United States: State AGs In The News 15 May 2014

Hot News

Blog Post: Think You're Not a Holder of Unclaimed Property? Think Again!

  • All 50 states have unclaimed property laws that require companies that possess abandoned property (a "holder") to transfer that property to the state or potentially face investigations resulting in interest and penalties. Many companies limit their unclaimed property due diligence to traditional types of unclaimed property like wages and accounts payable. This may no longer be enough.
  • States consider unclaimed property an important revenue stream, accounting for nearly $41.7 billion in property currently held on behalf of individuals and businesses according to the National Association of Unclaimed Property Administrators. State administrators are beginning to focus on potential new types of unclaimed property, such as life insurance proceeds, health savings accounts, securities, gift and stored value cards, and promotional programs.
  • Read our recent blog post to find out more about these changes and how companies can respond.

Nebraska Primary Election Results

  • Nebraska Primary Elections took place on May 13. Janet Stewart (D) and Doug Peterson (R) won the nominations for state attorney general.
  • Pete Ricketts won the Republican nomination for Governor, beating Attorney General Jon Bruning by a narrow margin. In the general election, Ricketts will face Chuck Hassebrook, who was unopposed for the Democrat nomination.
    • We will continue to provide updates on AG-related elections. For breaking news, please follow us on Twitter @StateAGMonitor.

Consumer Protection

New York Attorney General Settles With Debt Buyers to Resolve Allegations of Unlawful Collection of Time-Barred Debt

  • New York AG Eric Schneiderman settled with Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC and Sherman Financial Group, LLC, two companies that purchase consumer debt, to resolve allegations that they brought time-barred debt collection actions against consumers.
  • The AG alleged that Portfolio and Sherman filed debt collection actions and obtained judgments without ensuring that the claims were timely under the statute of limitations of the state where the action accrued, which generally requires shorter periods than New York.
  • The settlement requires the companies to have approximately 3,000 judgments totaling about $16 million vacated by the court, cease any further collection activities on those judgments, and enhance their debt collection practices. The settlement also requires Portfolio to pay $300,000 and Sherman to pay $175,000 in penalties and costs. Neither company admitted any of the allegations.

Illinois, Kentucky, and North Carolina Attorneys General Settle Allegations Against Marketing Company That It Operated a Pyramid Scheme

  • Illinois AG Lisa Madigan, Kentucky AG Jack Conway, North Carolina AG Roy Cooper, and the Federal Trade Commission settled claims with Fortune Hi-Tech Marketing, Inc. to resolve a lawsuit alleging that it operated a pyramid scheme.
  • Fortune Hi-Tech allegedly claimed that program participants could earn significant income by selling consumer products and services, including satellite television service, home security systems, and beauty products. Participants were allegedly required to pay substantial start-up costs and monthly fees to maintain their position in the company. Allegedly the company's main business, however, was to recruit members and most of these members lost money by participating in this program.
  • The settlement requires the company to pay at least $7.75 million in restitution to participants. The court's order imposes a judgment of approximately $169 million, which will be partially suspended when the company surrenders certain assets to pay the restitution. The full judgment will become due immediately if the company misrepresented its financial condition. The settlement also prohibits the company from further misrepresentations, bans it from selling or otherwise benefitting from customers' personal information, and bans it from collecting any additional money from customers.
  • According to AG Conway, North Dakota and Texas had previously settled similar allegations with the company.

Data Privacy

CFPB Proposes Rule Allowing Financial Institutions to Post Online Annual Privacy Notices

  • The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau proposed a rule that would allow financial institutions to use a model disclosure form and post annual privacy notices online rather than delivering paper copies separately and individually to customers. The CFPB claims that this will make the disclosures more effective because customers could more easily see how these institutions use their personal information.
  • The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act generally requires financial institutions to send customers annual privacy notices describing whether and how the institutions shares the consumers' nonpublic personal information and information on opt-out rights and procedures. The proposal would not allow use of online posting if the institution were sharing data in a way that would trigger consumer opt-out rights.
  • In an unrelated matter regarding the CFPB's involvement in privacy issues, the Online Interest-Based Advertising Accountability Program, an accountability program developed by the Council of Better Business Bureaus (BBB) and other advertising and self-regulatory industry associations, referred SunTrust Bank Inc. to the CFPB for refusing to participate in the program's self-regulatory process. According to a BBB press release, the program had sent an inquiry to SunTrust regarding how it was using third parties to collect user web-browsing habits and whether it was using that information to deliver interest-based ads. SunTrust allegedly responded that complying with the demands would consume all of its allocated resources. The CFPB has not yet commented.


Airline Industry Contractor Settles Allegations of Minimum Wage Violations With New York Attorney General

  • New York AG Eric Schneiderman settled with commercial airline industry contractor Air Serv Corporation for almost $20,000 to resolve allegations that it underpaid wheelchair attendants by improperly classifying them as tipped employees and paying them less than the state minimum wage.
  • Under New York law, employers may pay tipped employees less than minimum wage, but the tipped employee must earn weekly average tips exceeding a certain threshold particular to each industry—the applicable threshold for these wheelchair attendants is $1.20 per hour. AG Schneiderman alleges that the wheelchair attendants employed by Air Serv did not earn a weekly average of at least $1.20 per hour in tips.
  • The settlement requires Air Serv to pay restitution to the attendants of almost $16,000, pay the state $4,000 in penalties, designate a compliance officer responsible for ensuring the proper use of the tip credit, and file quarterly reports with the AG's office.


Sixteen Attorneys General File Comments With EPA on Proposed Carbon Regulations

  • West Virginia AG Patrick Morrisey and Nebraska AG Jon Bruning led a group of 16 AGs in filing comments with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) opposing proposed regulations that would require all new coal-fired power plants to use carbon capture and storage technology.
  • The AGs argue that this technology has not been adequately demonstrated on a commercial scale and therefore violates the Energy Policy Act of 2005. The Energy Policy Act prohibits the setting of omissions standards based on government subsidized technologies that are not the best "adequately demonstrated" technology within the meaning of the Clean Air Act.
  • These comments follow a letter AG Morrisey sent to the EPA asking the EPA to delay these regulations.

False Claims Act

New York Attorney General Settles Allegations of Overcharging With Office Supply Company for $475,000

  • New York AG Eric Schneiderman settled with Office Depot, the state's contracted office supply provider, for $475,000 to resolve allegations that it overcharged state entities for office supplies.
  • AG Schneiderman investigated the matter pursuant to the state False Claims Act and the state Fraud Enforcement and Recovery Act, which amends the False Claims Act and allows the state to collect treble damages and between $6,000 and $12,000 per violation from companies that defraud the state government.

Financial Industry

New York Attorney General Continues Probe Into "Insider Trading 2.0" by Requesting Information From Banks

  • New York AG Eric Schneiderman continued his probe into what he calls "Insider Trading 2.0," the allegedly unfair advantages obtained by high-frequency traders using high-speed technology to gain early access to market information, by requesting information from Goldman Sachs.
  • AG Schneiderman sent a letter to Goldman requesting information about its high-speed trading operations. According to a news report, AG Schneiderman is also seeking information from Barclays and Credit Suisse.


Vehicle Service Contract Provider Allegedly Not Covered by Required Insurance Settles With Idaho Attorney General

  • Idaho AG Lawrence Wasden settled with Gold Standard Automotive Network, Inc. to resolve allegations that it violated the state consumer protection act by operating without required liability insurance.
  • State law requires that motor vehicle service providers obtain liability insurance to protect consumers if the provider goes out of business or cannot otherwise meet its contractual obligations. Gold Standard allegedly sold motor vehicle service contracts that were not covered by insurance and failed to make mandatory disclosures in its contracts.
  • Pursuant to the settlement, Gold Standard must cancel those contracts and refund the consumers.

Medicaid Fraud

Texas Attorney General Sues Company for Approving Allegedly Fraudulent Medicaid Payments for Unlawful Dental Services

  • Texas AG Greg Abbott sued Xerox Corporation and its wholly owned subsidiary, ACS State Healthcare, LLC (Xerox) for allegedly improperly approving Medicaid payments for orthodontic and dental services.
  • Xerox bid for, and won, contracts with the state Health and Human Services Commission to perform Medicaid program administration, including evaluation of authorization requests for orthodontic treatment. State law generally excludes orthodontic services from Medicaid coverage, unless the orthodontic condition poses a health risk to the patient. According to the complaint, Xerox approved orthodontic services that were not medically necessary and therefore not authorized under state law.
  • AG Abbott seeks injunctive relief, civil penalties, restitution of overpayments made by Medicaid because of Xerox's allegedly unlawful conduct, interest, expenses, fees, and costs.
  • Xerox described the lawsuit as "misdirected" and said it "will defend itself vigorously."

State AGs in the News

Twenty-Two Attorneys General File Amicus Brief Opposing New York Gun Law

  • A group of 22 AGs, led by Alabama AG Luther Strange, filed an amicus brief in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit against a New York gun law that bans certain kinds of semiautomatic firearms.
  • A group of organizations and individual gun-owners challenging the gun ban filed the lawsuit. In December, a lower court opinion held that because the law related to achieving an important governmental interest in public safety, the law did not violate the U.S. Constitution's Second Amendment.
  • The brief to the Second Circuit argues that New York failed to show that the ban would increase public safety or decrease gun violence and is therefore unconstitutional.

Judge Rules on Airbnb Subpoenas

  • A judge ruled to quash a subpoena issued by New York AG Eric Schneiderman to Airbnb because its demands for customer data was overbroad.
  • We recently posted a summary of oral arguments during which AG Schneiderman defended the subpoena, which was issued as part of an investigation into potential violations of state tax and hotel laws that generally prohibit apartments in New York City from being rented for less than 30 days in the absence of the permanent occupant.
  • The judge said that while a factual predicate had been established, the subpoena was overbroad because it was not limited to hosts in New York City, hosts that rented frequently and may be subject to the tax law, or to rentals of fewer than 30 days. The opinion reads that the subpoena as drafted, "seeks materials that are irrelevant to the inquiry at hand and accordingly, must be quashed." The opinion also stated, however, that the subpoena was not unduly burdensome, did not seek impermissible confidential or private information, that the issue of whether the statutes the AG may try to apply are unconstitutional is not yet ripe, and that any remaining issues are unpersuasive or unnecessary.
  • AG Schneiderman's office plans to issue a new subpoena that addresses the judge's concerns. A representative stated, "The judge rejected all of Airbnb's arguments except for a narrow technical issue, and we will reissue the subpoena to address it."

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions