United States: Circuit Training

Last Updated: May 30 2014
Article by Mark S. Davies and Don Daybell

How will the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit deal with cases arising from mechanisms introduced by the America Invents Act? Orrick's Mark S Davies and Donald Daybell discuss

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has tremendous influence over the development of US patent law. From its establishment in 1984 up through today, the court has rendered thousands of decisions that touch on virtually all aspects of the patent system.1 Although the Supreme Court and the Congress may have greater formal authority, neither of those institutions is as critical to the daily running of the US patent system.

This year, the Federal Circuit will turn its attention to a set of cases arising from an important new procedure introduced by the America Invents Act. This law introduced several new mechanisms by which parties can ask the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) to reconsider the validity of granted patents. The primary new USPTO proceeding is called "inter partes review," a mechanism by which any issued patent can be challenged on the basis of prior art.2 Another new USPTO proceeding is called "covered business method review," a mechanism by which certain "business method" patents can be challenged on a variety of bases, including prior art as well as other requirements of the patent laws.3 These proceedings both involve a 'mini-trial' before three Administrative Patent Judges (APJ) of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB).

Importantly, these APJs are technically trained. All hold degrees in science or engineering and some hold advanced degrees in these areas. They all also have law degrees. The 'trial' before the PTAB is an 18-month long process, involving detailed briefing of the legal and technical issues, depositions of any testifying expert or fact witnesses, and culminating with an oral hearing before the PTAB. The hearing lasts for several hours, and the questions from the judges are often focused on the fine details of the relevant invention and prior art.

Many companies, particular those in the technology sector, have elected to challenge issued patents using this new proceeding. The proceedings are, so far, faster and more streamlined than district court patent litigation while eliminating some of the restrictions that hampered challenges to patents under prior USPTO processes. The PTAB is reporting that it receives three to five petitions every day, about twice what was initially anticipated by the patent office.4 The number of administrative judges at the patent office has more than doubled in response. Most of the patent trials involve electrical/computer patents, see figure on right.

So far, the PTAB has issued 33 final written decisions (not including patent owner requests for adverse judgments) in IPRs, and 11 written decisions in CBMs. Garmin International, Inc v Cuozzo Speed Technologies LLC5 was the first written opinion issued from an inter partes proceeding, and it set the tone for many of the PTAB's rulings. The ruling took its cue from a Supreme Court ruling, KSR Int'tl Co, 550 US 398 (2007), in emphasising that "inferences and creative steps that a person of ordinary skill in the art would employ can be taken into account" in deciding whether a claimed invention is "obvious". The challenged patent related to a speed limit indicator. Applying its technical background, the PTAB invalidated the patent because "one with ordinary skill would have recognized that the dynamically adjustable colored plate suggested by [earlier inventors] can be improved by adding automatic control, if the dynamic settings are automatically-determinable." Many, if not all, of the subsequent written decisions reflect both a detailed understanding of the technical dimensions of the claimed invention and an application of technical experience to assessing whether the "inferences and creative steps" were obvious.

Now, the focus will shift to the Federal Circuit. A party disappointed with a PTAB ruling can appeal the result to the Federal Circuit.6 As with any new agency scheme, the appellate court will have to resolve some initial questions about the procedure. For example, the "real party in interest" provision bars repetitive suits, but neither the statute nor the agency has defined the phrase.7 Similarly, the PTAB has restricted the number of "redundant" arguments a party can make, and the Federal Circuit will no doubt get asked to consider whether this approach squares with the statute.8

But the more enduring question will centre on the Federal Circuit's approach to assessing claimed innovations. The Federal Circuit has jurisdiction over a host of subject matters other than patents, such as government contracts, government employees and veterans' affairs.9 And while some of the Federal Circuit judges have a technical background, many do not. Of the five newly appointed judges, only one has any formal technical training.10 Instead, the judges bring to the bench expertise in a variety of substantive legal areas, such as trade regulation and commercial litigation. Oral argument typically lasts just half an hour, and the focus is often as much on the practical implications of an appellate ruling as on the fine details of any particular patent or art.

This difference in judicial orientation has direct consequences for parties contesting the validity of a patent. The Federal Circuit presentation must make the basic technological principles accessible; place a premium on selecting only the very best points to emphasise; and consider the long term policy consequences of the choice before the court of appeals. For these reasons, approaches that have worked well at the PTAB should be refined and rethought once the proceedings reach the appellate stage.

There is nothing undesirable or even unusual about these differences between the Federal Circuit forum and the PTAB forum. To the contrary, the difference reflects a core strength of the US legal system. Across the wide span of government there are expert agencies that make rulings that are, at times, reviewed by generalist courts. By establishing deferential standards of judicial review and other normative guidelines, Congress has created an effective system whereby interested parties receive a prompt hearing from those trained in the relevant arts while the generalist courts assure that the expert agencies are following sound principles. The patent system is made all the stronger by the interdependency of agency and appellate court.

Figure 1: A breakdown of patents by subject matter challenged through new procedures introduced by the America Invents Act from http://www.uspto.gov/ip/boards/bpai/ stats/041714_aia_stat_graph.pdf.


1.http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/images/stories/Statistics/patent%20filings%20historical. pdf (line chart showing around 400 patent infringement appeals yearly since 2004).

2. See 35 USC § 311.

3. See 35 USC.§ 326.

4. Erica Teichert, PTAB Says It's Not A 'Death Squad' For Patents, Law360 (April 15, 2014).

5. Case IPR2012-00001 (Nov 13, 2013).

6. 35 USC § 319.

7. 35 USC § 315.

8. Liberty Mutual Ins Co v Progressive Casualty Ins Co., CBM2012-00003.

9. 28 USC § 1295.

10. http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/judges.

Previously published on www.intellectualpropertymagazine.com

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
17 Jan 2019, Speaking Engagement, New York, United States

Orrick Partner Jill Rosenberg will speak at the New York State Bar Association 2019 Annual Meeting, Dispute Resolution Section and Corporate Counsel.

23 Jan 2019, Speaking Engagement, New York, United States

New York partner Rich Martinelli will be a featured panelist during the Society of Physician Engineers' event, "Intellectual Property Law & Tax Credits for Life Science Companies."

29 Jan 2019, Speaking Engagement, New York, United States

Please join Orrick partner Jay Jurata at this year's Joint NGMN and ITU Conference on January 29-30 in Geneva, Switzerland.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions