United States: Looking To Litigate In Secret? Fourth Circuit Creates Hurdles For Product Manufacturers

Last Updated: May 22 2014
Article by Erin M. Bosman, Julie Y. Park and Chika Arakawa

In April, the Fourth Circuit ruled in Company Doe v. Public Citizen that a manufacturer could not hide behind a veil of secrecy even after successfully enjoining the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) from publishing an inaccurate report of harm.1 As a result of this ruling, Ergobaby, a company that makes and sells baby carriers, recently revealed itself as Company Doe.2 In light of this opinion, manufacturers must tread carefully if the CPSC attempts to publish a suspect report that could unfairly harm the manufacturer's reputation.


The Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008 (CPSIA) requires the CPSC to maintain a publicly available, searchable database on the safety of consumer products.3 The CPSC implemented this mandate in 2011 by establishing the website SaferProducts.gov. The purpose of the database is to provide consumers with an avenue through which to report safety hazards about certain consumer products and to enhance public access to product safety information.4

Submitters can report a harm or risk related to the use of a consumer product or other product or substance within the jurisdiction of the CPSC. Product manufacturers can then submit claims that a report contains materially inaccurate information. Additionally, manufacturers may submit comments to be displayed in the database along with the report.5


In 2011, the CPSC received a report of harm that attributed the choking death of an infant to an Ergobaby carrier.6 Ergobaby filed a claim with the CPSC that the report contained materially inaccurate information.7 Despite four requests by Ergobaby to have the report corrected, the CPSC refused to halt publication of the original report.8 Ergobaby then brought suit in the District of Maryland to enjoin the CPSC from including the report in the database.9 This was the first legal challenge to the implementation of the online database and garnered ample media attention.10

In addition to asking for injunctive relief, Ergobaby moved to litigate the case under seal and to proceed under a pseudonym.11 It claimed that exposing the content of the report through court documents would have the same effect as disclosure through the database.12 At this time, three consumer advocacy groups—Public Citizen, Consumer Federation of America, and Consumer's Union (collectively "Consumer Groups")—filed objections to the motion to seal.13

The motion to seal was pending for nine months and the entire case was litigated in secret.14 The court granted Ergobaby's summary judgment motion and permanently enjoined the CPSC from publishing the report.15 Most importantly for Ergobaby, the court ruled that the death of the infant was not caused by or related to Ergobaby's carrier in any way.16 On the motions to seal and to proceed under a pseudonym, the court acknowledged the presumption favoring public access to judicial documents, but determined Ergobaby's interest "in preserving its reputational and fiscal health" outweighed the public's "abstract interest" in obtaining information about the lawsuit.17 The sealed documents included the pleadings, Ergobaby's motion for preliminary injunction and related briefing, the parties' cross-motions for summary judgment, and the docket sheets themselves.18 In addition, the district court released a heavily redacted memorandum opinion.19

Consumer Groups moved to intervene for the purpose of appealing the district court's sealing and pseudonym orders.20 The district court failed to rule on the motion before the expiration of time to appeal the underlying judgment, so Consumer Groups appealed to the Fourth Circuit.21 More than three months after the notice of appeal, the district court denied Consumer Groups' motion to intervene, concluding that because the underlying merits of the dispute and the sealing orders were "inextricably intertwined," Consumer Groups' objections to the sealing order became moot with the grant of summary judgment in favor of Ergobaby.22


The Fourth Circuit addressed a few threshold issues before deciding the merits of the Consumer Groups appeal. First, the court vacated the district court's denial of the motion to intervene, finding that the timely filing of a notice of appeal deprived the district court of jurisdiction.23 The appellate court also found that there was standing for Consumer Groups to appeal the district court's sealing orders because Consumer Groups had participated sufficiently in objecting to the motion to seal, and the presumptive right of access to judicial documents gave Consumer Groups an interest in the underlying litigation when they were deprived of access.24 Because Consumer Groups' interest was entirely independent of the injury that supplied standing for the suit brought by Ergobaby against the CPSC, there was also Article III standing for Consumer Groups' appeal.25

Determining that the jurisdictional and standing requirements were met, the Fourth Circuit moved on to the merits of the sealing and pseudonym orders. The Fourth Circuit stated that the public and press have First Amendment and common-law rights of access to judicial documents and records.26 Courts may permit abrogation of those rights only in "unusual circumstances."27

Those unusual circumstances did not exist here. The Fourth Circuit held that the right of access under the First Amendment applied to all of the sealed and redacted documents.28 The purpose of the right, in part, is to oversee the courts, which is impossible if the documents supporting a court's opinion and the opinion itself are kept secret.29 Sealing the docket sheets is an even "more repugnant" deprivation of meaningful access to civil proceedings because no one can challenge a sealing order if the proceeding itself is secret.30

The court then considered whether a compelling governmental interest negated the public's right of access to the sealed case.31 Given the lack of evidence showing how the sealed information might harm Ergobaby, the claim of reputational harm fell short of a compelling interest.32 The fact that a corporation's image or reputation may be diminished in a lawsuit is "the nature of public litigation," and does not alone warrant sealing.33 The Fourth Circuit instructed the district court to unseal the case in its entirety on remand.34

The district court also committed error in delaying ruling on the motion to seal until its summary judgment order. The Fourth Circuit rejected the district court's rationale to delay, declaring that the public right of access is not conditioned upon whether a litigant wins or loses.

35 Finally, the Fourth Circuit held that the district court abused its discretion in permitting Ergobaby to litigate under a pseudonym because it gave no explicit consideration to the public's interest in open judicial proceedings.36

Although agreeing with the judgment to unseal the court documents and uncover the manufacturer's name, Judge Hamilton wrote a concurrence acknowledging that the district court judge faced a "difficult task," and that the "equities lie with Company Doe."37 The disposition of the appeal would have been "completely different" in Judge Hamilton's view had Ergobaby supported its motion to seal with expert testimony establishing a high likelihood that denying its motion would cause it to suffer substantial and irreparable economic harm.38

Following this ruling, on May 8, 2014, Ergobaby acknowledged that it is Company Doe.39 In addition to informing various media outlets, Ergobaby published an FAQ and a message from its CEO on its website, along with contact information for any questions or comments.40 Although it disagrees with the Fourth Circuit's decision, Ergobaby decided not to appeal the decision on unsealing the records because the district court's ruling on the inaccuracy of the original report remains intact.41


The result in Company Doe presents product manufacturers with a dilemma in cases where the CPSC disagrees with the manufacturers' claims of material inaccuracy in a report of harm.

The good news for product manufacturers is that suing the CPSC can be successful, as it was in Company Doe. Companies can take heart that it is possible to halt publication of inaccurate and potentially damaging information, particularly on a government-hosted and moderated forum like SaferProducts.gov. On the other hand, such a suit is likely to draw increased attention to the report and to the company. Even if the district court ultimately concludes the report is inaccurate, relief may come too late, especially with the rapid dissemination of information in what Judge Hamilton describes as the "electronically viral world" of today.42

Furthermore, given the limited scope of judicial review of agency actions under the Administrative Procedures Act, manufacturers must assess whether the facts of its case are sufficiently strong to merit taking the risk of harmful publicity from a lawsuit. An alternative to going to court could be to publish comments in response to the report on A manufacturer that decides to sue and wishes to proceed under seal should follow the advice of the concurrence and present evidence that denial of the motion to seal would cause substantial and irreparable economic harm. The manufacturer could also detail why and how that evidence trumps the public's right to access and the public's interest in openness.

If a court denies a motion to seal or overturns a grant of a motion to seal, the manufacturer can follow the footsteps of Ergobaby and attempt to mitigate any harmful effects by publishing its own disclosure before the unsealing of the record. The spotlight is now on Ergobaby, and whether any economic or reputational harm will result from this announcement remains to be seen.

The unsealing of this case may prove advantageous to manufacturers in one regard. It will provide guidance in bringing similar suits in the future and reveal the arguments that successfully proved that a report of harm was materially inaccurate.


1 Company Doe v. Public Citizen, No. 12-2209 (4th Cir. April 16, 2014).

2 Ergobaby in the News, http://store.ergobaby.com/news (last visited May 12, 2014).

3CPSIA, Pub. L. No. 110-314, § 212, 122 Stat. 3048 (2008).

4 Company Doe, No. 12-2209 at *5-*6 (citing H.R. Rep. No. 110-501, at 34 (2007)).

5 16 C.F.R. § 1102 (2010).

6 Ergobaby, supra note 2.

7 Company Doe, No. 12-220 at *7.

8 Ergobaby, supra note 2.

9 Company Doe, No. 12-220 at *8.

10 Id. at *3.

11 Id. at *8.

12 Id.

13 Id.

14 Id. at *9.

15 Id.

16 Ergobaby, supra note 2.

17 Company Doe, No. 12-220 at *10.

18 Id. at *39.

19 Company Doe v. Tenenbaum, No. 8:11-cv-02958-AW (D. Md. July 31, 2012).

20 Company Doe, No. 12-220 at *12-*13.

21 Id. at *12.

22 Id. at *13.

23 Id. at *20.

24 Id. at *23-25.

25 Id. at *35.

26 Id. at *36.

27 Id. at *37 (citing Stone v. Univ. of Md. Med. Sys. Corp., 855 F.2d 172, 182 (4th Cir. 1988)).

28 Company Doe, No. 12-220 at *45.

29 Id. at *41.

30 Id. at *44-45.

31 Id. at *45.

32 Id. at *48-*49.

33 Id. at *50-*51.

34 Id. at *53.

35 Id. at *55-*56.

36 Id. at *59.

37 Id. at *62.

38 Id. at *63.

39 Ergobaby, supra note 2.

40 Id.

41 Id.

42 Company Doe, No. 12-220 at *63.

Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP. All rights reserved

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Erin M. Bosman
Julie Y. Park
In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


From time to time Mondaq may send you emails promoting Mondaq services including new services. You may opt out of receiving such emails by clicking below.

*** If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of services offered by Mondaq you may opt out by clicking here .


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.