United States: State AGs In The News - June 12th, 2014

Hot News

Attorneys General Discuss Possible Approaches to Prescription Drug Abuse Problem

  • The dangers of prescription drug abuse continue to be a huge concern for regulators at every level, including state AGs. This week at the National Association of Attorneys General summer meeting in Mackinac Island, Michigan, AGs furthered their discussions of such abuse and possible tools to combat the problem.
  • To read about what AGs have been and will be doing to fight prescription drug abuse, visit our recent blog post on this topic.

2014 Election

Arkansas Primary Runoff Election Results

  • Leslie Rutledge defeated David Sterling for the Republican nomination by a margin of 58.94% to 41.06% with all of the precincts reporting. Rutledge will face Nate Steel (D) in November's general election. Incumbent AG Dustin McDaniel (D) is term limited.

Nevada Primary Election Results

  • Ross Miller (D) and Adam Laxalt (R) received their respective party's nomination after both ran unopposed in the primary. Incumbent AG Catherine Cortez Masto (D) is term limited.

North Dakota Primary Election Results

  • Incumbent AG Wayne Stenehjem (R) and Kiara Kraus-Parr (D) received their respective party's nomination after both ran unopposed in the primary.

South Carolina Primary Election Results

  • Incumbent AG Alan Wilson (R) and Parnell Diggs (D) received their respective party's nomination after both ran unopposed in the primary.

Connecticut Primary Election Candidates

  • The Connecticut filing deadline was on June 10. The candidates for the primary election are incumbent AG George Jepsen (D), Kie Westby (R), and Stephen Fournier (Green).

District of Columbia Court of Appeals Rules in Favor of Attorney General Election in 2014

  • The District of Columbia (DC) Court of Appeals ruled that an election for the attorney general position must be held in 2014 unless it would not be "practically possible" for the board of elections to do so under applicable statutory and regulatory provisions. If DC can establish that an election is not practically possible in 2014, the court stated that the election must be held as soon as practically possible in 2015.
  • Paul Zukerberg, a potential AG candidate, brought the lawsuit to place the DC AG position on the ballot in 2014. Zukerberg argued that the DC Charter, which reads, "[t]he first election for the position of Attorney General shall be after January 1, 2014," prohibited the DC Council from delaying the election.
  • The DC Court of Appeals stated that the language was ambiguous when considered in isolation and could mean "the following day, any time after that date, or some point in between." The court held that when examined in the broader context of the D.C. Code, however, that "the far more natural reading" of that language would be that the election "must be held in 2014."
  • According to a news report, current AG Irvin Nathan stated that he would seek an en banc review of the case. The case is currently on remand to the DC Superior Court.

We will continue to provide updates on AG-related elections. For breaking news, please follow us on Twitter @StateAGMonitor.


Amicus Brief Filed by 23 Attorneys General Regarding Application of Federal Antitrust Laws to State Regulatory Boards

  • Twenty-three AGs, led by West Virginia AG Patrick Morrisey, filed an amicus brief in the U.S. Supreme Court in support of a state regulatory board in the case of North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. Federal Trade Commission.
  • The AGs argue that the state board, which is staffed by professionals in the field, is not a private actor and that the state action exemption to federal antitrust law applies. They also argue that application of federal antitrust laws to state regulatory boards would interfere with the states' self-governance and sovereign authority to regulate industries within their borders.

Consumer Protection

Missouri Attorney General Settles Pricing Lawsuit With Major Retailer

  • Missouri AG Chris Koster and Walgreens settled a lawsuit brought by the AG alleging false, misleading, and deceptive retail pricing in Walgreens' Missouri stores.
  • Pursuant to the settlement, Walgreens agreed to use an independent auditor to audit 25 percent of the Missouri stores each quarter for three years and to pay penalties for any failed inspections. In the settlement, the company did not admit any wrongdoing.

Massachusetts Attorney General Settles With Motorcycle Financial Services Company

  • Massachusetts AG Martha Coakley settled with Harley-Davidson Financial Services, Inc., to resolve allegations that it failed to pay required refunds to borrowers under its motorcycle finance agreements.
  • The company allegedly failed to refund all finance contract enrollment fees, which are fees typically paid by borrowers for special loan terms and refunded in a prorated amount if the borrower pays off the loan early.
  • The company will pay $228,000 in restitution to consumers and $25,000 to the state. It has also agreed to follow policies and procedures that ensure borrowers always obtain refunds.

West Virginia Supreme Court Affirms $14 Million Judgment Against Loan Company


Michigan Attorney General Files Additional Charges Against Energy Company for Alleged Racketeering and Fraud

  • Michigan AG Bill Schuette filed additional criminal charges against Chesapeake Energy Corporation alleging racketeering and fraud. Chesapeake allegedly obtained uncompensated land options from landowners using false pretenses and prevented competitors from leasing the land.
  • In March, the AG had charged Chesapeake and Encana Oil & Gas USA with alleged antitrust violations with regard to private land leasing and the state land auction. In May, Encana settled with the AG for $5 million.
  • The AG is now charging Chesapeake with one count of conducting criminal enterprises and eight counts of false pretenses. Representatives from the company are scheduled to be arraigned on June 25 before Cheboygan County's 89th District Court.


Oil Spill Lawsuit Allowed to Proceed

  • A judge for the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas ruled that a lawsuit brought against ExxonMobil by Arkansas AG Dustin McDaniel, on behalf of the Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality, and the U.S. AG, on behalf of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, will be allowed to proceed.
  • The lawsuit, resulting from a pipeline rupture and oil spill in March 2013, alleges violations of the state and federal pollution and hazardous materials laws.
  • ExxonMobil argued that the plaintiffs did not state a claim or otherwise establish that the company should have to pay penalties for the spill. The court disagreed.

Vermont Attorney General Sues Gasoline Refiners for Alleged Groundwater Pollution

  • Vermont AG Bill Sorrell sued more than two dozen gasoline refiners, manufacturers, and suppliers of the gasoline additive methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE) for alleged pollution of state groundwater.
  • AG Sorrell alleges that the companies promoted, marketed, and distributed gasoline containing MTBE knowing that it was hazardous and posed risk to groundwater. AG Sorrell also alleges that the companies failed to inform state regulators, resellers, or consumers of the hazards or means to mitigate these hazards.
  • The complaint claims violations of the state groundwater protection act, design defect, failure to warn, public and private nuisance, trespass, negligence, and civil conspiracy. The AG seeks compensatory and punitive damages, injunctive and equitable relief, costs, and interest.

Pennsylvania Attorney General Investigation Leads to Criminal Environmental Charges

  • An investigation by Pennsylvania AG Kathleen Kane led to a grand jury recommending criminal charges against Minuteman Towing Inc., Minuteman Spill Response Inc., Minuteman Environmental Services Inc. (collectively Minuteman), Bolus Truck Parts and Towing Services Inc., the owners of these companies, and family members of the owners.
  • Prosecutors charge that Minuteman allegedly violated both the state Clean Streams Law and Solid Waste Management Act by unlawfully disposing of and/or burying waste in the ground. Prosecutors also found that Minuteman and its owner allegedly overbilled businesses, and that several of the owner's family members were allegedly added to the payroll for Minuteman and Bolus and submitted increased health care premiums for the group health insurance.
  • The company responded that the charges are "baseless and without merit" and that it will defend itself against them.

Financial Industry

Court Remands Lawsuits Against Financial Rating Agency for Lack of Federal Jurisdiction

  • The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York remanded lawsuits brought by 17 AGs against Standard & Poor's Financial Services LLC (S&P) for lack of federal jurisdiction. The decision effectively vacated an order by the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (MDL), closed the MDL proceeding, and dismissed two related lawsuits brought by S&P against South Carolina and Tennessee.
  • The suits, filed in state courts, alleged that S&P violated consumer protection and deceptive trade practices acts by misrepresenting the objectivity of its rating service. S&P had the cases removed to federal court and the AGs moved to remand.
  • California, Connecticut, and Illinois have lawsuits against S&P that remained in state court. The U.S. Department of Justice also has a lawsuit pending in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California.

Health Care

Kentucky Attorney General Settles for $3.7 Million With Hematology and Oncology Center

  • Kentucky AG Jack Conway , the U.S. Attorney for the Western District of Kentucky, and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services settled for $3.7 million with Elizabethtown Hematology and Oncology, PLC and its owners (collectively Elizabethtown) to resolve allegations that it submitted or caused to be submitted false claims to health care programs.
  • Elizabethtown allegedly extended chemotherapy treatment times to maximize reimbursements and billed unnecessary office visits for infusion therapies.
  • Pursuant to the settlement, Elizabethtown will also enter into a three-year corporate integrity agreement that requires enhanced accountability and monitoring.

Medicaid Fraud

Louisiana Attorney General Settles with Abbott Laboratories for $9.5 Million to Resolve Allegations of Medicaid Fraud

  • Louisiana AG Buddy Caldwell settled with Abbott Laboratories for $9.5 million to resolve allegations that it misbranded its drug Depakote, an antiepileptic medication, by promoting it to control agitation and aggression in elderly dementia patients and to treat schizophrenia without obtaining approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
  • Forty-nine other states and the District of Columbia previously settled with Abbott on similar allegations for $1.5 billion.


Forty-Five Attorneys General Settle for $105 Million With a Pharmaceutical Company to Resolve Unlawful Marketing Allegations

  • Forty-five attorneys general, led by Illinois AG Lisa Madigan and Oregon AG Ellen Rosenblum, settled allegations of violation of consumer protection laws with GlaxoSmithKline, LLC.
  • The AGs alleged that GlaxoSmithKline misrepresented and improperly promoted the uses, qualities, and benefits of its asthma drug, Advair, and its antidepressant drugs, Paxil and Wellbutrin.
  • Pursuant to the settlement, GlaxoSmithKline will pay $105 million, which a multistate executive committee will divide amongst the states and the District of Columbia. In addition, the company agrees not to make any false, misleading, or unapproved claims and will revise some of its practices, including those used for marketing and responding to health care provider questions. It will also continue a program that addresses compensation of sales representatives to reduce any financial incentives to engage in deceptive marketing. The company did not admit to any wrongdoing.

State AGs in the News

Mississippi Attorney General Elected NAAG President

States v. Federal Government

West Virginia Attorney General Writes Letter Objecting to Proposed Carbon Emissions Rule

  • West Virginia AG Patrick Morrisey wrote a letter to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) objecting to the EPA's proposed rule to cut carbon emissions for existing power plants.
  • Last week we blogged about the AGs' responses to the proposed rule, including both objections to and support for the proposal. In AG Morrisey's letter, which is a follow up to his initial response last week, he argues that the proposed rule violates the Clean Air Act. He also describes the EPA's plan as "legally flawed" and urges it to withdraw the proposal.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions