European Union: European Court Of Justice Provides Guidance Regarding Potential Liability Of Cartel Members In EU Member States For Sales By Non-Cartel Participants

Last week, the EU's highest court, the European Court of Justice (ECJ), held that Member State laws may not categorically prohibit consumers from recovering from cartel members damages attributable to purchases from non-cartel participants that—acting independently—were able to charge inflated prices as a result of market-wide price effects from cartel behavior. Much remains to be determined in the national courts, and plaintiffs will continue to face significant barriers to recovery based on this theory. In certain circumstances, however, companies alleged to have engaged in cartels could face increased potential civil exposure in Europe. Particularly in light of the EU's upcoming directive on competition damages actions (expected this fall at the latest), which will provide substantial guidance regarding private actions for alleged competition violations, the decision is another sign that Europe may become a hotbed for antitrust litigation.

Umbrella Theory of Liability: The U.S. Experience

Although the issue is relatively new in Europe, in the United States private plaintiffs purchasing from non-cartel members have on occasion sought to hold cartelists liable on theories that by raising market-wide prices, the collusion created a pricing "umbrella," enabling non-cartel members to independently price higher than they would have but for the cartel. These theories have found little success in U.S. courts.

In Mid-West Paper Products Co. v. Continental Group, Inc., 596 F.2d 573, 584 (3d Cir. 1979), for example, the plaintiff claimed to have been injured by purchasing paper bags from rivals of participants in an industry cartel that were allegedly able to charge artificially inflated prices as a result of the cartel's umbrella effect. In rejecting this damage theory, the court relied heavily on Illinois Brick v. Illinois, 431 US 720 (1977), in which the U.S. Supreme Court held that federal antitrust law does not provide a damages cause of action for indirect purchaser claims based on overcharges imposed on direct purchasers that were "passed on" to them. Among several concerns about allowing indirect purchaser claims, the Supreme Court cited the "massive evidence and complicated theories" inherent in "attempt[ing] to trace the effect of the overcharge through each step in the distribution chain from the direct purchaser to the ultimate consumer." Id. at 741.

The Third Circuit analogized the umbrella theory to indirect purchaser claims because "in both situations the plaintiff seeks to recover for higher prices set by, and paid by it to, parties other than the defendants." Mid-West Paper, 596 F.2d at 584. Moreover, the Third Circuit observed that because independent pricing decisions are determined by many factors, umbrella claims are inherently speculative and trying to determine why a non-cartel member charged a certain price would necessarily lead to the sort of complex economic proceedings that Illinois Brick cautioned against. Id. at 585; see also, e.g., FTC v. Mylan Laboratories, Inc., 62 F. Supp. 2d 25, 39 (D.D.C. 1999) ("The main difficulty with the umbrella theory is that, even in the context of a single level of distribution, ascertaining the appropriate measure of damages is a highly speculative endeavor. There are numerous pricing variables which this Court would be bound to consider to approximate the correct measure of damages.").

The Kone Decision

The Kone decision arose from litigation in Austria brought by a builder subsidiary of Austrian Federal Railways against several participants in a market allocation scheme involving installation and maintenance of elevators and escalators in Austria and several other EU Member States, resulting in a EUR 992 million fine by the European Commission. Case C-557/12, Kone AG, et al. v. ÖBB-Infrastruktur AG, (ECJ 2014). Relying on an umbrella theory, the plaintiff sought to recover for alleged overcharges incurred when it purchased elevators and escalators from non-cartel members, arguing that market-wide price effects from the cartel allowed the non-member to charge prices higher than it would have been able to but for the cartel. Id. at ¶10. The case eventually made its way to the Federal Supreme Court of Austria. That court found that, as a matter of Austrian national law, the plaintiff's umbrella theory was too attenuated to support a claim. Id. at ¶ 15. But it stayed the proceedings to seek a determination from the ECJ whether EU law, which here has primacy over Member State law, prohibits Member States from categorically rejecting umbrella liability claims. Id. at ¶ 17. The court referred the following question to the ECJ:

"Is Article 101 TFEU [the EC Provision prohibiting agreements in restraint of trade] to be interpreted as meaning that any person may claim from members of a cartel damages also for the loss which he has been caused by a person not party to the cartel who, benefiting from the protection of the increased market prices, raises his own prices for his products more than he would have done without the cartel (umbrella pricing), so that the principle of effectiveness laid down by the Court . . . requires the grant of a claim under national law?"

Id. Answering the referred question in the affirmative, the ECJ found that "the full effectiveness of Article 101 . . . would be put at risk if it were not open to any individual to claim damages for loss caused to him by a contract or by conduct liable to restrict or distort competition," so long as "there is a causal relationship between that harm and an agreement or practice prohibited under Article 101." Id. at ¶¶ 20-21. Although it is generally the province of each Member State to "lay down the detailed rules governing" claims for compensation based on violations of Article 101," national rules "must not jeopardise the effective application of Articles [101 and 102]." Id. at ¶¶ 24, 26. The ECJ went on to observe that depending on various factors such as "the nature of the goods or the size of the market covered by [a] cartel," a "competing undertaking, outside the cartel in question," might choose to set prices higher than "it would have chosen . . . in the absence of that cartel." Id. at ¶ 29.

The ECJ concluded that "the victim of umbrella pricing" may obtain compensation from cartel members "where it is established that the cartel at issue was, in the circumstances of the case and, in particular the specific aspects of the relevant market, liable for the effect of umbrella pricing by third parties acting independently, and those aspects could not be ignored by the members of the cartel." Id. at ¶ 34. In other words, the possibility of umbrella liability recovery must be available in Member State private litigation where (i) the plaintiff proves a sufficient causal connection between the cartel activity and inflated prices paid to a non-cartel member and (ii) the cartel participants had a sufficient basis to recognize that would be the case. Id. Importantly, however, the ECJ found that "[i]t is for the referring court to determine whether those conditions are satisfied." Id.

Implications

The Kone decision could have substantial implications for companies accused of participating in cartels that are alleged to have injured consumers in EU Member States. Depending on the circumstances, the decision could increase total potential exposure for cartelists selling in Europe, or at least open the door to claims by plaintiffs that previously may not have considered bringing a claim.

Importantly, however, the decision leaves much for national courts to determine. Member States may no longer categorically deny umbrella liability claims. But, as the ECJ made clear, it will be up to the national courts to determine the critical questions of whether (i) on the particular facts, inflated prices paid to non-cartel members were sufficiently linked to market-wide effects from the cartel and (ii) cartel members had a sufficient basis to recognize their conduct would lead to inflated prices, even for those buying from non-cartel members. Outcomes in future cases will undoubtedly turn on the specifics of each case—e.g., the particular type of cartel conduct at issue, the nature of the cartelized product, the proportion of market supply accounted for by cartel members, and the methodology non-cartel members use to set prices. Outcomes will also turn on particulars of national law governing proof of causation and the like for private competition claims. In practice, it will continue to be challenging for plaintiffs to prove the requisite causal connection between cartel activity and inflated prices for purchases from non-cartel members. As the European national courts proceed to adjudicate umbrella theories, it may be the case that—like many courts in the United States—many national courts will find umbrella theories are too speculative to permit recovery.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Kurt G. Kastorf
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions