United States: Dodd-Frank At 4: Where Do We Go From Here?

Where do we go from here? As we mark another milestone in regulatory reform with the fourth anniversary of the enactment of the Dodd-Frank Act, it strikes us that although most studies required to be undertaken by the Act have been released and final rules have been promulgated addressing many of the most important regulatory measures, we are still living with a great deal of regulatory uncertainty and extraordinary regulatory complexity.

In this summary, we provide a brief recap of the most significant Dodd-Frank Act related regulatory developments of the last year. We also offer our thoughts on what's left....

REGULATORY RECAP

Substantial rulemaking progress was made in the last year (since July 2013) with many of the most important and most controversial Dodd-Frank Act related rules having been finalized. Below we offer a quick recap of the most significant regulatory developments of the last year in the United States. We also provide a review of the most significant developments in Europe.

UNITED STATES

Regulatory Capital Requirement

Just before the last anniversary of the enactment of the Dodd-Frank Act, in early July 2013, the Federal Reserve Board, the OCC, and the FDIC (collectively, the "Agencies") approved the publication of the final regulatory capital rules (the "Regulatory Capital Rules," or "Rules"). The Regulatory Capital Rules make major changes to the U.S. regulatory capital framework in an effort to strengthen the regulatory capital of U.S. banking organizations and bring the United States into compliance with the Basel Committee's current international regulatory capital accord ("Basel III"). The Rules replace the Agencies' general risk-based capital rules, advanced approaches rule, market risk rule, and leverage rules, as provided by the Rules' transition provisions. In brief, the Rules:

  • Revise the basic definitions and elements of regulatory capital. Consistent with Basel III, Tier 1 capital will consist of common equity Tier 1 capital and additional Tier 1 capital. Total Tier 1 capital, plus Tier 2 capital, will constitute total risk-based capital. The Rules require a number of capital adjustments, exclusions, and deductions (e.g., goodwill, other intangibles, and most deferred tax assets).
  • Make substantial changes to the credit risk weightings for banking and trading book assets through the adoption of material elements of the Basel II standardized approach for credit risk weightings.
  • Finalize changes made to the Basel capital framework in the aftermath of the financial crisis to large U.S. banking organizations subject to the advanced Basel II capital framework (the "advanced approach framework").
  • Adopt a new phased-in capital conservation buffer for all covered banking organizations equal to 2.5% of total risk-weighted assets, and for banking organizations subject to the advanced approach framework, the Rules adopt a macro-economic countercyclical capital buffer of up to 2.5% of total risk-weighted assets.
  • Adopt a separate Tier 1 leverage capital requirement, measured as a ratio of Tier 1 capital, minus deductions, to average on-balance sheet assets. Banking organizations subject to the advanced approach framework will be subject to a new and separate supplementary leverage ratio.

The Rules became effective on January 1, 2014, with a mandatory compliance date of January 1, 2015, for banking organizations that are not subject to the advanced approaches framework. On that date, most banking organizations would be required to begin the transition to the full implementation of the new capital framework by 2018. For banking organizations subject to the advanced approaches framework, the effective date and compliance period, and the start of the transition period, was January 1, 2014. The Rules provide phase-in/phase-out periods for certain aspects, including minimum capital ratios, adjustments and deductions, non-qualifying capital instruments, capital conservation and countercyclical capital buffers, supplemental leverage ratio for advanced approaches banks, and changes to the PCA rules, which generally take effect by January 1, 2019.

For more information on the Regulatory Capital Rules, please see

Volcker Rule

The Final Rule

The final Volcker Rule was adopted more than two years after the proposed rule, and three and a half years after the Dodd-Frank Act was enacted. On December 13, 2013, the Federal Reserve, the FDIC, the OCC, the SEC, and the CFTC (together, the "Agencies") adopted the final rule (the "Final Rule") implementing Section 13 of the Bank Holding Company Act.

The Volcker Rule generally prohibits, subject to exceptions, banking entities – a broad term that includes banks, bank holding companies, foreign banks treated as bank holding companies, and their respective affiliates – from (i) engaging in proprietary trading and (ii) acquiring or retaining ownership interests in, or acting as sponsors to, certain hedge funds and private equity funds ("covered funds"). Certain trading and fund activity is expressly permitted – notably, underwriting activities, market-making related activities, and risk-mitigating hedging activities. In addition, the Volcker Rule has special application for foreign banking organizations ("FBOs").

The Volcker Rule legislation covered the area with a broad brush, leaving many significant issues open to regulatory interpretation. The Final Rule is complex in scope and has elicited significant commentary and questions from the banking industry and the public at large. We address only certain selected topics from the Final Rule.

Proprietary Trading

Proprietary trading is defined as engaging as principal for the trading account of the banking entity in the purchase or sale of a financial instrument. The Final Rule does not prohibit a banking entity from engaging in agency or riskless principal transactions. A "financial instrument" includes: a security; a derivative; and a contract of sale of a commodity for future delivery (or an option on the same). Specifically excluded from the definition of "financial instrument" are loans; a commodity that is not an "excluded commodity," a derivative or a commodity future; and foreign exchange or currency. A "trading account" is also broadly defined and, given that, certain types of trading are specifically excluded from the rule's coverage, such as repo and securities lending transactions and trades where the banking entity is acting solely as agent, broker or custodian. However, trades are presumed to be for the trading account of a banking entity if the banking entity holds the position for fewer than 60 days, unless the banking entity can demonstrate otherwise.

The Volcker Rule permits certain trading activities – notably, in connection with permitted underwriting activities, market making-related activities, and risk-mitigating hedging activities – and the Final Rule addresses the parameters of and possible conditions on these activities. In order to engage in a permitted activity, a banking entity must comply with three overall conditions: the banking entity must maintain an internal compliance program required by Subpart D to ensure that the banking entity complies with the conditions permitting the activity; the compensation arrangements of personnel involved in these activities must not be designed to reward or to create incentives to engage in prohibited proprietary trading; and the banking entity must be licensed or registered to engage in the permitted activity.

Trading in connection with underwriting activities is permitted only if the trading desk's underwriting position is related to a "distribution" of securities for which the banking entity is acting as underwriter. The underwriting position must be designed not to exceed the reasonably expected near-term demands of clients, customers, or counterparties, and reasonable efforts are made to sell or otherwise reduce the underwriting position within a reasonable period, taking into account the liquidity, maturity, and depth of the market for the relevant type of security. In order to determine "near-term demands," an underwriter must make reasonable judgments based on its experience with similar offerings, its knowledge of the market and market conditions, and its book-building experience.

The prohibition on proprietary trading does not apply to purchases or sales of financial instruments by a banking entity made in connection with the banking entity's market making-related activities. Market making-related activities are permitted only if the relevant trading desk "routinely stands ready" to purchase and sell one or more types of financial instruments related to its financial exposure and is "willing and available" to quote, purchase, or sell those types of financial instruments for its own account in commercially reasonable amounts and throughout market cycles on a basis appropriate for the liquidity, maturity, and depth of the market for the relevant types of financial instruments. The amount, types, and risks of the financial instruments in the marketmaker inventory must be designed not to exceed the reasonably expected near-term demands of clients, customers, or counterparties.

The prohibition on proprietary trading does not apply to certain risk-mitigating hedging activities. Subject to numerous conditions, hedging activities that are "in connection with and related to individual or aggregated positions, contracts or other holdings" and "designed to reduce the specific risks to the banking entity" that are "related to such positions, contracts or other holdings" are permitted. In order to distinguish between these permitted hedging activities and impermissible proprietary trading, the Final Rule requires that a banking entity establish a compliance program, which we discuss in our Volcker Rule User's Guide. The banking entity should determine at the inception of its trading that the risk-mitigating hedging activity should be demonstrably risk reducing or mitigating. The Agencies note that "at the inception of the hedging activity, the risk-reducing hedging activity [must not] give rise to significant new or additional risk that is not itself contemporaneously hedged." The Release also makes clear that this exemption is not intended to address a banking entity's hedging activities with respect to "generalized risks that a trading desk or combination of desks, or the banking entity as a whole, believe exists based on non-position-specific modelling or other considerations."

The prohibition on proprietary trading does not apply to the following: trading in U.S. government or government agency securities; trading in municipal bonds; trading by a foreign banking entity or a foreign bank subsidiary of a U.S. banking entity of debt of a foreign government (or of any agency or political subdivision of that foreign government) issued by the foreign country in which the foreign banking entity or the foreign bank subsidiary is organized; and trading by a banking entity that is a regulated insurance company (including a foreign insurance company), whether for the insurance company's general account or for a separate account. In addition, the prohibition does not extend to trades by the banking entity as trustee or in a similar fiduciary capacity for a customer, so long as the transaction is conducted for the account of, or on behalf of, the customer, and the banking entity (or an affiliate) does not have or retain a beneficial ownership of the financial instruments. A banking entity also can conduct riskless principal activities so long as these are "customer-driven and may not expose the banking entity to gains (or losses) on the value of the traded instruments as principal." The Final Rule establishes an exemption for proprietary trading by an FBO to the extent the trading is conducted solely outside the United States.

The permitted proprietary trading activities referenced above are not permissible under the Final Rule if they would involve or result in a material conflict of interest between the banking entity and its clients, customers, or counterparties; they would result in a material exposure by the banking entity to a high-risk asset or a high-risk trading strategy; or they pose a threat to the safety and soundness of the banking entity or to the financial stability of the United States (the so-called "prudential backstops").

Fund Investment and Sponsorship

General prohibition. The Volcker Rule generally prohibits a banking entity, as principal, directly or indirectly (in other words, through a subsidiary), from acquiring or retaining an ownership interest in, or sponsoring, a "covered fund."

Exception. This prohibition does not apply to a banking entity that acts solely as agent, broker or custodian, so long as the activity is conducted for the account of, or on behalf of, a customer, and the banking entity (and any affiliate) does not retain beneficial ownership interest. The prohibition also does not apply to a banking entity that acts as a trustee for a customer that is not itself a covered fund.

What is a covered fund? Broadly speaking, a covered fund falls into three categories or prongs.

First, a covered fund includes any issuer that would be an "investment company" as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the "ICA"), but for exemptions for private funds provided by section 3(c)(1) and section 3(c)(7) of the ICA. Section 3(c) (1) excludes issuers whose outstanding securities are beneficially owned by not more than 100 persons and is not making or proposing to make a public offering. Section 3(c)(7) excludes issuers, the outstanding securities of which are owned exclusively by persons who, at the time of acquisition, are "qualified purchasers" and are not making or proposing to make a public offering.

Second, a covered fund includes a commodity fund for which the commodity pool operator ("CPO") has claimed an exemption under Rule 4.7 under the Commodity Exchange Act (available when pool offerings are limited to certain qualified investors).

Thus, exempt commodity pools fall within the definition of a covered fund, because they have characteristics similar to those of private funds, as discussed above.

Third, covered funds include foreign funds (that is, those organized abroad and whose interests are sold abroad to non-U.S. residents) that are sponsored by a U.S. banking entity or its affiliate. Covered funds do not include foreign funds that, if organized in the United States, would be investment companies but for section 3(c)(1) or section 3(c)(7) of the ICA.

Exemptions.The Final Rule excludes several entities from the definition of covered fund, including:

  • Foreign public funds;
  • Wholly owned subsidiaries;
  • Joint ventures;
  • Certain acquisition vehicles;
  • Securitization-related vehicles;
  • Registered investment companies; and
  • Certain other entities related to insurance company separate accounts and retirement funds.

Entities not specifically excluded from the definition of covered fund.The Final Rule does not specifically exclude certain entities, such as financial market utilities, collateral cash pools, pass-through real estate investment trusts, municipal securities tender option bond transactions and venture capital funds, because while they appear to fall within the definition of covered funds, they may be able to rely on exemptions from the definition of an investment company other than the exemptions found in section 3(c)(1) and section 3(c)(7).

Scope of the prohibition. Generally, banking entities may not "sponsor" or acquire an "ownership interest" in a covered fund, subject to certain exceptions for permissible activities. The Final Rule defines sponsorship and ownership interest in detail. Note that interests that may not be ownership interests in some contexts may fall within the definition of ownership interests for purposes of the rule.

Permitted covered fund sponsorship and investments.The rule allows banking entities to invest in or sponsor covered funds under limited circumstances. For example, banking entities may own or sponsor covered funds for certain "customer funds" in a fiduciary capacity, subject to many conditions. Banking entities must limit their investment to three percent of the value of the covered fund, or the number of ownership interests in the covered fund. During the "seeding period," banking entities may exceed this limit. In addition, the Final Rule exempts foreign banking entities from the prohibition against investment in and sponsorship of covered funds to the extent the activity is conducted solely outside the United States, as further described below.

Super 23A.The rule also restricts banking entities from entering into "covered transactions" with respect to permissible covered funds. Covered transactions means the kinds of transactions between banking entities and their affiliates that section 23A of the Federal Reserve Act restricts. Unlike section 23A, however, the rule imposes absolute transactions prohibitions, and thus this part of the rule is referred to as "Super 23A."

Volcker Rule Impacts on Securitization

Banking entities involved as investors in, sponsors of, or transaction parties (e.g., credit or liquidity providers) with securitization issuers may be subject to severe restrictions or required divestiture if the securitization issuer is a covered fund.

In the Dodd-Frank Act, Congress stated its intent that the Volcker Rule not limit or restrict the ability of banking entities to sell or securitize loans. In the Final Rule, the Agencies generally followed this intent by making clear that most securitizations of traditional loan products (e.g., mortgage loans, auto loans, student loans and credit card receivables) are not covered funds.

However, the Final Rule creates the possibility that certain securitization vehicles – particularly those whose assets include securities or derivatives (as opposed to loans) – may be covered funds. The consequences of a securitization vehicle being determined to be a covered fund are binary. If the vehicle is a covered fund, investors, sponsors and transactional counterparties will be subject to severe restrictions that in many cases will preclude their involvement altogether; if the vehicle is not a covered fund, banking entities may be involved with the securitization without restriction under the Volcker Rule.

As described above, the basic definition of "covered fund" is a three-pronged test. For most securitization issuers, the relevant test will be that set forth in the first prong of the definition – whether the issuer would be an investment company under the ICA but for the exemptions set forth in section 3(c)(1) or section 3(c)(7) of the ICA.

Many securitizations rely on other exemptions from the ICA and are therefore not covered funds. Even if the transaction was intended to rely on section 3(c)(1) or section 3(c)(7), it may still not be a covered fund if another ICA exemption is also available or if the transaction can be restructured to comply with another exemption.

If the securitization issuer relied on section 3(c)(1) or section 3(c)(7) and another ICA exemption is not available, it may still avail itself of one or more of the 14 enumerated exclusions from the definition of covered fund. These include exclusions for qualifying loan securitizations, asset-backed commercial paper ("ABCP") conduits, qualifying covered bonds, and securities issued by certain wholly owned subsidiaries of a securitization issuer.

For most securitizations that rely on section 3(c)(1) or section 3(c)(7), including many collateralized debt obligations ("CDOs"), collateralized loan obligations ("CLOs") and certain collateralized mortgage obligations ("CMOs"), the key question will be whether the so-called "loan securitization exclusion" is available. This exclusion is available only if the assets underlying the securitization consist only of loans as opposed to securities or derivatives, with very limited exceptions for certain types of ancillary assets that support the securitization. If the primary assets of a section 3(c)(1) or section 3(c)(7) securitization include non-permitted securities or derivatives – which is often the case with CDOs, CLOs and CMOs – the securitization vehicle will likely be a covered fund.

As noted above, banking entities are prohibited from, among other things, acquiring or holding "ownership interests" in covered funds. While most market participants fully expected that the definition of "ownership interest" would include truly equity-like interests such as residuals and deeply subordinated debt securities, the definition of "ownership interest" in the Final Rule is sufficiently broad that it includes not only these equity-like interests, but also potentially senior, highly rated debt securities issued by securitization vehicles such as CDOs and CLOs as the result of certain voting or other management control rights given to such senior classes in many transactions. As a result, many banking entities are analyzing whether securities they previously considered to clearly be debt securities may nonetheless be considered prohibited "ownership interests" for purposes of the Final Rule, most likely requiring divestiture prior to the end of the conformance period.

Limited Regulatory Relief

On January 14, 2014, the Agencies issued an interim final rule granting banking entities relief from Volcker Rule restrictions for certain previously issued CDOs backed by trust preferred securities. This relief is of limited applicability and does not address many of the interpretational concerns raised by securitization market participants regarding the Final Rule. It is unclear whether additional guidance addressing these concerns will be forthcoming from the Agencies.

Compliance

One of the greatest impacts of the Volcker Rule upon banking entities is found in its requirements that the covered institutions adopt compliance systems and procedures designed to ensure that they are complying with the Rule. The scope of the requirements depends on the banking entity's size and the extent of its proprietary trading and covered fund activities. Banking entities not engaged in such activities have no obligation to establish a relevant compliance program, and those with "modest activities," that is, total assets of $10 billion or less, have very minimal requirements that may be included in their existing compliance policies and procedures. All others must implement a compliance program that addresses these six points:

  • Written policies and procedures reasonably designed to supervise proprietary trading and covered fund activities;
  • Internal controls reasonably designed to monitor compliance with the Volcker Rule;
  • A management framework that delineates responsibility and accountability for compliance with the Volcker Rule;
  • Independent testing and auditing of the effectiveness of the compliance program;
  • Training to appropriately implement and enforce the compliance program; and
  • Recordkeeping sufficient to demonstrate compliance with the Volcker Rule.

In addition, the Final Rule requires larger entities, those with total consolidated assets of $50 billion or more or, in the case of a foreign bank, with total U.S. assets of $50 billion or more, to have the "enhanced minimum standards for compliance programs" provided in Appendix B to the Final Rule. In general, the enhanced standards address similar requirements to those in the six-point program required of all firms, but also provide highly prescriptive and detailed obligations for all components of an entity's proprietary trading activities, including its trading desks; descriptions of risks and risk management processes; authorized risks, instruments and products; hedging policies and procedures; analysis and quantitative measurements; and remediation. A similar level of detail is given to the enhanced compliance program for covered funds activities or investments.

The Final Rule also requires a banking entity with significant trading assets and liabilities – over $50 billion between June 30, 2014 and April 29, 2016; $25 billion between April 30, 2016 and December 30, 2016; and $10 billion beginning on December 31, 2016 – that are engaged in proprietary trading permitted by the Rule to furnish periodic reports – within 30 days of the end of the month, and for the largest entities within 10 days of the end of the month beginning in January 2015 – reporting various quantitative measures to their regulators, and to maintain relevant records, in order to assist the regulators in determining whether the banking entities are complying with the Final Rule. The seven quantitative measurements fall into three categories: Risk-Management Measurements, Source-of-Revenue Measurements and Customer-Facing Activity Measurements.

Foreign Banking Organizations

The Final Rule also impacts FBOs – in other words, foreign banks that own U.S. banks or Edge Corporations or operate branches or agencies in the United States, and companies that control such foreign banks – and banking entities that are affiliates of FBOs (together, "foreign banking entities").

In particular, the Volcker Rule exempts foreign banking entities from the prohibition against proprietary trading to the extent the activity is conducted solely outside the United States ("SOTUS Exemption"). Under the Final Rule, foreign banking entities are now permitted to rely on the SOTUS Exemption to engage in proprietary trading subject to the following requirements:

  • The foreign banking entity may not be directly or indirectly controlled by a U.S. banking entity;
  • The foreign banking entity must be a qualifying foreign banking organization ("QFBO") or an affiliate of a QFBO that has the preponderance of its business outside of the United States;
  • The foreign banking entity engaging in the trading activity (including any relevant personnel of the foreign banking entity that arrange, negotiate or execute the trades, but not those who clear or settle the trades) must be located outside the United States and must not be organized under U.S. law;
  • The trading decisions must be made outside of the United States;
  • The trades, including any related hedging transactions, must be booked, and the profit or loss must be accounted for as principal, outside of the United States in an entity that is not organized under the laws of the United States; and
  • No financing of any trades may be provided by a U.S. branch or affiliate of the foreign banking entity.

Trades may not be conducted with or through a U.S. entity, except:

  • Trades with the foreign operations of a U.S. entity, as long as no personnel of the U.S. entity located in the United States are involved in the arrangement, negotiation, or execution of the trades;
  • Trades through an unaffiliated intermediary acting as principal, provided that the trades are promptly cleared and settled through a clearing agency or derivatives clearing organization acting as a central counterparty; or
  • Trades through an unaffiliated market intermediary acting as agent, if conducted anonymously on an exchange or similar trading facility and promptly cleared and settled through a clearing agency or derivatives clearing organization acting as a central counterparty.

Further, the Final Rule also permits foreign banking entities to engage in proprietary trading in their home-country government obligations.

The Volcker Rule also exempts foreign banking entities from the prohibition against investment in and sponsorship of covered funds to the extent the activity is conducted solely outside the United States. The exemption for foreign banking entities under the Final Rule is subject to the following requirements:

  • The foreign banking entity may not be directly or indirectly controlled by a U.S. banking entity;
  • The foreign banking entity must be a QFBO or an affiliate of a QFBO that has the preponderance of its business outside of the United States;
  • Ownership interests in the covered fund in which the foreign banking entity invests have been sold only in an offering that does not target residents of the United States;
  • Investment/sponsorship decisions must be made outside of the United States;
  • The fund investment, including any related hedging transactions, must be booked outside of the United States in an entity that is not organized under the laws of the United States; and
  • No financing of any fund investment may be provided by a U.S. affiliate of the foreign banking entity.

The Final Rule also excludes foreign funds from the definition of covered funds, subject to certain requirements, if they are not sponsored by U.S. banking entities or no U.S. banking entities have an ownership interest in the fund, and the funds' ownership interests must be offered or sold solely outside the United States.

To read this article in full, please click here.

Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP. All rights reserved

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions