United States: The Fourth Circuit Weighs In On Third-Party Releases In Plans Of Reorganization

Last Updated: September 9 2014
Article by Peter C. Blain

Section 524 of the United States Bankruptcy Code (the Code) describes the effect of a discharge of a debtor, and in section 524(e), provides that a discharge of a debtor does not affect the liability of any other entity for the debtor's obligations. Today, virtually every plan of reorganization or liquidation includes releases for officers, directors and employees of the debtor, affiliates of the debtor, debtor and committee counsel involved in the case, the members of the creditors committee and plan sponsors, among others. However, courts addressing the enforceability of releases of third parties in plans of reorganization have interpreted section 524(e) in very different ways. On June 27, 2014, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the bankruptcy and the district courts' determination that certain non-consensual third-party releases of a debtor's officers and directors in a confirmed plan of reorganization were not enforceable, adopting the Sixth Circuit's enumerated factors to be considered when analyzing the appropriateness of such releases.

In National Heritage Foundation v. Highbourne Foundation, No. 13-1608, 2014 WL 2900933 (4th Cir. June 27, 2014), the court considered a confirmed plan that provided for non-consensual releases of officers and directors (among others) of a financially distressed not for profit foundation. Several donors objected to the enforceability of the releases. While the bankruptcy court and the district court initially found the releases enforceable, the Fourth Circuit remanded the case because it found that the bankruptcy court had not made sufficient factual findings to support its conclusions. It directed the bankruptcy court to consider the substantive factors enumerated in Class Five Nevada Claimants v. Dow Corning Corp. (In re Dow Corning Corp.), 280 F.3d 648 (6th Cir. 2002). The six factors include:

  1. Whether there is an identity of interests between the debtor and the third party.
  2. Whether the non-debtor has contributed substantial assets to the reorganization.
  3. Whether the injunction is essential to the reorganization.
  4. Whether the impacted class has voted overwhelmingly to accept the plan.
  5. Whether the plan provides a mechanism to pay for all, or substantially all, of the class affected by the injunction.
  6. Whether the plan provides for an opportunity for those creditors who choose not to settle to recover in full.

On remand a different bankruptcy judge considered the issue. While the court gave the parties the opportunity to submit additional evidence, they declined to do so. The bankruptcy court subsequently found that under the Dow Corning standards, the releases were unenforceable, and the district court affirmed. The debtor appealed to the Fourth Circuit.

The Circuit Court analyzed each of the Dow Corning factors and found that because there was an indemnification obligation in the Foundation's bylaws, only the first standard was met. Regarding the remaining factors, the court found that the officers and directors did not contribute cash to the plan, and that their service as officers and directors during the reorganization did not constitute contributing substantial assets to the plan, given that they had received salaries and had fiduciary duties to fulfill. Regarding the releases being essential to the plan, the court found that there was minimal evidence demonstrating the alleged risk that the officers and directors would resign. Moreover, the severability provision in the plan providing that the plan would remain in effect even if a particular provision was unenforceable was evidence that the releases were not essential to the plan.

Under the plan, the class which included the objecting donors was paid in full and, consequently, because it was unimpaired, it was deemed to have accepted the plan without a vote. The court said that while that section 1126(f) of the Code provides that unimpaired classes are presumed to accept a plan, the power to authorize non-debtor releases in a plan is based upon the bankruptcy court's equitable authority and not section 1126(f). While the court acknowledged it was a close question, because the affected class did not have the opportunity to vote on the plan containing the releases, it held that this factor was not met. Even if this factor was met because of the deemed acceptance of the plan, said the court, the other factors weighed against enforcing the release.

Regarding the fifth factor, because there was no mechanism to pay creditors which did not have an allowed claim (because it was late filed or otherwise), and because the debtor did not introduce evidence that the claims process it utilized adequately protected the donors' interests, this factor was not met. Finally, pointing to the same absence of any mechanism to pay donors outside of the plan, the court found that the last factor of providing the opportunity of donors affected by the release to be paid in full, was also absent.

Because only the first factor was demonstrated, the court agreed with the lower courts' determination that the release was unenforceable. However, the court concluded by saying that a debtor need not show that all of the Dow Corning factors are met for a release to be enforceable. Rather, the debtor must show sufficient facts to support the granting of the exceptional relief of a third-party release, and that was not done in this case. The court also found that the debtor had the options to reopen the bankruptcy case or file another Chapter 11 proceeding if donor suits actually materialized which subsequently damaged the debtor.

The Seventh Circuit has also addressed the enforceability of third-party releases. Refusing to read section 524(e) to prohibit all such releases, the Seventh Circuit initially held that consensual releases which are integral to the plan may be enforceable. In In re Specialty Equipment Cos., 3 F.3d 1043 (7th Cir. 1993), the court found that releases binding only those creditors who voted in favor of a plan and which were not dependent upon the vote of a particular class, were not violative of section 524(e) of the Code and therefore were permissible in appropriate circumstances.

Fifteen years later, in Airadigm Communications, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission (In re Airadigm Communications, Inc.), 519 F.3d 640, 655 (7th Cir. 2008), the court expanded its holding in Specialty Equipment and found that in the appropriate circumstances, non-consensual releases were also not inconsistent with section 524(e) and the general equitable power of the bankruptcy court. In Airadigm, the plan provided for a release of Telephone Data and Systems, Inc. ("TDS") for actions taken or omitted in connection with the plan or the case, but specifically excluded willful misconduct. The court noted the disparity in the various standards applied by other courts, including those articulated in Dow Corning set forth above, contrasted with the position of the Ninth Circuit in In re Lowenschuss, 67 F.3d 1394 (9th Cir. 1995), and the Tenth Circuit in In re Western Real Estate Fund, Inc., 922 F.2d 592 (10th Cir. 1990), which found that non-consensual releases were always impermissible. In upholding the bankruptcy court's approval of Airadigm's release provisions, the court found that the release did not provide blanket immunity but was limited to actions or omission in connection with the plan and the case; it excluded a release of any of TDS's willful misconduct; and the release was essential to the plan, which could not have been confirmed without the substantial contribution of TDS as holder of a secured claim of $188 million.

Today, third-party releases are ubiquitous in plans of reorganization and liquidation. In fact, debtors' counsel may be reluctant to exclude them for fear of a subsequent malpractice claim. However, they are subject to review under different standards in different jurisdictions. The Fourth Circuit has joined the Sixth in requiring a very rigorous standard to be met to justify the inclusion of third-party releases in a confirmed plan. While the Seventh Circuit has adopted a different standard, common among the three circuits is the requirement that the release be essential to the plan. This will likely be met by a third party making a monetary contribution which is substantial and so crucial that the plan could not be confirmed without it.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Peter C. Blain
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions