United States: Looking To Litigate In Secret? Fourth Circuit Creates Hurdles For Product Manufacturers

Last Updated: May 22 2014
Article by Erin M. Bosman, Julie Y. Park and Chika Arakawa

In April, the Fourth Circuit ruled in Company Doe v. Public Citizen that a manufacturer could not hide behind a veil of secrecy even after successfully enjoining the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) from publishing an inaccurate report of harm.1 As a result of this ruling, Ergobaby, a company that makes and sells baby carriers, recently revealed itself as Company Doe.2 In light of this opinion, manufacturers must tread carefully if the CPSC attempts to publish a suspect report that could unfairly harm the manufacturer's reputation.


The Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008 (CPSIA) requires the CPSC to maintain a publicly available, searchable database on the safety of consumer products.3 The CPSC implemented this mandate in 2011 by establishing the website SaferProducts.gov. The purpose of the database is to provide consumers with an avenue through which to report safety hazards about certain consumer products and to enhance public access to product safety information.4

Submitters can report a harm or risk related to the use of a consumer product or other product or substance within the jurisdiction of the CPSC. Product manufacturers can then submit claims that a report contains materially inaccurate information. Additionally, manufacturers may submit comments to be displayed in the database along with the report.5


In 2011, the CPSC received a report of harm that attributed the choking death of an infant to an Ergobaby carrier.6 Ergobaby filed a claim with the CPSC that the report contained materially inaccurate information.7 Despite four requests by Ergobaby to have the report corrected, the CPSC refused to halt publication of the original report.8 Ergobaby then brought suit in the District of Maryland to enjoin the CPSC from including the report in the database.9 This was the first legal challenge to the implementation of the online database and garnered ample media attention.10

In addition to asking for injunctive relief, Ergobaby moved to litigate the case under seal and to proceed under a pseudonym.11 It claimed that exposing the content of the report through court documents would have the same effect as disclosure through the database.12 At this time, three consumer advocacy groups—Public Citizen, Consumer Federation of America, and Consumer's Union (collectively "Consumer Groups")—filed objections to the motion to seal.13

The motion to seal was pending for nine months and the entire case was litigated in secret.14 The court granted Ergobaby's summary judgment motion and permanently enjoined the CPSC from publishing the report.15 Most importantly for Ergobaby, the court ruled that the death of the infant was not caused by or related to Ergobaby's carrier in any way.16 On the motions to seal and to proceed under a pseudonym, the court acknowledged the presumption favoring public access to judicial documents, but determined Ergobaby's interest "in preserving its reputational and fiscal health" outweighed the public's "abstract interest" in obtaining information about the lawsuit.17 The sealed documents included the pleadings, Ergobaby's motion for preliminary injunction and related briefing, the parties' cross-motions for summary judgment, and the docket sheets themselves.18 In addition, the district court released a heavily redacted memorandum opinion.19

Consumer Groups moved to intervene for the purpose of appealing the district court's sealing and pseudonym orders.20 The district court failed to rule on the motion before the expiration of time to appeal the underlying judgment, so Consumer Groups appealed to the Fourth Circuit.21 More than three months after the notice of appeal, the district court denied Consumer Groups' motion to intervene, concluding that because the underlying merits of the dispute and the sealing orders were "inextricably intertwined," Consumer Groups' objections to the sealing order became moot with the grant of summary judgment in favor of Ergobaby.22


The Fourth Circuit addressed a few threshold issues before deciding the merits of the Consumer Groups appeal. First, the court vacated the district court's denial of the motion to intervene, finding that the timely filing of a notice of appeal deprived the district court of jurisdiction.23 The appellate court also found that there was standing for Consumer Groups to appeal the district court's sealing orders because Consumer Groups had participated sufficiently in objecting to the motion to seal, and the presumptive right of access to judicial documents gave Consumer Groups an interest in the underlying litigation when they were deprived of access.24 Because Consumer Groups' interest was entirely independent of the injury that supplied standing for the suit brought by Ergobaby against the CPSC, there was also Article III standing for Consumer Groups' appeal.25

Determining that the jurisdictional and standing requirements were met, the Fourth Circuit moved on to the merits of the sealing and pseudonym orders. The Fourth Circuit stated that the public and press have First Amendment and common-law rights of access to judicial documents and records.26 Courts may permit abrogation of those rights only in "unusual circumstances."27

Those unusual circumstances did not exist here. The Fourth Circuit held that the right of access under the First Amendment applied to all of the sealed and redacted documents.28 The purpose of the right, in part, is to oversee the courts, which is impossible if the documents supporting a court's opinion and the opinion itself are kept secret.29 Sealing the docket sheets is an even "more repugnant" deprivation of meaningful access to civil proceedings because no one can challenge a sealing order if the proceeding itself is secret.30

The court then considered whether a compelling governmental interest negated the public's right of access to the sealed case.31 Given the lack of evidence showing how the sealed information might harm Ergobaby, the claim of reputational harm fell short of a compelling interest.32 The fact that a corporation's image or reputation may be diminished in a lawsuit is "the nature of public litigation," and does not alone warrant sealing.33 The Fourth Circuit instructed the district court to unseal the case in its entirety on remand.34

The district court also committed error in delaying ruling on the motion to seal until its summary judgment order. The Fourth Circuit rejected the district court's rationale to delay, declaring that the public right of access is not conditioned upon whether a litigant wins or loses.

35 Finally, the Fourth Circuit held that the district court abused its discretion in permitting Ergobaby to litigate under a pseudonym because it gave no explicit consideration to the public's interest in open judicial proceedings.36

Although agreeing with the judgment to unseal the court documents and uncover the manufacturer's name, Judge Hamilton wrote a concurrence acknowledging that the district court judge faced a "difficult task," and that the "equities lie with Company Doe."37 The disposition of the appeal would have been "completely different" in Judge Hamilton's view had Ergobaby supported its motion to seal with expert testimony establishing a high likelihood that denying its motion would cause it to suffer substantial and irreparable economic harm.38

Following this ruling, on May 8, 2014, Ergobaby acknowledged that it is Company Doe.39 In addition to informing various media outlets, Ergobaby published an FAQ and a message from its CEO on its website, along with contact information for any questions or comments.40 Although it disagrees with the Fourth Circuit's decision, Ergobaby decided not to appeal the decision on unsealing the records because the district court's ruling on the inaccuracy of the original report remains intact.41


The result in Company Doe presents product manufacturers with a dilemma in cases where the CPSC disagrees with the manufacturers' claims of material inaccuracy in a report of harm.

The good news for product manufacturers is that suing the CPSC can be successful, as it was in Company Doe. Companies can take heart that it is possible to halt publication of inaccurate and potentially damaging information, particularly on a government-hosted and moderated forum like SaferProducts.gov. On the other hand, such a suit is likely to draw increased attention to the report and to the company. Even if the district court ultimately concludes the report is inaccurate, relief may come too late, especially with the rapid dissemination of information in what Judge Hamilton describes as the "electronically viral world" of today.42

Furthermore, given the limited scope of judicial review of agency actions under the Administrative Procedures Act, manufacturers must assess whether the facts of its case are sufficiently strong to merit taking the risk of harmful publicity from a lawsuit. An alternative to going to court could be to publish comments in response to the report on A manufacturer that decides to sue and wishes to proceed under seal should follow the advice of the concurrence and present evidence that denial of the motion to seal would cause substantial and irreparable economic harm. The manufacturer could also detail why and how that evidence trumps the public's right to access and the public's interest in openness.

If a court denies a motion to seal or overturns a grant of a motion to seal, the manufacturer can follow the footsteps of Ergobaby and attempt to mitigate any harmful effects by publishing its own disclosure before the unsealing of the record. The spotlight is now on Ergobaby, and whether any economic or reputational harm will result from this announcement remains to be seen.

The unsealing of this case may prove advantageous to manufacturers in one regard. It will provide guidance in bringing similar suits in the future and reveal the arguments that successfully proved that a report of harm was materially inaccurate.


1 Company Doe v. Public Citizen, No. 12-2209 (4th Cir. April 16, 2014).

2 Ergobaby in the News, http://store.ergobaby.com/news (last visited May 12, 2014).

3CPSIA, Pub. L. No. 110-314, § 212, 122 Stat. 3048 (2008).

4 Company Doe, No. 12-2209 at *5-*6 (citing H.R. Rep. No. 110-501, at 34 (2007)).

5 16 C.F.R. § 1102 (2010).

6 Ergobaby, supra note 2.

7 Company Doe, No. 12-220 at *7.

8 Ergobaby, supra note 2.

9 Company Doe, No. 12-220 at *8.

10 Id. at *3.

11 Id. at *8.

12 Id.

13 Id.

14 Id. at *9.

15 Id.

16 Ergobaby, supra note 2.

17 Company Doe, No. 12-220 at *10.

18 Id. at *39.

19 Company Doe v. Tenenbaum, No. 8:11-cv-02958-AW (D. Md. July 31, 2012).

20 Company Doe, No. 12-220 at *12-*13.

21 Id. at *12.

22 Id. at *13.

23 Id. at *20.

24 Id. at *23-25.

25 Id. at *35.

26 Id. at *36.

27 Id. at *37 (citing Stone v. Univ. of Md. Med. Sys. Corp., 855 F.2d 172, 182 (4th Cir. 1988)).

28 Company Doe, No. 12-220 at *45.

29 Id. at *41.

30 Id. at *44-45.

31 Id. at *45.

32 Id. at *48-*49.

33 Id. at *50-*51.

34 Id. at *53.

35 Id. at *55-*56.

36 Id. at *59.

37 Id. at *62.

38 Id. at *63.

39 Ergobaby, supra note 2.

40 Id.

41 Id.

42 Company Doe, No. 12-220 at *63.

Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP. All rights reserved

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Erin M. Bosman
Julie Y. Park
In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions