United States: The Long Arm Of The FCPA: Former BizJet CEO Arrested In Amsterdam, Pleads Guilty In Oklahoma

On July 24, 2014, the Department of Justice (DOJ) announced that Bernd Kowalewski, the former president and chief executive officer of BizJet International Sales and Support Inc. ("BizJet"), pleaded guilty to conspiracy to violate the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) and one substantive count of violating the FCPA. Unlike his co-conspirators, who received significant reductions to their sentences for cooperating with the government's investigation, and BizJet, which similarly received the benefit of a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) for voluntarily disclosing to and cooperating with the government, Kowalewski became a wanted man after being indicted under seal in 2012. He was arrested on a provisional arrest warrant in Amsterdam on March 13, 2014, and waived extradition to the U.S. this past June. A fourth defendant in the case, Jald Jensen, remains at large.

DOJ's approach to prosecuting BizJet and its former executives serves as an example of both the kind of credit the government is willing to give to companies and individuals who provide meaningful cooperation and the lengths to which DOJ is willing to go to track, arrest, and extradite U.S. and foreign nationals abroad to face FCPA charges in the United States. Executives such as Kowalewski—international businesspeople who depend on their ability to travel—should not be lulled into a false sense security as a result of their status as foreign nationals or the fact that they live outside the United States, possibly in countries that do not extradite their own nationals. Indeed, in this case and a number of others, DOJ has filed charges under seal, lying in wait for fugitives to cross international borders.


BizJet is a provider of aircraft maintenance, repair, and overhaul services based in Tulsa, Oklahoma. Kowalewski's plea is the latest development in a larger FCPA investigation involving four BizJet executives: Kowalewski, BizJet's former President and CEO; Peter DuBois, the former Vice President of Sales and Marketing; Neal Uhl, the former Vice President of Finance; and Jald Jensen, a former BizJet sales manager.

Indictments filed against the four executives allege that BizJet and its employees engaged in a conspiracy to violate the FCPA by paying bribes to foreign officials to obtain and retain business from foreign government customers including the Mexican Federal Police, the Mexican President's Fleet, Sinaloa, the Panama Aviation Authority, and other customers.1 The contracts obtained through bribery by BizJet included maintenance contracts for planes used by the President of Mexico.

Kowalewski, Dubois, Uhl, and Jensen paid bribes, which they referred to as "commissions," "incentives," and "referral fees." They attempted to conceal the bribes by making the payments by hand or by using a shell corporation, Avionica International & Associates, Inc. ("Avionica"), owned by Jensen. Avionica operated under the pretense of providing aircraft maintenance brokerage services, but, in fact, existed only to launder money related to BizJet's bribery scheme.2

DOJ identified specific emails and other communications in which the individual defendants discussed how to collect and remit the bribes. For example, at one meeting, in response to a question about who the decision maker was at a particular customer organization, DuBois stated that a director of maintenance or chief pilot was normally responsible for decisions on where an aircraft went for maintenance work. Kowalewski then responded by explaining that the directors of maintenance and chief pilots in the past received "commissions" of $3,000 to $5,000 but were now demanding $30,000 to $40,000. Other emails cited by the government stated that the BizJet executives would "work to build these fees into the revenue as much as possible" in order to "remain competitive in this respect to maintain and gain market share."3

The indictments also allege that, when Kowalewski learned BizJet's parent, Lufthansa Technik AG, was conducting a detailed audit of BizJet's "incentive payments," he allegedly "caused deletion software to be installed and run on his computer that erased content from his computer."4

DuBois pled guilty, on January 5, 2012, to conspiracy to violate the FCPA and a substantive violation of the FCPA. Uhl also pled guilty on January 5, 2012 to conspiracy to violate the FCPA. But those charges and the respective guilty pleas were all kept under seal at DOJ's request. That is because, as later revealed in court filings, DOJ was trying to locate and arrest Kowalewski and Jensen, who were by then living outside the United States. After more than a year under seal, the charges against all four defendants were unsealed on April 5, 2013, as the district court, which had permitted the matter to remain under seal for an extended period of time, moved forward with the sentencing of DuBois and Uhl.5 Jensen remains the last fugitive and is believed to be living abroad.


Commentators often question whether there is substantial value in voluntary disclosure and cooperation. With the BizJet case, DOJ certainly tried to answer those critics. In March 2012, BizJet agreed to pay a criminal penalty of $11.8 million in connection with the conspiracy. Although it filed a one-count criminal information charging BizJet with conspiring to violate the FCPA, DOJ agreed to defer prosecution of BizJet for three years. This was a substantial benefit to the company given that the Kowalewski, the company's CEO, and other high-level executives were personally involved in the bribery scheme.

The DPA credits BizJet for initiating an internal investigation and voluntarily disclosing the misconduct to DOJ after discovering the FCPA violations as a result of an internal audit.6 The DPA states that BizJet's cooperation was "extraordinary, including conducting an extensive internal investigation, voluntarily making U.S. and foreign employees available for interviews, and collecting, analyzing and organizing voluminous evidence and information for the Department . . ." The DPA also outlines extensive cooperation expected of BizJet by DOJ going forward.7 Finally, BizJet was credited for engaging in extensive remediation efforts, including "terminating the officers and employees responsible for the corrupt payments"8 and agreeing to report periodically to DOJ about its continued compliance efforts, such as implementation of an enhanced compliance program and internal controls designed to prevent and detect future violations.9

DOJ also agreed not to prosecute BizJet's indirect parent company, Lufthansa Technik AG, a German-based provider of aircraft-related services. DOJ cited Lufthansa Technik AG's "timely, voluntary, and complete disclosure of the conduct; [its] extraordinary, real-time cooperation with the Department; [and] remedial efforts already undertak[en] and to be undertaken" going forward.10

DuBois and Uhl, who pleaded guilty to FCPA violations in January 2012, also provided substantial cooperation for which they received significant reductions to their sentences. DuBois, for example, worked with the government in an undercover capacity, which included recording conversations with former BizJet executives and other subjects of the ongoing investigation.11 Both DuBois and Uhl received sentences of probation and eight months of home detention. DuBois was facing a potential sentence of between 108 to 120 months in prison, while Uhl faced a potential sentence of 60 months in prison.12


In stark contrast to the substantial reductions in sentence enjoyed by DuBois and Uhl for their cooperation, Jensen and Kowalewski were secretly charged under seal. Jensen remains at large, but Kowalewski's arrest in Amsterdam this past March demonstrates DOJ's growing commitment to and success in bringing fugitives to justice in FCPA cases.

In announcing Kowalewski's plea, newly appointed Assistant Attorney General of the Criminal Division, Leslie R. Caldwell, specifically noted that "[t]hough he was living abroad when the charges were unsealed, the reach of the law extends beyond U.S. borders, resulting in Kowalewski's arrest in Amsterdam and his appearance in court ... in the United States. [His] guilty plea is an example of [DOJ's] continued determination to hold corporate executives responsible for criminal wrongdoing whenever the evidence allows."13

Kowaleski's arrest was a result of "investigators and prosecutors . . . work[ing] together across borders and jurisdictions to vigorously enforce the [FCPA]." One U.S. Attorney noted that, "[p]artnership is a necessity in all investigations. By forging and strengthening international partnerships to combat bribery, the Department of Justice is advancing its efforts to prevent crime and to protect citizens."14 Court papers in the case, which were later unsealed, reflect that determination. In 2011, the government sought to temporarily seal the indictment against DuBois in order to protect and keep secret the undercover operation until Kowalewski and Jensen, both of whom are foreign nationals, were arrested.15 DOJ argued that "[p]ublic identification of Mr. DuBois as a defendant who likely is cooperating with the government may jeopardize the undercover aspect of the government's investigation . . . [T]he government intends to seek the indictment of two foreign nationals who no longer reside in the United States in the near future. To bring those individuals to justice, the government must effect the arrest and extradition of those individuals from foreign countries. Should Mr. DuBois's plea become public, the putative defendants may take steps to evade arrest and/or decrease the likelihood of extradition."16

DOJ's practice of keeping indictments sealed bucks the adage that no news is good news. Companies and particularly individuals involved in FCPA investigations must be aware that silence from the government may simply be the result of DOJ striving to keep its enforcement efforts under wraps until measures are in place to arrest and bring to justice individuals who are the target of the investigation. Indeed, in its court papers in the BizJet case, the government made plain its intention to indict and arrest Kowalewski and Jensen "in whatever countries they are found."17 So far, DOJ has made good on that promise with respect to Kowalewski.

DOJ can exercise a number of options to bring to justice foreign nationals residing outside the United States. DOJ can file a red notice, which is circulated by INTERPOL to all member states and seeks the location and arrest of a person wanted by a judicial jurisdiction or an international tribunal with a view to extraditing the person to the issuing country.18 DOJ through its law enforcement agency partners can also "lure" a target back to the United States, or simply establish a "border watch" to alert law enforcement when an individual presents himself or herself at the U.S. border. DOJ can also seek provisional arrest warrants and pursue the extradition of individuals from other countries pursuant to extradition treaties. Growing cooperation between U.S. and foreign authorities only increases the likelihood that DOJ's efforts will be successful, ensuring that individuals being investigated for or charged with FCPA violations or other crimes will not be able to evade the long arm of the U.S. government simply by remaining abroad.

Indeed, Kowalewski is only one in a growing list of examples where DOJ has been able to bring individuals living abroad back to the U.S. to face criminal charges. Frederic Pierucci, a French citizen, was arrested on April 14, 2013, in FCPA-related charges stemming from French engineering company Alstom SA's bribing of Indonesian government officials. Pierucci was arrested when his plane landed at John F. Kennedy International Airport in New York. The indictment against him had been filed the previous year under seal and only unsealed after his arrest.19 Pierucci later pleaded guilty.

In July 2009, Ousama Naaman, a Lebanese-Canadian national charged with paying $150,000 in bribes to Iraqi government officials on behalf of a UK company in an eight-year conspiracy to defraud the United Nations Oil for Food Program, was arrested in Germany.20 The charges against Naaman had been filed the previous year under seal. Naaman subsequently was extradited to the United States, where he pleaded guilty in June 2010.21 In December 2011, Naaman was sentenced to 30 months in prison.22

Similarly, in March 2009, DOJ announced that it had charged two British citizens—Jeffrey Tesler and Wojciech Chodan—with participating in a long-running scheme to "bribe Nigerian government officials to obtain engineering, procurement and construction contracts."23 Tesler, a U.K. solicitor who had both British and Israeli citizenship, was arrested by police in London and was extradited back to the United States in March 2011, at which time he pleaded guilty.24 Tesler was sentenced to 21 months in prison and ordered to forfeit $148 million, the largest individual forfeiture in FCPA history.25 Chodan was extradited back to the United States in December 2010.26 He pleaded guilty, too, and was sentenced to a year of probation and fined $20,000.27

This is not to say that DOJ has always been successful at apprehending fugitives in FCPA cases. Indeed, there is a lengthy list of FCPA fugitives.28 For example, the case of Victor Kozeny, who remains in the Bahamas in spite of substantial efforts to have him extradited to face FCPA charges, highlights the limitations of some U.S. extradition efforts. In that case, the Privy Council, which serves as the highest court of appeals for many British Commonwealth countries, upheld a Bahamian court's rejection of a U.S. extradition request.29 Kozeny and others, including Frederic Bourke, who was tried and convicted in 2009 for his role in the scheme, allegedly conspired to pay bribes and caused bribes to be paid to Azeri government officials to ensure that an investment consortium, which included Kozeny's company, participated in the privatization of the State Oil Company of the Azerbaijan Republic.30

Similarly, James Tillery, a former executive of Willbros International, Inc., a subsidiary of the Houston-based Willbros Group, avoided extradition by renouncing his U.S. citizenship and becoming a naturalized Nigerian citizen. Tillery is the last of a group of former Willbros executives to face charges for their roles in a conspiracy to pay more than $6 million in bribes to government officials of the Federal Republic of Nigeria and officials from a Nigerian political party to assist Willbros and its joint venture partner, a construction company based in Mannheim, Germany, in obtaining and retaining a gas pipeline project valued at approximately $387 million. Tillery was indicted for one count of conspiracy to violate the FCPA, and two substantive counts of violating the FCPA in connection with the authorization of specific corrupt payments to Nigerian and Ecuadoran officials. In 2010, Tillery was arrested in Lagos, Nigeria by the FBI and held by American authorities until the intervention of the Nigerian high court, which halted his extradition. He apparently then renounced his United States citizenship and became a naturalized citizen of Nigerian. To date, he remains in Nigeria, a fugitive.31

Perhaps the most high-profile and challenging extradition to date, the case against Ukrainian billionaire, Dimitry Firtash, has yet to be decided. Firtash posted a record-setting $147 million bond after being arrested during a trip to Austria. As with other FCPA cases, the charges were filed under seal and only unsealed after Firtash was arrested. With substantial resources at his disposal, the battle over his extradition will certainly be one to watch.32

While there have certainly been setbacks and the occasional defeat, recent events nevertheless display DOJ's resolve in pursuing foreign fugitives, and FCPA cases are not the only area where DOJ has been successful recently in bringing foreign nationals and others residing outside the United States back into the country to face charges. On April 4, 2014, DOJ announced its first successful extradition of a foreign national to the United States to stand trial for alleged violations of criminal antitrust law. Romano Pisciotti, an Italian national and a former executive with Parker ITR Srl, headquartered in Italy, was extradited to Miami to face charges that he participated in an international cartel involving sales of marine hose in violation of the Sherman Act. Pisciotti has been under indictment in the United States since 2010. In announcing Pisciotti's extradition from Germany, Assistant Attorney General of the Antitrust Division, Bill Baer, lauded this development: "This marks a significant step forward in our ongoing efforts to work with our international antitrust colleagues to ensure that those who seek to subvert U.S. law are brought to justice."33

In addition to extradition, the Antitrust Division uses the same methods the Criminal Division employs in FCPA cases. For example, in 2007, seven British, French, and Italian executives attending an energy industry convention in Houston were arrested to face charges in connection with the same marine hose investigation in which Pisciotti is charged. And, in July 2011, Homy Hong-Ming Hsu, a Taiwanese national and executive of auto lights manufacturer Eagle Eyes Traffic Industrial, was arrested as a result of a border watch when his plane landed at Los Angeles International Airport. Hsu's ultimate destination was Mexico.


Kowalewski's arrest and extradition are more than simply the latest chapter in DOJ's investigation and prosecution of BizJet and its former executives. They serve to highlight that executives should heed Kowalewski's arrest and extradition as another example of DOJ's increasing willingness and ability to bring international business people back to the United States to face charges. As the Kowalewski case shows, DOJ continues to invoke, and make good on, its promise to pursue individuals wherever possible.


1 See, e.g., United States v. Kowalewski, No. 12-CR-07-GKF, Indictment at 5-6 (N.D. Cal.) (filed Jan. 5, 2012), available at http://www.justice.gov/criminal/fraud/fcpa/cases/kowalewskib/Kowalewski-Indictment.pdf

2 Id at 3, 12-13.

3 Id. at 8-14.

4 Id. at 14.

5 See DOJ Press Release, Four Former Executives of Lufthansa Subsidiary BizJet Charged with Foreign Bribery (Apr. 5, 2013), available at http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/2013/April/13-crm-388.html.

6 United States v. Bizjet Int'l Sales & Support, Inc., No. 12-CR-61-CVE, Deferred Prosecution Agreement at 3, available at http://www.justice.gov/criminal/fraud/fcpa/cases/bizjet/2012-03-14-bizjet-deferred-prosecution-agreement.pdf.

7 Id. at 4-6.

8 Id.

9 Id. at 7-9.

10 See Letter Agreement Between Lufthansa Technik AG and U.S. Department of Justice at 1 (Dec. 21, 2011), available at http://www.justice.gov/criminal/fraud/fcpa/cases/lufthansa-technik/2011-12-21-lufthansa-npa.pdf.

11 United States v. DuBois, No. 11-CR-183-GKF, Application Temporarily to Seal Docket, All Files (Including this Application), and All Orders (Including Any Order on this Application) at 6 (N.D. Cal.) (filed Dec. 27, 2011) ("DuBois Motion to Seal").

12 See DOJ Press Release, Four Former Executives of Lufthansa Subsidiary BizJet Charged with Foreign Bribery (Apr. 5, 2013), available at http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/2013/April/13-crm-388.html.

13 See DOJ Press Release, Former Chief Executive Officer of Lufthansa Subsidiary BizJet Pleads Guilty to Foreign Bribery Charges (July 24, 2014), available at http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/2014/July/14-crm-778.html.

14 Id.

15 DuBois Motion to Seal at 4.

16 Id at 6.

17 Id.

18 For a discussion of INTERPOL red and other notices, see http://www.interpol.int/INTERPOL-expertise/Notices.

19 See DOJ Press Release, Foreign Bribery Charges Unsealed Against Current and Former Executives of French Power Company (Apr. 16, 2013), available at http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/2013/April/13-crm-434.html.

20 See DOJ Press Release, Canadian National Charged with Foreign Bribery and Paying Kickbacks Under the Oil for Food Program (July 31, 2009), available at http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/2009/July/09-crm-757.html.

21 See DOJ Press Release, Innospec Agent Pleads Guilty to Bribing Iraqi Officials and Paying Kickbacks Under the Oil for Food Program (June 25, 2010), available at http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/2010/June/10-crm-747.html.

22 See The Legal Times, D.C. Judge Orders 30-Month Term in Foreign Bribery Case (Dec. 22, 2011), available at http://legaltimes.typepad.com/blt/2011/12/dc-judge-orders-30-month-term-in-foreign-bribery-case-.html.

23 See DOJ Press Release, Two UK Citizens Charged by United States with Bribing Nigerian Government Officials to Obtain Lucrative Contracts as Part of KBR Joint Venture Scheme (Mar. 5, 2009), available at http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/2009/March/09-crm-192.html.

24 See DOJ Press Release, UK Solicitor Pleads Guilty for Role in Bribing Nigerian Government Officials as Part of KBR Joint Venture Scheme (Mar. 11, 2011), available at http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/2011/March/11-crm-313.html.

25See The Guardian, Second British Man Sentenced Over Nigerian Government Bribes (Feb. 23, 23012), available at http://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/feb/23/british-jeffrey-tesler-jailed-nigeria.

26 See DOJ Press Release, UK Citizen Pleads Guilty to Conspiring to Bribe Nigerian Government Officials to Obtain Lucrative Contracts as Part of KBR Joint Venture Scheme (Dec. 6, 2010), available at http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/2010/December/10-crm-1391.html.

27 See The Guardian, British Man Sentenced in US over Bribes to Nigerian government (Feb. 22, 2011), available at http://www.theguardian.com/law/2012/feb/22/us-extradition-british-man-sentenced-bribes-nigeria.

28 The FCPA Blog maintains an informal list of FCPA fugitives. The latest iteration contains over 15 names. See http://www.fcpablog.com/blog/2012/9/18/the-fcpa-fugitive-list-september-2012.html.

29 See Bloomberg News, Kozeny Won't Be Sent to U.S., U.K. Privy Council Rules (Mar. 28, 2012), available at http://www.businessweek.com/news/2012-03-28/kozeny-won-t-be-extradited-to-u-dot-s-dot-u-dot-k-dot-privy-council-rules.

30 See https://www.traceinternational2.org/compendium/view.asp?id=136.

31 See JDSupra Business Advisor, And Then There Was One – Willbros Related FCPA Enforcement Continues (May 6, 2013), available at http://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/and-then-there-was-one-willbros-relate-44779/ .

32 See The New York Times, Brash Ukrainian Mogul Prepares to Fight U.S. Bribery Charges (May 6, 2014), available at http://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/07/world/europe/brash-ukrainian-mogul-prepares-to-fight-us-bribery-charges.html?_r=0.

33 See DOJ Press Release, Former Marine Hose Executive Extradited from Germany to Face Charges of Participating in Worldwide Bid-Rigging Conspiracy (Apr. 4, 2014), available at http://www.justice.gov/atr/public/press_releases/2014/304888.htm.

Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP. All rights reserved

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:
  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.
  • Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.
    If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here
    If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq you may opt out by clicking here

    Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

    Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

    Use of www.mondaq.com

    You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


    Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

    The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


    Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

    • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
    • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
    • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

    Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

    Information Collection and Use

    We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

    We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

    Mondaq News Alerts

    In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


    A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

    Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

    Log Files

    We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


    This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

    Surveys & Contests

    From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


    If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


    From time to time Mondaq may send you emails promoting Mondaq services including new services. You may opt out of receiving such emails by clicking below.

    *** If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of services offered by Mondaq you may opt out by clicking here .


    This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

    Correcting/Updating Personal Information

    If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

    Notification of Changes

    If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

    How to contact Mondaq

    You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

    If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.

    By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions