United States: Weekly Washington Healthcare Update: June 9, 2014

Last Updated: June 13 2014
Article by Stephanie A. Kennan and Brian J. Looser



District Work Period -- No Legislative Activity


Senate Easily Confirms Burwell as HHS Secretary

On June 5, Sylvia Mathews Burwell was confirmed on the Senate floor by a vote of 78-17 as the next Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Burwell, who previously served as the director of the Office of Management and Budget after terms as president of the Walmart Foundation and President Bill Clinton's chief of staff 1997-1998, replaces current HHS secretary Kathleen Sebelius. The newly elected secretary enjoyed bipartisan support throughout her confirmation, although a minority of Republican senators, led by Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY), voted against Burwell's confirmation in protest of the Affordable Care Act. When debate on Burwell's nomination ended June 4, 14 Republicans crossed the aisle in the procedural vote, which passed 67-28. Burwell will be sworn into her new role on June 9.

Bipartisan Veterans Affairs Reform Proposal

Senators Bernie Sanders (I-VT) and John McCain (R-AZ) led a bipartisan agreement on June 5 on proposed legislation to reform the Department of Veterans Affairs. The bill includes legislation that passed the House in May and portions of three bills that were previously seen by the Senate. The agreement would make it easier to fire VA officials, and would expand veterans' access to health care. It would also allow certain veterans to see private doctors if they experience long wait times or live farther than 40 miles from a VA facility; would mandate the construction of 26 new VA facilities across 18 states; and would use $500 million in unobligated VA funds to hire additional VA doctors and nurses. The proposal would cost an estimated almost $2 billion, funded by emergency appropriations, and still faces potential roadblocks in amendments from senators unsatisfied with the compromise. The proposal comes in the aftermath of an investigation into wait times for health care at VA facilities that resulted in Eric Shinseki's stepping down as the head of the Department of Veterans Affairs in May.


OMB: Review of Medicare Home Health Care Reimbursement Rule

On June 5, 2014, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) received a proposal from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) that would set FY2015 Medicare payment rates for home health agencies. The proposal would update figures including the 60-day national episode rate and national per-visit rates centered on applicable home health marketbasket updates and a case-mix adjustment. The reimbursement changes would apply to services furnished on or after Jan. 1, 2015. CMS estimates that about 3.5 million beneficiaries received care from home health services from 12,000 home health administrators in 2012, at a cost of $18.2 million to Medicare. The CMS final rule is due Nov. 1.

Health Information Technology Coordinator Plan for Interoperability, Data Sharing

On June 5, the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) released a broad 10-year plan for a national interoperable health IT infrastructure as it moves to create health technologies that allow providers, patients, researchers and the government to share and use data for advancing clinical and public health decision-making processes. "Electronic health information needs to be available for appropriate use in solving major challenges such as providing more effective care and informing and accelerating scientific research," the report says. The aggressive ONC plan hones in on improving technology interoperability by infusing IT into new payment and reimbursement models as an essential criterion for improving care, saving money and creating efficiencies. Over the next three years, ONC will focus on ensuring providers and patients can send, receive, find and use basic health information to improve treatment quality. Long-term goals focus on sharing data among patients, providers and public health departments, and improving patient monitoring via remote devices.

Three New MedPAC Commissioners Appointed

On May 29, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) announced the appointments of Kathy Buto, Francis "Jay" Crosson and Warner Thomas to the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC). Current members Willis D. Gradison Jr. and William J. Hall were also reappointed, and the five members will serve terms that expire in April 2017. The three new appointees bring a wealth of experience to MedPAC; Buto is an expert in U.S. and international health policy, Crosson serves as group vice president for the American Medical Association and Thomas is the president and CEO of Oschsner Health System in New Orleans. Current member Jon Christianson was named vice chair of the commission, which will meet next Sept. 11-12. MedPAC advises Congress on payments, cost and quality, other key issues in Medicare and providers with plans participating in Medicare Advantage.

HHS $300 Million for Federally Qualified Community Health Centers

Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Kathleen Sebelius announced June 4 that HHS will award up to $300M under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) to 1,300 federally qualified community health centers (FQHC) across the country. The funds will support increased access to comprehensive primary health care services through expanded service hours; increased number and greater availability of medical providers; and provision of services like oral and behavioral health, pharmacy, vision services, etc., at existing health care sites. FQHCs requesting expanded services funds must reveal how these funds will be utilized to grow primary care programs and services to underserved populations in the communities in which they operate. "Health centers are key to ACA's goal of expanding access to health care," said Secretary Sebelius. "They are critical providers of care and have also been instrumental in linking people to coverage through the Health Insurance Marketplace." These health centers operate more than 9,000 service delivery sites that provide care to over 21 million patients in every state and the U.S. territories.


New York Medicaid Waiver Funds Hinge on State Matching Requirement

New York's $8 billion Medicaid arrangement with the federal government, which requires Medicaid providers across the state to meet predetermined metrics -- aimed at decreasing in-patient hospitalizations by 25 percent over five years, is viewed by many as a lifesaver for institutions such as the financially troubled Interfaith Medical Center in Brooklyn. However, state matching funds are required in order to secure the full $8 billion, and as a result, the state's five major health systems -- the New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation, SUNY, Westchester Medical Center, Nassau University Medical Center and Erie County Medical Center -- will play an outsized role in determining how, and whether, New York actually receives the maximum amount.

Maryland Approves New Xerox Exchange Contract, Insurers Mull Rates

The Maryland Health Benefit Exchange Board, which oversees the state's broken insurance exchange, approved $43.5 million in contracts late last week with the hope that a move to new technology, which is currently used successfully in the Connecticut exchange, will help overcome problems that have plagued Maryland's efforts thus far. The agreement also includes a five-year contract for Xerox to host technology used by the highly successful Connecticut exchange. At the same time, five Maryland health insurers are considering dramatic changes in their rates next year, reflecting volatility that is likely to greet the second year of ACA coverage nationwide. Specifically, CareFirst BlueChoice and CareFirst of Maryland want to raise rates by 22.8 percent and 30.2 percent, respectively, while Kaiser Foundation Health Plan is pitching a 12.1 percent cut and Evergreen Health Cooperative wants a 10.3 percent cut. A fifth insurer, All Savers Insurance, which is a United Healthcare company, wants a 4.8 percent increase. Maryland is one of the first states to release its proposed rates for next year.


CMS Proposed Rule: Medicare, Medicaid EHR Incentive Program

On May 23, 2014, CMS issued a proposed rule that would change the meaningful use stage timeline and the definition of certified electronic health record technology (CEHRT). It would also change the requirements for the reporting of clinical quality measures for 2014. Certified EHR technology is defined for the Medicare and Medicaid HER Incentive Programs at 42 CFR 495.4, which references the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology's (ONC) definition of CEHRT under 45 CFR 170.102. For Stages 1 and 2 of meaningful use, CMS and ONC worked closely to ensure that the definition of meaningful use of CEHRT and the standards and certification criteria for CEHRT were coordinated. The definition of CEHRT under 45 CFR 170.102 requires, beginning with federal fiscal year (FY) and calendar year (CY) 2014, EHR technology certified to the 2014 Edition EHR certification criteria. Therefore, all EPs, eligible hospitals and CAHs must use 2014 Edition CEHRT to meet meaningful use under the Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs, beginning with FY 2014 and CY 2014. Beginning in 2015, all eligible hospitals and professionals would still be required to report using the 2014 Edition CEHRT. The proposed rule also includes a provision that would formalize CMS' and ONC's previously stated intention to extend Stage 2 through 2016 and begin Stage 3 in 2017.

To view the CMS press release on the proposed rule, visit cms.gov.

Medicare Program; Prior Authorization Process for Certain Durable Medical Equipment, Prosthetics, Orthotics and Supplies (DMEPOS) Items

On May 23, 2014, CMS issued a proposed rule that would establish a prior authorization process for certain durable medical equipment, prosthetics, orthotics and supplies (DMEPOS) items that are frequently subject to unnecessary utilization and would add a contractor's decision regarding prior authorization of coverage of DMEPOS items to the list of actions that are not initial determinations and therefore not appealable.

The proposed rule is intended to replicate the Medicare Prior Authorization of Power Mobility Device Demonstration. Launched in 2012, the demonstration established a prior authorization process for certain power mobility devices. Based on September 2013 claims data, monthly expenditures for certain power mobility devices decreased from $12 million in September 2012 to $4 million in August 2013 across the seven demonstration states (California, Florida, Illinois, Michigan, New York, North Carolina and Texas) with no reduction in beneficiary access to medically necessary items. CMS seeks to leverage this success by extending the demonstration to an additional 12 states. These states include Arizona, Georgia, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Missouri, New Jersey, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tennessee and Washington. This will bring the total number of states participating in the demonstration to 19.

CMS also proposes to establish a prior authorization process for certain durable medical equipment, prosthetics, orthotics and supplies items that are frequently subject to unnecessary utilization. Through a proposed rule, CMS will solicit public comments on this prior authorization process, as well as criteria for establishing a list of durable medical items that are frequently subject to unnecessary utilization that may be subject to the new prior authorization process. CMS will launch two payment model demonstrations to test prior authorization for certain non-emergent services under Medicare. These services include hyperbaric oxygen therapy and repetitive scheduled non-emergent ambulance transport. Information from these models will inform future policy decisions on the use of prior authorization.

The deadline to submit comments is July 28, 2014.

OIG Proposed Rule to Promote Civil Monetary Penalties for Health Fraud

On May 12, the Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General published a rule in the Federal Register that would expand the use of civil monetary penalties (CMPs). Under the rule, CMPs could be applied to entities for failing to provide OIG with quick access to documents, ordering or prescribing medication or services while excluded from participation in federal health care programs, making false statements on enrollment applications, failing to report or return overpayments, and making a false statement that is part of a fraudulent claim. In addition, the proposed rule would also allow CMPs to be imposed on Medicare Advantage and Medicare Part D organizations. Comments on the rule are due July 11.

CMS Proposed Rule FY 2015 Hospice Payment Rate Update

On May 2, 2014, CMS issued a proposed rule [CMS-1609-P] that would update fiscal year (FY) 2015 Medicare payment rates and the wage index for hospices serving Medicare beneficiaries. As proposed, hospices would see an estimated 1.3 percent ($230 million) increase in their payments for FY 2015. The hospice payment increase would be the net result of a proposed hospice payment update to the hospice per diem rates of 2 percent (a "hospital market basket" increase of 2.7 percent minus 0.7 percent for reductions mandated by law), and a 0.7 percent decrease in payments to hospices due to updated wage data and the sixth year of CMS' seven-year phase-out of its wage index budget neutrality adjustment factor (BNAF). This rule also provides an update on hospice payment reform analyses and solicits comments on "terminal illness" and "related conditions" definitions, and on a process and appeals for Part D payment for drugs, while beneficiaries are under a hospice election. In addition, the rule proposes timeframes for filing the notice of election and the notice of termination/revocation; adding the attending physician to the hospice election form; a requirement that hospices complete their hospice inpatient and aggregate cap determinations within five months after the cap year ends, and remit any overpayments; and updates for the hospice quality reporting program.

Public comments on the proposal will be accepted until July 1, 2014.

CMS Final Rule -- Federally Qualified Health Center Prospective Payment System

On May 2, 2014, CMS issued a final rule with comment period to implement methodology and payment rates for a prospective payment system (PPS) for federally qualified health center (FQHC) services under Medicare Part B beginning on Oct. 1, 2014, in compliance with the statutory requirement of the Affordable Care Act. In addition, it establishes a policy that allows rural health clinics (RHCs) to contract with nonphysician practitioners when statutory requirements for employment of nurse practitioners and physician assistants are met, and makes other technical and conforming changes to the RHC and FQHC regulations. Finally, this final rule with comment period implements changes to the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) regulations regarding enforcement actions for proficiency testing (PT) referrals. Comments will be accepted through July 1, 2014.

CMS Issues Proposed Hospital Inpatient Payment Regulation

CMS issued a proposed rule that would update fiscal year (FY) 2015 Medicare payment policies and rates for inpatient stays at general acute care and long-term care hospitals (LTCHs). This rule builds on the Obama administration's efforts through the Affordable Care Act to promote improvements in hospital care that will lead to better patient outcomes while slowing the long-term health care cost growth. CMS projects that the payment rate update to general acute care hospitals will be 1.3 percent in FY 2015. The rate update for long-term care hospitals will be 0.8 percent. The difference in the update is accounted for by different statutory and regulatory provisions that apply to each system.

The rule's most significant changes are payment provisions intended to improve the quality of hospital care, which reduce payment for readmissions and hospital acquired conditions (HACs). The rule also includes proposed changes to the Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting (IQR) Program. The rule also describes how hospitals can comply with the Affordable Care Act's requirements to disclose charges for their services online or in response to a request, supporting price transparency for patients and the public.

CMS will accept comments on the proposed rule until June 30, 2014, and will respond to comments in a final rule to be issued by Aug. 1, 2014.

Fiscal Year 2015 Inpatient Psychiatric Facilities Prospective Payment System

On May 1, 2014, CMS issued a proposed rule that would update the prospective payment rates for Medicare inpatient hospital services provided by inpatient psychiatric facilities (IPFs). These changes would be applicable to IPF discharges occurring during the fiscal year (FY) beginning Oct. 1, 2014, through Sept. 30, 2015. This proposed rule would also address implementation of ICD-10-CM and ICD-10-PCS codes; propose a new methodology for updating the cost of living adjustment (COLA); and propose new quality measures and reporting requirements under the IPF quality-reporting program. The proposed rule will appear in the May 6, 2014, Federal Register and will be open to public comment for 60 days.

Proposed Fiscal Year 2015 Payment and Policy Changes for Medicare Inpatient Rehabilitation Facilities

On May 1, 2014, CMS issued a proposed rule that would update the prospective payment rates for inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs) for federal fiscal year (FY) 2015 (for discharges occurring on or after Oct. 1, 2014, and on or before Sept. 30, 2015) as required by the statute. The rule also proposes to collect data on the amount and mode (that is, Individual, Group and Co-Treatment) of therapy provided in the IRF setting according to therapy discipline, revise the list of impairment group codes that presumptively meet the "60 percent rule" compliance criteria, provide for a new item on the Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility-Patient Assessment Instrument (IRF-PAI) form to indicate whether the prior treatment and severity requirements have been met for arthritis cases to presumptively meet the "60 percent rule" compliance criteria, and revise and update quality measures and reporting requirements under the IRF quality reporting program (QRP). The proposal also addresses the implementation of the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM), for the IRF prospective payment system (PPS), effective when ICD-10-CM becomes the required medical data code set for use on Medicare claims and IRF-PAI submissions. The proposed rule will appear in the May 7 Federal Register and will be open to public comments for until June 30, 2014.

FDA Proposed Rule on Deeming Tobacco Products To Be Subject to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act

FDA has issued a proposed rule that would deem products meeting the statutory definition of "tobacco product," except accessories of a proposed deemed tobacco product, to be subject to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act), as amended by the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act (Tobacco Control Act). The Tobacco Control Act provides FDA authority to regulate cigarettes, cigarette tobacco, roll-your-own tobacco, smokeless tobacco and any other tobacco products that the Agency by regulation deems to be subject to the law. Option 1 of the proposed rule would extend the Agency's "tobacco product" authorities in the FD&C Act to all other categories of products, except accessories of a proposed deemed tobacco product, that meet the statutory definition of "tobacco product" in the FD&C Act. Option 2 of the proposed rule would extend the Agency's "tobacco product" authorities to all other categories of products, except premium cigars and the accessories of a proposed deemed tobacco product, that meet the statutory definition of "tobacco product" in the FD&C Act. FDA also is proposing to prohibit the sale of "covered tobacco products" to individuals under the age of 18 and to require the display of health warnings on cigarette tobacco, roll-your own tobacco and covered tobacco product packages and in advertisements. FDA is taking this action to address the public health concerns associated with the use of tobacco products. Comments are due July 9, 2014.

CMS Proposed Rule on Life Safety Codes for Medicare, Medicaid Providers

On April 14, 2014, CMS announced a proposed rule on the adoption of an updated life safety code (LSC) that CMS would use in its ongoing work to ensure the health and safety of all patients, family and staff in every provider and supplier setting. The updated code contains new provisions that are vital to the health and safety of all patients and staff. CMS intends to adopt the National Fire Protection Association's (NFPA) 2012 editions of the (LSC) and the Health Care Facilities Code (HCFC), as the 2012 edition of the LSC also is aligned with the international building codes to make compliance across codes much simpler for Medicare- and Medicaid-participating facilities.

Currently, CMS applies the standards set out in the 2000 edition of the LSC to facilities in order to ensure patients' and caregivers' health and safety. CMS is now proposing to adopt the 2012 editions of the LSC and the Health Care Facilities Code. The LSC sets out fire safety requirements for new and existing buildings, and is issued by the NFPA, a private, nonprofit organization dedicated to reducing loss of life due to fire. The new edition of the LSC applies to: hospitals, long-term care facilities (LTC), critical access hospitals (CAHs), Programs for All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE®), religious nonmedical healthcare institutions (RNHCIs), hospice inpatient facilities, ambulatory surgical centers (ASCs) and intermediate care facilities for individuals with intellectual disabilities (ICF-IIDs).

Comments are due June 16, 2014.


CBO: Payments of Penalties for Being Uninsured Under the Affordable Care Act: 2014 Update

The number of people penalized under the Affordable Care Act by 2016 will be significantly fewer than originally predicted, according to a Congressional Budget Office (CBO) report released June 4. The CBO now estimates that four million people will be liable for penalties in 2016 -- two million fewer than the Office reported in September 2012 -- and that $4.2 billion will be collected in penalties. That figure is $3 billion less than the CBO had previously predicted, and an estimated 61 percent of the collected penalties will be from households with incomes that are 400 percent or more of the federal poverty line. The CBO attributed the decrease in its estimate in part to technical updates from the Department of Health and Human Services and changes in the economic outlook. While 30 million non-elderly residents will be uninsured by 2016, 23 million of them will qualify for exemptions, according to the report. While this would leave an estimated seven million still uninsured, the number of residents penalized would be shrunk further through additional granted exemptions. The current administration has been allowing exemptions from the individual penalty for several reasons, including policies that were cancelled because they did not meet ACA requirements and technical malfunctions with the ACA websites that inhibited those trying to enroll. Also of note in the report was that the CBO and Joint Commission "can no longer determine exactly how the provisions of the ACA that are not related to the expansion of health insurance coverage have affected their projections of direct spending and revenues."

OIG: Vulnerabilities in Medicare's Interrupted-Stay Policy for Long-Term Care Hospitals

In a report released June 4 by the Office of Inspector General (OIG), the agency found that Medicare made an estimated $4.3 million in improper payments to long-term care hospitals (LTCH) in 2010 and 2011 as a result of vulnerabilities in its interrupted-stay policy. The majority of the $4.3 million ($3.8 million) went to long-term care hospitals as a result of reimbursement for two separate stays even if patients qualified for one uninterrupted stay. The remaining $523,000 in payments resulted from CMS's improperly reimbursing intervening facilities for services provided during interruptions of three days or less, despite current policies that mandate those payments be made by the hospital. While the LTCH interrupted-stay policy is designed to save CMS money by counting an LTCH stay with multiple interruptions as a single stay, the OIG said its review "identified several vulnerabilities in the LTCH interrupted-stay policy, including inappropriate payments, financial incentives to delay readmissions, and potential overpayments to collated LTCHs." In its report, OIG recommended several LTCH payment policy oversight changes to help reduce improper payments, including: taking action against LTCHs with high readmission rates immediately following the end of a fixed-day period, evaluating safeguards aimed to prevent inappropriate payments to LTCHs that are currently in place, and creating a system to ensure that payment adjustments for LTCHs occur with subsequent providers that exceed the 5 percent threshold.

Medicare Physical Therapy: Self-Referring Providers Generally Referred More Beneficiaries but Fewer Services per Beneficiary

According to a report recently released by the GAO, from 2004 to 2010, non-self-referred physical therapy (PT) services increased at a faster rate than self-referred PT services. During this period, the number of self-referred PT services per 1,000 Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries was generally flat, while non-self-referred PT services grew by about 41 percent. Similarly, the growth rate in expenditures associated with non-self-referred PT services was also higher than for self-referred services. In addition, the relationship between provider self-referral status and PT referral patterns was mixed and varied on the basis of referring provider specialty, Medicare beneficiary practice size and geography. GAO examined three measures of PT referral for each referring provider for the three provider specialties that referred nearly 75 percent of PT services in 2010 -- family practice, internal medicine and orthopedic surgery. GAO also found that in the year a provider began to self-refer, PT service referrals increased at a higher rate relative to non-self-referring providers of the same specialty. For example, family practice providers that began self-referring in 2009 increased PT referrals 33 percent between 2008 and 2010. In contrast, non-self-referring family practice providers increased their PT service referrals 14 percent during this same period.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


From time to time Mondaq may send you emails promoting Mondaq services including new services. You may opt out of receiving such emails by clicking below.

*** If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of services offered by Mondaq you may opt out by clicking here .


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.