United States: A Better Way Out? Exit Services In Outsourcing

Last Updated: June 16 2014
Article by Alistair Maughan

As with any business relationship, the end of an outsourcing can be a difficult time. Happy, trouble-free exits are rare. Emotions often run high, there may be pending legal claims in relation to the termination circumstances that triggered the exit, and employees may be worried about their future jobs.

The problem of achieving a smooth exit that works for both customer and service provider plagues many outsourcings, both large and small. Too often, outsourcing parties let these issues distract them from what's really important: continuity and effective transition.

There is a better way. There are a handful of simple approaches that can be followed in any outsourcing arrangement in order to avoid the most common mistakes in the exit phase. As with many outsourcing issues, the keys to success are planning, transparency, and using past experiences to avoid future mistakes.

In the outsourcing sector globally, it is becoming increasingly important for both customers and service providers to focus on how to ensure continuity of services and a seamless exit and transition. As the average duration of outsourcing relationships continues to shrink and the complexity of the outsourcing services provided increases, the frequency and difficulty of exit also increases. If anything, the growth in frequency of multisourcing strategies – and the corresponding need for one-to-many exit handovers – has exacerbated the problems.

For a customer, the priority should be to maintain continuity of service during an exit. For a service provider, the priority should be to ensure that its resources can be effectively transitioned to the next deployment with minimal downtime.

We have co-written a Practice Guide on Exit Services in Outsourcing with a number of independent law firms in Europe (the Outsourcing Law Group) with which we cooperate on outsourcing projects. This Practice Guide draws on the vast experience of the Outsourcing Law Group team of assisting clients in this most sensitive time of an outsourcing project.

The Outsourcing Law Group Practice Guide explains some of the core principles that are important to establish a better set of arrangements in relation to outsourcing exits. The Guide examines the most common issues that arise when dealing with exits in outsourcing relationships. The Guide focuses on three essential exit stages – Decision to Exit, Planning of Exit, and Post-Exit – and proposes a six step New Approach to improving the exit experience. The Guide also considers the tricky topic of how parties involved in an outsourcing relationship ought to address the issue of payment for exit services.


One of the main underlying issues of outsourcing is that, during the term of the outsourcing contract, neither customer nor service provider pays enough attention to the issue of exit terms or to creating a foundation for a seamless exit and continuation of services.

No one wants to think about exit issues during the pre-contract "dating phase" of an outsourcing relationship or in the happy post-signing honeymoon period. And then, by the time the services have been ramped up and steady-state achieved, exit is either viewed as too distant an issue to address, or something contentious that would upset the happy balance between customer and incumbent service provider – or, conceivably, something that belongs in the "too difficult" box for both parties.

And so the issue gets ignored until the customer is working out what its future strategy will be, and only then realizes that (a) it has only a very loose idea of how to transition services to another provider; (b) the incumbent service provider has the best access to key data that would allow a level playing field for competitors to bid to replace it; and (c) the incumbent service provider owns key assets and there is no blueprint or plan for how service continuity will be maintained if the customer's best value for money solution lies elsewhere.

The most common issues in an exit situation are:

  • Failing to plan properly, and assuming that the exit process will either magically occur or will be agreed upon at the time when it's needed (when, by definition, the parties' relationship is likely to be at its worst)
  • A customer expecting something for nothing in the exit situation and believing that the key services required to effect an exit transition have already been paid for during the term
  • The parties failing to build a firewall around exit discussions and bringing to the table the same antagonism that exists in relation to termination, or using exit as a weapon in an ongoing dispute over termination.

There is a better way. Many of the issues involved in an exit can be avoided if the parties follow a few simple rules:

  • Plan for the exit in advance when entering into a business relationship and spend time discussing and regulating any future exit terms
  • Understand each other's drivers and needs for a successful exit: the process is not just about continuity of service for the customer
  • Keep exit under review during the contract life; don't let draft exit plans grow stale or out-of-date
  • Work out in advance a fair way to pay for an exit
  • Create a structure for exit. One size will not fit all, and you can't legislate for everything, but if you can try to create a level playing field for cooperation, openness and dialogue, you will have made the parties' collective lives easier when exit finally occurs
  • The incumbent's exit plan is only half the story. Establish a process by which to create alignment between the incumbent's exit plan and the new service provider's incoming transition plan
  • Think about exit in terms of the obligations pre-exit (including what may be needed to consider whether to exit or not), managing an exit, and post-exit obligations. How will all of the key resources (e.g., people, data, process maps, software, intellectual property, and data) be treated at each stage?


The most common defect of outsourcing exit processes is that planning doesn't start early enough.

Even the greatest exit plan will not resolve every potential issue that may arise at the end of an outsourcing relationship. But it is possible to use the planning process to establish the right culture within which an exit will occur, to determine key resource constraints, and to identify how exit transition issues will be addressed in a way that recognizes the concerns of all parties.

It is essential that detailed planning of an exit should not begin after an exit is decided upon; it should begin immediately after the contract is signed or even as a part of the tendering process. It is common today in many outsourcing contracts to require the service provider to deliver an exit plan shortly after the signing of a contract, and to require that plan to be continually updated when there are significant changes made to the services provided.

It is, however, equally common that an exit plan is not delivered, or is delivered as a high level plan which is not useful and, very often, the plan delivered is not updated and maintained during the term of the contract. Customers tend to accept this situation until exit becomes a live issue within the customer's organization – by which time, it's frequently too late to revise or create a plan.

Regardless of whether the eventual exit is planned due to expiry, or unplanned due to material default, it can become a costly problem for both the service provider and the customer if an exit plan has not been provided, is insufficient, or is obsolete due to changes in the services. The customer will have the cost and the burden of the problems; however, if the service provider is in material breach, a substantial portion of the cost may eventually be covered through claims for damages caused by the service provider.

The overall purpose of the exit plan is to enable the customer and the replacement service provider to provide services of a similar nature and scope to the services in the contract, at the same service levels as prior to termination or expiry of the contract. Further, the plan should ensure a seamless transition minimizing disruption or degradation in the services during the exit phase, including provisions to ensure that no data is lost or corrupted. And all of these provisions in the plan need to be carried out in the shortest practical timeframe.


While it's not possible to wave a magic wand and make all exit issues disappear, it is possible for customers to take a more proactive approach to exit planning.

Based upon our experience in exit situations, effective planning can be broken down into specific segments. It would be illusory to believe that any single plan could remove all exit risk, but the planning process does at least cause the parties to focus on the key risk areas; and that focus may effectively reduce the threat to continuity of service.

Our Practice Guide addresses six areas where parties to an outsourcing relationship can make small but significant changes in the exit planning process.

Improve the Payment Model. The cost structure related to exit services should be based on the principle that some exit-related services and deliverables will not be separately payable but, instead, will be included in the base charges. Apart from such expressly stipulated services or deliverables, all other requirements should be separately payable and subject to a quotation and approval process.

Focus on Achieving Alignment between an Exit Plan and a Transition Plan. The incumbent provider's exit plan is only half the battle. The exit plan must align with the new provider's transition plan. Both plans should be shared and openly discussed. The aim of all parties should be to identify possible gaps and work out how such gaps can be closed.

Regular Certification of Exit Readiness. On a yearly basis, the service provider should be required to certify to the customer in writing that the current version of the exit plan fully reflects any changes in the services; and that an exit from the service provider and transfer of the ability to perform services to the customer and/or competent replacement provider can be efficiently conducted via the exit plan, subject to the exit plan being updated where required with information to be obtained from the customer and/or replacement provider.

Risk Management. Risk management best practice often lapses when faced with an exit situation. The service provider should provide and maintain a specific exit-related risk register. The register should cover any non-trivial risk that may adversely affect the ability of the service provider and customer jointly to execute the exit plan. Risks may be operational, technical, commercial, or legal. The customer and service provider should jointly own the agreed mitigation initiatives, which should including a time schedule and, if relevant, a price proposal.

Adjustment of Pricing and Relief of Service Provider. Customers need to be more proactive and cut service providers some slack in terms of appropriate relief from service requirements. Equally, providers ought to be more open to a graduated service transition in certain circumstances. There's no precise template for how this might occur, but transparency as to how services can be transitioned and resources released is key.

An Ombudsman as Part of Governance. The parties should agree in advance who actually controls an exit – and the customer shouldn't be surprised if the right answer is that it's the customer's job. It's vital to set the right governance forums to manage an exit. These forums may be differently constituted from the normal running, live service forums. Customers should be more prepared to own the exit process. Additionally, parties ought to consider appointing ombudsmen, either within their own organizations or independently, in order to ensure rapid and effective resolution of exit-related issues.


Any gap in service provision could have disastrous consequences for a customer's business. That being the case, as a rational economic operator, a customer ought to be prepared to pay a premium if necessary to ensure that that those consequences are avoided. So why do many customers seem to want to achieve an exit at no, or minimal, cost?

Exit charges ought to be a part of the overall financial equation for a customer, and one of the factors in its decision-making. That overall financial equation is split into two distinct parts: the initial decision to appoint an incumbent service provider and then the later decision, to possibly change providers. Part of the problem, however, seems to be that many customers often focus on the wrong part of the equation: that is, at the outset, they regard the cost of exit as a "next generation" issue but then, when the time for re-compete comes around, they regard exit costs as something that should be entirely subsumed within the original transaction cost.

The most successful exit processes are ones in which exit charges are transparent both in terms of what level of fees is payable but more particularly in terms of what will be paid – or priced into – what revenue stream.

Crucially, payment and charges should be fair and balanced between the two most commonly held views, either that customers expect an exit to be handled at no extra charge (especially in a for-cause termination) or that service providers expect to be paid at full day rates for all extra termination services.

Exit service disputes between customers and service providers often derive from lack of clarity about who bears the costs of the services to be provided, i.e., whether such costs should be paid by the customer as part of the ongoing payments during the term of the contract, or paid separately as the exit services are being delivered. There are a number of permutations and variations in relation to exit services payment mechanisms, and some have led to more disputes than others.

Often, outsourcing contracts take the position that if a termination is due to a service provider's material default, the service provider is required to provide the exit services at its own cost. The rationale is that the payments would often form part of a claim for damages anyway, and therefore the service provider may as well bear the cost up-front to save the customer having to make the damages claim. In some jurisdictions, this is considered to be market practice.

We do not generally support this approach of linking the level of exit service payments to the underlying cause of a termination. A seamless transition may be worth paying for if a business is vulnerable to service disruptions and it must be remembered that a service provider will have little incentive to deliver, or to ensure quality, if there is no payment for its services.


Our Practice Guide takes the position that the most controversial thing about the exit process should be that it ought to be uncontroversial. Of course, the parties may be wildly in disagreement about the underlying cause of the exit. Often, such disagreements are hard to avoid, with allegations and counter-threats about who is to blame. But the issue too often is that parties can't separate their contractual antagonism from the need for cool analysis to make sure that the practical exit process runs smoothly.

In practice, there's no silver bullet that will ensure a perfectly smooth transition in the exit phase. It's possible to use sensible planning techniques and best practices to anticipate and avoid many of the most common problems, but there's no magic solution and it's not possible to legislate for every possible scenario.

Outsourcing parties can achieve a vastly improved exit scenario by taking simple steps to recognize that, for example, continuity of services for the customer is significantly more important than saving a few dollars, euros or pounds – or that the service provider has as much need to plan its future resourcing as the customer needs certainty in services delivery.

Download a copy of the Outsourcing Law Group Practice Guide.

Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP. All rights reserved

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Alistair Maughan
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Morrison & Foerster LLP
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Morrison & Foerster LLP
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions