United States: District Court Erred In Denying Stay By Reviewing Board’s Decision To Institute A Covered Business Method Proceeding

n VirtualAgility Inc. v. Salesforce.com, Inc., No. 14-1232 (Fed. Cir. July 10, 2014), the Federal Circuit held that the district court clearly erred in denying a stay pending a covered business method ("CBM") review when it undertook its own review of the Board's decision to institute the CBM review.

VirtualAgility Inc. ("VA") sued Salesforce.com, Inc. ("Salesforce") and other defendants (collectively "Defendants"), alleging infringement of U.S. Patent No. 8,095,413 ("the '413 patent").  In May 2013, Salesforce filed a petition with the Board for CBM review, alleging that all claims of the '413 patent were not patent eligible under 35 U.S.C. § 101 and were invalid under 35 U.S.C. §§ 102 and 103 based on prior art.  Also in May 2013, Defendants filed a motion to stay all district court proceedings pending the CBM review.  In August 2013, while the motion to stay was pending, the district court issued a discovery order and held a scheduling conference, setting the claim construction hearing and trial dates for April 2014 and November 2014, respectively.  In November 2013, the Board instituted CBM review of all claims of the '413 patent under §§ 101 and 102, setting a trial date at the Board for July 2014.  The district court then denied Defendants' motion to stay in January 2014.  Defendants appealed.

On appeal, the Federal Circuit first considered the proper standard of review.  The parties disputed whether the appellate review standard should be de novo or abuse of discretion.  The Court observed that prior to the America Invents Act ("AIA"), a district court's denial of a motion to stay pending PTO proceedings was generally not appealable, but when it was, the Court reviewed the denial under the "abuse of discretion" standard.  The Court noted that the AIA created an express right to appeal stay decisions pending CBM review.  The Court declined, however, to resolve the parties' dispute over the standard of review, holding that the district court's denial would be reversed even under the "abuse of discretion" standard.

"Under the statutory scheme, district courts have no role in reviewing the [Board's] determinations regarding the patentability of claims that are subject to CBM proceedings."  Slip op. at 11.

The Court then considered each of the factors set forth in the AIA for deciding whether to grant a stay pending CBM review.  First, in considering whether a stay would simplify the issues in question and streamline the trial, the Court rejected the district court's finding that "it was 'not convinced' by the [Board's] assessment that cancellation of some or all of the claims during the CBM review was 'probable.'"  Slip op. at 6 (quoting VirtualAgility Inc. v. Salesforce.com, Inc., No. 13-cv-00111, 2014 WL 94371, at *2, *5 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 9, 2014)).  The Court agreed with Defendants that the issues would be simplified and determined that this factor heavily favored a stay.  Although agreeing that this factor and another stay factor overlap in their analyses, the Court stated that "they continue to be separate, individual factors which must be weighed in the stay determination" and could not be collapsed into a single factor.  Id.  at 11.  The Court held that the district court erred in collapsing two of the factors and to the extent that the district court "decided to 'review'" the Board's determination because "district courts have no role in reviewing the [Board's] determinations regarding the patentability of claims that are subject to CBM proceedings."  Id.  The Court then determined that once the district court's improper review of the Board's analysis was removed, the remaining evidence of this factor weighed in favor of a stay.  For example, the Court observed that because CBM review was granted on all claims of the only patent-at-issue, if Salesforce is successful at the Board, then any burden on the district court would be eliminated.  The Court also took judicial notice of the fact that VA filed a motion to amend its claims at the PTO.  Although the Court did not consider the motion to amend, it stated that the motion to amend would "only weigh further in favor of granting the stay."  Id. at 14. 

The Court next examined the factor of whether discovery was complete and whether a trial date had been set.  The Court determined that this timing factor heavily favored a stay.  The Court noted that "it was not error for the district court to wait until the [Board] made its decision to institute CBM review before it ruled on the motion"; however, the Court also stated that "a motion to stay could be granted even before the [Board] rules on a post-grant review petition."  Id. at 16.  The Court observed that Defendants filed the stay motion in May 2013 and the Board instituted CBM review in November 2013, but the district court denied the stay motion in January 2014.  Although the Court reiterated that it was not error to decide the motion to stay until after institution by the Board, it stated that a court "should make every effort to expeditiously resolve the stay motion after the [Board] has made its CBM review determination."  Id.  at 17.  The Court also explained that the time at which the motion was filed is generally the relevant time to measure the stage of litigation.  The Court then held that, in this case, this factor weighed in favor of a stay because the motion was filed before discovery had begun and before a trial date had been set.  The Court also noted that when the PTO instituted CBM review, eight months remained in fact discovery, claim construction statements had not yet been filed, and jury selection was more than a year away.  Thus, the Court concluded that, even at the time of institution, this factor favored granting a stay.

The Court then turned to whether a stay would unduly prejudice the plaintiff or give the Defendants a tactical advantage.  The Court determined that the district court clearly erred in finding that undue prejudice weighed heavily against a stay, stating that although "competition between parties can weigh in favor of finding undue prejudice," there was "no evidence in [the] record that the two companies ever competed for the same customer or contract."  Id. at 21.  Further, the Court noted that VA's delay in seeking relief and its decision not to seek a preliminary injunction contradicted VA's assertions that it needed injunctive relief as soon as possible.  The Court also rejected VA's argument that there was a risk of witness loss, explaining that there was "no evidence that any of these individuals are in ill health, and at least one of the older witnesses has already been deposed."  Id. at 23.  Although noting that no single factor in its analysis was dispositive, the Court concluded that "the evidence of competition is weak and the patentee's delays in pursuing suit and seeking preliminary injunctive relief belie its claims that it will be unduly prejudiced by a stay."  Id. at 25.

The Court concluded that, because three of the four factors weighed heavily in favor of a stay and the fourth factor, "at best, weighs slightly in favor of denying a stay," the district court had abused its discretion in denying the stay.  Id. at 25-26.

Judge Newman dissented.  Judge Newman would have found that the district court's denial was within its discretion, concluding that "[a]lthough the Covered Business Method (CBM) statute provides that appellate review of a district court's decision to grant or deny a stay 'may be de novo,' when the district court's decision is within its range of discretion, it warrants appellate respect."  Newman Dissent at 3.

Judges:  Newman (dissenting), Moore (author), Chen

[Appealed from E.D. Tex., Judge Gilstrap]

This article previously appeared in Last Month at the Federal Circuit, August, 2014.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
27 Nov 2017, Seminar, London, UK

Finnegan partner Anthony Tridico will present “U.S. Patent Case Law Update” at the Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys’ annual Patent Case Law Review.

28 Nov 2017, Seminar, Milan, Italy

Finnegan partner John Paul will present “Internet of Things: Patent Liability, Enforcement and Licensing” and will join the Mock WIPO Mediation at International Technology Transfer—Licensing and ADR, co-hosted by Licensing Executives Society and World Intellectual Property Organization.

29 Nov 2017, Seminar, Tel Aviv, Israel

Finnegan is a platinum sponsor IVC Research Center’s start-up forum, “The Most Promising Start Ups for 2017 – A Synergy of Big Data, Artificial Intelligence, Machine Vision and IoT.”

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


From time to time Mondaq may send you emails promoting Mondaq services including new services. You may opt out of receiving such emails by clicking below.

*** If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of services offered by Mondaq you may opt out by clicking here .


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.