United States: Cost Of Counsel In Immigration: Economic Analysis Of Proposal Providing Public Counsel To Indigent Persons Subject To Immigration Removal Proceedings

Last Updated: June 3 2014
Article by Dr. John Montgomery

I. Qualifications

1. I am John D. Montgomery, Ph.D., a Senior Vice President at NERA Economic Consulting, a global firm of experts dedicated to applying economic, finance, and quantitative principles to complex business and legal challenges. I direct projects and provide testimony in a range of complex commercial litigation. I have a Ph.D. in economics from Princeton University. I have held positions at the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, International Monetary Fund, the President's Council of Economic Advisers (under President Clinton), and Morgan Stanley. I have published numerous articles in professional publications.1

II. Summary of Findings and Description of the Proposal

2. In this report, I present my analysis of the estimated costs and offsetting savings of a proposal to create a program, entirely funded and overseen by the Federal government, to provide counsel to every respondent in immigration removal proceedings under 8 U.S.C. § 1229a who qualifies as indigent (hereinafter, the "Proposal").2 I must state upfront that information and data on legal representation in immigration proceedings is incomplete, and a substantial range of uncertainty consequently is attached to the estimates in this report. However, using a range of available numbers and background information, I have prepared what I believe to be unbiased estimates based on the best information available to me, from a variety of sources.

3. A summary of my findings is as follows:

  • Primary Savings: I estimate that detention costs borne by the Federal government would decline by at least $173 to $174 million per year, and likely substantially more.
  • Additional Savings: In addition, I estimate that other Federal outlays, including payments for legal orientation programs, transportation, and foster care would decline by between $31 and $34 million per year. Together with detention cost savings, I estimate total savings of between $204 and $208 million per year.
  • Cost of Proposal: I estimate that the Proposal would cost $208 million annually.
  • Net Cost of the Proposal: Under plausible assumptions, fiscal savings could exceed the costs of providing publicly funded counsel, and the Proposal would pay for itself. The higher end of my range of estimated savings exceeds the estimated cost of the Proposal. Even at the lower end of the range, providing publicly funded counsel to indigent immigration respondents would cost the Federal government no more than $4 million per year, with 98 percent of the cost being paid for by Federal fiscal savings.

4. Under the Proposal, counsel would be provided before a respondent's first court hearing, normally a Master Calendar Hearing, and would continue until the respondent's case is resolved by an immigration judge.3 Both detained and non-detained respondents would be eligible for public counsel, and respondents would be represented during any hearings, including those to determine whether or not they should be detained.

III. Likely Effects of the Proposal

5. My analysis indicates that the Proposal is likely to make immigration removal proceedings, and detention and deportation pursuant to them, more accurate and efficient. Generally, the involvement of counsel is likely to increase the chances that respondents who are legally entitled to be in the United States are allowed to stay. It is self-evident that respondents with legal representation are more likely to successfully argue that they are ineligible for removal or successfully claim relief from removal. Data from asylum proceedings (discussed below) demonstrate that legal representation improves outcomes for respondents. The involvement of counsel will also likely improve the efficiency of the proceedings, resulting in faster removals for those without opportunities for relief from removal.

6. I focus on two quantifiable effects of public provision of counsel in immigration removal proceedings:

  • First, legal representation is likely to reduce costly detention expenditures by the Federal government for respondents who are detained while they are waiting for their cases to be adjudicated, by reducing the aggregate number of days that the government must provide food, housing, and other provisions for those detained respondents. Two factors contribute to this potential reduction in detention days. Some of the reduction is likely because cases with lawyers involved will proceed more quickly from initiation of the cases to decisions by immigration judges, either due to fewer continuances, or because a substantial number of detained respondents without any chance of relief will accept deportation more quickly if well-counseled. Additionally, other respondents with lawyers would be more likely to secure release at the outset of removal proceedings through a successful bond hearing (allowing them to continue working, supporting their families, paying taxes, etc., while waiting for their cases to be decided). Evidence supporting these effects, not all of which can be quantified, is discussed later in this report.
  • Second, legal representation would likely improve the accuracy of cases by helping those individuals who are legally entitled to be in the United States to stay, some of whom otherwise may have been deported without the assistance of counsel. With counsel, either fewer individuals would be determined eligible for removal or more of those eligible would be able to obtain relief through the avenues of relief open to them. In turn, by helping those respondents who are legally entitled to stay, counsel would help reduce social costs and spur other economic benefits. One quantifiable social cost that would likely be reduced is foster care expenditures for children of deported parents. Other economic benefits and savings in social costs would likely be realized as well, although this report does not quantify those benefits and savings. In addition, the reduced deportations of those individuals who are legally entitled to stay through the provision of counsel, would also lead to savings in transportation and travel costs incurred when individuals are deported.

To read this Paper in full, please click here.

Footnotes

1 I have been retained by the law firm Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & Dorr LLP on behalf of the New York City Bar Association. The opinions expressed herein do not necessarily represent the views of NERA Economic Consulting or any other NERA consultant. I thank Mark Noferi of the Center for Migration Studies, and Tiffany Payne, Sanhita Sen, and Hunter Landrum of WilmerHale for providing their insights, perspectives, comments, and research for this study. At NERA, Mitchell Chubinsky provided excellent research and analytical support, and Dr. Stephanie Plancich provided very helpful comments.

2 In my analysis, I assume other immigration laws stay the same. The analysis in this report assumes that counsel will only be provided to those indigent respondents whose removal proceedings are initiated on or after the date that legislation regarding the Proposal is enacted. There is a considerable backlog of removal proceedings at various stages in the U.S. immigration court system, a majority of which, I am informed, likely involve respondents who are represented.

3 Removal proceedings under § 240 of the Immigration and Nationality Act ("INA") are initiated by a charging document called a Notice to Appear ("NTA"). 8 U.S.C. § 1229a; Lenni B. Benson & Russell R. Wheeler, Enhancing Quality and Timeliness in Immigration Removal Adjudication, Report for the Administrative Conference of the United States, pp. 8-21 (Section III.C, "Removal Adjudication Processes") (June 7, 2012), available at http://www.acus.gov/sites/default/files/documents/Enhancing-Quality-and-Timeliness-in-Immigration-Removal-Adjudication-Final-June-72012.pdf (hereinafter "Benson & Wheeler"). Upon issuance of a NTA, the respondent may be kept in custody (a.k.a. "detained"), released under a bond of $1,500 or more, or released on conditional parole into the community. INA §236(a); 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a). During the removal process, the respondent will be asked to appear at two types of hearings—a master calendar and an individual hearing. Benson & Wheeler, pp. 15-16. The master calendar is a preliminary hearing for pleadings (somewhat analogous to a criminal arraignment). Respondents answer the charges against them and may file an application for relief from removal. There are several forms of relief from removal including asylum (8 U.S.C. § 1158); withholding of removal (8 U.S.C. § 1231(b)(3)); Convention Against Torture (8 C.F.R. § 208.16); waivers of removability or inadmissibility (e.g., 8 U.S.C. §§ 1186a(c)(4), 1227 (a)(1)(D)(ii) (certain hardship waivers)); adjustment of status (8 U.S.C. § 1255); and cancellation of removal (8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)). If a respondent states grounds for relief, the Immigration Judge ("IJ") will schedule an individual hearing, also referred to as a merits hearing. At the individual hearing, the parties are given the opportunity to present evidence and testimony before the IJ. Benson & Wheeler, p. 15. At the conclusion, the IJ will issue an order determining the respondent's alleged inadmissibility or deportability and decide on any requested relief. 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(b), (c). Either side can appeal the decision to the administrative Board of Immigration Appeals ("BIA") within 30 days. 8 C.F.R. § 1003.3. If the respondent loses before the BIA, he or she can then appeal within 30 days to the Federal Court of Appeals in the circuit where the case is located. 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b).

As noted above, the Proposal is limited to counsel being provided to indigent respondents from the initiation of removal proceedings through the point at which an IJ issues his or her decision. Accordingly, this report does not analyze costs and savings associated with counsel being provided to indigent respondents for any stage of appeal. The costs and benefits of such an extension to the Proposal are unclear. On the one hand, some extra costs would be borne by the government in providing for counsel to appeal to the BIA (and further costs to a Federal Court of Appeals). On the other hand, some costs would be saved as well, in that well-litigated cases in the trial courts may avoid unnecessary appeals to the BIA and a Federal Court of Appeals. An informal 2011 Department of Justice analysis based on fiscal year 2009 data estimated that it currently costs the federal government $1,240 to litigate a BIA appeal (in prosecution and court costs), and $17,858 to litigate an appeal to a Federal Court of Appeals ($7,865 in prosecution costs and $9,993 in court costs). U.S. Department of Justice, Immigration Litigation Bulletin, What Does it Cost to Regulate Immigration? Three Measurements to Calculate Costs, p. 6 (July 2011), available at http://www.justice.gov/civil/docs_forms/ImmigrationBulletin/July_2011.pdf. Some additional costs outlined in this report would be saved as well. Further, if parties are represented at appeals, counsel on both sides may reach settlements or stipulations that save court time or obviate the need for a full appeal.

Additionally, this Proposal would provide representation to unaccompanied juveniles, as part of providing representation to those in 8 U.S.C. § 1229a proceedings. Less is known about the fiscal impacts of representation on juveniles, though, and this analysis does not separately analyze those impacts.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions