United States: The Road Ahead: What’s Coming In The Final Months Of The 113th Congress And The Lame Duck Session

As Congress returns from the August recess, re-election politics will play an increasing role on Capitol Hill. Congress is expected to be in session fewer than a dozen days between now and Election Day. This will tempt Congressional leaders to bring to the floor a series of "messaging bills" meant to draw contrasts and force vulnerable incumbents to cast "tough votes". The piece of legislation most likely to reach the President's desk in this limited time is a continuing resolution to keep the government funded. Gone from the debate this year are the ACA-driven shut down issues that have shrouded past funding extensions, but the debate will be tough nonetheless and it will be difficult for substantive legislation to move, at least until after the November elections. Other issues may be a part of the fiscal debate, for example the anticipated executive actions by the President on immigration have elicited a strong reaction from some Republicans.

Here the Dentons team in Washington looks at what is left on the agenda before November 4 and in the "Lame Duck" session to follow the election. We examine how election concerns will influence the legislative process and prospects, and how the election results may influence legislation in the Lame Duck and beyond. We also take a look at the trends in the competitive House and Senate races and do a little prognosticating ourselves.

Energy

House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R.CA) plans to revisit several energy and environmental measures in late September, including bills to: approve the Keystone XL (KXL) pipeline, block federal limits on carbon emissions from power plants and expand access to drilling offshore and on federal lands. This will require tough votes for Democratic House members. Energy issues will be important in states like Colorado, Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana and West Virginia.

Senate Energy Committee Chair, Senator Mary Landrieu (D.LA), recently joined Republicans to pass a bill out of committee approving the KXL pipeline. Senate passage of that bill is unlikely, but it allows Landrieu to tout her pro-energy record, and her role as Chair of Energy serves to highlight issues on which she di.ers with the Obama Administration's policies on oil and gas. We expect Landrieu to hold more hearings on issues that will resonate in Louisiana: revenue sharing, energy production on federal lands and coastal restoration.

The Obama Administration will continue work on energy-related regulatory initiatives. In late August, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) sent its final 2014 Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) to the O.ice of Management and Budget (OMB) for a review that may be complete before Election Day. The Department of Energy finalized its new review process for applications to export liquefied natural gas (LNG) to non- Free Trade Act countries on August 14, and could soon approve several pending applications. The Department of Commerce could act soon to clarify the Administration's crude oil export policy by defining more clearly what qualifies as a reined product that falls outside the ban on exports.

Financial Services and Taxation

Tax Extenders. GOP lawmakers would like to pass "extenders"—bills to extend permanently some of more than 50 expired tax breaks—rather than just extend them for two years, as the Senate would prefer. House Republicans would like to renew the tax breaks in a piecemeal fashion, rather than accept the Senate's approach of a comprehensive extenders bill. They are at an impasse.

In April, the Ways and Means Committee favourably reported six separate bills—each to make permanent an expiring tax provision. None of the six bills included revenue offsets. Democrats are calling for "pay-fors" to cover the costs of permanent extensions estimated by the Congressional Budget O.ice (CBO) at nearly $1 trillion in revenue over the next 10 years. Three of the six stand-alone extenders bills have passed the House, with no prospect of consideration in the Senate. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D.NV) attached the Senate extenders package—a two year extension of the 50 expired tax breaks—to a bill addressing healthcare for veterans. The bill then stalled after Republican senators voted against moving forward, despite general support for the underlying veterans' legislation. It is unlikely that any tax extenders legislation will become law this year.

Terrorism Risk Insurance Act (TRIA). The reauthorization of the TRIA, a program set to expire at the end of 2014, faces many hurdles in the House. In July, the Senate passed a bipartisan seven year TRIA reauthorization bill (S. 2244) by a vote of 93.4, but the House did not take up its version of a TRIA reauthorization bill before the August recess. Prospects are increasing that the issue of TRIA's reauthorization will not be resolved until the Lame Duck session after the election.

The current version of S. 2244 has the support of the White House and would make only minor changes to the 2007 TRIA reauthorization. In contrast, House Financial Services Committee Chairman Jeb Hensarling (R.TX) has sought consistently to eliminate, or radically scale back, the TRIA program and the federal role in terrorism insurance. Unable to do that, Hensarling has supported H.R. 4871, a TRIA reauthorization bill favourably reported out of the committee by Republicans on June 20th on a partyline vote. H.R. 4871 would extend TRIA for five years, increase the insurer copay to 20 percent, raise the program's trigger from $100 million to $500 million and bifurcate the program so that the federal share of coverage for nuclear, biological, chemical or radiological (NBCR) attacks would be greater than the federal share of coverage for non-NBCR attacks. House Democrats strongly support passage of S. 2244 and unanimously oppose H.R. 4871.

Corporate Tax Inversion.

Controversy continues to grow over inversions—cross-border transactions in which a US firm merges with an offshore entity to establish tax residency in a foreign country with a lower corporate tax rate. President Obama has called companies who do inversions "corporate deserters who renounce their citizenship to shield profits". Democrats seek to pass stand-alone legislation to curb corporate inversions, while most Republicans believe that inversions should be addressed, if at all, only as part of a comprehensive tax reform proposal.

Various legislative proposals have been offered to limit or prevent the use of corporate inversions by raising the foreign ownership threshold for the post-merger entity from 20 percent to 50 percent; broadening the ban on the award of federal contracts to inverted corporations or reducing the amount of interest inverted companies can deduct. Senate Finance Committee Ranking Member Orrin Hatch (R.UT) believes that reform of the tax code is the only way to completely address inversions. He argues that any interim steps to address inversions must not be retroactive or punitive, should be revenue neutral, must favor a territorial tax system and not impede progress toward comprehensive tax reform. There is no reason currently to believe that Finance Committee Chairman Ron Wyden (D.OR) and Ranking Member Hatch can agree on legislation that both the Senate and House would pass and the President would sign.

The President may use his executive authority to address corporate inversions as many Democrats have urged. It is unclear how much can be accomplished administratively. The Treasury Department is now putting together a range of administrative options for executive action that Secretary Jack Lew says would "change the economics of inversions" but has not yet identified any of the administrative options under consideration.

Health Care

A divided Congress and presidential veto threat will preclude the enactment of any Affordable Care Act (ACA)-related legislation when Congress returns to Washington. It is unlikely that the appropriations fights of the past to defund the ACA will recur, apart from rhetoric and amendments with little chance of passage.

The ACA is certain to play a role in many close elections around the country (particularly in Senate races), however, the impact of the law on voters' thinking is unlikely to reach 2010 or 2012 levels. Public opinion of the law has barely shifted since its enactment; the electorate substantially has turned to other issues.

The second annual open enrollment period will begin November 15, after the election. For the three month open enrollment period, the bulk of health reform activity will be directly related to the experiences of consumers in open enrollment. Congress also has temporarily fixed the Medicare physician payment formula through March 31, 2015, avoiding the annual end-of-year scramble to enact Medicare legislation.

Immigration

More than a year after the US Senate passed a comprehensive immigration reform bill, and despite the stream of undocumented migrants from Central America, immigration reform remains stalled in Congress, where the House is expected to take no further action on a reform bill. President Obama has recently indicated that he may use executive orders and agency action to a.ect changes in our immigration system. He is considering action to provide additional green cards for high-tech workers and family members of US citizens and to forestall deportation for many undocumented immigrants currently in the US.

White House action on immigration is expected soon, following the failure of negotiations with Congress to pass a measure to address the recent surge of migrants from Central America. The president's proposed $3.7 billion package to address the border crisis, and more modest measures from Republicans in Congress, fell victim to the election politics of immigration, a particularly powerful issue in states where key Senate races will be decided. The President's likely executive actions will further roil the immigration debate. Republicans will cite it as executive overreach. Immigration reform will not pass in this session of Congress, and the politics of the issue ensure that it will be difficult to pass next year.

FY 2015 Appropriations

Despite assent in Congress to the Murray-Ryan agreement—the bipartisan budget conference agreement reached by Senate Budget Committee chairman Patty Murray (D.WA) and House Budget Committee chairman Paul Ryan (R.WI)—on a top line number of $1.014 trillion for all FY 2015 appropriations, Congress has sent none of its twelve appropriations bills to the President for his signature this year. The House has passed seven bills (Commerce, Justice-Science, Defense, Energy and Water, Financial Services, Legislative Branch, Military Construction and Transportation-HUD), while the Senate has failed to pass even one, though Fiscal Year 2014 will expire on September 30, 2014.

Since Congress is likely to recess from late September through the election, it will almost certainly pass a "Continuing Resolution" (CR) to keep the government running from October 1, 2014 until mid- December 2014. This would allow Congress to put together an omnibus appropriations bill, with all 12 spending bills in a single package, and send it to the President in December. Or Congress could pass another CR during the Lame Duck session and tackle the 12 appropriations bills in early 2015, in the next Congress.

Telecommunications

Congress will continue work on the Satellite Television Extension and Localism Act of 2012 (STELA), which is slated to expire on December 31, 2014. In July, the House approved a bipartisan 5-year extension of the Act, with some changes, including repeal of the set-top box integration ban, prohibiting broadcasters in the same market from joint retransmission consent negotiations, and repeal of rules prohibiting pay-TV providers from blacking out broadcast signals during Neilson "sweeps weeks" periods.

On the Senate side, the Judiciary Committee has reported out a "clean" five year extension, without any of the video reforms that the House adopted. However, Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation Chairman Jay Rockefeller (D.WV) and Ranking Member John Thune (R.SD) recently released their "Local Choice" bipartisan draft proposal. The Senate Commerce Committee would likely consider and report STELA legislation during September, with rumors of a September 17th markup. Majority Leader Reid would prefer for the Senate to pass its STELA bill by unanimous consent. It remains to be seen whether the Local Choice proposal, or any of its components, moves forward with STELA.

The Internet Tax Freedom Act will expire on November 1, 2014. The House has voted for a permanent moratorium on state and local governments taxing access to the Internet. The Senate is considering a shorter-term 10 year extension, but Majority Leader Reid plans to attach the Marketplace Fairness Act, which would require online retailers to collect sales tax. That bill passed the Senate last year. A Senate floor vote is possible in September or it could slip until November, following the election.

Cybersecurity

Congress made some progress on cybersecurity legislation this Congress, but it is doubtful that any more cybersecurity legislation will pass the Senate before the elections. The House has passed numerous cybersecurity bills in this Congress, primarily codifying existing Federal cybersecurity programs, providing increased Federal research and development and enhancing cyber workforce training. However, the House-passed Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act (CISPA) is seen as the most critical piece of legislation necessary to protect critical infrastructure against cyber threats.

CISPA was sponsored by House Intelligence Committee Chairman Mike Rogers (R.MI) and Ranking Member Dutch Ruppersberger (D.MD) and passed the House in April 2013. It provides for information sharing between the federal government and private sector, and provides liability protections for companies that share cyber threat information with the government. CISPA has been criticized by privacy rights advocates. The President has threatened to veto CISPA due to concerns about individual privacy.

Despite this controversy, Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Diane Feinstein (D.CA) and Ranking Member Saxby Chambliss (R.GA) introduced a Senate companion bill to CISPA. Their bill, the Cyber Information Sharing Act of 2014 (CISA), was passed out of the Senate Intelligence Committee in July 2014, by a vote of 12.4. The Administration has raised privacy concerns, but has yet to threaten a veto.

Given the opposition by privacy rights groups and the Administration to the current House and Senate information sharing bills, it is unlikely that there will be any action on either bill before the mid-term elections. After the elections, the prospects for Senate passage and eventually sending a bill to the President will improve but it is unclear if the Senate will allocate loor time for this legislation.

Export-Import Bank

The fate of the Export-Import Bank (Ex-Im) is in doubt. Its charter is set to expire at the end of September. The agency provides loan guarantees and insurance to foreign companies purchasing US goods, but many Republicans lately have called for its dissolution, arguing that the bank represents corporate welfare and "crony capitalism." In the past, the Ex-Im Bank has enjoyed bipartisan support. Despite support for the bank's reauthorization from influential business groups, including the US Chamber of Commerce, it is possible that Ex-Im Bank's charter could lapse on September 30.

In the Senate, a group of eight senators, led by Senator Joe Manchin (D.WV) and Senator Mark Kirk (R.IL), introduced a bill that would reauthorize the bank for five years, while increasing reporting requirements and boosting its lending authority to $160 billion from $140 billion over a four-year period. The bank's reauthorization is also a critical topic in many contentious Senate races including Iowa, North Carolina and Louisiana.

Some Republican members called for the committee to find a middle ground on the bank's renewal, and impose reforms that would rein in its lending capacities. Disagreement within House Republican ranks— and lawmakers facing tough re-election bids in districts with a stake in ExIm-inanced exports— could provide critical leverage for a short-term reauthorization. A short-term extension of three to six months also would provide time for House Republicans to organize a reform strategy and negotiate with the Senate, while preserving the opportunity to take advantage of the potential Republican takeover of the Senate in January.

Election Outlook

While a week can be a lifetime in a campaign, our team understands the dynamics of the electoral battlefield in the competitive races and the trends at play in each. Trends can change, and "October Surprises" may dramatically alter the dynamics of a particular race. "Wave" elections may not become apparent until late October. With congressional approval at historic lows, all incumbents face some peril from the electorate—in the current climate, some observers have already speculated that a Republican wave election is possible this year.

Republicans are virtually certain to hold the House, so the race for the Speaker's gavel will be contested only among Republicans after the election. The effects of the 2010 redistricting combined with the impacts of President Obama's approval rating below 50 percent create a strong tailwind for House Republican candidate. Although most seats are contested, the number of truly competitive races in the House remains small, numbering in the dozens, with anywhere from eight to 12 "toss up" races for seats held by House Democrats and three to five for Republicans. In all, the universe of competitive seats is less than a third of the Chamber.

Control of the Senate will be largely determined by races in several states that Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney carried in 2012. Democrats in Alaska, Arkansas, North Carolina and Louisiana face very strong challengers. The atmospherics of this cycle and polling have consistently shown the challenge they face in these traditionally "red states." The Democratic-held seats in South Dakota, Montana and West Virginia already seem likely to see a party switch. Bucking the trend at the moment is Senator Mark Begich who holds a slim lead in Alaska. The re-election e.ort of Mark Udall in Colorado also has national Democrats concerned, and the open seat long held by Democrat Tom Harkin in Iowa has yielded a very tight race. Republicans find themselves closely watching the McConnell-Grimes race in Kentucky (where the Republican Leader remains favored to win but is facing a surprisingly strong challenge). The outcome is uncertain in the Saxby Chambliss open seat in Georgia where Republican David Perdue and Democrat Michelle Nunn remain close in the polls.

Republicans require a pick up of six seats to gain the majority in the Senate —although a majority in the Senate does not bestow complete control. In today's Senate, effective control and the ability to pass bills comes with 60 votes. If Republicans take the Senate, they will still need some Democratic votes to move important legislation. This is their best opportunity, because the electoral landscape dramatically Current breakdown of Congressional districts shifts in 2016 where Senate Republicans will ind themselves defending more vulnerable seats than will the Democrats. Political analysts have suggested that should the Republicans gain the majority in the US Senate in 2014, their majority will be in peril in 2016.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Events from this Firm
25 Oct 2018, Other, New York, United States

Once again, Dentons is proud to bring together insurance industry leaders, lawyers and regulators for a full-day examination of the most current issues.

26 Oct 2018, Other, New York, United States

Selling your company may be the most important and complicated transaction of your life. To achieve an optimal outcome, you need to get educated.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Proskauer Rose LLP
Holland & Knight
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Proskauer Rose LLP
Holland & Knight
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions