United States: New Jersey Tax Court Allows Taxpayer To Revise Federal Adjusted Basis For Corporation Business Tax Purposes

The New Jersey Tax Court allowed an automobile leasing company to revise its federal adjusted basis when calculating gain from the sale of its assets for New Jersey corporation business tax (CBT) purposes to account for depreciation deductions that resulted in no state tax benefit.1 Also, the Tax Court struck down a regulation promulgated by the New Jersey Division of Taxation to the extent that it purported to limit New Jersey's decoupling from federal bonus depreciation to property acquired on or after January 1, 2002. Finally, the Division's removal under the "throwout rule" of the taxpayer's receipts sourced to Nevada, South Dakota and Wyoming from the denominator of the sales factor was determined to be erroneous.


The taxpayer, a California corporation which operated a vehicle leasing business in numerous states including New Jersey, facilitated the financing of lease transactions entered into by affiliated automobile dealers and their consumers. In a typical lease transaction, an automobile dealer entered into a lease agreement with a consumer for a vehicle. After the taxpayer bought the leased vehicle from the dealer, the taxpayer was assigned the lease agreement and collected the lease payments from the consumer. At the completion of the lease, the taxpayer sold the used vehicle.

For federal income tax purposes, the taxpayer subtracted the cost of its leased vehicles through depreciation deductions. To determine the taxpayer's gain when it sold a vehicle,2 the basis of the vehicle was adjusted downward to reflect the depreciation deductions.3 The reduction of the basis had the effect of increasing the taxpayer's gain when the vehicle was sold because its gain was the excess of the proceeds over the adjusted basis. The lower basis provided for depreciation recovery when a vehicle was sold by increasing the gain realized from the sale by the amount of the used and allowable depreciation.

The taxpayer operated on a fiscal year basis, with its fiscal year commencing on October 1 of each year. During periods prior to fiscal year 2003 (which began on October 1, 2002), the taxpayer had been allowed substantial excess depreciation deductions that increased its net operating losses (NOLs). Because of a New Jersey statute that prohibited loss carryovers during the taxpayer's 2003 and 2004 fiscal years,4 the taxpayer could not use the losses for New Jersey CBT purposes during these years. However, the taxpayer disposed of vehicles and recognized depreciation recovery gain for federal income tax purposes. This gain was attributable to the excess depreciation deductions which provided the taxpayer with no CBT benefit. The taxpayer initially used its federal adjusted basis to determine its CBT gains, but subsequently filed amended returns for its 2003 and 2004 fiscal years so that the depreciation recovery gains would not be included in its entire net income used to determine its CBT liability.5 Also, the taxpayer argued that the state's bonus depreciation decoupling provision was not limited to property acquired on or after January 1, 2002 and that the Division should not have thrown out its sales in Nevada, South Dakota and Wyoming. The Tax Court considered cross-motions for summary judgment concerning the taxpayer's CBT obligations for its 2003 through 2006 fiscal years.

Taxpayer Could Revise Federal Adjusted Basis

The Tax Court agreed that the taxpayer could adjust the federal basis in its property to account for depreciation deductions for which it received no New Jersey CBT benefit.6 In reaching its decision, the Tax Court explained that the "entire net income" tax base under the CBT is coupled to federal taxable income. After discussing the CBT statute that imposes tax on "entire net income,"7 the Tax Court acknowledged that nothing in the statute expressly allows a taxpayer to depart from its federal taxable income to reflect depreciation deductions which benefitted the taxpayer for federal tax but not New Jersey tax purposes. However, other CBT statutory and regulatory provisions suggested that the New Jersey legislature intended to tax only an entity's actual economic gains from the sale of its property and not artificial gains from unused depreciation deductions.

To support its decision that the taxpayer could adjust its federal basis for CBT purposes, the Tax Court relied on New Jersey gross (personal) income tax (GIT) appellate decisions that established a "broad principle that State tax policy prohibits the assessment of a tax on 'phantom income' resulting from depreciation deductions used by the taxpayer for federal purposes but which resulted in no New Jersey tax benefit." In Koch v. Director, Division of Taxation,8 the New Jersey Supreme Court held that if a taxpayer's federal adjusted basis in a partnership interest reflects benefits under federal law, but not available under New Jersey law, the Division could not require a taxpayer to use the federal adjusted basis to calculate the gain from selling the partnership interest.

The taxpayer successfully relied on Moroney v. Director, Division of Taxation9 to support its argument that it could depart from its federal adjusted basis when calculating its gain. In Moroney, the Appellate Division followed Koch and allowed a taxpayer to adjust its federal basis when calculating gain for GIT purposes. The Tax Court acknowledged that there are differences between the CBT and GIT, but applied the Koch and Moroney decisions to the CBT. There were parallels between the GIT statutory provisions interpreted in Moroney and the CBT statutory provisions defining an entity's income that supported the taxpayer's position. Finally, the Tax Court rejected the Division's argument that application of Moroney to calculate the taxpayer's taxable income would contravene the CBT Act's prohibition on the carryforward of NOLs during the relevant tax years. The Tax Court concluded that a statutory ban on carrying forward NOLs does not by itself preclude an adjustment to federal basis. As a result, the Tax Court granted the taxpayer's motion for summary judgment.

State's Decoupling from Federal Bonus Depreciation

The taxpayer successfully argued that New Jersey's statute decoupling from federal bonus depreciation includes property purchased after September 10, 2001 and prior to the taxpayer's first fiscal year beginning on or after January 1, 2002. Under federal law, bonus depreciation applied to property acquired after September 10, 2001.10 In 2002, New Jersey enacted legislation that decoupled from federal bonus depreciation for property acquired after September 10, 2001 and before September 11, 2004.11 On February 27, 2003, the Division promulgated a regulation that somewhat modified the dates contained in the statute, providing the state decoupled from bonus depreciation for property acquired on or after January 1, 2002 and during a fiscal year beginning on or after January 1, 2002.12

The taxpayer's 2003 fiscal year (which began on October 1, 2002) was the taxpayer's first fiscal year beginning on or after January 1, 2002. In that fiscal year, the taxpayer placed leased vehicles into service after September 10, 2001. The taxpayer argued that decoupling began in the taxpayer's 2003 fiscal year and applied to any property it purchased after September 10, 2001. Under this argument, decoupling from bonus depreciation applied to a more expansive subset of vehicles as a means to lower the amount of gain the taxpayer ultimately realized as a result of selling the vehicles, since the effect of federal bonus depreciation was to lower the basis of the vehicles and increase the amount of the gain on property that was sold. The Division argued that decoupling did not apply to vehicles the taxpayer purchased between September 10, 2001 and October 1, 2002.

The Tax Court concluded that the statute expressly provided that the decoupling from federal bonus depreciation applied to property acquired after September 10, 2001 and before September 11, 2004.13 The Division did not have the authority to alter the statutory language by promulgating a regulation applying the decoupling to property acquired on or after January 1, 2002 and during a fiscal year beginning on or after January 1, 2002. Therefore, this portion of the regulation was determined to be invalid and the decoupling provision applied to property the taxpayer acquired after September 10, 2001.

Throwout Rule Did Not Support Exclusion of Receipts

The Tax Court held that the Division should not have applied the "throwout rule" to remove the taxpayer's receipts from Nevada, South Dakota and Wyoming from the denominator of the sales factor. During the relevant tax years, New Jersey used a three-factor apportionment formula with a property, payroll and double-weighted sales factor.14 Under the throwout rule, sales made into foreign jurisdictions where a corporation was not subject to tax were excluded from the denominator of the sales factor.15 In Whirlpool Properties, Inc. v. Director, Division of Taxation,16 the New Jersey Supreme Court held that untaxed receipts cannot be thrown out if the taxpayer has nexus with a destination state which has chosen not to impose an income tax. In the instant case, the Tax Court held that the taxpayer's receipts in Nevada, South Dakota and Wyoming could not be thrown out, because the taxpayer had sufficient business activity in these states so that if a corporation income or business tax were adopted in these states, the taxpayer would have been subject to tax.


The Tax Court's extension of the holdings in Koch and Moroney, cases involving the GIT, to allow taxpayers to adjust the federal basis when calculating gain for CBT purposes, provides valuable guidance for taxpayers. Under this decision, taxpayers are allowed to adjust the federal basis in their property to account for depreciation deductions for which they receive no New Jersey CBT benefit. Thus, under certain circumstances, taxpayers may ultimately be able to reduce their New Jersey gains on sales of property by increasing their New Jersey-specific basis of their property. Also, this case may create opportunities beyond the New Jersey CBT if the line of reasoning highlighted in Koch and Moroney is followed in other states.

The question of whether taxpayers can adjust their federal basis since the Koch decision has created some confusion in New Jersey, at least to the extent of inconsistencies found between the instructions for the GIT depreciation adjustment worksheet17 and Form NJ- 1065, the New Jersey partnership return.18 The depreciation worksheet provides for the computation of a New Jersey depreciation adjustment for taxpayers that have taken bonus depreciation. According to the instructions, New Jersey depreciation adjustments will affect an individual's determination of reportable income. Partnerships with a New Jersey filing requirement calculate the entity's adjustments to New Jersey depreciation and gain or loss from the disposition of the assets. The instructions for Form NJ-1065 provide express guidance for determining the gain or loss on the sale or disposition of a partnership and the Koch effect. The partnership must use the federal basis for partnership assets for New Jersey tax purposes. The Koch decision does not apply to the sale, disposition or liquidation of assets by a partnership. However, resident taxpayers that sell or dispose of a partnership interest may be entitled to make a Koch adjustment to their federal basis in the partnership when determining New Jersey gain or loss. Thus, the depreciation adjustment worksheet instructs partnerships to make adjustments, while the partnership return prohibits partnerships from making adjustments.

By invalidating the portion of the Division's regulation providing that New Jersey did not decouple from federal bonus depreciation for property acquired after September 10, 2001 and prior to a fiscal year beginning on or after January 1, 2002, the Tax Court emphasized that regulations cannot explicitly change statutory provisions. In this particular case, this decision allowed the taxpayer to decouple from bonus depreciation for property acquired after September 10, 2001 and prior to October 1, 2002. This was important because the taxpayer sold significant amounts of property after a relatively short holding period. For federal income tax purposes, the impact of bonus depreciation substantially reduced the taxpayer's federal basis in the property, resulting in greater gains when such property was sold than if normal depreciation methods (followed by New Jersey as a result of decoupling) were used.


1 Toyota Motor Credit Corp. v. Director, Division of Taxation, New Jersey Tax Court, Dkt. No. 002021- 2010, Aug. 1, 2014.

2 The taxpayer realized gain under Internal Revenue Code (IRC) § 1001.

3 The federal adjusted basis was calculated by deducting from the cost of the vehicle the cumulative amount of depreciation deductions that were available to the taxpayer.

4 N.J. REV. STAT. § 54:10A-4(k)(6)(E).

5 The taxpayer relied on Moroney v. Director, Division of Taxation, 868 A.2d 1132 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2005).

6 Following its decision in Toyota Motor Credit, the New Jersey Tax Court decided a similar case, Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Director, Division of Taxation, New Jersey Tax Court, Dkt. No. 015751-2009, Aug. 5, 2014. Because the Ford Motor Credit case involved a fact pattern very similar to Toyota Motor Credit and concerned the same adjustment to federal basis argument, the Tax Court relied on this portion of the Toyota Motor Credit decision in Ford Motor Credit.

7 N.J. REV. STAT. § 54:10A-4(k).

8 722 A.2d 918 (N.J. 1999).

9 868 A.2d 1132 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2005).

10 IRC § 168(k). This provision allowed the taxpayer to take an additional federal deduction equal to 30 percent of the cost of a leased vehicle in the year placed in service. Regular depreciation was computed on the remaining 70 percent over the course of the taxpayer's ownership of the vehicle.

11 Ch. 40 (A.B. 2501), Laws 2002, amending N.J. REV. STAT. § 54:10A-4(k)(12)(A). This legislation expressly applied to privilege periods and taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2002. The statute was subsequently amended and the reference to September 11, 2004 was removed.

12 N.J. ADMIN. CODE § 18:7-5.2(a)(2)(iv).

13 Ch. 40 (A.B. 3111), Laws 2004, amending N.J. REV. STAT. § 54:10A-4(k)(12)(A).

14 N.J. REV. STAT. § 54:10A-6.

15 Prior N.J. REV. STAT. § 54:10A-6(B) (repealed for tax years beginning after June 30, 2010).

16 26 A.3d 446 (N.J. 2011). The New Jersey Supreme Court explained that throwing out receipts increases the sales factor and the taxpayer's CBT liability.

17 General Instructions, New Jersey Gross Income Tax Depreciation Adjustment Worksheet GITDEP.

18 Instructions for Form NJ-1065, Partnership Return and New Jersey Partnership NJK-1.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


From time to time Mondaq may send you emails promoting Mondaq services including new services. You may opt out of receiving such emails by clicking below.

*** If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of services offered by Mondaq you may opt out by clicking here .


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.