United States: Department Of Defense’s Renewable Energy Program: Exploring The Challenges And Opportunities

Orrick and Clean Energy Pipeline have launched a series of reports dedicated to exploring investment opportunities and challenges in the U.S. renewable energy sector. In this first issue, we analyze the exciting investment opportunities arising from the Department of Defense's (DoD) major renewable energy procurement initiatives. This white paper pays particular attention to the impact that DoD power purchase agreement (PPA) contract clauses and language might have on the bankability and profitability of renewable energy projects.

Market update

The DoD has made a huge commitment to renewable energy. By 2025, the agency intends to source 25% of its power from renewable energy projects, which is a significant amount given that the DoD's annual energy spending totals some $20 billion, making it the largest single energy consumer worldwide.

All three major branches of the U.S. military have made firm commitments to sourcing power from renewable energy, and each branch has ambitious and advanced plans. Each branch is committed to procuring at least 1 GW of renewable energy capacity by 2025.

In order to meet these objectives, each branch is taking varying approaches. The Navy and the Air Force have so far procured 254 MW and 60 MW of renewable capacity, respectively. The Army has procured around 45 MW. Importantly, each branch is generally only seeking to procure power from renewable energy projects and does not intend to own the generation assets. This means that the projects will have to be financed, built, owned, operated and maintained by third-party companies.

In 2012, the Army launched a $7 billion renewable energy procurement program. The $7 billion figure represents the total value of energy available for purchase through PPAs assuming a fixed 30-year term. In order to facilitate these goals, the Army issued a series of multiple award task order contracts (MATOC) that qualify sets of MATOC awardees to compete for Army renewable energy projects through project-specific contracts called task orders. The Army issued its first request for proposals (RFP) for MATOCs in 2012 and last year awarded 58 MATOCs across four sectors: solar (22), wind (17), biomass (13), and geothermal (6). An additional 21 MATOCs were awarded in January and February 2014. The Army Energy Initiatives Task Force (EITF) is expected to oversee and facilitate the issuance of the first task order RFP over the next several months. Similarly, the Army, working with the Defense Logistics Agency and the Army Corps of Engineers, is issuing one-off renewable energy contracts outside the MATOC initiative.

Why renewables?

The DoD is dedicating significant resources to renewable energy procurement primarily for strategic and security (rather than environmental, political or public relations) reasons. On-site renewable generation enables the military to be less reliant on aging transmission infrastructure and remote power plants, which are more susceptible to cyber attacks and natural disasters. Cost is also a factor. Entering into long-term PPAs allows the military to avoid the costs of constructing energy infrastructure and to lock in fixed prices that act as a hedge against volatile power prices.

"The military is very focused on energy security for their domestic installations and are therefore looking for reliable and resilient power. Many domestic bases are directly supporting operational missions across the globe, and they need to be able to secure power for these activities."

For example, a 16.4 MW solar PV project situated at the Davis-Monthan Air Force Base in Tucson, Arizona, is expected to reduce energy costs by $500,000 annually for the next 25 years. The project, which came online in February 2014 and is the Air Force's largest constructed solar array, will deliver 35% of the base's energy needs.

"The military has determined that energy is an important operational and tactical resource in both deployed and domestic scenarios," explained Nate Butler, Manager of Federal Programs at SunEdison. "The military is very focused on energy security for their domestic installations and are therefore looking for reliable and resilient power. Many domestic bases are directly supporting operational missions across the globe, and they need to be able to secure power for these activities."

CASE STUDY - Davis-Monthan Air Force Base

On February 13, 2014, the DoD's largest solar PV project at the Davis-Monthan Air Force Base was officially commissioned. The 16.4 MW installation will deliver 35% of the base's electricity needs for 30 years and is expected to save $500,000 annually in energy costs. The project was developed by SunEdison and sells power to the base through a 25-year PPA. The North American Development Bank provided $35 million debt financing for the project.

Orrick provided legal advice to SunEdison on this project, specifically related to SunEdison's construction financing and sale of the project to Macquarie and Chevron. Orrick also provided government contracts and procurement advice related to the project. This installation is by far the largest solar energy renewable project built on an Air Force base.

Emerging obstacles to financing military-procured projects

The margins on renewable energy projects that sell power to the military are already very tight given that the government generally does not wish to pay higher prices for installation-generated renewable energy than it does to utilities. For this reason, it is essential that both industry and the government focus on PPAs in order to ensure they contain financeable terms and do not contain Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) clauses that are extraneous or not applicable to procuring renewable energy – as these extra clauses tend to significantly increase costs to the developer.

"The government has made clear they are not looking to procure energy at these installations at costs that are more than they pay utilities," explained Christopher Gladbach, Senior Associate, Energy and Infrastructure at Orrick. "There is continual pressure for the DoD to reduce spending. There is no appetite at the moment to pay more for renewable energy at the installations."

However, some PPAs currently offered by the military to renewable energy projects contain ambiguous language regarding key purchase and sale mechanics or include FAR clauses related to government contracting legal requirements that developers and investors are not used to or that are otherwise extraneous to the government's legal requirements. Some of these provisions are not palatable for the developer and banking communities at all, while others simply add costs. The three branches (often through committed groups such as the EITF) are working to understand and address these issues and continue to work with the renewable energy industry to adapt PPA clauses to ensure projects are bankable while at the same time ensuring the military's requirements are met. However, there is still some way to go.

Some key issues of developers and investors are outlined below:

1. Termination for convenience

As a matter of law, government procurement contracts typically must provide the government with the right to terminate the contract for convenience. Although termination events are rare, there is often concern on the part of both developers and their financiers about perceived ambiguities regarding the level of compensation should a termination for convenience occur.

In order to resolve this issue, recent renewable energy PPAs with DoD facilities have tended to include a schedule that determines the level of compensation that will be awarded to the contractor for every year that a termination may take place after the facility is placed in service. This provides contractors and investors with some additional certainty.

"Despite nervousness on the part of some investors, looking at case law and the way these settlements work out, the contractors generally do tend to get made whole," confirmed Christopher Gladbach. "By that, I mean that they get their costs covered but not their future profits. This is often more than you would get in the private sector, where contracts can also be terminated. However, this remains one of the biggest issues for financing parties because many are new to financing renewable energy projects for the military. Many of these parties are requesting termination value schedules, which essentially set forth an assumed recovery amount during a given year of production. That said, even if the government actually provides these schedules (which is the predominant trend now), many banks will require further explanation and additional comfort on this issue."

"Encouragingly, the EITF modified this requirement in its model PPA to the extent that liquidated damages must only be paid if annual production falls below 75% of the minimum annual production level."

2. Minimum annual production levels

Renewable energy PPAs with the DoD include commitments that the power purchaser will pay for a minimum annual production level per year. Beyond this level, the government typically only commits to pay for energy consumed, rather than the total volume of energy produced by the asset, as is generally the case with renewable energy utility PPAs. This effectively means that contractors will only build projects that meet the minimum annual production level, since there are no assurances that additional generation will be paid for.

In parallel, PPAs with the DoD typically require the contractor to pay liquidated damages if energy production does not meet a certain threshold. Liquidated damages would cover the costs of replacement energy.

Some early versions of PPAs and the model PPA put out by the EITF (which is intended to set the standard for all future task order contracts entered into under the MATOC and will also be an important precedent for other branch acquisitions) stipulated that contractors would be required to pay liquidated damages if assets did not meet the minimum annual production level. This was problematic for intermittent renewable energy generation because the minimum production level was effectively acting as a ceiling and a floor. If generation fell below this level then contractors would be required to pay liquidated damages, but production over this level would not necessarily be paid for by the offtaker if not required.

Encouragingly, the EITF modified this requirement in its model PPA to the extent that liquidated damages must only be paid if annual production falls below 75% of the minimum annual production level.

"The Army is now asking that it be compensated if annual production does not hit 75% of the minimum production level," explained Harry Clark, Partner, International Trade & Compliance at Orrick. "But where these negotiations have ended up has been a bit all over the place. This whole area is not as systematic as it ought to be. One criticism of the overall program is that we are starting with every project and it doesn't have to be this way. We are trying to work with the military services one by one to create a more systematic approach to ensure that things are going to be addressed in the same way."

Less encouragingly, the model PPA still requires contractors to obtain replacement renewable energy credits (RECs) if they fail to provide RECs up to the minimum production. This effectively presents the same "floor and ceiling" problem discussed above and is one of the points that industry is requesting be addressed by the government.

3. Domestic Preference Rules

Domestic preference rules apply to acquisition of solar panels for DoD power projects, subject to the exemptions of the Trade Agreements Act. This means that solar panels must be sourced from the United States or another designated or qualifying country. Designated and qualifying countries include those that are parties to the World Trade Organization Procurement Agreement, have a free trade agreement with the United States, or have qualifying defense procurement arrangements with the United States. Notably, China is not party to any of these arrangements, meaning that solar panels cannot be sourced from China for any DoD project. Because Chinese solar PV panels are often the lowest cost option, developers must consider how procuring higher cost panels might impact project economics.

Apart from the special domestic preference rules applicable to solar panels, it would not seem that standard "Buy American" policies should apply to DoD power projects since the U.S. government's commitment is to purchase electrical power—not the facilities or any other equipment. The facility and equipment systems remain the property of the contractor that produces the power. Still, contract and award documents have sometimes created uncertainty about application of general domestic preference requirements, which has, in turn, raised transaction costs.

4. Davis-Bacon requirements

Extensive discussions are taking place between the renewable energy industry and Federal procurement officers as to whether Davis-Bacon requirements should apply, although the current political environment and preliminary indications from the services suggest it is likely they will. Under the Davis-Bacon Act, laborers must be paid prevailing wages (as determined by the Secretary of Labor) when undertaking construction, alteration, or repairs to public buildings and public works. However, because the government is not using its contracting authority for the construction of renewable energy assets or providing for their financing—but is merely purchasing power—several in the industry are

arguing that these requirements should not apply. Contractors should follow this issue closely and understand how it might impact project economics.

"Davis-Bacon and domestic preference rules can materially add costs," explained Harry Clark. "We believe that the better view is that Davis Bacon and domestic preference rules should not apply at all, apart from the domestic preference rules that relate to solar panels. They should not apply because the DoD is simply buying power, not the asset that is producing the power. The government has needlessly created uncertainty about whether these rules will apply or not and there needs to be certainty."

The four issues outlined above should be given careful consideration by contractors when bidding for PPAs and, following award, when interfacing with financing parties and the government to construct and finance the project.

Beyond these discussed items, there are many more issues related to military procurement of renewable energy that need to be carefully considered by potential contractors. Orrick has worked on a number of transactions in this space and has experience dealing with many of these issues. We will continue to monitor developments and are available to assist clients in this area.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
23 Jan 2019, Speaking Engagement, New York, United States

New York partner Rich Martinelli will be a featured panelist during the Society of Physician Engineers' event, "Intellectual Property Law & Tax Credits for Life Science Companies."

29 Jan 2019, Speaking Engagement, New York, United States

Please join Orrick partner Jay Jurata at this year's Joint NGMN and ITU Conference on January 29-30 in Geneva, Switzerland.

27 Feb 2019, Conference, Las Vegas, United States

Partner John Narducci will be discussing The Impact of the Tax Reform Act on Valuations at ABI’s Valcon 2019 Conference.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions