United States: Beyond Information Document Requests: Tools The IRS Uses To Obtain Information From Foreign Countries

Many U.S. taxpayers express bravado with respect to their records in foreign countries, commonly exclaiming "the IRS can't get that—it's overseas" in strategy conferences with their tax attorneys. However, these taxpayers are misguided. In addition to the traditional method of obtaining information via Information Document Requests, the International Examiners of the IRS have numerous tools at their disposal to acquire information from abroad.

Before reviewing these tools, an initial problem confronting U.S. taxpayers is that most of their foreign offices do not have records that are in a usable format, as records are often prepared in foreign languages. Must a U.S. taxpayer spend a large amount of time and money translating the documents into English for the IRS?

This issue was confronted in the case of Nissei Sangyo America, Ltd.1 Nissei involved the audit of a U.S. subsidiary of a Japanese parent. In response to an IRS summons, the U.S. subsidiary had randomly selected documents relating to the issue under examination and provided full translations. The Japanese parent had also randomly selected and translated documents. In addition, the U.S. subsidiary translated the subject matter headings or titles of 1,441 pages of Japanese correspondence and prepared English translation keys for the travel expense authorization forms. The IRS demanded that all documents described in the summonses be translated to English, which the company estimated would cost from $850,000 to $1.5 million. The court held that the IRS could not compel the translation of documents that were not relevant to the tax liability or that the IRS already had in its possession.2

Most cases do not involve translation costs of $1 million, but just as there are subtle nuances of meaning in the definitions in the Internal Revenue Code, there are subtle nuances of meaning in the translation of languages. Considering the diverse army of employees that the IRS has to consult with for translations, the taxpayer should be advised to engage a translator who will resolve any ambiguities in meaning in the taxpayer's favor. Although Nissei involved summons enforcement, this lesson is applicable to any type of information gathering tool the IRS may use.

The primary authority for recordkeeping requirements of a taxpayer is Code Sec. 6001 , giving the IRS the specific authority to examine any books, papers, records or other data that may be relevant or material to ascertaining the correctness of any tax liability.

The IRS typically exercises its authority in an Information Document Request (IDR). An IDR requests information or documents from taxpayers when there are voluminous records to be examined or when it is desirable to document requests. Requested on Form 4564, an IDR provides the IRS a convenient means to request information and simultaneously yields a permanent record of what was requested, received and returned to the taxpayer. After reviewing the information gathered from an initial IDR, the International Examiner will focus on those areas with the largest potential for possible adjustments. As the examination progresses, IDRs generally become more narrow in scope and tend to focus on specific items or transactions.

In addition to this authority, an International Examiner of the IRS can employ several procedural tools to obtain information beyond that obtained via IDRs. These tools include summonses, designated summonses, foreign plant visits, Formal Document Requests, and exchanges of information under treaties. The Summons Power

Used both domestically and internationally under the general authority to examine, the IRS has the power to compel a taxpayer or any other person to produce records and to testify under oath. This compulsory process authorizes the IRS to issue an administrative summons.3 The IRS may summon any person to appear at a time and place named in the summons for the purpose of giving testimony under oath and producing books, papers, records or other data. The IRS has generally delegated the authority to Internal Examiners to issue summonses.4

When auditing a corporation, the IRS may direct the summons to either a specific corporate officer or the corporation itself.5 The summons should indicate the officer's corporate title. When a corporation receives a summons, the IRS must serve an officer, director or managing agent.

After serving the summons, the International Examiner prepares and signs a certificate of service on the reverse side of the Form 2039 retained by the IRS, which certifies the date, time and manner of service. The signed certificate of service is evidence in any proceeding to enforce the summons.6 The compliance date the summons requires cannot be less than 10 days from the date of issuance.7

Pursuant to the standards of Powell,8 to enforce a summons, the IRS must show that:

  • the IRS has a legitimate purpose for the investigation;
  • the material sought is relevant to that purpose;
  • the material sought is not already within the IRS's possession; and
  • the IRS followed those administrative steps that are required by the Internal Revenue Code.

Taxpayers have objected to the use of administrative summonses by the IRS during Tax Court proceedings as circumventing the restrictive Tax Court discovery rules. This often occurs in transfer pricing matters, where the functions performed and risks assumed typically change little from year to year.

The Tax Court has held that it would be an unfair advantage to allow the IRS in a pending case to use evidence obtained via a summons.9

More specifically, in Ash,10 the Tax Court set forth guidelines to determine whether it should issue a protective order when the IRS uses a summons during litigation. Where Tax Court litigation has commenced and a summons is then issued for the same taxpayer and tax year involved in the litigation, the Tax Court will issue a protective order to prevent the IRS from using any of the summoned evidence in the litigation.11 However, the Tax Court will not issue a protective order if the IRS can show that the summons was issued for a sufficient reason that was independent of the pending litigation.

In those cases where the IRS issues the summons before the taxpayer files a Tax Court petition, the court will not issue an order for any information obtained as a result of the summons. The Tax Court, in Ash , explained that before fi ling a petition, the Tax Court has no jurisdiction and there is no basis for viewing the summons as an attempt to undermine the Tax Court's discovery rules.12

Finally, where litigation has commenced and the IRS issues an administrative summons with regard to a different taxpayer or a different tax year, the Tax Court normally will not issue a protective order.13 However, the Tax Court stated that it would issue a protective order if the taxpayer could show the IRS lacked an independent and sufficient reason for the summons.

Contrary to popular belief, a summons does not extend the statute of limitations, which encourages taxpayers to delay.

Example 1. ForCo sells gadgets to its wholly owned U.S. subsidiary, USCo. USCo files its 2010 U.S. tax return deducting a cost of goods sold for the transfer price USCo pays to ForCo for the gadgets on September 15, 2011. In early 2014, the International Examiner that has been auditing USCo requests USCo to extend the statute of limitations beyond September 15, 2014. USCo refuses. Consequently, the International Examiner issues a summons on August 15, 2014, that USCo ignores. When the IRS seeks a court order enforcing the summons on September 20, 2014, the court refuses enforcement because the statute of limitations has expired. See Diagram 1.

Designated Summonses

In lieu of issuing a summons, which does not extend the statute of limitations, the IRS may issue a designated summons.14 A designated summons tolls the running of the statute of limitations during the period in which judicial enforcement proceedings are pending and for either 30 or 120 days thereafter, depending on whether or not the court orders compliance with the summons. The legislative history indicates Congress was concerned that taxpayers responded slowly to IRS requests for information without extending the statute of limitations.

Congress did not intend to extend the statute of limitations in a large number of cases, but to encourage taxpayers to provide requested information on a timely basis by realizing that the IRS had this tool available. In addition to satisfying the aforementioned Powell standards, the internal procedures the IRS personnel must follow to issue a designated summons greatly impede their issuance. Both the LB&I Division Commissioner and Division Counsel-LB&I15 must approve the issuing of a designated summons, which the IRS must issue at least 60 days before the expiration of the statute of limitations.16

Example 2 . ForCo sells gadgets to its wholly owned U.S. subsidiary, USCo, during 2010. USCo files its 2010 U.S. tax return deducting a cost of goods sold for the transfer price USCo pays to ForCo for the gadgets on September 15, 2011. USCo refuses to extend the statute of limitations beyond September 15, 2014. Concerned about the possibility that the statute of limitations will expire, the International Examiner issues a designated summons on July 1, 2014. The designated summons tolls the statute of limitations during enforcement proceedings and for 30 or 120 days thereafter.17 See Diagram 2.

Foreign Plant Visits

International Examiners have taken an increased interest in foreign site visits and plant tours.18 While IRS budget constraints and internal administrative requirements may occasionally affect the number or duration of such visits, taxpayers should expect such requests and prepare to respond. The taxpayer should remember that it is a request, not an order, and that it can negotiate the request in terms of choosing the facility to visit (the taxpayer may want to substitute a domestic plant for a foreign one), the duration of the visit, the timing of the visit and the number of IRS employees involved. The hot issues resulting in foreign plant tours are the manufacturing exception to foreign base company sales income of Subpart F and transfer pricing (determining the functions performed abroad). Accordingly, International Examiners have instructions on how to analyze the activities of foreign plants.19

Careful planning of any plant trip may result in an opportunity to present, in effect, key facts supporting the taxpayer's position. The taxpayer should prepare the plant personnel for the visit and may consider pre-screening the tour to determine if the tour covers processes or procedures relevant to the audit cycle and pre-interviewing all involved personnel to sensitize them to the potential issues. The taxpayer's counsel will have the opportunity to plan as the internal levels of IRS approval the International Examiner must obtain usually take a long time.

Formal Document Requests

The IRS may also issue a Formal Document Request (FDR). Congress did not intend the IRS to use the FDR as part of a routine examination, but instead as a tool for securing information that the IRS could not obtain through normal request procedures.20

The "Formal Document Request" arrives on Letter 2261 by registered or certified mail and provides:

  • the time and place for the production of the documentation;
  • the reason the documentation previously produced (if any) is insufficient;
  • the description of the documentation being sought; and
  • the consequences to the taxpayer of the failure to produce the documentation sought.21

If the taxpayer does not furnish the requested information within 90 days of the mailing of the FDR, the taxpayer cannot later introduce the requested documentation at trial. Foreign-based documentation is "any documentation which is outside the United States and which may be relevant or material to the tax treatment of the examined item."22 Therefore, the IRS has broad authority to request virtually any relevant information as long as the request satisfies the aforementioned Powell standards.23 The purpose of this procedure is to discourage taxpayers from delaying or refusing disclosure of certain foreign-based documentation.

To avoid the later exclusion of documents, the taxpayer must substantially comply with the FDR, which depends on all the facts and circumstances. For example, if the taxpayer submits nine out of 10 requested items and the court believes the missing item is the most substantial, the taxpayer could be found to have failed to comply substantially with the FDR. Accordingly, a court could prevent the taxpayer from later introducing the missing document.

Any taxpayer that receives an FDR has the right to begin proceedings to quash the request within 90 days after the IRS mailed the FDR. The standard for quashing a FDR is the same Powell standard for quashing a summons.24 Moreover, the taxpayer may contend, for example, that the information requested is irrelevant, that the requested information is available in the United States, or that reasonable cause exists for the failure to produce the information. Reasonable cause does not exist where a foreign jurisdiction would impose a civil or criminal penalty on the taxpayer for disclosing the requested documentation.25

In a proceeding to quash, the IRS has the burden of proof to show the relevance and materiality of the information requested. During the period that a proceeding to quash or any appeal from that proceeding is pending, the statute of limitations is suspended.26 The legislative history to Code Sec. 982 details three factors to consider whether there is reasonable cause for failure to furnish the requested documentation: (1) whether the request is reasonable in scope; (2) whether the requested documents are available within the United States; and (3) whether the reasonableness of the requested place of production within the United States.27

An example of unreasonable scope may be a request "for all the books and records and all the supporting documents for all the entries made in such books or records" for all foreign entities controlled by the taxpayer. However, a request for the general ledger, an analysis of an account, and supporting documents for a particular transaction of such foreign entity would be reasonable in scope. Moreover, the place of production of records is generally at the taxpayer's place of business or the International Examiner's office. The key to the reasonableness of the place for production is its mutual convenience to both the taxpayer and the International Examiner. As a result, requesting the production of records in New York City by a taxpayer that resides in and engages in a trade or business in Los Angeles may be considered unreasonable.

Exchanges of Information Under Treaties

The United States has tax treaties with approximately 65 foreign countries. Under the exchange of information article in most treaties, the IRS can generally request information from a foreign country that is either in the foreign country's possession or available under the respective tax laws of that foreign country. These provisions generally do not require an exchange of information that would disclose any trade or business secret.

The IRS will not request information from another country unless:

  • there is a good reason to believe that the information is necessary to determine the tax liability of a specific taxpayer;
  • the information is not otherwise available to the IRS; and
  • the IRS is reasonably sure that requested information is in the possession of, or available to, the foreign government from whom the information is being requested.

Example 3. A distributor of frozen concentrated orange juice, USSub is a subsidiary of ForParent. USSub buys the frozen concentrated orange juice from ForParent and resells it in the United States. After USSub fails to respond to an IDR requesting all agreements between USSub and ForParent, the IRS requests the information from the tax authority of ForParent's country pursuant to the exchange of information article in the tax treaty. See Diagram 3.

The IRS's internal guidelines require that information sought from another country must specifically describe the information desired and the reason why the information is necessary.28

Conclusions

The IRS has numerous tools to acquire information that a taxpayer may have abroad. The prudent tax professional should advise the U.S. taxpayer that having records in the hands of a foreign affiliate will not keep those records from the IRS. Taking a cavalier approach can result in disastrous consequences.

Footnotes

1 Nissei Sangyo America, Ltd., DC-IL, 95-2 USTC ¶50,327 . The internal procedures of the IRS require the IRS to request documents, review them and then specify the documents to be translated. Reg. §1.6038A-3(b)(3) .

2 See the general summons standard of M. Powell , SCt, 64-2 USTC ¶9858, 379 US 48, infra .

3 Code Sec. 7602(a)(2) .

4 T.D. 6421 , 1959-2 CB 433; Delegation Order No. 4.

5 IRM 25.5.2.3.

6 Code Sec. 7603 .

7 Code Sec. 7605(a) . A longer period is required for third-party recordkeeper summonses.

8 M. Powell, SCt, 64-2 USTC ¶9858, 379 US 48, 85 SCt 248.

9 Tax Court Rule 103.

10 M.K. Ash, 96 TC 459, Dec. 47,221 (1991).

11 The Tax Court issued such an order in Universal Manufacturing Co. , 93 TC 589, Dec. 46,154 (1989).

12 Bennett , DC-TX, 2000-2 USTC ¶50,717 .

13 In an earlier case involving this type of situation, the issuance of a protective order was justified by the "compelling facts." Westreco, Inc. , 60 TCM 824, Dec. 46,882(M) , TC Memo. 1990-501.

14 Code Sec. 6503(j) .

15 Reg. §301.6503(j)-(c)(1)(i) .

16 Code Sec. 6503(j)(2)(A) .

17 K.T. Derr , CA-9, 92-2 USTC ¶50,369, 968 F2d 943.

18 I.R.M. 4.46.3.10.2 through 4.46.3.10.5.

19 IRS International Continuing Professional Education materials , Chicago, Illinois, May 2005; see also IRM Exhibit 4.61.3-1. These include the following: Obtain information about departmental cost sheets or schedules. Learn the training requirements of each type of production employee. Obtain any records regarding sales to all customers. Ascertain the extent of product development performed at the plant. Interview plant employees. Plant interviews will bring a sense of reality to the case. Interviews should flush out the employee's ability to alter the production process and the technical training each production employee received. If the company is a controlled foreign corporation, determine how and to whom it sells its products. Obtain all company manuals regarding the operations of the plant. Obtain all job descriptions prior to the plant tour. Obtain all annual evaluations of the employees to be interviewed. Obtain all company "programmer" manuals. This manual offers guidance to the programmer to construct the program, so that software can be readily translated and localized.

20 See Joint Committee on Taxation, General Explanation of the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982, HR 4961, 97th Cong., 2d Sess. 246-247.

21 Code Sec. 982(c)(1) .

22 Code Sec. 982(d)

23 B.V. Yujuico , DC-CA, 93-1 USTC ¶50,097, 818 FSupp 285

24 Flying Tigers Oil Co., Inc. , 92 TC 1261, Dec. 45,764 (1989); Yujuico , supra note 23.

25 Code Sec. 982(e) .

26 Code Sec. 982(e) .

27 Conference Committee Report on P.L. 97- 248, The Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982.

28 IRM 4.60.1.2.4.2.

This article is reprinted with the publisher's permission from the JOURNAL OF TAX PRACTICE & PROCEDURE, a bi-monthly journal published by CCH, a part of Wolters Kluwer.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
McDermott Will & Emery
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
McDermott Will & Emery
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions