United States: Tax Talk: Volume 7, No. 2 July 2014


With the halfway mark of 2014 just behind us, we are pleased to share with you in this issue of Tax Talk some of the more noteworthy tax developments from Q2. The most important highlight of the past quarter from our neck of the woods is, without a doubt, FATCA going live July 1, 2014. Although the IRS and U.S. Treasury Department have signaled that the remainder of 2014 and all of 2015 are a "transition period," the government didn't slacken its pace in rolling out updated withholding forms, even as the FATCA deadline rapidly approached. The government also ramped up its intergovernmental approach to FATCA, entering into Intergovernmental Agreements ("IGAs") with countries such as China, India, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, and Hong Kong, just to name a few recent additions. This brings the IGA count to nearly 100, as of July 1, 2014, with more surely to come. For more information on FATCA, please be sure to visit our website, at www.KNOWFatca.com.

In spite of our FATCA preoccupation, this issue of Tax Talk also discusses other significant tax developments, such as the IRS's new regulations under Circular 230 governing written tax advice. In a substantial departure from the previous regulations, the IRS replaced the "covered opinion" rules with a single, simplified approach, designed to subject all written federal tax advice to one standard. As part of this guidance, the IRS made clear that a "one size fits all" Circular 230 email legend is not necessary in attorney/ accountant communications.

In other news, the IRS released private guidance addressing partnerships and financial instruments. In the first piece of guidance, the IRS addressed securities dealer activities of a partnership and whether those activities could be attributed to its partners (no, they cannot). In the second, the IRS addressed the consequences when a partnership no longer treats certain securities transactions as options and, as a result, stops deferring the associated gains, losses, income, or deductions (a change in accounting method and adjustment occurs).

Next, we provide an update on recently released proposed regulations addressing the scope of qualifying real estate assets for REITs: important rules as more and more corporations with nontraditional fixed assets are seeking to be treated as REITs. Turning from real estate to banking, this issue of Tax Talk also discusses a recent private letter ruling addressing a bank's tax reporting obligations with respect to certain fee credit programs maintained for commercial customers.

Finally, this issue of Tax Talk discusses three items on the international tax front. The first clarifies that taxpayers do not need to report virtual currencies on FBARs for 2013. The second describes the IRS's application of the section 956 anti-abuse rule to debunk a transaction designed to minimize a U.S. corporation's section 956 inclusion. The third discusses modifications to the IRS's voluntary offshore disclosure program.

As always, our regular section, MoFo in the News, concludes this issue of Tax Talk.


FATCA went live on July 1, 2014. Just days before the deadline, the IRS and U.S. Treasury Department released the remaining Form W-8 withholding certifications, including instructions. In addition, the number of countries entering into IGAs increased and, as of July 1, 2014, the government had signed 34 Model 1 IGAs and 5 Model 2 IGAs. The government has also agreed in substance to 52 Model 1 IGAs and 8 Model 2 IGAs (these are IGAs that have not yet been signed, but are treated as "in effect" until December 31, 2014, the date they must be signed in order to remain in effect without interruption). This brings the total number of IGAs to just under 100. The IRS has also released a revised Qualified Intermediary agreement, which will be used for agreements with an effective date on or after June 30, 2014. This revised QI agreement now incorporates certain changes necessitated by FATCA, as well as updates to reflect recently released coordination regulations. Finally, in a gesture that appears to tacitly acknowledge the headache implementing FATCA is causing for financial institutions worldwide, the IRS and U.S. Treasury Department announced that 2014 and 2015 would be treated as a "transition period," during which the IRS will approach enforcement with an alleged degree of leniency, provided foreign financial institutions demonstrate a modicum of good-faith compliance. For more information on this development, please see our client alert, "IRS Issues Notice Signaling 2014 and 2015 as FATCA 'Transition Period'."1


On June 9, 2014, the U.S. Treasury Department and IRS issued final regulations replacing the "covered opinion" rules under Circular 230.2 Effective June 12, 2014, the final rules now subject all written federal tax advice to one standard.

From a practical perspective, the most noticeable change tax practitioners (and their clients) will likely appreciate in the short run is the elimination of the need for the ubiquitous Circular 230 disclaimer from written communications, such as the disclaimers that are almost universally appended to emails from lawyers and accountants.

However, a more substantive and significant change will be the elimination of the need for determining whether written advice constitutes a "covered opinion" (as defined under the prior regulations) and whether the advice could instead be delivered in the form of a "limited scope" opinion. In addition, in either case, practitioners will also no longer be required to evaluate whether written advice satisfies all of the detailed requirements of the former Circular 230 rules, including the explicit statement of all facts relevant to the issues, identification of all assumed facts, and, if a limited scope opinion was not permissible, consideration of all significant federal tax issues that are relevant. As a result, practitioners and clients will have more flexibility to limit the scope of written advice to the particular issues of concern to the client.

Elimination of Covered Opinion Rules

The final rules eliminate the former covered opinion rules and replace them with a single "reasonableness" standard applicable to all written tax advice. As revised, Circular 230 requires practitioners in delivering written advice to:

  • base all written advice on reasonable factual and legal assumptions (including assumptions as to future events);
  • reasonably consider all relevant facts and circumstances that the practitioner knows or reasonably should know;
  • use reasonable efforts to identify and ascertain the facts relevant to written advice on each "federal tax matter";
  • not rely upon representations, statements, findings, or agreements (including projections, financial forecasts, or appraisals) of any person if such reliance would be unreasonable;
  • relate applicable law and authorities to facts; and
  • not, in evaluating a federal tax matter, take into account the possibility that a tax return will not be audited or that an issue will not be raised on audit.

The final regulations also clarify that it is unreasonable for a practitioner to rely on representations if the practitioner knows or reasonably should know that one or more representations (or assumptions on which any representation is based) are incorrect, incomplete, or inconsistent.

The final regulations permit a practitioner, in providing written advice, to rely on advice of another person unless the practitioner knows or has reason to know that the opinion of the other person should not be relied on (including because such person either lacks the qualifications necessary to give the advice or has a conflict of interest that violates Circular 230 standards).

Finally, because the final regulations eliminate the disclosure requirements that were part of the covered opinion rules, practitioners will no longer need to include Circular 230 disclaimers to avoid the covered opinion rules. This will come as welcome news to practitioners and their clients alike because, as explained in the Preamble to the final regulations, Circular 230 "disclaimers are routinely inserted in any written transmission, including writings that do not contain any tax advice." As a result, the final rules effectively eliminate the use of Circular 230 disclaimers in emails and other written communications so that tax advice can be delivered on discrete issues without risk of violation of the covered opinion rules.

Heightened Standard of Review for Marketed Opinions

While the IRS will generally apply a "reasonable practitioner" standard that takes into account all facts and circumstances in reviewing practitioner compliance with the new written requirement rules, the IRS will give more weight to the additional risk caused by a practitioner's lack of knowledge of the taxpayer's particular circumstances in transactions in which the practitioner knows or has to reason to know the opinion will be used in promoting or marketing a potentially abusive tax shelter.


In a recent Chief Counsel Advice (CCA),3 the IRS rejected a taxpayer's attempt to mark to market mortgage loans held in a non-REMIC securitization trust, finding, among other things, that loan modifications alone were not sufficient dealer activity. Unfortunately, the CCA's tangled analysis raises more questions than it answers.

In the CCA, the taxpayer was a partner in a partnership that originated and securitized mortgages. Some of the mortgages were securitized in non-REMIC trusts. Each trust that held the mortgages would issue notes to investors in exchange for cash. The trust residual was held by the partnership. The CCA does not state whether the mortgages were residential or commercial nor does it identify the type of securitization transaction.

The partnership was a dealer in securities; however, it also held some of its mortgages for investment. It is possible, although by no means clear, that the mortgages in the trusts at issue were held for investment. In any event, in a tax year after the trusts were created, the partnership sold the trust residuals to the taxpayer. The taxpayer took a basis in the mortgages equal to the amount of the trust debt plus the cash it paid to the partnership.

The taxpayer then tried to mark to market the mortgages, presumably in an attempt to claim an ordinary loss equal to the difference between the tax basis in the mortgages and their fair market value. (It would not be surprising if the mortgages were substantially depreciated when the taxpayer acquired them.) The taxpayer argued that it was a dealer in securities for federal income tax purposes either because (i) it was a partner in the partnership and the partnership was a dealer or (ii) modifications of the mortgages held by the trust (which were executed by the trust's sub-servicer) were dealer activity.

Not surprisingly, the IRS rejected the taxpayer's arguments. However, the reasoning of the CCA is contorted and is already being questioned.4 One issue in the analysis: the IRS concluded that the sub-servicer was not the taxpayer's agent. The IRS reasoned that there was no express agency under local law and that the sub-servicer was described as an "independent contractor" in the subservicing agreement. However, the construct for federal income tax purposes has always been that a mortgage servicer is a mortgage owner's agent. That is why a mortgage owner includes the full amount of income on a mortgage loan and then deducts mortgage servicing fees as an ordinary and necessary business expense or section 212 expense.5 The IRS, instead, went off on a tangent about National Carbide Corp. v. Commissioner, 336 U.S. 422 (1943), and Commissioner v. Bollinger, 485 U.S. 340 (1988), which deal with whether a corporation that is in form an owner can actually be an agent for federal income tax purposes. It is hard to see what those cases have to do with the CCA's facts; there was never any issue about whether the sub-servicer owned the mortgage loans.

In any event, the IRS also found that merely modifying loans was not a dealer activity. However, the analysis is fuzzy as to whether this is legally impossible or whether the loan modifications were not sufficiently regular and continuous in this particular case.

In an unusual twist, the IRS also had some helpful advice for the taxpayer, suggesting that perhaps the partnership could have marked to market the loans under Prop Reg. section 1.475-2(a), which requires a mark immediately before disposition by a mark-to-market taxpayer. One assumes that would only get the taxpayer half a loaf because it would only get its share of the partnership's loss rather than the full loss it anticipated.

To read this Newsletter in full, please click here.


1. Our May 8, 2014 client alert on Notice 2014-33 can be found at: http://media.mofo.com/files/Uploads/Images/140508-FATCA-Transition.pdf.

2. T.D. 9668, RIN 1454-BF96 (June 9, 2014).

3. CCA 201423019 (June 6, 2014).

4. Sheppard, "Inbound Mortgage Modifications Confound the IRS," Tax Notes, July 14, 2014, p. 105.

5. See Rev. Rul. 91-46.

Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP. All rights reserved

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

David N. De Ruig
Anna Pinedo
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions