United States: Bankruptcy Sale: No Stay Pending Appeal, Then No Appeal?

Last Updated: June 16 2014
Article by Vicki Harding

Rushton v. ANR Company, Inc. (In re C.W. Mining Co.), 740 F.3d 548 (10th Cir. 2014)

After a chapter 7 trustee sold assets of the debtor in a bankruptcy sale, he sought to dismiss various pending appeals involving issues relating to the sold assets.  After the district court dismissed the appeals as moot, the parties appealed to the 10th Circuit.

Prior to bankruptcy, the debtor (CW Mining) had the exclusive right to mine coal on land owned by two affiliates (ANR and COP) under leases.  Originally another company (Hiawatha) operated ANR's mine.  However, after it ran into regulatory problems, Hiawatha and ANR agreed to pass control to CW Mining. An individual (Reynolds) ran CW Mining's operations at the COP mine and lived with his family in the scale house connected to the mine.  Although COP owned the house, it was under CW Mining's exclusive control.

CW Mining ended up in bankruptcy after a customer obtained a $24.8 million judgment for breach of contract and then filed an involuntary petition.  After the bankruptcy was filed, the debtor tried to transfer its operations to Hiawatha, and COP and ANR entered into post-petition agreements with Hiawatha to mine coal in the debtor's place.

CW Mining's bankruptcy was converted to a chapter 7 liquidation, and a bankruptcy trustee was appointed.  The trustee brought various proceedings to recover assets, including the coal mining operations at the active COP mine, the scale house at the COP mine (occupied by Reynolds) and the debtor's contracts with ANR and COP (which had been replaced by the agreements with Hiawatha).

The bankruptcy court ordered that all assets be returned to the bankruptcy estate.  ANR, COP, Hiawatha and Reynolds each appealed.  While the appeals were pending, the trustee sold the COP mining operations, the scale house, and the ANR and COP mining contracts to another company for $15 million.  The court found that the buyer was a good faith purchaser entitled to protection under Section 363(m) of the Bankruptcy Code.  No one moved for a stay pending appeal, and the sale closed.  After closing, the trustee and buyer moved to dismiss the appeals as moot – under Section 363(m) or an equitable mootness doctrine.  The district court agreed and dismissed the appeals.

No one disputed that Section 363(m) applied to asset sale.  So the only question was whether Section 363(m) would permit relief if an appellant prevailed.  Under Section 363(m) the reversal or modification on appeal of authorization to sell property will not affect the validity of the sale, unless the appellant obtains a stay of the sale pending appeal.

Initially the appellants argued that Section 363(m) applied only to appeals of the sale order itself.  However, the 10th Circuit determined that the scope of this section was not limited to appeals of the sale order, but rather extended to other orders that would effectively modify the sale order.  To hold otherwise would be contrary to the text of the Code and would frustrate the purpose of protecting the public interest in finalizing bankruptcy sales.  Thus, an appeal will be moot if the only remedies available would affect the validity of the sale.

Turning to the individual appeals:  ANR sought a determination that its agreement with the debtor had been terminated.  The bankruptcy court denied this request since ANR did not provide a required notice of default.  Alternatively, ANR requested all unpaid royalties.  This was denied because ANR did not provide documentation to support that any royalties were owed.

While its appeal was pending at the district court the sale was approved and ANR's mining agreement was included in the assets sold.  The district court found that ANR's request for declaratory relief regarding the contract would necessarily call into question the bankruptcy court's interpretation, and thus the validity of the sale.  In response, ANR argued that it did not substantially affect the sale order, and besides it was entitled to monetary relief in the form of constructive trust.  The 10th Circuit disagreed since Section 363(m) applied to any remedy regardless of whether it was substantial, and ANR waived its right to a constructive trust by not pursuing the argument in the lower courts.

When the trustee sought to recover assets transferred post-petition to Hiawatha, Hiawatha contended that it was entitled to protection under Section 549(d), which disallows avoidance of transfers in the gap between the filing of an involuntary petition and a court entering an order for relief to the extent of any value given for the transfer.  Hiawatha claimed it gave value by hiring former employees and paying trade creditors, royalties, property taxes and interest on pre-petition debt.  However, there was no evidence that Hiawatha itself made the payments, as opposed to the debtor, or that the payments were in exchange for the assets as opposed to part of its ongoing business operations.

Hiawatha also sought an improver's lien under Section 550(e) as a good faith transferee for its supposed expenditures to improve the property.  Again, there was no evidence it used its own money, and the bankruptcy court concluded Hiawatha was not a good faith transferee.  When it received the debtor's assets, it knew CW Mining was an involuntary in bankruptcy and that there was a $24 million judgment outstanding against it.

After the sale, Hiawatha argued that the appeal was not moot since it was making a claim to the proceeds.  Instead of trying to recover the sold assets, Hiawatha suggested the court could order that it be paid the value of the assets from the estate.  The trustee argued in response that there is a "bright-line rule" that if the proceeds are not segregated, a claimant cannot recover the proceeds.

While the 10th Circuit rejected the bright-line rule, it still affirmed dismissal of the appeal as moot since the only proposed remedy that would not affect the sale was imposing a constructive trust. In order to impose a constructive trust under applicable state law, Hiawatha had to (1) trace the property to the proceeds and (2) show that there would be unjust enrichment if the estate retained the property without paying its value.  Given that (i) Hiawatha could not trace its claimed assets to sale proceeds, (ii) it did not contest that "it mined a million tons of coal in willful violation of the automatic stay, making an equitable remedy impossible in light of such inequitable behavior," and (iii) it did not identify any wrongful conduct by the trustee, it could not prevail.

With respect to Reynolds, Reynolds had argued that he owned the scale house, not the debtor, and also filed a counterclaim under a state statute seeking $175,000 for supposed improvements.

While his appeal of the determination that he did not own the scale house was moot (since any remedy would affect the sale), Reynolds contended that he sought only the value of his home, or alternatively the value of the improvements, from the sale proceeds.  Although Reynolds could not establish a constructive trust, the trustee also did not establish that Reynolds could not assert a claim for the value of the improvements.  Reynolds could not recover the scale house and his appeal of that issue was moot, but his request for monetary relief under the state statute for the value of improvements was not moot.

Finally, COP claimed that its mining agreement with the debtor had terminated under various theories. While appealing an adverse decision by the bankruptcy court, the contract was sold.  The court concluded that COP could not continue the appeal because changing the interpretation of the contract would alter the definition and value of the assets that were sold.

Although COP argued that it was only seeking compensation from the sale proceeds, that theory was not adequately presented to the lower courts: A statement in a footnote that "monetary relief is another available remedy that will not disturb the Sale Order" was not sufficient to preserve the argument.

In response to various arguments by the trustee, COP contended that it was sufficient to show the "mere existence" of theories of relief that would not be subject to mootness.  "But COP is mistaken:  the mootness question does not turn on what relief 'merely exists.'  Rather, '[t]he mootness question turns on what relief is available to COP if it were to prevail in this appeal.'"

Consequently, the 10th Circuit agreed that COP's appeal was moot.

Even if a party's objection is not a direct attack on a bankruptcy sale, as this case demonstrates, it still may be precluded from proceeding if the requested remedy has even an indirect impact on the sale or the sale assets.  Obtaining a stay of the sale pending appeal (if possible) is certainly the way to go.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Vicki Harding
In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions