United States: The Need For Off-Site Stormwater Easements In Pennsylvania

It is not uncommon these days for a question to arise as to the need for an off-site stormwater easement by the municipality or Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) as part of the design of the stormwater system for a new development project.  When this happens, an applicant needs to determine if they can redesign their stormwater system to avoid the need for this off-site stormwater easement or if they will have to approach one or more adjacent or area landowners to acquire a stormwater easement on their properties.  Obviously, in many cases, the former is much easier than the latter; particularly when one of those landowners from whom you would need a stormwater easement is either opposing your project or looking for a payday.  And I am not talking about the candy bar. 

In the recent case of Bretz v. Central Bucks School District, the Commonwealth Court attempted to "clarify" the law as to when an applicant needs an off-site stormwater easement.   Unfortunately, based on my reading of this case, the Court only "muddied up the waters" on this subject.  Some might attempt to argue that the Bretz case sets a "new and higher" standard as to when an applicant needs an off-site stormwater easement.  Some might also attempt to argue that an off-site stormwater easement is now needed any time an applicant has proposed to construct a stormwater basin and discharge the water from the basin either directly or indirectly onto an adjacent property.  In my opinion, such an interpretation would further complicate and frustrate the approval process when it comes to stormwater designs and would be contrary to the intent of the Pennsylvania Stormwater Management Act and other DEP regulations/design guidelines on the subject. 

In Bretz, the adjacent landowner appealed an Order of the Bucks County Court of Common Pleas that denied their request for injunctive relief concerning stormwater issues they were having as a result of recent and proposed improvements by the adjacent Central Bucks School District.  The landowner's 31-acre property is downstream from and adjacent to the District's 66-acre property containing a high school, middle school and related improvements.  The landowner filed a complaint in equity alleging that the expansion of the adjacent schools caused an increase in the volume and duration of stormwater discharge onto their property and resulted in long-term and continuous damage to their property.  According to the landowner, the detention basin, berm and 36-inch pipe installed by the District operated to decrease the rate of surface water flow onto their property, but substantially increased the duration of stormwater discharge from one to four or five days. 

At the hearing before the lower court, both parties presented expert testimony concerning the stormwater management undertaking during the District's construction.   Much of the testimony concerned whether the District violated the applicable subdivision and land development ordinance.   However, all parties agreed that, although the direction of water into the new detention basin decreased the rate of stormwater flow onto the landowner's property, it increased the total volume of water discharged.  The trial court determined that the landowner was not entitled to injunctive relief because they failed to establish a violation of the Township's subdivision and land development ordinance; and because the continued construction of the District's improvements will, in the future, reduce stormwater flow onto their property to pre-development levels. 

On appeal, the landowner argued that the trial court erred in holding that the landowner did not demonstrate an exception to the "common enemy rule" (i.e., the general principle that the law regards surface waters as a common enemy which every proprietor must fight to get rid of best he may) in determining that the District did not violate the applicable SALDO provisions and that the District's construction of a stormwater detention basin and a 36-inch pipe did not constitute an alteration of existing points, patterns or the location of natural drainage. 

In order to understand this issue, a historical review as to prior case law on the subject would be helpful.  In 1906, in a case titled Strauss v. Allentown, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court held as follows: 

The owner of upper land has the right to have surface waters flowing on or over his land discharged through a natural water course onto the land of another  . . . He may take proper and profitable use of his land even though such use may result in some change in quality or quantity of the water flowing to the lower land . . . from those rules it is clear that only where the water id diverted from its natural channel or where it is unreasonably or unnecessarily changed in quantity or quality has the land owner received an injury. 

In 1955, the Supreme Court restated the common enemy rule in the case of Leiper v. Heywood-Hall Construction Co., as follows: 

It is only where the owner of higher land is guilty of negligence which causes unnecessary damage to the servient owner, or where by an artificial channel, he collects and discharges surface waters in a body or precipitates them in greatly increased quantities upon his neighbor, that the latter may recover for any damage thereby inflicted. 

In this same case, the Supreme Court summarized the law on this subject as follows: 

A landowner may not alter the natural flow of surface water on his property by concentrating it in an artificial channel and discharging it upon the lower land of his neighbor even though no more water is thereby collected than would naturally have flowed upon the neighbor's land in a diffused condition.  One may make improvements upon his own land, especially in the development of urban property, grade it and build upon it, without liability for any incidental effect upon adjoining property even though there may result some additional flow of surface water thereon through a natural watercourse but he may not, by artificial means, gather the water into a body and precipitate it on his neighbor's property

In Marlowe v. Lehigh Township, in 1982, the Commonwealth Court, in reliance on the above authority, held that where surface water is artificially diverted or collected, a plaintiff sustains a cognizable injury if there has been an increase in the total volume of water discharged onto the land or if the volume remains unchanged but is "discharged with augmented force."  This Court also held that the legal wrong lies in the artificial diversion or collection of water itself, and made these pronouncements without regard to the degree in which the volume or force is increased per this Court:  "A plaintiff need only show that a landowner collected and/or concentrated surface water from its natural channel through an artificial medium, and the water was discharged onto the plaintiff's property in an increased volume or force; however slight." 

Then, in 1985, these principles were summary by the Superior Court in LaForm v. Bethlehem Township, which held that an upper landowner is liable for the effects of surface water running off his property in two distinct circumstances:  (1) where the landowner has diverted the water from its natural channel by artificial means; or (2) where the landowner has unreasonably or unnecessarily increased the quantity or changed the quality of water discharged upon his neighbor. 

In the Bretz case, in addressing the District's liability under the common enemy rule, the trial court determined that the increase in quantity of water was "reasonable," the installation of the detention basin and 36-inch pipe was "a proper and profitable use" of the District's land, and the water was discharged onto the landowner's property at the same place before and after construction.  However, the Commonwealth Court held that the trial court applied only the second standard set forth in LaForm (unreasonable or unnecessary change in quantity or quality), and overlooked the first standard (diversion from the natural channel by artificial means). 

Per the Commonwealth Court, the determination of whether a landowner "has diverted the water from its natural channel by artificial means" does not involve consideration of the reasonableness of the change in quantity or location of water flowing onto the lower land;   rather, to establish liability, a plaintiff need only show that a landowner collected and/or concentrated surface water from its natural channel through an artificial medium and that the water was discharged onto plaintiff's property in an increased volume or force; however, slight. 

In this case, the trial court specifically found the following as fact: 

  • The natural, physical contour leading to the landowner's property was a 60-foot-wide swale.  Due to the District's construction, the swale was replaced by a five to six-acre detention basin and a surrounding 15-foot high berm. 
  • The detention basin and berm collected additional surface water emanating from five to seven acres (and after the science wing measures two to four acres) of drainage area, which was diverted toward the Landowner's property as a result of the District's expansion projects. 
  • After collecting the additional surface water, the detention basin concentrated it to and through a 36-inch pipe, and the water intruding upon the landowner's property increased in terms of total volume and duration of discharge. 
  • A channel on the landowner's property eroded after the District installed a detention basin, 36-inch pipe, and berm. 

Accepting the trial court's findings as supported by the evidence, the Commonwealth Court concluded that the trial court erred in applying the "common enemy rule" to the facts of this case. 

As the Commonwealth Court has interpreted the law concerning the need for off-site stormwater easements, I cannot recall a project where an applicant did not construct a stormwater basin to collect the stormwater to reduce the rate of flow onto the adjacent property; however, in such case, the total volume of stormwater discharge was increased.  How can it not?  If additional improvements are being constructed, there will be more stormwater, there will be a need to contain that stormwater in a basin and then that stormwater must be released.  Last this author checked, stormwater continues to flow, like it or not, to the downstream properties.  An upstream property owner should not be prevented from discharging an increased volume of stormwater onto a downstream property if they have reduced the rate of runoff required by the municipality and DEP.  That is exactly what the Pennsylvania Supreme Court held in 1906 in the Strauss case in allowing a property owner to make a "proper and profitable" use of their land even though such use may result in a change in the quality or quantity of water flowing to the lower land.  The Commonwealth Court completely ignored the law established by the Supreme Court in Strauss; not to mention the Pennsylvania Stormwater Management Act and other DEP regulations/design guidelines on the subject.  This issue may need further clarification by the Supreme Court, the State Legislature, the Governor or DEP. 

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Emails

From time to time Mondaq may send you emails promoting Mondaq services including new services. You may opt out of receiving such emails by clicking below.

*** If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of services offered by Mondaq you may opt out by clicking here .

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.