United States: The Google Books Case – Here’s The Skinny

Last Updated: April 29 2014
Article by Steve S. Chang

I'm sure many of us have fond memories of the venerable library card catalog: the musty smell, the tiny wooden drawers and their endless deck of equally tiny, yellowed cards on which someone laboriously typed the Dewey Decimal code, bibliographic information and a short, textual summary of a book. But ever since the opening scene in the 1984 classic "Ghostbusters," library researchers have tirelessly sought to develop a way to catalog books in a way that isn't susceptible to ruination by the drawer-emptying, cardthrowing tendencies of a ghost librarian1.

In 2004, Google Inc. announced its solution. Google had entered into agreements with several major research libraries to scan the full text of millions of books in those libraries, to catalog the books electronically and allow users to run full-text keyword searches through those millions of books. However, the announcement troubled several authors and owners of copyright — should Google be permitted to make copies of their works, without permission? In 2005, The Authors Guild, Inc. and several individual authors filed suit against Google to challenge Google's plan. In late 2013, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York ruled in Google's favor on summary judgment2 and held that Google's actions were fair use. This article provides a summary of the issues involved, the reasoning behind the decision and the takeaways from the case.

In a Nutshell, What's the Dispute?

The parties do not dispute that Google is making copies of the books. The issue in dispute is whether that copying is protected under the Fair Use Doctrine.

What's fair use, really?

Fair use basically means there are certain situations in which copying is excused under the Copyright Laws. The Fair Use Doctrine is codified in 17 U.S.C. § 107 (the Copyright Act), and specifically states that "the fair use of a copyrighted work ... for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright." The Act goes on to list four key factors that a court should consider when evaluating a claim of fair use:

"In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include:

1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes;

2) the nature of the copyrighted work;

3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and

4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work."

Classic examples of situations where the Fair Use Doctrine has applied include: news reporters copying portions of a work for purposes of news reporting and criticism;3 users of VCRs recording television programs for later viewing;4 artists copying work, but transforming it to make new works,5 and in parody situations.6

What Did the Court Decide, and Why?

On summary judgment, Judge Denny Chin considered a variety of factors, and ultimately concluded that Google's actions were fair use. The court considered the four factors enumerated above, but even before doing so, the court pointed out several aspects that tilted in Google's favor.

First, the court noted that Google took quite a few measures to ensure that users7 could not simply obtain a free copy of books by searching for them. Search results only showed users a "snippet" view of the search result in context. To counter users who may try to gather an entire book a snippet at a time, Google's search intentionally excluded 10 percent of the pages of a book from the snippet view, and intentionally excluded one snippet on each page so that the particular snippet would not be shown. Furthermore, works that had smaller chunks, such as dictionaries, cookbooks and books of haiku, were excluded from snippet view altogether.

Second, the court noted how beneficial Google Books is to scholarly research. The court pointed out that Google Books helps librarians find sources, facilitates interlibrary lending and is used in at least one education curriculum. The court also noted that Google's index allowed a new type of research — "data mining" — in which searchers could examine things like word frequencies and historical changes in grammar usage patterns in ways that simply were not feasible before the Google Books project.

The court also found that Google Books expands access to books (e.g., text-to-speech conversion allows access to the blind), helps preserve books (e.g., many of the scanned books were out-of-print texts that would be difficult to find otherwise), and also helps authors and publishers because the search results take users to links where the books can be purchased.

After extolling those virtues, the court went on to specifically address the four factors. Regarding the purpose and character of use, the court noted that Google's use was highly transformative, in that Google's scans of the books created an important tool for research that does not supplant the books. The court acknowledged that Google is a for-profit enterprise, but noted that Google doesn't sell the scans, does not run advertisements on the pages with the snippets and does not directly benefit from any commercialization of the books that it scanned. Google makes money indirectly since Google Books users, while on the site, may well use other Google tools with advertising revenue, but the court cited several prior cases in which fair use was found despite some commercial benefit being bestowed on the defendant. The court found that the first factor strongly favored a finding of fair use.

Regarding the nature of the work, the court noted that all of the books were published and available to the public and that the majority of the books (93 percent) were non-fiction (works of non-fiction generally receive lesser copyright protection since facts themselves are not copyrightable). The court found that the second factor favored a finding of fair use.

Regarding the amount and substantiality of the portion used, the court acknowledged that Google's copying was verbatim and complete, but emphasized that Google limited the amount of text displayed in response to a search and noted that the complete copying was needed to provide the Google Books functionality. On the balance, the court found that the third factor slightly weighed against a finding of fair use.

As for the effect of the use on the potential market or value, the court disagreed with the plaintiffs, finding that it would be unlikely for anyone to try and piece together a full copy of a book one snippet at a time (and in view of the fact that some snippets and pages would simply never be found by such a user). The court found that a reasonable fact-finder could only find that Google Books enhances the sales of books, since the tool publicizes the books and provides convenient links to retailers selling the books. The court found that the fourth factor strongly weighed in favor of a finding of fair use.

Given the weighing above, the court concluded that Google Books is a fair use of the copyrighted books that it scanned.

What's Next?

The Authors Guild Inc. and the individual authors appealed the decision at the end of 2013, and the appeal is working its way through the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

What Did I Miss (Takeaways)?

Here are the big picture takeaways from the case thus far:

  • Google Books' full-text scanning of millions of books to provide full-text search capability was deemed a fair use.
  • Google Books helped its cause by 1) taking steps to prevent users from getting a free copy of the book through its searches, 2) avoiding direct profits from the use of the copied works, 3) providing links to help users purchase the books that were found in the search, and 4) providing a tool that offers many benefits to the research community.
  • The case is currently under appeal at the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
  • There's a ghost librarian in the movie "Ghostbusters."

Footnotes

1 If you happened to miss this classic hit, it opens with a scene in which a ghost librarian slimes and scatters the contents of a library's card catalog, and ends with making you either want, or hate, marshmallows.

2 Authors Guild, Inc. v. Google, Inc., 954 F.Supp.2d 282 (S.D.N.Y. 2013).

3 See, e.g., Religious Technology Center v. Pagliarina, 908 F.Supp. 1353 (E.D. Va. 1995) (the Washington Post newspaper quoted brief portions of Church of Scientology texts in an article, and its use was deemed a fair use); and Italian Book Corp. v. American Broadcasting Co., 458 F.Supp. 65 (S.D.N.Y. 1978) (a television film crew covering a festival recorded a band playing a portion of a copyrighted song, and the film was replayed during the news broadcast — the unauthorized reproduction of the song portion in this case was deemed fair use).

4 See Sony Corp. v. Universal City Studios., 464 U.S. 417 (1984) (home videotaping was deemed fair use).

5 See, e.g., Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, 510 U.S. 569 (1994) (rap group 2 Live Crew sampled portions of the song "Pretty Woman," but transformed the small part copied to create a new work that was deemed fair use).

6 See, e.g., Leibovitz v. Paramount Pictures Corp., 137 F.3d 109 (2d Cir. 1998) (a movie company superimposed head of actor Leslie Nielsen on a photo of a naked pregnant woman, parodying a famous magazine cover photograph).

7 The participating libraries were entitled to receive full digital copies of the books that the libraries provided to Google, but others only got a "snippet" view.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Brinks Gilson & Lione
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Brinks Gilson & Lione
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions