United States: Highlights Of Congressional Hearings On Copyright Remedies: Statutory Damages, Small Claims And Felonious Streaming

Last Updated: August 22 2014
Article by David A. Kluft


On July 24, 2014, the Judiciary Committee of the United States House of Representatives, through its Subcommittee on Courts, Intellectual Property and the Internet, held hearings on the subject of copyright remedies. Most of the discussion focused on the efficacy of statutory damages, which provide for awards between $750 and $30,000 per infringed work (with adjustments up to $150,000 per work for willful infringement). There was also discussion of the Copyright Office's recent proposal for a small claims tribunal.  The proposed tribunal would enable individual copyright holders to seek a remedy for small-dollar-value infringements without bringing a copyright infringement action in federal court, which Representative John Conyers (D-Mich.) asserted can cost an average of $350,000.

Following is our summary of highlights from the witness testimony:

David Bitkower, Acting Deputy Assistant Attorney General, US Dept. of Justice


Acting Deputy Bitkower discussed the efforts of the Department of Justice to develop and maintain copyright enforcement programs to meet the challenges of the digital age. In particular, he called attention to the Department's efforts with regard to the "Mega Conspiracy" case, in which defendants associated with the Megaupload websites are currently facing extradition to the Eastern District of Virginia to face charges of criminal copyright infringement, fraud and money laundering.  Mr. Bitkower's written testimony contains other examples of recent enforcement efforts.

Bitkower reported that internet streaming is becoming the preferred method for pirates to distribute unauthorized material online. However, because streaming has been held to be a "public performance" rather than a distribution or a reproduction, it is criminally punishable only as a misdemeanor and not as a felony. Bitkower asked that Congress amend the criminal provisions of the Copyright Act to clarify that illegal streaming can give rise to a felony prosecution. He also recommended increased funding to allow the Department to send specialized prosecutors to other countries to combat global IP piracy.

Steven M. Tepp, CEO of Sentinel Worldwide


Mr. Tepp, a former Copyright Office lawyer, provided oral and written testimony addressing the history of the relief available to copyright holders, including injunctive relief, actual damages, impoundment of infringing goods, statutory damages and attorneys' fees.  He testified that this array of remedies has three goals: compensation, deterrence and, in egregious cases, punishment.

Tepp's testimony before the Committee focused on his support for the current statutory damages regime, which he described as working reasonably well.  According to Tepp, statutory damages have always been an important part of copyright law, because actual damages are often difficult to prove. State copyright laws provided for statutory damages even before a similar provision was incorporated into the Copyright Act of 1790, which set statutory damages at 50 cents per infringing copy. Over time, Congress revised this amount to adjust for inflation and provide different statutory amounts for different types of work. In 1895, Congress introduced the concept of a statutory damages range (at the time between $100 and $10,000 per infringing copy for certain types of work).  In 1976, Congress established the current statutory damages structure, which provides for a range of $750 to $150,000 per infringed work (not per infringing copy as in prior laws).

Representative Blake Farenthold (R-TX) questioned whether the statutory damages concept was out of date, in that it originated at a time when large-scale infringement was possible only for commercial interests and people with substantial resources (e.g., access to a printing press).  Today, Rep. Farenthold asserted, any ordinary person can make many copies of many works for private use, and some of these people are being held liable for $1.5 million in damages just for downloading a few songs. Tepp responded that the few such cases resulting in high damage awards can be explained by other factors, such as the defendant's destruction of evidence or lying on the stand.

Matt Schruers, Vice President of Law and Policy, Computer & Communications Industry Association


Mr. Schruersargued that the current statutory damages regime is "too much of a good thing" because it requires no proof of any injury and because the amounts are often disproportionate to the harm.  Schruers asserted that the risk of statutory damages discourages investment in technological innovation and incentivizes copyright trolls. He cited Veoh as one company that, although it was eventually found not to have committed infringement, was nevertheless driven into bankruptcy by legal expenses and the threat of claims against individual investors.  Schruers also argued that disproportionate statutory damages awards threaten the credibility of copyright law.  Schruers gave the example of a student who illegally downloads a song that would have cost $1 on iTunes; even the minimum penalty of $750 is seven hundred and fifty times the actual damages involved, which seems unfair to many people.

In his oral and written testimony, Schruers offered several proposals to address these concerns, including reassessment of the statutory damages range (he cited proposals such as a $250-$3,000 range for file sharing, and a statutory limit of $10 per work for non-commercial infringement). Schruers also recommended providing judges with more options for downward adjustment of damages in cases of non-willful infringement, and limiting statutory damages for secondary infringers by capping the number of per work awards that can be aggregated in a single case.

[Author's Note: The concept of "concurrent damages," another recent proposal for statutory damages reform, was not mentioned by any of the panelists.  More information on that proposal is available here.]

Sherwin Siy, Vice President for Legal Affairs, Public Knowledge


Mr. Siy echoed Mr. Schruers' comments, and argued that disproportionate statutory damages awards chill free speech, discourage fair use, encourage trolls, and are much higher than they need to be for their purported deterrent purpose (because "an amount I can't afford is still an amount I can't afford whether it's in the thousands or millions").

In his oral and written testimony, Siy suggested several ideas for reform, including limitations on statutory damages for non-commercial uses, and caps on damages in certain cases involving large numbers of works. Siy also supports legislating additional guidelines for application of statutory damages, including some consideration of the actual harm involved.

Nancy Wolff, Partner, Cowan, DeBaets, Abrahams & Sheppard LLP


Ms. Wolff testified on behalf of a number of visual arts trade associations. According to Wolff, internet users increasingly are taking advantage of the "right click license," i.e., they are simply copying and pasting material with no license at all. In this environment, statutory damages are a critical deterrent, and are often the only leverage a copyright owner has in seeking to settle an infringement claim.  In her written testimony, Wolff also recommended making the registration process easier for multiple works, so that more artists have access to the statutory damages remedy (for which pre-infringement registration is a prerequisite).

Wolff (like most if not all of the panelists and Committee members) supported the Copyright Office's proposal to establish a small claims tribunal.  She stated that the federal court venue is too expensive to be of much use to most copyright holders, particularly individual artists.  Infringers know this, which is why demand letters and other extra-judicial attempts at settlement are frequently ignored by infringers. Although the Copyright Office's proposal would make the small claims tribunal completely voluntary, Wolff recommended adding an incentive for participation, such as the possibility of additional damages in court against defendants who refuse the tribunal.

To view Foley Hoag's Trademark and Copyright Law Blog please click here

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions