G from selling energy shot products that were confusingly similar to Innovation's products.

Innovation Ventures had hoped its problems with N2G were over. But as it turned out, N2G was still drinking its own Koolaid — and clearly was primed for more action. In 2012, a trial court held N2G in contempt after Innovation Ventures showed that its competitor was still selling modified versions of the enjoined products. And recently, Innovation Ventures brought yet another contempt motion against N2G, arguing that the latter was still trying to sell modified versions of the previously enjoined products.

The trial court agreed. Deciding that N2G's energetic activities again constituted infringement, the court held N2G in contempt in part under the "safe distance rule," which allows courts broader discretion to hold defendants in contempt of injunctions — even for selling new products that would not necessarily have infringed the plaintiff's mark on their own. The idea is to prevent defendants from making tiny tweaks to repeatedly circumvent injunctions and to remedy confusion by forcing defendants to adopt entirely new marks.

In support of the safe distance rule, many courts have recited the concept that a defendant previously found guilty must keep a safe distance away from what might be considered the common-sense margin line of infringement, instead of adopting the practice of getting as close as it can come to that which it has been enjoined from doing. In general, courts have shown themselves ready to keep a defendant previously found guilty from doing something that others might not have received censure for. Such a penalty might even involve a handicap compared with those who have not disqualified themselves.

Said differently, courts clearly share the view that once caught, an infringer should expect some fencing in — even if that fence presents a tighter constraint on its actions than a court would enforce on others. That infringer should expect to have its conduct carefully scrutinized in future uses of marks, and should not expect to be allowed to receive the same leniency accorded a user who commences in good faith to use a mark, for example, to which an enjoined defendant may have shifted.

Otherwise, in the thinking of the courts, a defendant enjoined from using a certain mark could simply make a tiny change to it, just as in the Eskay case in 1951, and start a new trademark contest all over again. The 7th Circuit, for example, has explicitly stated that it is fine if the court requires the defendant previously found guilty to choose a distinctively different mark rather than to hew so close to the line that the parties must return to court interminably, to haggle about every mark.

In this case, though, N2G just couldn't get off the litigation treadmill, appealing the trial court's contempt finding to the 6th Circuit. Rather surprisingly, its lawyers argued that the 6th Circuit had previously shown itself as not liking to rely on the safe distance rule, instead relying primarily on its own opinion in The Taubman Co. v. Webfeats, et al.

The Taubman case involved a defendant's using a plaintiff's trademarks in conjunction with the word "sucks" in the domain name of several "complaint" sites, as well as in the domain name of a non-commercial "fan" site. So the 6th Circuit disagreed with N2G's argument that the earlier ruling pertained to its own case. In distinguishing theTaubmancase, the 6th Circuit explained that it was an appeal from a preliminary injunction, whereas N2G was appealing a contempt holding after violating a permanent injunction.

The 6th Circuit further distinguished Taubman by explaining that the earlier decision did not involve a commercial dispute at all but rather addressed whether a business could use the Lanham Act to shut down public debate about its commercial activities. The court explained that the safe distance rule had had no place in Taubman,but that it was particularly applicable in N2G's case — in which the 6th Circuit felt that N2G was trying to skirt a permanent injunction for its own commercial gain.

N2G had also raised a novel argument that the safe distance rule should not apply to trade dress cases because those types of cases were too subjective. The 6th Circuit disagreed with that argument also, holding that N2G produced no authority to suggest that it should not, and explained that many courts have done what the district court did here — apply the safe distance rule to insure that a serial infringer respects protected trade dress.

So, in sum, it's safe to say the safe distance rule is alive and well. But what does this recent case mean for future plaintiffs and defendants?

The most interesting aspect of the safe distance rule, which remains an open issue after this case, is whether a trademark owner can successfully use it against a potential infringer who has not been previously adjudged to have infringed the trademark owner's mark, but who has agreed to change one of its marks at the trademark owner's demand in the past to get the alleged infringer to change another mark.

Can the owner use that previous change to argue that the alleged infringer must select a mark that is farther away from the trademark owner's own mark, than the mark that an innocent third-party user could select? The outer reaches of the safe distance rule are what savvy trademark owners need to analyze and potentially use to their advantage. Trademark attorneys and the courts may have to expend some energy of their own to figure this one out.

Originally published by Inside Counsel Magazine.

This article is intended to provide information of general interest to the public and is not intended to offer legal advice about specific situations or problems. Brinks Gilson & Lione does not intend to create an attorney-client relationship by offering this information and review of the information shall not be deemed to create such a relationship. You should consult a lawyer if you have a legal matter requiring attention. For further information, please contact a Brinks Gilson & Lione lawyer.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Scott J. Slavick
In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions